User talk:Prakash Neupane

Speedy deletion nomination of Software Freedom Day 2012 in Nepal


A tag has been placed on Software Freedom Day 2012 in Nepal, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It appears to be a clear copyright infringement. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 04:22, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Reply
Hi, thanks for message. I accept that your blog had an acceptable licence, so there does not appear to be a copyright issue. There are other problems though.
 * You need provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Although you gave references, they were associated with the organisation, or to self-made sources like blogs. You need references in eg newspapers or other sources which can be assumed to be independent and notable.
 * It was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Examples of unsourced claims presented as fact include: was successfully celebrated... everyone expected more perfect, more matured more new... In my terms the program was success, success... we regain the spirit of team work... It is just like the dream how we worked this year... &mdash; and that's just from the first paragraph.
 * Your article was a non-neutral personal reflection (Our Inauguration) or blog, not a proper encyclopaedia article

I hope this helps  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  08:13, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Unblock request

 * First things first; the unblock request goes at the bottom of the page. Secondly, no blocks are in your log, so I'm assuming this is an IP block, possibly auto. Would you be good enough to copy and paste the block message on to this page?-- Laun  chba  ller  14:58, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Girls in ICT Day
This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Girls in ICT Day, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://girlsinict.org/what-girls-ict-day.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 06:25, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Girls in ICT Day


A tag has been placed on Girls in ICT Day requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stuartyeates (talk) 07:45, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Notification
Hi Prakash Neupane, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the course campus volunteer right to your account, as you have demonstrated a need for it through the Wikipedia Education Program. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and will just allow you to be able to access the course extension as well as add yourself to courses. Before you forget, please make sure to create a profile page for yourself here, so that other other users can learn more about you. For more information on the course campus volunteer right, see this page. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 18:04, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 28)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Prakash Neupane/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 12:00, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 9)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheSandDoctor was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Prakash Neupane/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheSandDoctor (talk) 20:40, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SwisterTwister (talk • contribs) 21:11, 9 May 2017 (UTC)