User talk:Prasanna1998

Welcome!
Hello, Prasanna1998, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Kailash29792 (talk) 07:25, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Recent edits to Dharma Durai (2016 film)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Dharma Durai (2016 film), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 08:46, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Untitled Queen Remake for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Untitled Queen Remake is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Untitled Queen Remake until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - MrX 14:40, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

December 2016
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Tamannaah filmography, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 15:03, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Please don't arbitrarily reorder cast
Hi there, re: this, please don't arbitrarily reorder the cast. The guidelines for the starring parameter of the infobox are at Template:Infobox film. The guidelines for the cast section are at WP:FILMCAST. Unexplained reordering tends to look like you're merely entertaining personal preference, which is an insufficient reason. I've also seen people reordering cast to promote their favorite actors over others, and even to perpetuate sexist motivations, for instance by moving women down further in the list. Regardless, these sorts of things are problematic, which is why we have guidelines. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:13, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. FoCuS contribs ;  talk to me!  13:57, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

December 2016
Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. ''Diffs: The financial figures, and other claims you provided, were unsourced. It's also unclear why you are editorializing by describing theatrical runs as "successful". And do you mean financially successful, or successful in the sense that nobody pulled the films out of theaters before the 100 day (or whatever) run was completed? Unnecessary either way. Lastly, as has previously been explained on your talk page, we have guidelines for how we determine starring credits in the film Infobox. Based on these unexplained edits I don't get the sense you know what the rules are yet. Please see Template:Infobox film instructions. "Starring" is a special credit, and the parameter should not be used to indicate supporting cast. The word is not interchangeable with "appeared in". We derive starring roles from the theatrical poster's billing block. If that is not available, as it sometimes is not on Indian posters, the film's credits may be used instead. Thank you.'' Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:52, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

More unsourced financial data: The last edit also includes an unsourced summary of critical response, the introduction of meaningless "mixed to positive" language that is widely shunned by WikiProject Film, and the inappropriate editorial where you perform your own analysis of the film's performance and contrast it to another film using inappropriate POV phrasing "disastrous". Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:33, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I'm CAPTAIN RAJU. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Kriti (film) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. CAPTAIN RAJU ( ✉ ) 11:39, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Dharma Durai (2016 film).  Imminent 77   (talk)  12:42, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Tamannaah filmography. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 10:22, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 12:21, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Recent edits to Veera Sivaji
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Veera Sivaji, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 10:20, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

December 2016
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:45, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

You've already been blocked for problematic editing, and you have previously been asked to stop adding your editorial opinions in articles as you continue to do here and here and here and here. And you continue to submit unsourced data here and here and here. We don't need you describing things as blockbusters or failures or bombs, and using ridiculous terms like highly positive and highly negative to describe critical response. Even if sourced it's still hyperbole. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. We're not writing a blog. If this continues after this block expires, you will be asked to stop editing at Wikipedia for the foreseeable future. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:46, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

Oh, and in this edit you changed the critical response summary for Gethu from "mixed" to "highly negative" with no substantiation. This reference says that Gethu received mixed response. So, this change is indistinguishable from vandalism. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:50, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Siruthai, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Justeditingtoday (talk) 04:14, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:43, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

For this, which is indistinguishable from vandalism and this which appears to be a total fabrication, as it is unreferenced. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:45, 22 December 2016 (UTC)