User talk:Pratyushkumarbaner

May 2019
Hello, I'm AussieLegend. I noticed that you recently removed content from Balaji Telefilms without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 09:44, 2 May 2019 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Puncch Beat. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. KylieTastic (talk) 11:31, 2 May 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Mitegi Laxman Rekha, you may be blocked from editing. KylieTastic (talk) 13:27, 2 May 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of programmes broadcast by &TV. KylieTastic (talk) 13:43, 2 May 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Don't use minor edit checkbox unless it's a spelling or grammar correction It's disruptive otherwise.   Ravensfire  (talk) 15:58, 2 May 2019 (UTC)

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you.  Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 17:10, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Just to clarify, "Ok" is not an appropriate edit summary. Summaries should describe what you did in your edit. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 17:11, 2 May 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. NJA (t/ c)  20:30, 4 May 2019 (UTC)