User talk:PravinthU1

Welcome!
Hello, PravinthU1, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Woolfell, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! McGeddon (talk) 17:34, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Proposed deletion of Woolfell


The article Woolfell has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No suggestion that the film meets WP:NFF.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. McGeddon (talk) 17:34, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Woolfell for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Woolfell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Woolfell until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. McGeddon (talk) 21:06, 27 October 2015 (UTC)


 * I'd recommend reading Articles for deletion/Woolfell and seeing if you can address the points raised there. If it can't be confirmed that Woolfell has commenced principal photography (perhaps because it simply hasn't commenced yet) then it is very unlikely that the article would be kept, however much material you'd added to it. --McGeddon (talk) 17:32, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Why the year ranges?
What is special about 2002-2003 as an exact range in the career of Silambarasan? He did work before that (but after 1999 when you claim his previous era ended). What happened in 2003 vs 2004 to make them entirely separate phases of his career (and likewise for 2008 vs 2010)? Except for "child vs non-child", which is an obvious stage of life, you would need a WP:RS to support these as distinct phases. DMacks (talk) 22:19, 2 January 2016 (UTC)