User talk:Pramame

Welcome
Hello, Pramame, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers: We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Active Banana    (bananaphone  14:54, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style

Neutral Point of View and reliable sources
Thank you for attempting to provide content to keep All India Trinamool Congress presenting an appropriate encyclpedic neutral point of view, however when presenting the various "sides" of an issue, all content must be from reliable sources with a reputation for fact checking and accuracy such as major newspapers and standardly published books, not just random websites. I have reverted your edit. Active Banana    (bananaphone  14:57, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Because they themselves do not consider themselves a neutral voice ["Tehelka was reborn as a weekly newspaper committed to constructive, crusading journalism. As a people's paper geared to take a stand, to follow the hard investigative story. A fearless paper ready to create opinion, and not just remain a passive vehicle of news. [[Special:Contributions/Active_Banana|Active]] Banana    (bananaphone  15:22, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia has over 3million pages with lots of content added by editors who dont know or dont follow "the rules", so just because something is used improperly on another article which hasnt yet been discovered and fixed, that is not sufficient reason to allow such improper usage to spread and be used where it has been discovered. And content regarding living people is specifically necessary to use the highest quality sources and present content accurately. This magazine is forthright about its stance not being neutral and thus it fails the basic requirements for a reliable source. Active Banana    (bananaphone  15:42, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

Please revert yourself
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on All India Trinamool Congress. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains consensus among editors. If unsuccessful, then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Improperly sourced re-insertion of controversial claims about a living person Active Banana    (bananaphone  15:53, 11 January 2011 (UTC)


 * AGAIN - Please read this notice and revert your edit or you will be blocked. Active Banana    (bananaphone  16:50, 11 January 2011 (UTC)