User talk:Pranay010

Speedy deletion nomination of B.M.Vyas
Hello Pranay010,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged B.M.Vyas for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks,

Barney the barney barney (talk) 18:54, 13 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Don't remove speedy deletion tags from articles. Barney the barney barney (talk) 19:16, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of B.M.Vyas


A tag has been placed on B.M.Vyas requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Karl 334 Talk- -Contribs  16:03, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of B.M.Vyas


The article B.M.Vyas has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Mkdw talk 16:13, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of B.M.Vyas
Hello Pranay010,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged B.M.Vyas for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Barney the barney barney (talk) 16:45, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

Please STOP copypasting copyrighted text
You need to rewrite the text otherwise it is WP:COPYVIO and will be speedy deleted. Barney the barney barney (talk) 16:52, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

May 2013
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted, as you did at B.M.Vyas. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. — Cactus Writer (talk) 16:53, 15 May 2013 (UTC)