User talk:Pratyya Ghosh/Archives/8 (2013-04)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Saransh Goila, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!  Pr at yya  (Hello!) 13:32, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Blocked
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Arctic  Kangaroo  14:18, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Blocked for 1 year by Jimbo Wales.
 * What's the big idea?!!!!! I understood. ha ha ha ha. Today is April fool!!-- Pr at yya  (Hello!) 14:31, 1 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Block me by placing block template on my talk page! (if you want)  Arctic   Kangaroo  14:33, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
Arctic  Kangaroo  14:50, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 second for I said so and it's April Fools' and that's the way aha aha, I like it aha aha. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mediran ( t  •  c ) 03:53, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

You have a message!
Jayadevp 13  14:22, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Styles of Silat
Please take a look at the talk page and AfD. The conversion to a list was discussed. Right now the content is unreferenced, full of copy and paste, and frankly a complete mess.Peter Rehse (talk) 21:06, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Last Belfast reversion
Just to let you know, that last revert you made I'm not sure actually was a good faith contribution. I might be wrong, but the IP's contribution (mi piace la patata) means I like potatoes in Italian (or sonething!)... I couldn't see how relevant that was (!!!) so would call it vandalism myself. Just advising, in case the IP comes back again. PS nice page! Basket Feudalist 15:28, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I'll remind next time.-- Pr at yya  (Hello!) 15:55, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

About Constructive of 'Rising Sun Flag' article
Also I am Korean, but you may think othes are not. But, see below links.

What about Korean thinks...

---need translator to wiew in english http://todayhumor.co.kr/board/view.php?table=bestofbest&no=104886&s_no=104886&page=4

(One of the humor site of Korea)

http://media.daum.net/society/others/newsview?newsid=20130402102120920

http://www.playxp.com/community/funny/view.php?article_id=4451540&search=2&search_pos=&q=

(some news and Reaction of DUMB students' use of the flag.)

http://rigvedawiki.net/r1/wiki.php/욱일기

(Rigveda wiki, Most active wiki site, and largest private wiki of Korea. More active than Korean Wikipedia.(Potential users of korean wikipedia uses rigveda wiki, so korean wikipedia has less article compaired to other countries even internet environment is one of the best.) It has more detail info(for example, origin of design and history) even more than english wikipedia.)

Bridal mask, drama directed by KBS(Korean national broadcast company, government owns) - Whole plot. One scene of this, Protagonist cuts the flag off.

http://media.daum.net/society/others/newsview?newsid=20130403155809541

http://media.daum.net/foreign/america/newsview?newsid=20130404112910756

http://media.daum.net/foreign/others/newsview?newsid=20130131103614975

...and so many other NEWSPAPER articles (Korean Portal sites use news from newspaper and TV company)

http://terms.naver.com/entry.nhn?cid=200000000&docId=1354341&categoryId=200000311

(Article from Doosan Korean Dictionary. even short reply of this think the flag=nazi flag)

Only Korean think like this? Please read below and think yourself.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_war_crimes

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unit_731, similar to Nazi's

* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yun_Dong-ju

(not in this article, but after search, you'll find that Yun was killed under 'experiment' of Unit 731) and translate other languages' wikipedia article of this and others like china and other asia. for example, "regarded as a symbol of Japanese militarism with the offensive"(from China/Taiwan).

...need more? If you think that's concrete, notify to me or you can edit to include this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.183.129.220 (talk) 11:39, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Thank you !
Hello Pratya ! Thank you for your feedback and decline on the article for creation Corner tube boiler. I accept that there is already an article existing on wikipedia with the same name. But if you can please answer some of my queries, I would be really grateful. The article Corner tube Boiler was submitted as a stub on 14th March 2013 and there after as I wanted to add more material and details I kept on working it in my sandbox and later created a page with the name corner tube boilers ( with more third party reliable resources and pictures). So the existing article still remains unreviewed or it is accepted already ? Please guide me in this particular situation so that I may not repeat it again and I would like to be be a Wiki contributor for further future as well right now as a beginner I am anxious and motivated to edit the existing ones and submit articles with time. Thank you in advance Ghorpaapi (talk) 14:41, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
 * You are a Bengali? Now answering your question. If your question is the existing article is still unreviewed, then the answer is the existing article is on the article space. So it is accepted. But in addition I need to say the article space article don't need to be accepted. They will be there when you create. Also the WP:AFC accepted articles stays at article space. It means only WP:AFC articles need to be reviewed. Also new created articles need to reviewed. But the New Pages Patrolers review them. If your article is not okay they add tags like . And if it's very much bad and it falls under the WP:CSD then they ask for WP:CSD. Hope it helps you. And if you need any feel free to ask.-- Pr at yya   (Hello!) 15:02, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Hello Pratya ! No I am not a Bengali. Thanks a lot for the details explaination . I understood the whole situation quite clearly now but still out of curiosity I would ask you another question. This is related to reviewing of the article. So when an article is created ( with all the references,lead sections and already categorised) still must it be submitted for reviewing or directly could be created for article space ? . Thank you for the time and energy and guidance.

Ghorpaapi (talk) 09:49, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
 * No you see the directly created articles don't need to be submitted for review. But they goes at New pages and New pages feed. If they wouldn't go there how the new page patroler find them!!! But if you are an admin or autopatrolled then your created articles won't go to the lists. They'll reviewed automatically. Any question?-- Pr at yya  (Hello!) 12:57, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you Pratyya . It was of real help. :) Ghorpaapi (talk) 08:33, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 01 April 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 16:14, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Be more careful
Please, be more careful when reverting suspect vandalism, as you did with this edit.--93.144.93.121 (talk) 19:31, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm really sorry for that mistake of mine. Everybody makes mistake so please forgive this mistake.-- Pr at yya  (Hello!) 04:19, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

Re : Hi
Ya, thanks. Btw, I'm still active here but can't contribute so much on en.wiki for a moment. Also I apologize because I can't help on the WikiProject Bangladesh Premier League, too many works to be done right now on ms wiki. &mdash; иz нίpнόpʜᴇʟᴘ! 20:10, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

He's busy 'cos he is currently spending a lot of time studying to go to college. :) Arctic   Kangaroo  03:24, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Hey Ranking no need to say sorry. It's alright.-- Pr at yya  (Hello!) 04:22, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

Wow..Thank you!
Thank you so much for the barnstar! You really made my day. I'm still working on my user page so I hope you'll come back to check it :) Acmilan10italia (talk) 13:18, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Sure. I have watchlisted your page.-- Pr at yya  (Hello!) 13:25, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

You've got mail
I apologize for the extremely late reply. — Preceding unsigned comment added by XapApp (talk • contribs) 06:39, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
 * No need to apologize. Is alright.-- Pr at yya  (Hello!) 12:52, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Submission
I have an article for review. I hope it's good enough. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Claude_Davis_(American_football) 173.78.231.251 (talk) 05:47, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
 * ✅. Accepted. Also please create an account. You are a very good editor. You have 40 accepted submissions!! Great IP. I have seen very very very very very little IP's editing like you. So it'll be helpful for you and also WP if you create an account-- Pr at yya  (Hello!) 06:30, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Ceramic hill at Netrokona.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Ceramic hill at Netrokona.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Psychonaut (talk) 07:43, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
 * They can be look like same. But both are taken at a time. But still if you think it has a problem then delete that.-- Pr at yya  (Hello!) 07:47, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Article Wizard for newbies
Hi Pratyya. Sorry it's taken me a while to reply to your question here. Basically, there are some issue that tend to arise when new editors go stright to article space and start creating their page from scratch. Usually, they make errors (commonly regarding markup, notability and tone) which result in NPPs slapping tags all over the new article, and very often nominating it (correctly and successfully) for deletion. That means we end up with a) extra work for NPPs and admins and b) disheartened new contributors. The advantage of using the Article Wizard is twofold: firstly, it guides the new editor through what's required of an article (so that they know about the need for sourcing and NPOV, and get instructions on layout and markup) and secondly, it has the option to drop the page into AFC rather than directly into article space, meaning that new users can get reviews and feedback before their work is exposed to the merciless gaze of the community. As a result, Wikipedia gets a better new article, and new contributors get an easier ride. Everyone's a winner! Yunshui 雲 &zwj; 水  09:39, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Orphan Black
Hello there,

You just undid my change to the intro of "Orphan Black"'s page.

I made this change to remove a pretty big spoiler.

I visited the site yesterday to see when the new episode would be released. One of the first things I saw was that the main character was one of a series of clones. This information was not revealed until the end of the episode I had logged on to verify, and as such was a huge spoiler.

I altered this page so instead of reading "one of a series of clones" it would in future say "has several mysterious doppelgangers", which I believe conveys the same information but without the massive spoiler.

It would be in the interests of the viewing public if you changed this back. The change was made for good reason, in good faith, and does not constitute vandalism or profanity.

Kind regards,

The Editor — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.29.15.2 (talk) 13:40, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Another Submission
I got this other article here. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Mike_Golic_Jr. 173.78.231.251 (talk) 18:29, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Maxim Kontsevich page
Hey Pratyya,

Checking in to see what's wrong with adding a link to the workplace of Maxim? That page only exists in Russian, so I chose not to make the English name clickable but add Russian link in the parents. By reversing it you deny the visitors direct transition to the workplace page, how is this constructive?

Kind regards, Dmitry — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.16.193.26 (talk) 21:28, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Changing my stuff
Listen you little maggot, let me do wat i want to do and u worry about yoursef — Preceding unsigned comment added by Demon Seed3331 (talk • contribs) 02:53, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Hey, wots happening bros? Basket Feudalist 10:13, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
 * You need to know Personal Attack is not allowed at WP.-- Pr at yya  (Hello!) 13:18, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

April 2013
Thank you for trying to keep Wikipedia free of vandalism. However, one or more edits you labeled as vandalism, such as the edit at Woolsthorpe-by-Colsterworth, are not considered vandalism under Wikipedia policy. Wikipedia has a stricter definition of the word "vandalism" than common usage, and mislabeling edits as vandalism can discourage newer editors. Please read NOTVAND for more information on what is and is not considered vandalism. Thank you. Psychonaut (talk) 10:08, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Sorry if I made a mistake. Human makes mistakes. So i have made too. But I'll be careful these days. And also I'm very very very happy that you showed me my mistakes. Thank you.
 * Ah-! But humans talk to each other... they don't p*ss-about with silly litte templates... Basket Feudalist 13:44, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Sorry I can't understand what you said. Can you say a bit clearly?-- Pr at yya  (Hello!) 13:46, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
 * I just meant, it's a lot more polite to actually talk to someone than just stick a template on their Talkpage, eh! Basket Feudalist 13:48, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

hello you just undid an edit on the Yo-Yo Ma page. I added an item to his discography which was correct, so I don't know what your reasoning was... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.103.3.243 (talk) 15:45, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
 * I didn't do that!! I was offline for last 30 minutes! Okay somehow the edit was made from my account. I'm sorry for that. Someone have made them.-- Pr at yya  (Hello!) 15:51, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

I don't think it's a hack, isn't it because STiki makes automatic revisions? So it's a sort of 'false positive' and no need to worry! -I hope! lol <b style="color:Green;">Basket </b><sub style="color:orange;">Feudalist 16:06, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

I tried to revert it back, but I'm now being accused of vandalism. Can you correct this and make the page the way I changed it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.103.3.243 (talk) 01:24, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Creativity
Take this kitty for your excellent userpage !;)

Gaurav Pruthi <sup style="color:#000066; background-color:#ffcc99;">talk 04:19, 10 April 2013 (UTC) <br style="clear: both;"/>
 * Thanks.-- Pr at yya  (Hello!) 04:30, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 08 April 2013
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">
 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 10:38, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Mistake
hey dude it was a mistake. i regret for doing so. i apologize. please let me know if it was a wrong one. thanks for notifying it. thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.207.220.36 (talk) 16:21, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Liverpool Girls High School.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Liverpool Girls High School.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. dave pape (talk) 14:17, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Hill at Netrokona 2.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Hill at Netrokona 2.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Psychonaut (talk) 14:53, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Ceramichill 5.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Ceramichill 5.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Psychonaut (talk) 14:59, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

Submission
I have this article for review. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Jared_Green 173.78.231.251 (talk) 18:44, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
 * ✅ Accepted.-- Pr at yya  (Hello!) 09:49, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Submission
I got this article for review. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Derek_Dimke 173.78.231.251 (talk) 05:38, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
 * ✅ Accepted.-- Pr at yya  (Hello!) 09:50, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

You've got mail!
The Anonymouse (talk &#124; contribs) 05:40, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
 * I sent you another e-mail back. The Anonymouse (talk &#124; contribs) 06:03, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
Arctic  Kangaroo  12:53, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Article
I got a article for review http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Aaron_Hester 173.78.231.251 (talk) 21:03, 14 April 2013 (UTC)


 * by someone else. I agree with him/her. Arctic   Kangaroo  15:00, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Another Submission
I this article for review http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Damario_Ambrose 173.78.231.251 (talk) 22:25, 14 April 2013 (UTC)


 * ✅ Arctic   Kangaroo  14:58, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 April 2013
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">
 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 20:15, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

One true faith
Hi, the material I removed was a partial duplicate of One true church, and is now there. 168.12.253.66 (talk) 17:21, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

, we moved your Teahouse host profile
Hello Pratyya Ghosh! Thank you for being a host at the Teahouse. However, we haven't heard from you lately, so our bot has moved your Host profile from the host landing page to the host breakroom. No worries; you can always just and our bot will move your profile back. Editing any Teahouse-related page will do the same thing for you. If you would prefer not to receive reminders like this, you can unsubscribe here. Thanks for your help at the Teahouse! HostBot (talk) 03:50, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

Pol Pot
"Premiership" is a neutral term and it is inappropriate to use a neutral term to describe the tenure of a person such as Pol Pot. Therefore your undo of my edit was a mistake, and I have reverted it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.234.185.147 (talk) 03:38, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
Mathnerd 101 (What I have done) (What have I done?) 03:55, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

Article
I got one aricle for a review http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Jeremy_Shelley 71.180.91.32 (talk) 05:48, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
 * ✅ Reviewed and Accepted. -- Pr at yya  (Hello!) 11:03, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Help test new SuggestBot design
We have developed an exciting new version of SuggestBot’s interface with some cool features! Volunteer to be one of the first users to try it and help us make it better by answering a short survey! If you’re interested in participating, leave us a message on SuggestBot’s user talk page. Regards from Nettrom, SuggestBot’s caretaker. 18:52, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the readership and quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale. For readership the scale goes from Low to High, while for quality the scale goes from Low  to High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:01, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 22 April 2013
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">
 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 12:34, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
Arctic  Kangaroo  10:30, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

SuggestBot beta test
Hi, and thanks for volunteering to test the new SuggestBot interface! You can find your suggestions and the survey on this page. Thanks again! Cheers, Nettrom (talk) 17:39, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi, from Italy
Hi Pratyya Ghosh, how are you? I'm Italian friend of Lodewijk Vadacchino and he told me I can write to you to ask to make a page in your Language. May I?

It will be just a little more than a stub only. I can pay my request with a translation of the same size from EN to IT, FR, PT or LMO.

Thank you very much to answer, have a nice week end

Rex Momo (talk) 11:26, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

P.S.: Usually I don't write in this Wikipedia, you'll find me easier in my italian page.


 * What's the name of your article?-- Pr at yya  (Hello!) 06:32, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Submission
I have this article for review. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Aaron_Hester 71.180.91.32 (talk) 08:31, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

The new page
Hi Pratyya Ghosh, thanks to your answer! The page is following here, I tried to take the best of the English page. You can take off utnill have a little stub, but for me the important are the 3 pictures, ok?

Thanks again for your precious help

Rex Momo (talk) 13:23, 28 April 2013 (UTC)


 * King Momo
 * ✅.-- Pr at yya  (Hello!) 13:59, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Another Submission
I have a article for review. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Tommy_Bohanon 71.180.91.32 (talk) 18:29, 30 April 2013 (UTC)