User talk:Pranay0706

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oppex Pharmaceutical Pvt. Ltd. (April 8)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 331dot was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Oppex Pharmaceutical Pvt. Ltd. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Oppex_Pharmaceutical_Pvt._Ltd. Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:331dot&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Oppex_Pharmaceutical_Pvt._Ltd. reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

331dot (talk) 08:39, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

April 2023
Hello Pranay0706. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Pranay0706. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 331dot (talk) 08:40, 8 April 2023 (UTC)


 * I am not paid, It was a local company so I thought that I should create an article. Pranay0706 (talk) 13:36, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Out of all the local companies in Mumbai, what caused you to write about this one? In any event, it is not enough to merely document the existence of a company. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia with criteria for inclusion- existence is insufficient. Wikipedia articles about companies summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about a company, showing how they meet the special Wikipedia definition of a notable company. 331dot (talk) 16:13, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
 * I used their medicines and found them very effective that's why I thought that I should create an article about the company.
 * What should I do to prove the existence of the company, I have already cited many articles on the company? Pranay0706 (talk) 18:46, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
 * You don't need to prove the existence of the company- you need to summarize what independent reliable sources say is significant or important or influential about the company, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable company. The vast majority of companies do not merit articles.  You've cited profiles and sources with basic information- not significant coverage. 331dot (talk) 19:54, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Oppex Pharmaceutical Pvt. Ltd.
Hello, Pranay0706. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Oppex Pharmaceutical Pvt. Ltd., a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:02, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Oppex Pharmaceutical Pvt. Ltd.


Hello, Pranay0706. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Oppex Pharmaceutical Pvt. Ltd.".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/G13?withJS=MediaWiki:G13-restore-wizard.js&page=Draft%3AOppex+Pharmaceutical+Pvt.+Ltd. request its undeletion]. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 02:29, 12 November 2023 (UTC)