User talk:PrashastSingh

Welcome!
Hello, PrashastSingh, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Broken Point, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 10:59, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Proposed deletion of Broken Point


The article Broken Point has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:NFILM, potential WP:PROMO"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 10:59, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

August 2017
Hello, I'm Jake Brockman. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Broken Point have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles are written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 11:00, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Broken Point


A tag has been placed on Broken Point, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Alexf(talk) 11:21, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

This is unfair. I was not advertising anything. If my page was deleted, it means Wikipedia should delete everything because every page " advertises" something. I feel backstabbed.
 * I'm sorry you feel this way. Please do take a moment to review the 5 pillar of Wikipedia which explains what Wikipedia is all about. In a nutshell, contents should be notable, verifiable and from a neutral point of view. Notability means, that any article needs to be well known and well documented by a wider community, before being added. It needs to be verifiable, i.e. it needs references and recognition from unrelated sources. Neutrality means, it should be free of conflicts of interest or commercial interests. It is simply not true that that every page advertises something as you claim. Please look at the following pages as good examples for articles that report factually about notable things Titanic, Delhi, Johannes Gutenberg or Human rights. Taking a film as examples, how about The Godfather. All those articles inform and cite informative, independent references as validation. Unfortunately the article you created did not meet the same standard: as a self created article, you may have a conflict of interest, so the article is not neutral. The references presented link to the amazon page which prompts people to rent or buy your movie. As such, it would be promotional. I also do not see any of the criteria for the inclusion as movie as being met. I hope this helps. Kind regards, pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 14:03, 19 August 2017 (UTC)