User talk:Prajput27

December 2015
Hello, I'm Jeraphine Gryphon. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Category:Rajput clans without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I have restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 09:32, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Prajput27, you are invited to the Teahouse!
Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Donner60 (talk) 03:06, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

In addition to the problems noted in the previous paragraph, your additions are copyright violations of http://www.peoplegroupsindia.com/profiles/lodha/, which you have copied exactly and at length. See Copyright Problems and Copyright violations. Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits or edits contrary to policy and guidelines to Wikipedia.

Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 04:55, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lodhi. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 05:00, 10 December 2015 (UTC)


 * In response to your comment on my talk page: I previously have referred you to Copyright Problems and Copyright violations because you have copied verbatim (exactly) large amounts of material from a copyrighted web page without rewriting it in your own words. You did not cite that source, whose authors are not named, as near as I can tell, and in fact, user submitted text may be included. This lessens its reliability. You removed referenced content instead of distinguishing it or simply adding your content. The content you removed from "etymology" is more in line with the web site you used than the addition you made. The alternative derivation of the name cited in the web site, which you do not reference, is hunter, not warrior (although Lodha claim to be descended from a warrior, which is not the same thing as the meaning of the word). Warrior is mentioned as a meaning only in a user submitted comment. You removed useful informational links that distinguish or refer to other articles on similar or related topics from the top of the page. At most, you should not remove sourced or useful information but add an alternative based on your source(s). I would not rely on the web page alone. You should not copy and paste copyrighted material in any event. Donner60 (talk) 05:26, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Lodhi shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

You have already broken the 3RR rule at Lodhi - you will almost certainly be blocked if you insert that material again - Arjayay (talk) 08:30, 10 December 2015 (UTC)