User talk:Pratap Singh Rajawat

I dont believe in untruth.If you are edinting wikipedia for abuse, caste association, and political advantage by providing misleading information I have to do something.

--Shivbramh 11:26, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Bharmal
As it stands, Bharmal is a rather confusing article to those of us who don't already know who it is. Could you expand the article, taking care to explain the man's notability? NickelShoe (Talk) 19:25, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Yes I am going to expend it.When I find time I will expend it.For your information Bharmal was first Rajput to enter into alliance with Mughals.He was father in law of emperor Akbar. --Shivbramh 03:52, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Udaipur Palace.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Udaipur Palace.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self-no-disclaimers tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:17, 23 March 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Angr 22:17, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

I have uploaded another version of this image.This is not copied from websites. Picture taken by my cousin and presented to me.Licensing also included. --Shivbramh 04:17, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Magan Singh Rizvi
In a book about Arjuna awards that I have, his name is Rijvi. Should the title just be Magan Singh ? I have usually seen his name in the newspapers that way. Pointy haired fellow 04:38, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Might be possible.But it was misspelled.Magan Singh is a Hindu name while Rizvi is a Muslim surname.I knew the fello personally.He is Magan Singh Rajvi.You can confirm this from Government of India official website, to which external link has been attached by me on Magan Singh Rizvi page in wikipedia.In this website his name is given as M.S.Rajvi.M.S. is short for Magan Singh.His name is given in football players who won Arjun Award.There isnt another M.S.Rizvi or Rajvi. So please correct the header. --Shivbramh 08:15, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

kajal4
my name iz kajal iz there any problem?

shivbramh
No not at all. You are welcome, but kindly be vigilant while editing history related articles.Dont put filmi stuff in them as it might not be true.Films and serials often put untrue versions to gain popularity.Best wishes.

--Shivbramh 03:37, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Mayo College
Have a look at the article when you get time comparing it with other school articles and see if it can be added to, when you get time. I asked for help at the Wiki Project for Schools and added their tag to discussion page of Mayo College, one of their editors has been working on it. Article is missing photos, see if any fair use images can be taken from mayo website, obviously fair use has to be explained in detail with image upload etc.

Thanks Atulsnischal 09:26, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Duplicate images uploaded
Thanks for uploading Image:Wiki.DSC-02177.JPG. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:DSC02177.JPG. The copy called Image:DSC02177.JPG has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot (talk) 10:44, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

Yes. I includes the same image again,as it did not show on the page I wanted.If overall meaning remains same, it makes no difference what the name is. --Shivbramh (talk) 20:26, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sheobramhpota


The article Sheobramhpota has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Has no visible verifiable references from reliable sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —  Jeff G. ツ (talk)   19:43, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

File source problem with File:The Jaipur infantry 1936.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:The Jaipur infantry 1936.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 23:42, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Nindar


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Nindar, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Trunzep (talk) 18:52, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nathawat


The article Nathawat has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Fails WP:GNG. Definitely a name but cannot even redirect to the Kachwaha article as there appear to be no reliable sources that make the connection. Unsourced for years.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sitush (talk) 12:53, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Nathawat for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nathawat is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Nathawat& until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sitush (talk) 12:55, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Rana Punja


The article Rana Punja has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unnotable article of a chieftain. He was neither of royalty nor nobility. Either this article should be deleted or redirected to the Battle of Haldighati."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hagoromo&#39;s Susanoo (talk) 09:58, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Rana Punja for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rana Punja is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Rana Punja until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hagoromo&#39;s Susanoo (talk) 09:59, 4 January 2018 (UTC)