User talk:Praseodymium-141/Archive 21

WikiCup 2024 April newsletter
We are approaching the end of the 2024 WikiCup's second round, with a little over two weeks remaining. Currently, contestants must score at least 105 points to progress to the third round.

Our current top scorers are as follows:


 * with 642 points, mostly from 11 GAs about radio and television;
 * with 530 points, mostly from two FAs (Well he would, wouldn't he? and Cora Agnes Benneson) and three GAs;
 * with 523 points, mostly from 11 GAs about coinage and history;
 * with 497 points, mostly from a FA about the 2020 season of the soccer club Seattle Sounders FC and two GAs;
 * with 410 points, mostly from a FA about the drink Capri-Sun and three GAs;
 * with 330 points, mostly from a FA about the English botanist Anna Blackburne and a GA.

Competitors may submit work for the second round until the end of 28 April, and the third round starts 1 May. Remember that only competitors with the top 32 scores will make it through to the third round. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. Please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAN, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs. As a reminder, competitors are strictly prohibited from gaming Wikipedia policies or processes to receive more points.

If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please read WikiCup/Scoring. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (,, and ) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:06, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

Question from Ashibijlwan (17:39, 13 April 2024)
hi i want to correct a section of page on Mariiage rummy and i can also provide reliable source for reference. --Ashibijlwan (talk) 17:39, 13 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Hello Ashibijlwan, and welcome to Wikipedia! I'm not sure what you're asking for, can you clarify please?  141 Pr  {contribs} 08:23, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Hi there and thank yo for welcoming me. I want to clarify that I have read an article about Marriage Rummy a kind of card game and there i found a mistake which i can correct because i play rummy in my free time. Also I can provide a reliable source to back my point but i am new and don't know how to do that. Thanks in advance. Ashibijlwan (talk) 16:12, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
 * As long as you add something that includes a reliable source (see here for more info on that), you can add new/change information. You can also read this page if you want general information on adding sources.  141 Pr  {contribs} 17:08, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

Question from Wikipubliceditorpro (03:31, 19 April 2024)
Hello! I've noticed that most of my 'Easy' suggested edits just ask me to revise "misspelled" words that are mostly just names that are incorrectly flagged. Is there a way for me to mark it as correct and contribute so that it doesn't falsely show up on another persons suggested edits page? --Wikipubliceditorpro (talk) 03:31, 19 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Hello Wikipubliceditorpro, and welcome to Wikipedia! Can you give me examples of pages that have been incorrectly flagged?  141 Pr  -\ contribs /- 12:36, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

Question from Sbrizvi (21:25, 21 April 2024)
Hello, I want to add a new article/ wiki page for Ansar Burney's new book, Awaaz: Echoes of Freedom and Justice.

The page will have information about the book, media articles, and coverage, Burney's interviews, and also book reviews published in different newspapers.

Can you please help me? --Sbrizvi (talk) 21:25, 21 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Hello Sbrizvi, and welcome to Wikipedia! I suggest that you first fix buidhe's comment; I can go through it more carefully once you have finished doing that.  141 Pr  -\ contribs /- 10:53, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

WikiCup 2024 May newsletter
The second round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 28 April. This round was particularly competitive: each of the 32 contestants who advanced to Round 3 scored at least 141 points. This is the highest number of points required to advance to Round 3 since 2014.

The following scorers in Round 2 all scored more than 500 points:
 * with 707 points, mostly from 45 good article nomination reviews and 12 good articless about radio and television;
 * with 600 points, mostly from 12 good articles and 12 did you know nominations about coinage and history;
 * with 552 points, mostly from a featured article about the 2020 Seattle Sounders FC season, three featured lists, and two good articles;
 * with 548 points, mostly from a featured article about the snooker player John Pulman, two featured lists, and one good article;
 * with 530 points, mostly from two featured articles (Well he would, wouldn't he? and Cora Agnes Benneson) and three good articles.

The full scores for Round 2 can be seen here. So far this year, competitors have gotten 18 featured articles, 22 featured lists, and 186 good articles, 76 in the news credits and at least 200 did you know credits. They have conducted 165 featured article reviews, as well as 399 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 21 articles to featured topics and good topics.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 April but before the start of Round 3 can be claimed during Round 3, which starts on 1 May at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews Needed.

If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please see this page. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (,, and ) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

Question from Meganmichelle94 (22:54, 30 April 2024)
I'm trying to create a Wikipedia page for Blumira, cybersecurity solutions platform. Can you provide tips to help me get the content accepted? --Meganmichelle94 (talk) 22:54, 30 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Hello Meganmichelle94, and welcome to Wikipedia! If you want to get the draft accepted, I suggest that you find reliable, secondary sources that can demonstrate that the article is notable.  141 Pr  -\ contribs /- 10:51, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

 * You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. 

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

Question from EricKugel (00:45, 3 May 2024)
Hello, thank you for mentoring! I recently edited the "The Michaels Companies" page with a very obvious change, and within minutes someone reverted my edit and messaged me, threatening to block me for "vandalism". Thankfully, a very nice editor stepped in and helped. My question is how the first person was able to see my edit so quickly, and why did they so quickly accuse me of vandalism when it very obviously wasn't? Was it a bot? And if so, how were they able to find an edit so quickly? Is there a feed somewhere of incoming edits, or were they just watching the page? Sorry for the deluge of questions... --EricKugel (talk) 00:45, 3 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Hello EricKugel, and welcome to Wikipedia! Well, it seems like that editor was a problematic editor. They have since been blocked. I think that person was just reverting random edits, and your edit was one of them. Anyways, just ignore the vandalism warning; your edit was constructive and helpful. :)  141 Pr  -\ contribs /- 10:48, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Hmm alright, thank you! Dustcloth (talk) 18:29, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
 * No problem!  141 Pr  -\ contribs /- 08:18, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

Seskarö Uprising
You recently reviewed my page and gave it a C. Could you tell me what i did wrong and give me some advise on how to improve in the future? (If you have the time or will ofcourse)

- Dencoolast33 (talk) 16:42, 8 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Hey Dencoolast! There is nothing inherently wrong with a C-class article, but this link gives information on how you could improve it.  141 Pr  -\ contribs /- 16:45, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Okay, thank you! Ill take a look. Dencoolast33 (talk) 19:54, 8 May 2024 (UTC)