User talk:Pranabesh007

October 2016
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Priyadarshini Chatterjee, you may be blocked from editing. Diffs:  Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:53, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

WP:NOINDICSCRIPT
Re: this, as I have previously explained, we do not use Indic script in an article's lead. See WP:INDICSCRIPT. Most of your edits at that article seem to revolve around Indic script. If you have thoughts about how her native name should be presented in that article, you need to discuss them on that article's talk page. If you are not willing to discuss and keep making edits that are unexplained and against community consensus, it will be considered disruptive. Discussion is your strongest tool. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:23, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Issues regarding your recent edits
Hi, I have noticed that your recent edits in various articles are without reference and with false informations(like the entire Barak Valley was not part of Bangal, only Korimganj District was part of it). I don't know why you remove assamese scripts from their appropriate places. If you have any issues regarding any articles, just leave a note on the discussion page.-  Ajay Das (অজয় দাস)  (Talk(বাৰ্তা)) 14:04, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

November 2016
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Darjeeling district and Darjeeling, you may be blocked from editing. - Tom &#124; Thomas.W talk 12:18, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Sikkim. Final warning for disruptive edits on multiple articles, adding personal POV comments, removing content with no explanation etc etc. - Tom &#124; Thomas.W talk 12:22, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

October 2017
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for continued disruption, refusal to discuss. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 17:13, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

Contributions
I have made necessary contributions to the page of Tezpur,but to my utter dilemma I have been blocked whereas some other user removed the word Bengali from the Tezpur page.So,I think the block is unnecessary as I have neither removed or disrupted any word,but included indigenous peoples language Bengali to the Page Tezpur,whereas some fellow people removed it and generated fake block request to block me.Dear administrator u can see my past contributions.Hope u check it out too. Pranabesh007 (talk) 14:18, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

True contributor

 * Pranabesh007, you have no edits at Tezpur in your, yet you've mentioned this article on three different occasions on your talk page above. So which one of the edits at were yours? Because it's a little confusing that you're talking about edits at Tezpur. As I look through your recent edits  I see unsourced additions, along with grammar, spelling and typographical errors, which are also problematic, because we expect editors to be able to contribute in proper English. Note also that in October 2016 I told you that per WP:NOINDICSCRIPT we do not use Indic script in article leads. And per more recent consensus at the Noticeboard for Indian Topics, Indic scripts are not to be added to the infobox. So It's unclear why you are talking about adding indigenous Bengali language to the page Tezpur or why you think this would be welcomed. Given the confusion here, I too would have declined your unblock request. It may be more efficient if you respond to the questions above in the space below, rather than opening a new unblock request, at least for the time being. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:08, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Request
Pranabesh007 (talk) 05:32, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Why don't you answer the questions I left above, so we can get a better idea of whether or not you are able to edit here constructively? Repeatedly posting unblock request without participating in the discussions is not going to go well for you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:45, 27 October 2017 (UTC)