User talk:Prasantapalwiki

Disambiguation link notification for January 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Quasi-one dimensional models, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Line (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Quasi-one-dimensional models for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Quasi-one-dimensional models is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Quasi-one-dimensional models& until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. freshacconci talk to me  20:38, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

WP:COI
You have been involved in COI editing for Quasi-one-dimensional models, due to the fact that you were one of the people who created this theory. This is banned on Wikipedia, so I advise you to stop. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 22:09, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

"Advanced image processing"
I see you've mostly added images that have been extremely processed, resulting in non-real detail. Your "Advanced image processing" looks like an overly applied unsharp mask. None of the features in your reprocessed VLBI images is real. - Parejkoj (talk) 18:43, 8 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Well you're free to make your `opinions` irrespective of your depth of expertise and openness to new kind of knowledge. But the comments about `unsharp` mask shows that your `knowledge filter` is limited to your own `limited` understanding of `image filters`. Its too premature to come to a conclusion like that about a piece of years long novel work unless you're motivated to undermine other people's work that doesn't conform to your category of understanding for `whatever` reason. On the other hand, if you're open to the spirit of debate and establish new kind of knowledge without priors and prejudices I'll be happy to debate and tell the truth about how to be a bit `sharp` about `unsharp` conclusions. Otherwise I'm too busy to engage any further. May be this peer review article will shed some light along the direction of the novel image feature discoveries that I've been making that somehow getting suppressed by `fixed mindset` folks. Very unfortunate but surprise to see that the imprisonment of `Galileo Galilei` may happen again despite so much advancement of the collective knowledge and wisdom of the humanity.
 * https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-023-47053-4
 * Best wishes,
 * Dr. Pal Prasantapalwiki (talk) 22:29, 13 March 2024 (UTC)