User talk:Praseodymium-141/Archive 1

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 3)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bkissin was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Bli231957/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Bli231957/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Bli231957/sandbox Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bkissin&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Bli231957/sandbox reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bkissin (talk) 21:07, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Unbitrium has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Unbitrium. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 22:03, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Unbitrium has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Unbitrium. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 22:08, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Unbitrium (January 11)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Unbitrium and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Unbitrium, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Unbitrium Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Robert_McClenon&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Unbitrium reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 15:45, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Gold
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Gold you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Amitchell125 -- Amitchell125 (talk) 22:20, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Gold
The article Gold you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Gold for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Amitchell125 -- Amitchell125 (talk) 22:41, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

January 2022
Hi Bli231957! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor&#32;at Holmium that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. ''I appreciate your edits to holmium and some other element articles. The only thing is that they're not minor, so keep this in mind in the future; it's a good practice.'' ComplexRational (talk) 20:36, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for your suggestion! I'll try to be more cautious on using the minor edit button. Bli231957 (talk) 20:44, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Copying licensed material requires attribution
Hi. I see in a recent addition to Draft:Neodymium acetate you included material from a webpage that is available under a compatible Creative Commons Licence. That's okay, but you have to give attribution so that our readers are made aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself. It's also required under the terms of the license. I've added the attribution for this particular instance. Please make sure that you follow this licensing requirement when copying from compatibly-licensed material in the future. — Diannaa (talk) 15:41, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

February 2022
Your edit to Neodymium acetate has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. The whole intro paragraph matched the americanelements ref, which does not appear to have a free license. DMacks (talk) 19:59, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Neodymium
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Neodymium you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ovinus -- Ovinus (talk) 23:00, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Bli231957

Thank you for creating Neodymium nickelate.

User:Hughesdarren, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Hughesdarren (talk) 21:34, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Neodymium compounds
Hi Bli231957

I appreciate your enthusiasm for neodymium. I see you are creating some Substubs on neodymium compounds. To be useful articles it would be good to include information about the properties of the substances, how they are made, or how they were discovered. Note that using PubChem as a reference does not prove that the substance even exists. You should be able to do a Google Scholar search to find serious writings about these materials. Otherwise a specialised textbook may have some information. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:14, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Neodymium nickelate.png
Thank you for uploading File:Neodymium nickelate.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 21:31, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Neodymium acetate, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dissolution. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of SSSPM J0829-1309 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article SSSPM J0829-1309 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/SSSPM J0829-1309 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 12:44, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of SSSPM J0829-1309


A tag has been placed on SSSPM J0829-1309 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

"Unattributed WP:G12 word-for-word copy of Draft:SSSPM J0829-1309"

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 13:46, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Gallium acetate


The article Gallium acetate has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "An unreferenced article that is a copied-and-pasted frame of another article. Has no notability whatsoever as nothing can be verified. If you remove this notice, please add three reliable references first."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk) 16:24, 5 May 2022 (UTC)