User talk:Praxidicae/Archive 1

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:37, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Scott Godin
Scott Godin is my band teacher and all these thing that I am writing are true. I don't know why u keep taking them off Sean.tersteeg (talk) 18:14, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

Contested deletion
This article should not be speedy deleted as being recently created, having no relevant page history and duplicating an existing English Wikipedia topic, because this is my user page and the requestor has requested this out of spite due to his numerous deletions of content on a self-promotional wiki article -- Chrissymad  ❯❯❯  Talk   20:38, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
 * I have reverted the edits by 2600:1:F418:BB6E:8C23:ED8A:90B2:A564 to your user page. In my opinion, that was just vandalism.  Deli nk (talk) 20:43, 28 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Thanks! It was retaliatory from an account that has been banned several times today due to creating self-promotional pages (and non-notable) for themselves.  Chrissymad  ❯❯❯  Talk   20:46, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Using template "uw-coi-username" on Emberonium
I'll be to the point: I believe you meant to use uw-coi. uw-coi-username is for someone with a username that violates the "implies shared use" guideline who has also created an article that their username implies a conflict of interest in. I've nearly done it myself too. Make sure to check the template preview before you post it. NOTNOTABLE (talk) 15:44, 1 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The article he/she created was called Emberonium, which I would think is a COI but is that only applied to groups/companies etc...? Like if I wrote a book called "ChrissyMad" and then created my UN, created an article, wouldn't that be a COI in both Username and content creation?  Chrissymad  ❯❯❯  Talk   15:46, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes, but look at the template. It explicitly talks about promoting companies and shared use usernames. (Frankly, I've been considering editing it so that it's more general.) NOTNOTABLE (talk) 17:01, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Ah, I see what you mean and agree maybe there needs to be a more broad warning or perhaps a discussion because I think the COI is limited and too specific at the moment because it doesn't cover subjects like my example, which seem to be the biggest issue here (like Aaron Christopher )   Chrissymad  ❯❯❯  Talk   17:06, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

G1 and G3
Just so you know, G1 is reserved for things that are actually incoherent or gibberish and no meaning can be derived - not poor english or ideas that are expressed poorly. G3 is when vandalism is very obvious - since it inherently assumes bad faith (an intent to vandalize Wikipedia), it shouldn't be used if there is a reasonable possibility the user wrote the article in good faith (even if the article is promotional/obviously invented/not significant). Appable (talk) 18:56, 6 December 2016 (UTC)


 * If you're referring to the G1 tag on Lisi de jaguey I'd consider random binary to be gibberish, is it not? I don't think that it was written in gf, nor do I think it was written maliciously. I can't recall anything that I've tagged recently g3 that wasn't vandalism (the only thing I tagged in the last hour was a troll page)  Chrissymad  ❯❯❯  Talk   18:59, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

about lisi de jaguey
sorry for the mess i made :( i'm new here. i try to delete the page that i made like a test minutes ago, but i could not find the option. (sorry for the english, is not my primary language). if you can delete, i would be nice :) from now i will use the sandbox page. sorry again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14ndy15 (talk • contribs) 19:05, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

No need to apologize! I'm not sure what your native language is but you might find it useful to write an article on that wiki language site! Chrissymad ❯❯❯  Talk   19:09, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Speedy on The Birkenhead Mafia
Hi Chrissymad -- I've deleted "The Birkenhead Mafia" but in future please tag negative unsourced articles about living individuals under G10 (attack pages) to get admin attention more quickly. You should also blank them. Cheers, Espresso Addict (talk) 19:42, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Lucki Starr
I see that you nominated Lucki Starr for AfD at the same time that I speedy deleted it.

This is at least the second go-round for an article on Starr. The first one was speedy deleted: on the surface, there appeared to be sources, but the sources never mentioned Starr. This version of the article looked to be the same thing over again, so I speedy deleted it.

I don't think this needs to go through AfD, but if you think it's worth me restoring the article to put get community consensus about the fate of this article, I will. —C.Fred (talk) 19:52, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

I wasn't entirely sure if it met CSD, so I did AFD but in retrospect, I agree with your consensus. It's not notable and the sources don't support the article itself. Chrissymad ❯❯❯  Talk   19:56, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Well, looks like it's back again anyway! Chrissymad ❯❯❯  Talk   20:04, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Bonobo (Slang) A1/NPP
Hi, it looks like you are trying to help out with patrolling new pages, which is great. I noticed that your speedy tag on Bonobo (Slang) doesn't meet the criteria there. CSD A1 is to be used only if you can't tell what the article is about. Something like an article titled "Bob Smith" with "The chair he sits on is white and pretty" as the only text. It's also good form to not tag an article like that within the first 30 minutes of creation because it would be biting the newcomers. It might be helpful for you to read through the tutorial at WP:NPP again. It deals with situations like this and links to other policies like WP:CSD. The general rule to follow with NPP is "if you are unsure, pass on it." It helps keep the patrolling accurate and not discourage legitimate newcomers from creating new articles. Thanks again for trying to help out. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:25, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Yeah I realize now that was a poor choice. It was kind of nonsensical (imo) but I also wasn't sure what it could fall under since it's more or less a non-notable subject but not covered by anything under notability.  Chrissymad  ❯❯❯  Talk   20:26, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
 * I added the A7 db-web tag to it because it appears mainly to be about web content that isn't notable. Like I said: thank you for trying to help with this. NPP is in backlog and we really do need all the help we can get. The policies can take some time to understand, so it might be good to spend more time reading and commenting at AfD and only tagging articles for speedy deletion that you are confident meet the deletion criteria. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:33, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

December 2016
Hello Chrissymad. Thanks for patrolling new pages – it's a very important task! I'm just letting you know, however, that there is consensus that we shouldn't tag pages as lacking context (CSD A1) and/or content (CSD A3) moments after they are created. It is also suggested that pages that might meet CSD A7 criteria not be tagged for deletion immediately after they are created. It's usually best to wait at least 10–15 minutes for more content to be added if the page is very short, and the articles should not be marked as patrolled. Tagging such pages in a very short space of time may drive away well-meaning contributors, which is not good for Wikipedia. Attack pages (G10), blatant nonsense (G1), copyright violations (G12) and pure vandalism/blatant hoaxes (G3) should of course be tagged and deleted immediately. Thanks. KGirlTrucker81huh? what I've been doing 21:03, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Pizzagate debunked fake conspiracy theory
Thank you for the compliment!

Please see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#Draft:Pizzagate_.28conspiracy_theory.29_moved_to_article_Pizzagate_.28conspiracy_theory.29 Sagecandor (talk) 16:09, 7 December 2016 (UTC)


 * There are a few dozen IPs/accts that have been adding pieces of "info" into other articles (I don't think are related, like actors etc...) accusing people of being part of this ridiculous Alex Jones tabloid article (I refuse to keep calling it anything else because that gives it too much credence.)  Chrissymad  ❯❯❯  Talk   16:14, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
 * What other pages? Sagecandor (talk) 16:15, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Let me go through my contribs and I'll list them.  Chrissymad  ❯❯❯  Talk   16:17, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Pizzagate vandals

 * Brendan Schaub by
 * Brendan Schaub by
 * Brendan Schaub by
 * Brendan Schaub by
 * Brendan Schaub by

There are definitely more but I didn't always fill out the edit summary so I'm going through other reversals now. Chrissymad ❯❯❯  Talk   16:26, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Requested semi protection at Requests for page protection. Sagecandor (talk) 16:28, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Okay that one got protected, any others? Sagecandor (talk) 17:17, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Deletion tagging
Hi again, just noting that it is typically bad form to tag something for deletion, speedy, PROD, or even AfD, almost immediately after it is created like you did at Ghulam Rasool Dehlvi. While the articles might end up needing to be deleted in the long-term, it often chills new editor trying to contribute, and could prevent Wikipedia from gaining content that is actually useful. Like I said above, the tutorial at WP:NPP is a very useful resource on dealing with this. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:02, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
 * I understand, however I didn't think this applied when a user continually makes new pages that fall into this category and are related in terms of notability or affiliation. Today, for example, there was a user who continued to make profile pages (as articles) for every member of a local bank, yet none were notable and it was merely an individual creating the equivalent of a company 'about us' website.  Chrissymad  ❯❯❯  Talk   20:05, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
 * The article I mentioned above was created by a sometimes editor who looks to be back from a long wiki-break, and I didn't see any other deletion notifications on his talk page other than the AfD you started. I haven't looked into it more than just a quick overview, and it very well might need to be deleted, but I don't have a strong opinion on that, but nominating it via AfD within two minutes of being created is good practice for NPP. and wanted to bring it up. Again, I'm appreciative of having more people doing NPP, but I also think it is important to give article creators a chance to build an article rather than having a deletion discussion started two minutes after it was created. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:14, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Hey Chrissymad. I'm actually also stopping by on a deletion issue. On Oliver Lavender, which I've deleted: inappropriate and useless with no place here? Absolutely. Blatant vandalism (as you tagged it)? Not at all – and it was a perfect A7 candidate.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 23:16, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Adding to this - vandalism speedy deletion makes a bad-faith assumption about the article. It is usually far more likely that the person did not know Wikipedia's goals or policies, and making a judgement like vandalism drives potential contributors away. Appable (talk) 02:09, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

CSD tagging
You tagged EXECUTIVE POWER BASED ON FEDERAL CONSTITUTION OF MALAYSIA as a copyvio. Firstly, that was a redirect that I created, not an article. I moved the actual article to a different name. So, you should not have notified me, I didn't create the article. You also probably should have tagged the actual article instead of the redirect. Also, the article wasn't really a copyvio, it was a close paraphrasing, and wasn't blatant enough that CSD G12 applies, you should have PRODed it or made an AfD. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 15:36, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Apologies - I tagged it as it was being moved (I hadn't refreshed) and it is very similar to the other copyvios on the exact same subject that have come through today and google revealed exact wording from several sources depending on which piece of the article was searched. See Sockpuppet investigations/Consti Group 7  Chrissymad  ❯❯❯  Talk   15:40, 9 December 2016 (UTC)


 * It wasn't exact, however. It wasn't blatant enough for a CSD. You can just slightly change the wording of some phrases, CSD is when the entire article's a copyvio, and when it's unsalvageable copyvio, you can't make some changes and fix the copyvio issue, as you could here. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 15:43, 9 December 2016 (UTC)


 * update if you're interested: Sockpuppet investigations/G16CONSTI  Chrissymad  ❯❯❯  Talk   15:53, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Blanking
Please note that users are almost always free to blank their own talk pages if they wish. See WP:OWNTALK. Widr (talk) 20:38, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

I thought they can't blank the warnings though? Chrissymad ❯❯❯  Talk   20:38, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
 * They can remove those too, see the link. Widr (talk) 20:39, 9 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Hiya Chrissymad - I see we've both had interactions with Pkbwcgs (which is what I'm assuming this section is about). Widr is correct, however you may have been confused with these warnings or notices which a user cannot remove -- samtar talk or stalk 20:44, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

December 2016
Please do not delete or flag potential "spoilers" in Wikipedia articles, as you did in the article List of The Walking Dead (TV series) characters. It is generally expected that the subjects of Wikipedia articles will be covered in detail, and giving a section a title such as "Plot" or "Ending" is considered sufficient warning to the reader that the text will contain revelations about the narrative. Deleting such information makes the article less useful for a reader who is specifically trying to find out more about the subject. For more information, see Wikipedia's guidelines on spoilers. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 17:21, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Warning
Stop warning that vandal--it's no use. Or, if you do, put an edit summary in there that signals it to admins who patrol Recent changes. See the AN thread--person needs to be blocked on sight, so report to AIV or whatever's fastest. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 19:02, 12 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Thanks, wasn't sure if there was a need to warn for a vandal like this.  Chrissymad  ❯❯❯  Talk   19:03, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
 * It's a waste of time. They won't benefit from any warnings--only from a good spanking when mom comes home. Drmies (talk) 19:05, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

hello sorry for vandalizing 198.140.242.233 (talk) 18:07, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!
thanks! Welcome to the club! I got my first set of vandals last week (and they decided to vandalize my instagram as well!)  Chrissymad  ❯❯❯  Talk

I've requested WP:SEMI on your page. Maybe that will get the point across to your new "friend". I'm posting the notice here so they can't quite tell what we're up to until after it happens. --Closeapple (talk) 16:07, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

Proposal Analyst
What are the skills required for a proposal analyst. This says related degree but doesn't mention it, this is the first time I am knowing about this job.185.156.172.154 (talk) 18:57, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Talkback
Dumfounded watsD (talk) 21:04, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

Like the New Signature
I like the new signature! :) I just noticed it on the AIV page. Just a heads up, I changed my username from RSTech1 to this. I promise I wasn't copying your signature lol...I was looking through the list of sig examples on the WP:SIGTUT page yesterday, and found one I liked. You're doing a great job with counter-vandalism. Keep it up! Hannibal Smith   ❯❯❯  23:34, 16 December 2016 (UTC)


 * No worries, I more or less did the same too! Thanks for the kind words! (also my sig emoji is pretty much my reaction to all the hilarious vandals today, particularly the one who threatened to sue Wiki because we kept reverting their incorrect edits to Doctor Strange (film) )  Chrissymad  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯


 * No prob! :) Lol, the emoji represents it perfectly. I know exactly what you mean. Lawsuit? Lol!! SMH. Uhmmmmm, yeah, because a lawsuit against Wikipedia will get real far. It's amazing how some people get pretty hot right out of the gate. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ <-- See what I did there.... Hannibal Smith   ❯❯❯  00:33, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

FYI
Your talk page message was modified (already reverted). --JustBerry (talk) 19:39, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

TY! Also this might be my favorite vandal yet! "You think I can be civil, I try to be civil but when I revert the edits I made, it keeps going back to the original version for Dr. strange, I demand the Kings Road be put back or I'll threaten a legal action, Wikipedia doesn't need incompetent people like Chrissymad who is being a irritating smart aleck.

Sincerely yours Unknown Person."

Chrissymad ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯


 * Not a problem! --JustBerry (talk) 20:10, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

Note from User
I am rasheed barsar. Allah Dita Barsar was me grandfather who was lived in phagwara when he was 52 years old the partition of punjab happens and he left the phagwara and came to faisalabad. But before partition he was only the largest land owner and the richest man of phagwara. He also made many textile industries in faisalabad. All my explanation is true — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rasheed Barsar (talk • contribs) 09:20, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

welcome to Wiki! Please read about COI and sources for more detail on why I reverted your edits. Chrissymad ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

A barnstar for you!

 * please see WP:PROMO, WP:ELPOINTS and WP:NPOV. I reverted the edits because it was also not sourced. Chrissymad  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Merry Christmas
Happy Holidays text.png Hello Chrissymad: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, CAPTAIN RAJU  ( ✉ ) 20:51, 23 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message

Hi
I thought everything i was putting was right that was what my brother told me an hes is cool!! Hamroxfordayzboiz (talk) 21:22, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Jahshaka page deletion
Hi there - trying to figure out how to get the jahshaka page that was taken down at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jahshaka back up ? i copied the text from the https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jahshaka and https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jahshaka pages to be as neutral as possilbe... please let me know how to submit to another editor to have it reviewed?

also if i get a name change on my account can i then submit updates ? we are not commercial and have been around forever - and not sure why they took down the mian jahshaka page and changed it to cinefx anyways !!!

i have tried to re-create it t

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JahshakaVR:Jahshaka

JahshakaVR (talk) 19:27, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

Kurdistan
Sockpuppet investigations/Aivarlukman (?). Thanks, GABgab 19:11, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Seeed Studio
Seeed studio got deleted so I've changed the CSD on Seeed Studio to A7/G11. Hope you're OK with that. Cabayi (talk) 14:26, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
 * of course! Thanks Chrissymad  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

BLP PROD
Just a note on the WP:BLPPROD you placed on Kara Mosher. I removed it because BLP PROD requires no sources broadly construed. The article had a link to her official webpage which makes the same claims as the article did. I've added an A7 tag to it, because the article asserts not credible claim of significance as a musician in my mind. Just letting you know for future reference re: sources and BLP PROD. Also, as an aside, thanks for all the work that you do. I've only commented on this page about removing deletion tags, but I notice you around a lot and really do appreciate all of the work you do :) TonyBallioni (talk) 18:54, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

James Jameson
How can I edit my post if you deleted it? This is about a commentator and industry expert I as a journalist interview as do others, so it'd be good to have a verifiable source for others. Risingupagain (talk) 16:47, 29 December 2016 (UTC)


 * I have not deleted any articles as I am not an admin. However the reason this was tagged for deletion again is because it fails to assert his notability. None of the sources, aside from one, so much as mention his name. Has there been significant coverage from independent, reliable sources? Chrissymad  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Yes, there are several external articles that I can link to that have him as an industry commentator. If I paste them here can you help me reinstate the article? I can't even find it to do so right now. Thanks. Risingupagain (talk) 19:16, 29 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Sure, if you can give me at least two, independent, reliable sources that are not just mentions, I'd be glad to try and help you, though I cannot undelete an article.  Chrissymad  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

http://www.fleetpoint.org/expertblog/how-fleet-managers-can-effectively-minimise-operational-risk/ http://www.shponline.co.uk/managing-risks-importance-cloud-based-solutions/ http://realbusiness.co.uk/hr-and-management/2015/06/26/why-health-and-safety-is-a-hot-topic-for-uk-businesses-right-now/ http://europe.chinadaily.com.cn/business/2015-09/24/content_21974743.htm https://www.worldcement.com/special-reports/17042015/in-the-spotlight-health-and-safety-by-rivo-710/ http://www.hsmsearch.com/page_651781.asp http://www.ifsecglobal.com/germanwings9-11-law-unintended-consequences/ http://www.communicatemagazine.com/features/2015-december/peoples-carbon/

Here you are, when you say you can't undelete an article, are you able to provide me a link to the deleted article so I don't have to write the whole thing again? Many thanks for your guidance! Risingupagain (talk) 09:05, 30 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The article was not deleted - see here:James Jameson (entrepreneur). I am not an admin though, so for future reference I wouldn't be able to provide any of that. With that being said, I would suggest strongly that you create a draft after going over this guideline for creating your first article so you don't run the risk of deletion. As far as those sources go, they are all interviews or written by the subject. I would not consider those to be adequate for an article without also having true, independent sources, which is why I think you should create a draft so you can get other editors opinions. Chrissymad  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Info about Baba Sundar ji
Hi, thanks for the trophy, but I'm not an admin. Page deletion has already been requested on that article. Chrissymad ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Hello Chrissymad, I am Mahshid kh that you left the COI alert on the talk page regarding the article "Marianne Schmid Mast". Thank you for your precise note. This article is not an autobiography. I took a look at the pages you offered me and I found useful information regarding the neutral point of view and took care of the following points carefully:

1.Avoid stating opinions as facts 2.Avoid stating seriously contested assertions as facts. 3.Avoid stating facts as opinions. 4.Prefer nonjudgmental language.

being more cautious, I have asked the editors to check the article again via the code. Thank you for your message Have a great new year! Mahshid
 * Hi there. An edit request should not be posted on user talk pages, instead, it should be posted on the article's talk page. Also, when requesting an edit, it means to propose changes to be made to the article on the talk page, which will then be reviewed by an independent editor (such as myself), and either accepted (and implemented by the person who reviewed it), or declined. An edit request should not ask for a review of the changes that have already been made to the article (if you have a connection to the subject in question, such changes should not be made in the first place). Regards, VB00 (talk) 07:30, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Your revert is out of line
If you want to revert the cnn article fine but do not revert something that someone reverted from me when he made no explanation. If you want to give a reason for the revert I will discuss it on the talk page as I will the cnn article link. Notice how I reverted his link but not yours. It was because there was an explanation and reverting that does not mean I am engaging in an edit war.

Contentcreator (talk) 01:06, 3 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Please do not leave information to talk to you on your comment page about the issue if you are just going to ignore it.
 * Contentcreator (talk) 01:42, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I am not at a computer at the moment and cannot respond fully. Please stop harassing and badgering me. I will get back to you when I can. Chrissymad  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

dewiki
Your opponent in the argument about a spam link in de:Fernsehturm Turkmenistan is the new account of this user, who fought agains everyone All discussions are useless and a waste of time. --Riklacrimaste (talk) 17:27, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks for letting me know. :) Praxidicae (talk) 17:29, 12 August 2019 (UTC)