User talk:Pranavkak04

An Important Information
Out of the ten links you had removed from page Kota, Rajasthan, I found eight were absolutely fine and reliable enough to be used in the article. You shouldn't have removed them. They have placed in the article as they were earlier. Indeed There were two faulty links that were showing error. I removed one and replaced the other with a desirable link under same title: the link under the airport section. Now all the sources in the article are perfectly reliable and verifiable and you should not remove them. Thank you.Vibhss (talk) 13:59, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Stop Stop Stop
This is your last and final warning. I told you that the links you removed were not unnecessary but they consolidated the information given in the Education section of the article. Each and every source is a reliable one. You can't remove them like that. What you are doing is link vandalism. Stop your Disruptive Edits or else you will be ultimately blocked.Vibhss (talk) 08:16, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Disruptive edits are not allowed
Which sources are showing bad reputation of Kota? Suicides are on the rise among Kota students and that is a reality. Isn't the poverty section of article India showing bad reputation of our country ? '''Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and it has to provide information whether it is good or bad. The information should be unbiased.''' You removed nine links again for no sound reason. What have you done? You left me a non-sensical message at my user page instead of the talk page. I talked to you politely until now considering you are not an experienced editor and need some guidance. Your Disruptive tactics are being noticed by everyone and if you continued violations, you are going to be surely blocked by administrators.

You must read what exactly is wikipedia, what is notability etc. What I am doing is that what is legal. More and more number of "reliable" sources makes the article unbiased, verifiable and more neutral.Vibhss (talk) 08:38, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

A simple warning and a request: Please read the complete message
If you don't want my suggestions, that's ok but how can we tolerate your Disruptive Edits ?

Listen, Your rude comment on my user page of I don't need your suggestions makes it even more necessary for you to understand that there are some policies and guidelines governing wikipedia which you must definitely follow while editing.

As I mentioned all the links in article Kota, Rajasthan are perfectly reliable including those mentioning economic problems in Kota and other problems like suicides among Kota students. It's your wrong perception that it throws a bad light of reputation of Kota. You can see any article: Mumbai, Kolkata and so on. They are rated as best articles. Those articles have 290 to 400 references. Would you also label them unnecessary? They also mention about economic problems in those cities.

You are not a frequent editor and thus you don't know about rules of Wikipedia. You are free to edit in wikipedia as far as your edits are reasonable and above all constructive. If Kota, Rajasthan is your favorite article, then add more information with references in that article. Why removing good and desirable links. '''If you make objectionable edits, how can other users tolerate them? You have to make edits that have consensus with other users. Do remember Kota, Rajasthan is not your copyright page.

Administrators can block you indefinitely for your destructive and disruptive Edits. If you don't want to follow my suggestions and continue further violations thinking you can do whatever you want, then wikipedia administrators will not mind to block your account for '''Link vandalism.

'''Do remember you can delete my messages from the current version of your talk page (as you did with the earlier message) but not from the history of your talk page. So, don't even think of outsmarting me. I will still have a credible evidence if it comes to Blocking your account. And of course, if you want to share your "pleasant and sweet" talks with me, then do this on my talk page and not on the user page as you did earlier. Well you are not supposed to do personal attacks and I will not tolerate them definitely next time'''. I just hope this warning will make you understand that Wikipedia is a legal forum and you can't do Disruptive Edits here.

'''Don't take me in wrong manner. Edit freely in Wikipedia but edit constructively.''' You ought not remove references/links labelled "reliable" and "desirable". I retained the remaining part of your edit.Vibhss (talk) 10:12, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Listen Buddy !
Even after reading above warning messages if you remove those links, then I don't think you would be able to continue with editing. Disruptive edits are reverted and will be reverted from wikipedia articles in the future also. We are expected to give two or three warnings to Disruptive editors for stopping their Disruptive edits. Seeing your contributions, it seems to me you don't know even the basics of editing on wikipedia. You even need to learn policies and guidelines of wikipedia, What are reliable sources ?, what is verifiability ? etc. There is nothing sort of matter/ link giving bad reputation to a place (here Kota) as you said. Whatever is reality is a reality. Wikipedia has to provide information. All it requires is reliable sourcing.

I think these warnings are enough and you know now if you carried out further violations, you may be blocked from editing without any further warning. Vibhss (talk) 14:35, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Warning for Disruptive Editing
→ You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. ❤ Trend SPLEND ✉ 14:29, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

Not assuming good faith
Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors. Thank you. ❤ Trend SPLEND ✉ 14:41, 8 May 2016 (UTC)