User talk:Pratullobo

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question and then place  before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Cheers.  Trance addict - Tiesto - Above and Beyond 23:39, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Welcome

 * }

Signing
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you.

Respect others copyright when creating Wikipedia content
Your addition to SME Rating Agency of India has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Offerings cut & pasted from http://www.smera.in/smerating.aspx -- Brianhe (talk) 03:11, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

Your addition to SME Rating Agency of India has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Section cut and paste after warning above, from http://www.msmefdp.net/Creditinformation1.aspx -- Brianhe (talk) 15:22, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 14:22, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

If I'm not mistaken I think its already being done. Pratul 14:27, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

Do not vandalize Wikipedia
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Andrew Symonds. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — Brianhe (talk) 05:52, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Hello, are you sure I have carried out vandalism. Please let me know when was this done? As per my knowledge I have never edited Andrew Symonds. I was working on SMERA and seeking your help on the same. --Pratul 08:53, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
 * You can check your user contributions as well as I can. — Brianhe (talk) 15:32, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

It was probably done 2 yrs back, not by me obviously but by someone else. Why are you bringing past matters to the table now? I dont understand what is your issue? If its a recent event, I can but not for something 2 years back.--Pratul (talk) 08:49, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
 * You are held responsible for edits made under your name, how could it be any other way? You should read WP:BRO if this isn't obvious. There is now a pending admin action (see notice below) due to the cumulative warnings and your response. — Brianhe (talk) 16:28, 3 March 2011 (UTC)


 * While people are responsible for all of their edits, you can't warn someone for vandalism if that event occurred 2 years ago. Vandalism warnings are given to tell the person what they may or may not do on Wikipedia, not just to make a record of old infractions.  Qwyrxian (talk) 03:09, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Vandalism doesn't say anything about time limits. One purpose of these warnings is to document past incidents, so appropriate escalations can be made.  ANI is one such escalation by bringing attention in a very factual way to a documented pattern of behavior.  Repeated inclusion of copyrighted material is damaging to Wikipedia.  So is violating WP:BLP policy.  As for documenting CoI, this was done in good faith, it seemed pertinent to note that a virtually single-purpose Wikipedia user name and the publicly advertised name of one of the executives of the subject article are one and the same. Seems to me there's more than a bit of self-outing in this case. If he doesn't want to be connected with the article, he should choose a different user name and/or edit other stuff. — Brianhe (talk) 02:55, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
 * One more thing for Qwyrxian. You asked why I brought up WP:BRO.  The summary sentence in the essay is "Don't try to lay the blame on someone else."  Compare to the statement above, "It was ... not by me obviously but by someone else."  Pertinent, I think. — Brianhe (talk) 03:01, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

With regards to repeated inclusion of copyright material, I was following the format used on other articles assuming they were following the rules laid down by wikipedia. When I relaised they were not, I prompted Brianhe to edit the same so that all articles respect the rules. Even after including material, Brianhe was notified whether the article SMERA follows the rules. Brianhe can check his talk page to verify if I have been in contact with regards to the same or not. Please illustrate one instant when I have carried out repeated inclusions of copyright material after having being notified of the rules and regulations on wikipedia. As far as CoI goes, I am not the only one contributing to the article, you can check for yourself in the articles history page. Apparently, Brianhe thinks wikipedia is his personal domain and he can do as he wishes because he is aware of the intricacies of creating an article. Rather than letting in new users to contribute to wikipedia, he seems determined to prevent genuine contributors from developing new articles. Pratul (talk) 12:16, 6 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Ok, let's get a few things straight here. While it is certainly a bit odd to warn a user for such an old action this: is in fact a disgusting act of racist vandalism that came from this account. The rule of thumb here is one person=one account, one account=one person. Normally if you claim someone else edited using your account you would be permanently blocked for failing to maintain control of your account, so you might want to reconsider that as a defense for this despicable edit. That being said, I think we can let this whole matter go and consider it a lesson learned for all involved. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:28, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Conflict of interest
Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article SME Rating Agency of India, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. — Brianhe (talk) 06:22, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Admin noticeboard
Informational note: this is to let you know that there currently is a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Regards, Brianhe (talk) 16:23, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of SME Rating Agency of India


The article SME Rating Agency of India has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Doesn't appear to cross the notability threshold for companies. It is not even a company – SMERA is a project of a bank and a business rating agency. Cursory Google search does not bring up much in terms of reliable, independent third-party mentions of SMERA. The listed website does not instil confidence that the subject is so notable as it merits an encyclopaedia article."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — kashmīrī  TALK  22:15, 21 November 2020 (UTC)