User talk:Prathamesh Patki

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Raj Thackeray.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Raj Thackeray.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 13:04, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Rachel Shelley.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Rachel Shelley.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 13:06, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Uncha Maaza Zoka.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Uncha Maaza Zoka.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:22, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Achyut Godbole for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Achyut Godbole is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Achyut Godbole until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Prashant Serai (talk) 10:23, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the [ reviewer's talk page] . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! ChrisGualtieri (talk) 03:31, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

Achyut Godbole
Hi there. I am also a fan of Achyut Godbole but that does not mean that we are allowed to add copy righted material on the wiki page. Please stop edit warring at the article and discuss the issue first on the talk page of the article before making changes in the article. Thanks. --Abhijeet Safai (talk) 08:37, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
 * You are right as new material has to be added to the article in an effect to survive it. But reference must be given. If we dont give reference, then ambiguity increases about notability and so the deletion discussion is going on. When I created article, I had given enough sources to make it stable. And it was stable. Later ppl added material simply by copy pasting and we can see the condition now.--Abhijeet Safai (talk) 13:36, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
 * It is the best hing to give references which are given in the autobiography. So you are on the right path. No issues. But the issues is of references. Give the name of the book, publication date, publisher, Author and page number from which the information has been taken. It might be a bit difficult for beginner to give references. But you will learn it as you edit more. Till the time you can put the material with the given details on the talk page of article and can ask for help to put it on the article. Someone or myself will see to it and will put to the article properly so that ppl will not question the reference. And you also can see as how proper referencing can be done.--Abhijeet Safai (talk) 04:51, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Ok. I agree that I thought that you are a newbie :P The reason was - I saw your first edit, and that was on 4th July 2012. And so I thought like that. It is very impressive to make such a progress in about 6 months. We shall see now as how the deletion discussion comes to conclusion as keep. Thanks. --Abhijeet Safai (talk) 06:50, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

With reference to: your latest edit on the Achyut Godbole page. I think you should rather develop your draft at a place convenient to you, and add it on to the article when you find credible sources. Prashant Serai (talk) 17:51, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Have you noticed that the article has been deleted? Abhijeet Safai (talk) 18:38, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the [ reviewer's talk page] . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! SarahStierch (talk) 19:58, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Rajesh Khanna.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Rajesh Khanna.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:13, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Rajesh Khanna.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Rajesh Khanna.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:24, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Clifton Chronicles concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Clifton Chronicles, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 17:59, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at AfC The Clifton Chronicles was accepted
 The Clifton Chronicles, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Redirect-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!  DGG ( talk ) 00:48, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.