User talk:Pratik12951

Devi Shakti
We already have articles on the concepts of Devi and Shakti. Your Devi shakti article appears to be a collection of unsourced original research that restates much of what has already been written elsewhere. I have redirected your article to Shakti. Feel free to expand the Devi and Shakti articles (or any others of your choosing), but please only based on reliable sources. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 16:03, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shakti, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shiv (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

Shakti
When I invited you to expand the Shakti article, I did mention that you should base your changes on reliable sources. I did not mean that you should completely replace the existing article with your own completely unsourced version. Please begin with the material that exists, and make incremental changes based on actual sources. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:02, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

November 2012
Hello, I'm WikiDan61. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Shakti without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:32, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

Please stop
Please stop moving pages to make a point. Leave the page where it is and address your concerns there. Moving pages is very disruptive. The changes you have wrought will only confuse people, and will now require an administrator's intervention to correct. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:37, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Shakti, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:41, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

Stop now
Stop now and enter the discussion that I have started at Talk:Shakti. Do not move the page or blank it again until consensus can be reached on the matter. If you continue to do so, you will likely find yourself blocked. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:43, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Shakti, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. ''Blanking the page is not the answer. Enter the discussion and build consensus, or you WILL be blocked.'' WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:44, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or  located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 14:04, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mahadevi shakti


A tag has been placed on Mahadevi shakti requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Hack (talk) 14:09, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

November 2012
This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Devi, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 08:16, 9 November 2012 (UTC) Please allow me to create a new article as there are lots of differences. The main difference being in the article name and also the content that I will be writing. I assure you that I wont interfere and also expect the same from the others.

Administrative intervention
Hi PRatik, my name is Qwyrxian, and I'm an administrator here on Wikipedia. It looks like you're having some difficulty adding information to Wikipedia. Some editors seem to be pretty upset at you, and I think that it may be because you're unfamiliar with how Wikipedia works. Wikipedia is a collaborative editing environment. That means that people have to work together to try to make improvements to the encyclopedia. When people don't agree with changes you've made, you need to go to the article's talk page and discuss them. You shouldn't just create other pages with the same information and content, and you shouldn't just try to force your version into Wikipedia.

In addition, you should know that Wikipedia requires information to be verified by reliable sources. That means that you can't just add in information that you "know"; rather, you need to cite good sources, like academic journals, books by reputable authors and publishing companies, and similar documents.

Some of the people above have asked for you to be blocked. I'm not going to do that right now, but I will have to do so if you don't start collaborating and stop trying to force people to follow your way. Now, I would be happy to help you do this. First, because the history surrounding the edits you're making is confusing me, could you explain to me what it is exactly that you think should be done? Is there information missing that you think needs to be changed? Do you think some article is mistitled? Something else? Qwyrxian (talk) 09:47, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

Hello Mate. See, My intension is not to interupt anyone. It is just that I want to create an similar article, in pretext to beliefs of Hinduism and not just a piece of informtion that is gathered by reading books and writing it. Henceforth, I request you to let the page Goddess Mahashakti be there as I have/will write about the goddess as per the beliefs of Hinduism, Indian people. I am not saying that the other article are wrong but I personally feel there are 3 articles Devi, Mahadevi, Shakti, which are actually one the same, yet are allowed to be in existence. They are repeated redirecting my article, which discuss the same topic. They might be feeling insecure that thier written article might not be searched if this my article is created. so, Give me time and let me make that article. You may find it similar to other article. But I am gona write it completely in regards to beliefs of Hindu people, as that goddess is worshipped by us (hindus) For your notice, the articles Mahadevi, Devi and Shakti are one and the same. Please take note of that too, as you and others are questioning about my article. If they call my article as unreliable and also at the same time,they say that my article is same as thier and henceforth, she be deleted or they themselves direct it. How a article be called as unreliable as well similar to thier artcle? They outraged and insecure, henceforth behaving this way. Please allow me to keep that article as it explains the same topic but in different perspective. — Preceding unsigned comment added by {ratik12951 (talk • contribs)
 * Wikipedia doesn't allow that, though. We can only have one article on a given topic. Having two articles on the same topic is called [{WP:FORK|forking]], and just can't be done. Think about a normal, paper encyclopedia: would you ever have two articles about the same subject? Even more simply, think of a dictionary: if a word has more than one meaning, all of those meanings are listed under the same entry. The same thing has to be true here on Wikipedia. I'm also a little concerned that you don't want it to be "a piece of informtion that is gathered by reading books and writing it". Now, maybe I'm misunderstanding you, but it sounds like you want to write it based upon what you, personally, "know" about the Goddess. But that, too, isn't allowed. Wikipedia can never be written just from what one person thinks. It must, in all cases, be based on reliable sources.
 * The thing is, if you want to edit here on Wikipedia, you have to follow Wikipedia's rules. I've reverted your undo of my redirect of that article. If you do that again, I will block you. I would really much rather help you learn how to edit here. But if you're unwilling or unable to follow our editing rules, then I have to stop you from disrupting the encyclopedia. Qwyrxian (talk) 11:19, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

Okey, Articles Devi, Shakti and Mahadevi are one and the same. Collaborate these three articles as its one and the same topic

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for disruptive editing. I wish I didn't have to do this, but I don't know how else to make you stop trying to force your version on Wikipedia. If you'll agree to stop recreating that WP:FORK, and instead agree to go to the relevant article's talk page and discuss your suggested changes, you can be unblocked. On the other hand, if you just wait out the block and start editing disruptively again after it expires, I'll have to reblock you for longer. Please, let's stop this now. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Qwyrxian (talk) 11:33, 9 November 2012 (UTC) Articles Devi, Shakti and Mahadevi are on one topic. Collaborate these three also. Otherwise, It will potray your biased nature. I am not writing what I feel. I am writing what I am taught by my society, Culture. I am Hindu or Indian. You being Japanese, you think you have more knowledge? I know your pride will never let you accept and understand my tought. But if my article is being deleted and I am block then same applies for articles Devi, Shakti and Mahdevi. Let these also be one and the same article

ASSHOLES you are. You write about our gods, targeting our toughts. And write all monotonous shits. And
 * Okay, okay, I know you're upset. But, first of all, why do you think that the other editors there aren't also Hindus? I've never edited that article, and I have absolutely no opinion or knowledge about what should be in it, except that I know that whatever you put has to follow Wikipedia's rules. But it's certainly possibly that the people who are editing the article are Hindu and/or Indian. Ultimately, though, that doesn't matter, because Wikipedia is never based on personal knowledge. You can't write "what you have been taught by your society and culture". You have to write what reliable sources say. If you don't want to follow these rules, then I recommend starting your own website (there are lots of places where you can host your own site for free) to put out your views on the subject. Qwyrxian (talk) 12:12, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

You dont have knowledge. This is accepted by you. Still how you can judge our prescribed links? Answer that. If a Admin having knowledge in this pretext does it, then it more acceptable. Your interfere is baseless as its accepted by youself that you have no knowledge in regards to this. And Secondly, Keep your toughts upto you. Wrong stuffs are being written by foreigners like you about us and other gods. We didnt have problem until this site comes up first in search results when searched on sites like google and the links provided by those who have done updates will surely not appear in first 1000 pages of google search. There are lots of places for you to go and poke your toughts, noses, legs whatever you want. Idiots

Disambiguation link notification for November 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mumbai New Delhi Duronto Express, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page LHB (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ashish Bisht


A tag has been placed on Ashish Bisht requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Shirt58 (talk) 12:43, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
Yunshui 雲 &zwj; 水  14:21, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ashish Bisht


The article Ashish Bisht has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fails WP:GNG and WP:NMODEL, no reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Yunshui 雲 &zwj; 水  14:44, 20 March 2013 (UTC)


 * As I said, you need to supply reliable sources, which PBase, Facebook and Youtube are not. Since it appears that you have again uploaded a copyrighted image, despite being specifically told not to, I am also blocking your account temporarily, per my earlier warning. Yunshui 雲 &zwj; 水  14:46, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

March 2013
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Yunshui 雲 &zwj; 水  14:47, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)