User talk:Praveshksingh

November 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Maharshi Mehi Paramhans has been reverted. Your edit here to Maharshi Mehi Paramhans was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sant_santati/message/331) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 10:36, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Baba Devi Sahab


Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Baba Devi Sahab, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. That's me!  Have doubt?   What I done?  09:33, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Baba_Devi_Sahab.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Baba_Devi_Sahab.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey (talk) 11:30, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Guru_Maharaj_1.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Guru_Maharaj_1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey (talk) 11:31, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Santsewiji.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Santsewiji.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey (talk) 12:15, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

AfD discussions
Greetings,, and welcome to Wikipedia's deletion process! Thank you for your contributions. As a newcomer, it may be helpful for you to read Wikipedia's deletion policy, and the pages describing the articles for deletion process, proposed deletion, and speedy deletion. Remember that deletion debates are not votes, and reasons matter, especially reasons relating to the central content policies of verifiability, neutral point of view, no original research, and what Wikipedia is not, and to the consensual community guidelines for biographies, corporations, music, and fiction. Also remember that deletion is not always the answer to a bad article. Feel free to drop me a line at my talk page if you have any questions. Again, welcome! AdventurousSquirrel (talk) 06:38, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: User:Praveshksingh/sandbox (December 20)
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [ Articles for creation help desk], or on the [ . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! The Ukulele Dude - Aggie80 (talk) 13:04, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Santsevi Paramhans concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Santsevi Paramhans, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Santsevi Paramhans


Hello Praveshksingh. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Santsevi Paramhans".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 19:16, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

Draft:Santsevi Paramhans
I am sorry, but now that I look at your new draft, I have to delete it again, because it is still largely copied from http://www.speakingtree.in/spiritual-blogs/seekers/science-of-spirituality/maharshi-santsevi-ji-paramhans-the-light-that-shone-the-way-180471?track=cntshem&sort=like. Wikipedia cannot accept material which is a copyright violation, for legal reasons we must delete it. If you own the copyright to this material and want to copy it, or quote sections from it, you must make a copyright release, as described at Donating copyright materials.

But that will not be enough because, although you have removed a few passages, what is left is still far too promotional in tone for an encyclopedia article. What you wrote for speakingtree.in was what I would describe as a "hagiography", full of admiration and expressing your opinion about what a wonderful person the subject was: "His modest disposition, magnetic persona, sweet charming voice, flawless pronunciation, captivatingly melodious rendition of devotional mystic hymns, captivating scholarly discourses..." etc. That is fine for a blog like that, but not for an encyclopedia, where a fundamental policy is WP:Neutral point of view.

You need to start with a clean sheet and write a plain description of the facts of Santsevi Paramhans' life, without any opinions. The reader of an encyclopedia article should not be able to tell what the author's personal opinion of his subject is. In this kind of writing, it is very good advice to take out all the adjectives. I suggest you ask for advice at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject India - ask them to point out some examples of acceptable articles about spiritual leaders like this, preferably articles that are at WP:Good article status, which you could use as a model.

One last point - when you ask someone to comment on an article or a draft, you do not need to copy the whole thing. Just give a link to it. If you put double square brackets round the name of a page, that will make a "Wikilink" to it - typing  Your first article  gives Your first article - which contains some good advice. JohnCD (talk) 23:20, 30 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Dear JohnCD,
 * Warm Regards!
 * Please accept my grateful thanks for taking pains to reply at length.


 * I understand that you are fully within your rights to delete the article again. However, I very humbly submit that the article on speakingtree.in site that you have referred is my own article. So, it should not be a case of copyright violation for what is there on speakingtree is my own article. I have removed the sentences that sounded like personal opinion and what is left looks fairly like an historic account. I have given dates also wherever required and have attached references as well.


 * So, it is my humble request that please don't delete the article again...yes, if you still feel that some sentences need to be modified, kindle suggest so and i will comply, but please don't delete the article...even if i write the article once again, it would only change the words or sentences and not the basic information. Maharshi Santsevi Paramhans lived in recent times and, therefore, there is nothing mythical about his life...So, please reconsider your decision...i m ready to incorporate any changes that you would suggest.


 * Hoping and praying for due consideration,


 * Kind regards!
 * pravesh (talk) 06:51, 31 December 2014 (UTC)Pravesh


 * I don't think you have read what I wrote above. Let me repeat:


 * Copyright: it does not matter how many times you say you wrote the original. All we know is that someone using the same username says so. That does not provide the legal certainty Wikipedia needs to be sure we are not violating the original author's copyright. The only way this material can be accepted is if the copyright owner follows the steps explained in Donating copyrighted materials.


 * Promotion: let me repeat just part of one sentence of your text:
 * "'His modest disposition, magnetic persona, sweet charming voice, flawless pronunciation, captivatingly melodious rendition of devotional mystic hymns, captivating scholarly discourses... '"
 * That is not a historic, factual account, it is an expression of admiration and love: eight out of twenty words are glowing adjectives of praise - fine for your blog, absolutely not for an encyclopedia. If you cannot see that, I am afraid you are too close to your subject, too involved with it, to be able to write about him in the neutral tone that Wikipedia requires as a fundamental policy.


 * JohnCD (talk) 22:14, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
 * JohnCD, this is old news, but I just found and revdeleted another copy of all this material on User talk:Gogo Dodo. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 18:48, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Maharshi Santsevi Paramhans


A tag has been placed on Maharshi Santsevi Paramhans, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. &#8213; Susmuffin Talk 10:12, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Maharshi Santsevi Paramhans
Hello, I have moved your article to draft space at Draft:Maharshi Santsevi Paramhans. The most important concern is that it needs to cite sources where you found information about Maharshi Santsevi Paramhans. Please read and understand referencing for beginners. It also needs a through copyedit. I see above that you have been trying for some time to get an article about this person included on Wikipedia. Perhaps it would be a good idea for you to spend some time in other topic areas so you get a feel for how sources are used and what sort of writing style Wikipedia is looking for. ~  ONUnicorn (Talk&#124;Contribs) problem solving 15:58, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

Rectifications Made
Dear ONUnicorn, Greetings! Have added the references and improved the article in so far as misspellings and grammatical errors are concerned. You are, therefore, requested to kindly restore the page. Regards! Pravesh

Speedy deletion nomination of Maharshi Santsevi Paramhans


A tag has been placed on Maharshi Santsevi Paramhans requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Daiyusha (talk) 18:31, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Maharshi Santsevi Paramhans


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Maharshi Santsevi Paramhans requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 05:43, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

Maharshi Santsevi Paramhans
While I understand that having an article of yours deleted is no fun, please do read Your first article and What we are not, as well as our policy on living persons in order to prevent it from happening again (or at least making it much less likely). Please do not keep attempting to recreate it repeatedly, as your editing privileges may be revoked as a consequence.

Thanks,

– John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 05:46, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

Maharshi Santsevi Paramhans
Hi! I saw your letter to Yunshui was posted to mainspace and nominated for deletion. You should write to his talk page here, instead of posting an article in the main encyclopedia. You should copy the letter you wrote while you still can, before it gets deleted. Mcampany (talk) 05:47, 28 December 2019 (UTC)