User talk:Pranish.Chhetry08

Welcome!
Hello, Pranish.Chhetry08, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Mero Euta Saathi Chha, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! &mdash;  Masum Ibn Musa  Conversation 11:56, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

January 2016
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Rabhasa, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. The source in the article does indeed say that Rabhasa was a "disaster" at the box office, not an "average grosser" as you tried to change it to. Thomas.W talk 14:02, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mero Euta Saathi Chha


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Mero Euta Saathi Chha requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Thomas.W talk 14:04, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Recent edit to Mero Euta Saathi Cha
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Mero Euta Saathi Cha, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Caballero / / Historiador   ☊  16:29, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

January 2016
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Anti-Indian sentiment, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 16:44, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 06:06, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Anmol K.C. with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 12:27, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Anmol K.C.. -- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 19:22, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

February 2016
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism, as you did at World Heritage Site. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  14:49, 4 February 2016 (UTC) I'm talking about this, this and this.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  14:51, 4 February 2016 (UTC)