User talk:Praxidicae/Archive 11

Draft Mfd
I forgot to log in, sorry my bad if it says user 2001. I noticed that you agreed to keep my draft and I really appreciate it. Thank you very much. I agree with you that KJP1 is trying to delete/nominate several suicide related articles and drafts for deletion on the basis that it's not encyclopedic. I have noticed that he was doing his usual nonsense complaints about my draft with another wikipedia administrator named Primefac. I have told him to look at other peoples suicide articles to prove that they have inappropriate information just like my draft but he just doesn't care. He just wants to prove to himself that what he is saying is correct. Can you please try your best to remove the Mfd template off my draft and can you please help me to move my draft into article space because I am trying my best to provide sufficient information into this article. I would really appreciate it.--Anonymous1941 (talk) 15:47, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Omer atab biography
Dear Chrissymad,

I have taken an initiative to create Omer Aftab page as my first project on Wikipedia. After thorough research, I found Omer Aftab to be one of a selfless person fighting for violence against women and specifically breast cancer awareness in Pakistan. And he has not been listed in Wikipedia although his achievements are worthy of being on Wikipedia.

You can search "Omer Aftab Breast Cancer" or "Omer Aftab Violence Against Women" on google or youtube to see him in action.

He has been internationally recognized and also received an award for his work from IPRA Golden Awared (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPRA_Golden_World_Awards) you can also check their website as well as the Wikipedia page that mentions his award.

Kindly guide me how to best achieve success of creating this biography page for Omer Aftab and avoid continuous deletion.

Appreciate you help.

More Links: The Public Relations Handbook khaleej times Violence Against Women and Girls: Lessons from South Asia Arab News Hasnain Bashir 11:45, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

FIFA Online 4
Why did you delete this reference? --Mondo Beer (talk) 07:15, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
 * because its a fan site, not a reliable source and refs. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  11:54, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!
Dear, I do not think I made any advertising or such other disruptive post. As I wrote for Arlington and their online courses in the following article so thought it might be helpful for the university. And over all of that, the current link is dead which you reverted again to dead. Requesting here to revert the changes you made. Either thank you!!! You can see the article here:

https://www.blogmonastery.com/2018/08/06/earn-a-degree-online-best-universities-around-the-world/

Mehedi--Mehedi Hossain Chowdhury (talk) 15:01, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Pushing your blog all over Wikipedia is the definition of spamming. Please stop. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  15:03, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Linkurious


The article Linkurious has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "clear promotional therefore DELETE. No historical value or of any other sort. No really any reason this article to exist in WP. Probably also of WP:COI from the major contributor of this article"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 188.4.85.230 (talk) 21:14, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
 * This is another PROD from the same IP block on an article created/edited by an editor involved in Articles for deletion/Emily L. Spratt (2nd nomination). See also Yuka Ishii. Bakazaka (talk) 23:28, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

metadata removal tool
There is nothing inappropriate in these links. Please stop removing them. I asked what's wrong with the links and received no reply. MaCobNi (talk) 13:23, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
 * It's refspam and not even remotely reliable. See WP:RS and WP:WTAF. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  13:24, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
 * The first link has a list of metadata removal software, stating main features and price. Useful for comparison. The second link is to a paper with a pretty thorough coverage of the subject. Both are reliable and give added value to the wikipedia article. MaCobNi (talk) 13:51, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
 * No, blogs are not reliable sources. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  13:56, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
 * It isn't a blog, merely a list of metadata removal tools. MaCobNi (talk) 14:02, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Really,, metadatascrubbing.blogspot .com is not a blog? CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  14:03, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Just because it's on blogspot doesn't makes it a blog. Take a look at it, afterwards read the article about blog, and then tell me yourself. MaCobNi (talk) 14:10, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
 * I do not need to read Blog to know that it's a blog. It's not subject to editorial oversight, it's not a reliable source and it's not going to be included on Wikipedia. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  14:11, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Partial revert
Hello Chrissymad, I partially reverted you and gave a rationale, but please let me know if you disagree with it. The book reference seems valid, and the link to the author's website was a deadlink. Best! --1l2l3k (talk) 13:18, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
 * I have reverted back prior to seeing this message as it's not at all a valid reference - merely being in a book doesn't make it RS and it's refspam by an SPA who is self-promoting his own works across this project CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  13:18, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
 * The fact that he is a SPA doesn't necessarily mean that he has a conflict of interest. I actually believe that he is a reliable source. What damage can Wikipedia have, if he is probably one of the best sources we have on Orthodoxy in the English language? On the contrary, you are removing those few sources we have. If you have concerns about the source being unreliable, you should seek consensus at WP:RSN, not remove. --1l2l3k (talk) 13:29, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
 * He is citing himself, his own book which is a direct conflict of interest and there is no proof that this is a reliable source. And yes being an SPA does literally mean he has a COI. Being in a *book* doesn't make it reliable automatically. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  13:30, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
 * And to add to that, it's the equivalent of WP:SELFPUBLISHED all hits for "St. Eadfrith Press" are his book that he's cited everywhere on Wikipedia. So, no, it doesn't need to go to RSN and him claiming to be an expert is meaningless to Wikipedia. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  13:38, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Self-published doesn't mean unreliable. Besides, I don't see many publications in English on Orthodox saints, with the exception of some translations. In general a source is better than nothing, and its removal is not improving wikipedia, it's just depriving it from some better support. Per policy Self-published sources can be reliable, and they can be used (except for claims about living people). Sometimes, a self-published source is even the best possible source...--1l2l3k (talk) 14:11, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
 * If you want to include it, the onus is on you to prove that it is a reliable source. The fact that there are few publications about any given subject doesn't mean we will or should include some random researchers self published material.  CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  14:14, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
 * And in addition to everything I've already said, it wasn't removed just for being self published, it is original research and does not appear to be a reliable source which is prohibited by policy. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  14:19, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
 * You provided a link to the book's Amazon page. What is in that page that tells you that it "does not appear to be a reliable source". Don't get me wrong, you may be 100% right, but what is it in the Amazon link that tells you it's unreliable? --1l2l3k (talk) 14:33, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
 * How about we do this the correct way round, . If you want to include this source on Wikipedia, YOU explain what makes it a reliable source and YOU explain what makes it appropriate for use. Nick (talk) 14:44, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Nick: I don't know if the source would be qualified as reliable or not. It's not very easy to do so that's why we have RSN. Normally, if Hutchinson, is a Theology PhD, that would be a good first step in being determined that he is RN, but that may be not sufficient, as a chair in a university may be seen as necessary too. Many wikipedians would go either way as to whether he is RS. My question was on the Amazon, if there is anything that makes that unreliable, as I became curious. If not, no big deal, and I won't fight this source, I'm not interested enough. Also, please do not capitalize your letters, it's not necessary, I can read your writing very well. Have a great day! --1l2l3k (talk) 14:49, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Take a look inside the book, it's pretty obvious why. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  14:53, 7 August 2018 (UTC)


 * You were having difficulty reading what Chrissymad wrote, so I thought I would ensure my comment was sufficiently clear. I, myself, am somewhat unclear on the situation (i.e I'm confused as fuck) but from what I can determine, you have absolutely no idea what makes a source reliable and absolutely no certainty at all that the source you were adding to an article was reliable, but were happy to add it back into an article anyway with an edit summary which described the source as a "good source". Is that an accurate and correct assessment of the situation, thus far ? Nick (talk) 14:54, 7 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Good means better than nothing, doesn't mean that I found it reliable. Never said so. And no, I had no trouble reading Chrissymad's responses, I was reading them just fine. I was just having a very fine conversation with Chrissymad, and then you stepped in, and started being rude, by using profanities. If me being here bothers you so much, I won't comment here anymore. --1l2l3k (talk) 15:05, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Then you are mistaken on how RS works - "means better than nothing" is not a standard on the English Wikipedia and we do not allow original research which is literally what his books are (and you can view this in the book directly.) Perhaps you shouldn't be assessing the suitability of a source when you're unfamiliar with these policies and couldn't even be bothered to review the source itself. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  15:07, 7 August 2018 (UTC)


 * , I was looking at it through google, and didnt' see many pages, just a summary on the saint, so it didn't look that bad, nothing exotic there, so I was wondering what was so bad about this book. Then I looked at the Amazon link that you sent and, initially, I couldn't understand why you sent me that link. Further I clicked on it, and, lol, the author thanks the Starbucks manager that allowed him to stay there and write the book. Ok, lol, after that I am 100% that this book is not reliable. Alright. Whew, that was a laugh! --1l2l3k (talk) 15:17, 7 August 2018 (UTC) Also, sorry for any distress that I may have created, it was not intended: in good faith I was trying to do the right thing, and try not to lose sourced material, but that source is definitely not reliable. See you around! --1l2l3k (talk) 15:25, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Muhammad Amin Mamaqani page.
Hi,

I don't know why are you just deleteing the page Muhammad Amin Mamaqani again and again.Just tell me what to do i will make the page acording to what you tell.I am creating it with references and you delete it every time.So please can you reply me on my talk page. Bye.

Tubi719 (talk) 19:37, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

SkillsUSA
Could you please tell me how my edits to SkillsUSA were spam? I was reverting the last remnants of an edit which I'm 99% sure was vandalism, but which didn't get reverted correctly. Was it the duplicate reference? I only noticed that after I'd submitted, and I didn't have enough time to fix it. CryptologicalMystic (talk) 13:14, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Smita Nair Jain
Sir, Please do see the notability:


 * Library of Congress Name Authority File: http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n2008206193.html
 * Virtual International Authority File: https://viaf.org/viaf/58564328/
 * International Standard Name Identifier: ﻿http://www.isni.org/0000000038913009
 * Katalog Der Deutschen National Bibliotek: http://d-nb.info/gnd/1161858962
 * OCLC Worldcat Identities: https://www.worldcat.org/identities/lccn-n2008206193/
 * Internet Movie Data Base: https://www.imdb.com/name/nm2434804/

Westland12 (talk) 15:12, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Just because a profile exists doesn't mean they are notable. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  15:14, 13 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Please do see the "further reading". I have put news papers articlesWestland12 (talk) 15:22, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

AQA Holdings Wiki Page
Hi i am just asking if you can keep the AQA Holding Page. AQA Holding is a registerd company and its also operates sepreatly like Lufthansa group or the American Airline Group. I am just asking if you can keep the page and stop reverting to how it was. Thank you
 * No. Consensus has been reached via several discussions. You were asked multiple times to stop your disruptive editing and you've persisted. See here. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  18:19, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Point Cloud Software page
Hi, why are you deleting content from the List_of_programs_for_point_cloud_processing page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.20.136.143 (talk) 14:01, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Because it's nothing more than list cruft and spam. See WP:WTAF, MOS:LIST WP:NOTDIRECTORY. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  14:29, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
 * What is your objective criteria for determining that? 92.20.136.143 (talk) 15:41, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Well, reading them, for starters. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  15:42, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
 * I don't think you understand the meaning of 'objective'. 92.20.136.143 (talk) 18:45, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
 * I don't think you understand the purpose of an encyclopedia. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  18:45, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Okay... 92.20.136.143 (talk) 18:49, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

re: AIV
Hi, can you give more information about the 2 users you reported? I don't see any edit that were caught in the filter nor any deleted contributions anywhere. Am I missing something? -- Luk  talk 19:52, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
 * They follow the identical naming pattern (See NSAMTR filter on meta) and normal spambot links that can be found at the SBL. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  19:53, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Well I learned that the spam blacklist was not included in the general user log, thanks! :) -- Luk  talk 21:34, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
 * you're welcome! I think it was/is non-public in that the generic "view all public logs" doesn't show it. I think the permission to view it is only in certain right bundles, but don't quote me on that. ;) CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  13:10, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

[AQA Holding S.p.A]
Hi AQA Holding S.p.A is a diffrent page from AQA Holding, Please get your facts right. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GUAE321 (talk • contribs) 19:57, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
 * You need to stop being disruptive. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  20:00, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alizzz
hi Chrissy

just been updating the wikipage and noticed that you removed a handful of sectinos including the musicians discography, production credits and some external links may i ask what the issues with these are?

best Daniel
 * Please see WP:INLINE and WP:ELNO. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  16:15, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Talkpage
Hi, you can post anytime on my talkpage, overreacted to a disagreement, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 15:27, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi! Is this in reference to something specific? CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  23:32, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Beyond Failure
Hi Crissy mad, the wiki page I created for my short feature film, Beyond Failure has been deleted by you. Please note this film is under production and addresses a very important subject in India. Request itbhe reinstated. Please let me know if there is any evidence you require. Thanks.

https://m.imdb.com/title/tt8864844/ https://m.facebook.com/Beyond-Failing-127226618095929/ Devashishdhall (talk) 08:31, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

COI
Hi Chrissy,

Thanks for your comment on Philippe_Parreno. The only reason I said that time had passed since the COI edited is that the user listed as a COI commented on the article talk page stating that there was some confusion, and that all their edits have been removed anyway. It was also something I read on the COI guideline page, so thought this was a good opportunity to start fresh and encourage some more edits since there is so much public info available for this artist - this page used to be a really good resource.

Fkw8711 (talk) 14:01, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Recent AIV reports
Hi Crissymad, When you say "see SBL", in an AIV report, what exactly is it you're asking an admin to do? There don't seem to be any edits, deleted edits, or filter log hits for any of the three accounts you reported. Is there some other "SBL log" that shows attempted edits that isn't in the filter log? The fault appears to be mine, because User:Edgar181's reply means he sees something too, but I've poked around a little and can't find where I'm supposed to look. --Floquenbeam (talk) 14:47, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
 * SBL is the spam blacklist + reported as a bot as it is identical to spambot behavior and the normal spambot links. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  14:53, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
 * These are not random reports either, I should clarify. They are without a doubt spambots and there has never been a single instance of a good faith addition of the links they attempted to add. They also meet every criteria of a global spambot pattern as you can see with the NSAMTR filter on Meta. In either case, I've requested a global lack since they meet that threshold. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  14:55, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Sorry, you're going over my head. First, I figured out SBL mean spam blacklist, but I don't see where I can look at the reports of attempted spam link additions. I would have thought it would show up in the edit filter, but it doesn't.  Second, I have no idea what a NSAMTR filter is; either it's new since I was last active on AIV, or it's specialized and not widely known.  While there are no doubt many admins more up to date than me on all this, when you make reports like this on AIV with no links or context, admins who don't know all this SBL stuff aren't going to be able to help. --Floquenbeam (talk) 15:02, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
 * SBL is not new and neither is the filter (it's a global filter and I don't have access rights.) The SBL is located in the public log section of any given user under "spam blacklist". This is a standard bot behavior and has been long established also by filter 499.  CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  15:06, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Special:Log/spamblacklist shows the attempted edits from the three editors in question. I can see that each of these editors made one attempt each to add a blacklisted link.  But since I don't see multiple accounts trying to add the same link, I think this is simply too little information for admins at WP:AIV to go on.  I realize that there is a longer term pattern of spamming of these links (otherwise they wouldn't be blacklisted) but without knowing the history (and no way of easily learning that history), it's hard to act on one attempted edit.  If these accounts typically make one spamming attempt then abandon the account, which seems likely here, then is it worth your time reporting them or admins' time blocking them?  -- Ed (Edgar181) 15:28, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
 * These are not standard spammers, they are spambots, so yes, they should be reported blocked and globally locked. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  15:29, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
 * FWIW, I’m pretty familiar with spambot patterns, so I always block on sight locally and think admins should if they’re aware of how spambots work: one edit on any project is enough for a steward to globally lock, and we aren’t actually dealing with real people here. That being said, stewards are more familiar with dealing with these, and reporting them on meta or in is often more effective than AIV simply because most local admins aren’t familiar with this. I also don’t think admins who aren’t familiar with spambots should decline the reports, but I also decline every “genre warring” report at AIV since I don’t think it is a real thing, and that pisses people off too... TonyBallioni (talk) 15:50, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Tags
Hi, you have added a template message to Restricted Code citing

1. A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject. (August 2018) 2. This article contains content that is written like an advertisement. (August 2018) 3. The topic of this article may not meet Wikipedia's general notability guideline. (August 2018)

I edited this page substantially, to remove several things that I thought might be considered "like an advertisement", and leave behind only factual statements, including adding an additional reference to one remaining statement. So I considered (2) dealt with.

I have no idea how to counteract (3) as it is clearly your opinion, but I could cite dozens of pages that exisit on wikipedia for very similar bands, who are not any more noteable than Restricted Code - a band that released several records on major independent record labels, appeared on BBC broadcast sessions and toured throughout the UK and Europe playing major venues.

As for (1), yes I am conntected, but whilst I knew that meant you had to add or edit content carefully I did not think that was a reason to stop publication of the page: after taking the action to resolve your issue (2) I removed your template but subsequently you threatened me with closure of my Wikipedia account if I do so again. So what else do I have to do to have this minor but important encyclopedia page published?

TomCannavanTomCannavan (talk) 18:07, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
 * The fact that you edited them at all is the reason for those tags - you have a direct conflict of interest and it's highly promotional. Please review WP:COI and WP:AUTOBIOG. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  18:08, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Apology from me
I am sorry for reverting you on the windmill article last week. I also shouldn't have left that condescending edit summary toward you in the revert. You are smart, intelligent, hard working and you were right to revert me. I studied up recently on article leads and how I have to source every edit (even things I feel are well known) and feel I am getting better at it. Thank you for pushing me in the direction. JC7V -constructive zone  19:07, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Questions on reverts
Hi, I have gone through my updates again and I was wondering why you reverted two of my edits today. I think they were improvements to the existing content Adewale1983 (talk) 19:15, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

At the risk of being an intrusive ninny muggins...
Hi,

Obviously feel free to ignore this if irritating, but I was just wondering if there was a reason you weren't an admin? I see you in all the places I do things and you're always both active and really helpful to everyone else, and I'd imagine you do even more if you have OTRS rights.

It just seems you'd be great at it :)

Nosebagbear (talk) 19:49, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

(AfC) Requesting review for Draft:Moideen_Koya_K._K.
I believe I have brought this draft to a very acceptable state by following the comments from a few reviewers. I request you to please review the page and move it to the articles section. This is my first article and I am pretty keen on wanting to see it get accepted. Please let me know if it needs any more improvements. Thank you. Ubhasrk (talk) 08:16, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Well said.
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links. Well said. Let me introduce myself, I am a professional musician who teaches music locally, when searching for useful instructional material I found the website whose link I put in the article 'major scale'. i inspected the other external links and found out that the first link was a dead link, the second link points to a website which explains something about major scale. So I decided to add my link (not my website/ affiliate link) so people can benefit from it. It looks like people here did not get my good intentionJEric94 (talk) 15:28, 23 August 2018 (UTC).
 * It's not an indiscriminate collection of links. Please see WP:EXTERNALLINKS. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  15:29, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Wiki It's not an indiscriminate collection of links
It's not an indiscriminate collection of links. Please see WP:EXTERNALLINKS. Read that a hundred times. Just out of curiosity I wonder, why the other two links are not deleted? Sure one of the link is a dead link and nobody bothers fixing it and people just because they don't like my new link they decide to get rid of it without understanding its quality. Do you know any real administrators I can talk to?JEric94 (talk) 15:53, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

New User
A new user has just appeared and, in constructing its user page, it included this diff. This strongly suggests that this user might be one and the same as "The Vixen". The editing behaviour is anomalous for a new user and when I checked the inward links to The Vixen, a list on one of your sub-pages popped up. I strongly suspect socking or recreation of a deleted article. If you can throw any light on this, that would be great. Apologies for the lack of linking but I thought a more stealthy approach might be better. Regards  Velella  Velella Talk 17:37, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
 * That is indeed . I've requested glock. Thanks! CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  17:38, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Ashwin Vinayagamoorthy Page - Unable to upload the full picture
Hi Chrissy! First of all thank you for evaluating my request for the page Ashwin Vinayagamoorthy and letting me know how to improve it. In the process I've stumbled on an error where for some reason the bottom half of the picture is greyed out. Any idea how to sort this out? Thanks in advance! :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kausthub Ravi (talk • contribs) 09:14, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Sattari Jame Mosque
Dear, Sir I want to submit my page and move draft to article.my page is written about a village principal mosque,so please submit my request and move to article.I am new user please help me to this article submit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by J3492 (talk • contribs) 16:17, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

User:RohitSingh665
I wanted to let you know about this mentioned user, he is recreating many articles who are previously deleted for G5 and disruptly moving pages like of Elli Avram. User:KaramjitSingh338 is previously blocked for same behaviour. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 39.44.84.227 (talk) 09:40, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

Elizabeth Cadell
I declined your prod on Elizabeth Cadell. While I'm having trouble finding sources online that are worth adding, I'm finding a whole lot of mentions that lead me to believe that she's notable enough for an article, once we track down the sourcing. I added a couple of Kirkus reviews, and a Powells.com interview with Nancy Pearl to help support the article. -- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 16:11, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
 * I also checked a library, newspapers etc...and came up with virtually nothing useful. The Kirkus reviews are something but I don't find that they lend themselves to notability in this case as it's just a collection of 2-3 sentence reviews. I'll nominate for AFD but will withdraw if you are able to find suitable sources. As a side note, I'm not sure any interview will help this article. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  16:16, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

Nitta Gelatin India Limited
Sir, Can you kindly quote the major edits that need to be included in the draft article. Sachinlal0505 (talk) 17:11, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

kurdish dog is specefic article
Hello My friend. This article have a authorized refrences And this dog breed is a different dog breed from all other : For example : kangal,anatolyuan shepherd ,alabai and so on. I am do many reaserchs to know this old dog breed. In fact anatolian shepherd has not any any Simillarity to ancient assyrian dog and story of a molloser is a lie. You can see history of the kurdistan area (assyrian capital center) All clay tablets found in kurdistan cities .they are Not founded in turkey. All features compare to kurdish dog breed. But not simila to any other dog shepherd. I can explain every thing (Truth history fact) Thank you very much Mohamad137026 (talk) 20:00, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
 * "Authorized references?" You're copying word for word from this site, which so far as I can tell is not even a reliable source. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  20:01, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion contested: Seshadripuram Institute of Management Studies
Hello Chrissymad. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Seshadripuram Institute of Management Studies, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article appears to have been edited by another editor to eliminate the copyvio. Thank you. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 22:46, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
 * this is the third time you’ve removed a g12 and have not requested Revdel. Please stop patrolling g12 if you’re not going to actually address the violations. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  22:52, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

Requesting Re-Review : Ashwin Vinayagamoorthy
Hey Chrissy, first of all thank you for evaluating my article. I've made all the changes as mentioned with note of reliable sources and references. This is my first article and I am really looking forward to getting it accepted. Please let me know if it needs any improvements. Thank you so much. Kausthub Ravi (talk) 06:18, 30 August 2018 (UTC)Kausthub Ravi

Please let the West Coast Racers page be, as this is already a notable enough project and people will likely add on to it with more news sources, images, and appropriate refs. In the meantime, you are disappointing the coaster community, and I suggest you let it be so it can grow and be read. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Erik James Kaspersetz (talk • contribs) 20:05, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

ANI discussion
I have started a discussion at WP:ANI. Fram (talk) 05:50, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Women in Red
Hi there, Chrissymad, and welcome to Women in Red. If you want to have a go at writing biographies, you might be interested in our Ten Simple Rules. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 07:37, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

September 2018 at Women in Red
--Ipigott (talk) 07:39, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

"I never thought I'd be able to say this but, per Ritchie" I resemble that remark! :-P Anyway, I'm pleased to see you've started doing stuff at Women in Red. Contrary to the yelling I've had from third parties on this talk page and elsewhere, I am not averse to you running at RfA full stop and have never expressed the view you should never be an admin, ever. If you can get some content under your belt and understand why a softer and diplomatic touch is a good thing to have at times, then I'd be happy to point you at WP:AIV, WP:SPI and WP:RFPP and say "have at it". A key point is you are interested in stuff that bores me to tears, and that's a big plus point for me, and if we get to the stage where I would support you, I'm pretty sure about 200 other people would follow suit. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  18:16, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

2018 Chemnitz stabbing attack: Why did you undo my edit?
Hi Chrissy, I made a minor edit to the article about the "2018 Chemnitz stabbing attack". I removed a comment that claimed the term "Lügenpresse" was a Nazi creation. This is simply not true, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lying_press#History. I was surprised to see you had undone my minor edit and I'd like to know why? I was also surprised to find that I'm no longer able to edit that page, I'd like an explanation for that too? 2602:306:C414:C120:9527:2685:1E23:D243 (talk) 20:27, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
 * That sentence has been restored to the article. Your edit was removed as collateral damage along with some other quite horrific material that had been added to the page by a bunch of IPs. Accordingly, people without accounts are unfortunately no longer able to edit that page. If you have any other things you would like to add, you may request them at Talk:2018 Chemnitz stabbing attack. Brad  v  20:32, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

WikiCup 2018 September newsletter
The fourth round of the 2018 WikiCup has now come to an end. The eight users who made it to the final round had to score a minimum of 422 points to qualify, with the top score in the round being 4869 points. The leaders in round 4 were:


 * Courcelles scored a magnificent 4869 points, with 92 good articles on Olympics-related themes. Courcelles' bonus points alone exceeded the total score of any of the other contestants!
 * Kees08 was second with 1155 points, including a high-scoring featured article for Neil Armstrong, two good topics and some Olympics-related good articles.
 * 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 Cas Liber, with 1066 points, was in third place this round, with two featured articles and a good article, all on natural history topics.
 * Other contestants who qualified for the final round were 🇲🇭 Nova Crystallis, Iazyges,  SounderBruce,  🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿 Kosack and 🇺🇸 Ceranthor.

During round four, 6 featured articles and 164 good articles were promoted by WikiCup contestants, 13 articles were included in good topics and 143 good article reviews were performed. There were also 10 "in the news" contributions on the main page and 53 "did you knows". Congratulations to all who participated! It was a generally high-scoring and productive round and I think we can expect a highly competitive finish to the competition.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck, and let the best editor win! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66, Vanamonde and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:31, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Rollercoaster
Please let the West Coast Racers page be, as this is already a notable enough project and people will likely add on to it with more news sources, images, and appropriate refs. In the meantime, you are disappointing the coaster community, and I suggest you let it be so it can grow and be read. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Erik James Kaspersetz (talk • contribs) 20:05, 30 August 2018 (UTC)


 * clearly you didn't read any of the edit summaries, so i've nominated for deletion. Also Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Please sign your edits and follow standard WP:MOS and add them to the bottom of talk pages in their own section. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  20:09, 30 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Dynamite (roller coaster) created today by same editor, following creation of Articles for deletion/West Coast Racers and interactions. Editor is not understanding... (Didn't have time to create a separate AfD, apologies) Shenme (talk) 06:21, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
 * , I also found Copperhead Strike had been created. I had sent Dynamite (roller coaster) to AFD Articles for deletion/Dynamite (roller coaster) --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 21:06, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Edit: All three upcoming roller coasters had been sent to AFD:


 * Articles for deletion/West Coast Racers
 * Articles for deletion/Dynamite (roller coaster)
 * Articles for deletion/Copperhead Strike


 * --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 21:11, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Have a Heart Compassion Care
Could you please give a reason for your speedy deletion request? If you compare this article to those of the companies listed by wikipedia in the same category on the page, you will see that there are more sources and information and it in no way is "promotional."

Please see the article on MedMen, a very similar company. This is what I used as a basis to make mine.

What can I change to make it not promotional in your eyes?

Thank You.

BenHKingESQ (talk) 09:48, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

On PolySwarm
I added multiple citations to the Draft:PolySwarm article and included a new section on the strategic approach of the company to open the marketplace to everyone, something that will help disadvantaged minorities and women. This new approach is notable in the cybersecurity world where most of the work is siloed. There are also a few tweaks to make the tone more neutral. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:14D:4100:12FD:D481:9F53:2F4A:4806 (talk) 12:50, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Removing maintenance
Why are you undoing these edits? I’ve removed the maintenance template after clearly addressing and outlining how I’ve corrected the issues in the article. ZoltanAlright (talk) 19:35, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Because the COI still exists and you're not adding remotely reliable sources. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  19:36, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Baggalútur
You have asked for the speedy deletion of Baggalútur, Wikipedia article on one of the biggest and long-standing bands of Iceland, an article I had created in January 2014. The reason given for the "speedy" being a copyright violation from a so-called page https://play.google.com/store/music/artist/Utangar%C3%B0smenn?id=Aoq2hsbxum5lfn5kokwapyjpoc4&hl=en a page about a mere one album and tracklist, whereas the page I created enumerates 11 albums by the band from 2005 to 2015. The page you indicate also says: Description provided by Wikipedia under Creative Commons Attribution CC-BY-SA 4.0 meaning they had taken from our Wikipedia page at a later date, and not that we were copying from them. And now those lines they copied from us at Wikipedia are grounds for speedy deletion of our Wikipedia page to deprive our readers of vital information about an Icelandic band selling 11 studio albums and countless hits on Icelandic charts over the years? And how about this song "Mamma þarf að djamma" staying 13 weeks at number one in Iceland becoming the biggest hit of Iceland that year? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DH4lVfueYF4 You should seriously reconsider what is just a rush job of a vital article, a judgement made on totally erroneous grounds as I indicated above. A brief look at the Icelandic page of the article will also prove the great notability of the band werldwayd (talk) 20:11, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Notable or not it's insanely promotional so it doesn't address the other side of the speedy which is G11. If it's a vital article, you should have no problem finding appropriate sources and neutral wording. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  20:13, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
 * To do that as you requested, the speedy deletion should be removed and we must be given enough time. Google Play copies thousands of articles from us, so blindly following texts from there to blame us is out of place. I've reread the article and it just describes the band in very few words and no promotion whatsoever. I am not from Iceland and have no relation whatsoever. You should spend more time on articles and the effort editors put to prepare article about non-English subjects where almost all the literature is in local language, before issuing such value judgements. It hads a few facts and a listing taken from the Icelandic page. What is so promotional about that, if I may ask. I will work on this urgently to save it from oblivion, but a little consideration to fellow colleagues should have been considered. The fact of the matter is that this article has been here for years and there is no need to speedy delete it. werldwayd (talk) 20:22, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Many thanks. Much appreciated. On to other articles then. One article more, one article less, who cares. English Wikipedia readers do not need to be "promoted to" about an Icelandic band they shouldn't care about I guess. werldwayd (talk) 20:50, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

ICOC HotNews
I see you had some questions about this as a RS. It is a church newspaper with an editorial board and a professional journalist writing articles for them. Last time I checked those constituted RS, particularly for non-controversial matters like membership numbers. Why the concerns? JamieBrown2011 (talk) 05:01, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
 * To be clear, this is the edit I am referring to If you don't have reason to claim NRS, I am inclined to revert, but would love to hear your thoughts. JamieBrown2011 (talk) 07:03, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Request on 11:30:24, 6 September 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Vishalinfidigit
Hi Chrissymad,

Thanks for updating about the COI (Conflict of Interest). Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest

I have read this page & would like to disclose about the COI.

Zivame is our client & we do Search Engine Optimization (SEO) for them. We discovered that they don't have any Wikipedia Page. Zivame is a famous lingerie brand & have multiple outlets within the different region in India. Therefore, we took this opportunity to create a page. Asked Zivame team to collect strong Notability URLs more than 5 in the count. Later, we have updated the content as per the Wikipedia Guidelines. And we were waiting for the review. In terms of the Costing: "Editors with a COI, including paid editors, are expected to disclose it whenever they seek to change an affected article's content. Anyone editing for pay must disclose who is paying them, who the client is, and any other relevant affiliation; this is a requirement of the Wikimedia Foundation. Also, COI editors should not edit affected articles directly, but propose changes on article talk pages instead."

We didn't ask any additional cost from Zivame team. It's normal monthly billing which we charge as basic SEO with Indian standard rates.

Feeback: Prior Submit Experience:
 * Is this information good enough to make this Zivame Page live?
 * If there are any changes in content than please address it so that I will try my best to keep it natural & neutral
 * 1) I did try adding Infidigit Consultant Pvt Ltd Page, however, it was promotional / less notability it got rejected. Now I am waiting for more notability sources so that I can try it again.

Conclusion: I like Wikipedia very much, have read lots of articles & also helped me a lot in everything. Therefore, in return if I can contribute something nothing like it.

Do let me know your thoughts on how to make this page live. Just started with Wikipedia & will try to add value to it.

Best Regards, Vishal Gohel

Vishalinfidigit (talk) 11:30, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

hedgewars
Is this a bad joke? Your review took 5 min max and i should take this serious? Wont accept your singular.uninfomed opinion. Ps: read about the validity of primary sources in our policiesShaddim (talk) 15:06, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Because it takes two minutes to see that not a single one of those sources are useful. They're almost exclusively primary and/or download links/non-reliable. You need to tone down your attitude. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  15:08, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
 * you should tone done your un-policy based fast-shoots. I'm long enough here to know the rules and to notice bullshit authoritarian grandeur. Shaddim (talk) 15:26, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
 * , If you won’t accept her “singular.uninformed opinion”, will you accept my opinion as well as hers? The article is not ready for the mainspace, largely in part of no reliable sources. Vermont (talk) 15:10, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
 * no, that is not the question at all. The question is, if the article is addresses a notable topic. The game exists for years, is in active development, has million of dpwnloads , hundredthousand of inclusions on coverdisks, so yes i believe it is notable by popular impact. The “indirect" but for admins convenient way for assesing notability are so called "reliable" sources. The article has, so i want to see the indibidually discussed or this is not an review but just stomach feelingShaddim (talk) 15:26, 6 September 2018 (UTC)


 * I'd also not call my opinion "singular" as it's been deleted nine times and been subject to two AFDs. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  15:13, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
 * if you would have done a proper review you would have noticed that the articled changed since then alot. So, no, not good work.Shaddim (talk) 15:26, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
 * If you read through WP:RS you'll understand it hasn't changed in the slightest to warrant an article. The sources are utter and total garbage and it seems to me like you have an issue understanding what a reliable and acceptable source is. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  15:27, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
 * i'm knowledgable wit wp:rs very well. Your review and nuanced understanding of rs is the only thing here which is utter garbage. Shaddim (talk) 15:30, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Right, which is why it's been deleted nearly a dozen times and via two AFDs. I suggest you ask at WP:RSN since you do not seem to understand what RS actually is. Please leave my talk page now as there's no evidence this conversation is going anywhere. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  15:32, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
 * no question, i will escalate this. And i consider also complainimg about your unprofessional behaviour like significant disrzptive edit decissions in second cadence or unilaterally ending ongoing discussions. Bad work. Shaddim (talk) 15:50, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
 * (edit conflict) Well... just from a brief review of some of your edits, even I can tell you have no idea what WP:RS means.   15:34, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Escalate it to what? You have shown that you haven't the slightest understanding of what WP:RS is and when you were challenged, resorted to petty attacks, when my edits were supported by several editors. I also asked you to leave the conversation alone on my talk page but if you feel the need to take it to one of the boards, be my guest but i'd start at WP:RSN. Please also show me where I have been disruptive before you continue casting aspersions and hinging on personal attacks. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  15:56, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Contested speedy
Hi. I've contested the db-madeup speedy of Common Attributes. The reason I gave in the edit summary was: ''Finding sources that call this "Samanya-guna", e.g. https://www.cs.colostate.edu/~malaiya/jaingloss.html, so it doesn't seem to be WP:MADEUP by the author. Maybe I'm wrong, but per WP:SYSTEMIC and probable lack of English-language sources I think this deserves an AFD at worst.'' I don't have NPP rights, so you may wish to un-patrol the article. Thanks. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 22:53, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Well, has now moved it to draftspace. Probably for the best. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 23:16, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Yep. It's possible this topic deserves an article, but it's too early to judge. Brad  v  23:22, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Intel Graphics Technology
That I need to do to add Intel HD Graphics 4600 (Haswell) decoding possibilities to Intel Graphics Technology? Coool (talk) 18:33, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

Rodingboy - Deleted external link(s)
Hi, you left me a message that you have removed some external links as 'not suitable for an encyclopedia'. It would help to know what these links are(were), so I can respond to your action. Thanks! Rodingboy — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rodingboy (talk • contribs) 13:14, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
 * You are mass adding a random collection of links across several articles, this is considered spamming, please stop. I have removed them again. Please see WP:LINKSPAM and WP:ELNO. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  13:56, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

Hi, This is very mysterious. Today, for the first time in many months, I have made some edits - but only to a couple of pages relating to the German writer Alfred Doeblin. I have added just a few very relevant links to just those pages. I have NEVER spammed Wikipedia! Two hypotheses: 1.the system is somehow copying my edits across other pages, or 2.someone has hijacked my account, in which case, how do we stop this recurring? Grateful for your advice! (UTC)RodingboyRodingboy (talk) 17:07, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

Hi Chrissymad, I've now spotted on the Alert page the exact deletions you've made to my edits of some pages related to the great German writer Alfred Doeblin. You state that you have deleted these because you deem them to be 'mass adding of random links', i.e. spam. Please explain why SPECIFIC LINKS to a website that provides interested users of Wikipedia with further material RELEVANT to this writer constitute (a) links unsuitable for an encyclopedia and (b) random spam. You appear to be a very experienced Wiki editor, so I look forward to learning exactly what I have done wrong here. The Wiki guidelines don't seem to indicate that I have acted illegally. Rodingboy (talk) 09:01, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

If you want to talk spam/promo...
Look no further than Chuck Feeney. Primefac (talk) 04:00, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

Reverting spam
Hello. I noticed that you reverted spamlinks on Whitefield, Bangalore but didn't warn the IP. To help keep track of which external links are being regularly spammed, and thus candidates for being blacklisted, it would be of great help if you would warn the user/IP and add the external link to the warning (formatted like this: ) since the spammers will then show up when an external link search is being made (like this). I posted a warning and the external link in this case, since I happened to notice the revert, but I'm not always online. Cheers, - Tom &#124; Thomas.W talk 10:57, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Articles for Creation: InsideSales.com
Hi. I'm having trouble understanding why the article InsideSales.com is being declined due to resources. Your first comment was about unreliable sources, so we found better sources, Yahoo Finance, Forbes, WSJ, Bloomberg, Gartner, Business Insider, Fortune, INC.com, etc. But then you mention that we just added the same advert back in (which isn't true we added additional sources to what was include previously). Can you help me understand what need sto be done to improve this article? Thank you. Ryanbreneman (talk) 16:04, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Question
I have a question for you, but I didn't want to publicly post it. Can you email me? CoachBriceWilliams at gmail Coachbricewilliams28 (talk) 17:43, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Due to privacy concerns and for the sake of being transparent, I do not communicate off wiki. Sorry. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  17:45, 10 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Fair enough. So in your edit comment you said the word "US" when communicating with Jaime. That is suggestive you are in the ICC and postulated yourself up against the ICOC/Jaime. Are you? If not, why say "US?" Coachbricewilliams28 (talk) 17:48, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
 * I think you've misread what I said, assuming you refer to this edit. I said in their "about us" section, which is on the source in question under "about us." I have absolutely no affiliation with whatever group you're referring to. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  17:55, 10 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Ok awesome! haha I read "about us" and read in not as the topic section, but as you were speaking on behalf of one of the groups! hahah too funny. Ok, ty. Coachbricewilliams28 (talk) 18:01, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Unwarranted assumption
I see that there are currently messages on this page from two different editors who address you as "sir", and another one in your latest talk page archive. I, on the other hand, have not been addressed as "sir" in at least the last 1000 edits to my talk page. I wonder why so many people assume you are male. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 14:38, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
 * I wonder daily myself since I've never met a male named "Chrissy" ;) CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  14:41, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Which reminds me, maybe I should add in big bold letters "PLEASE DO NOT ADDRESS ME AS SIR." CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  14:41, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Chrissytopher? 🤷 - TNT 💖 14:43, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
 * I mean... it does have "Chris" in part of the name :-P  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   14:42, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Chrissy McKaigue is the only male listed at Chrissy. Home Lander (talk) 14:59, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Ironically,, I did not think to check Wikipedia. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  15:00, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Don't forget about Chrissy Boy. Natureium (talk) 20:13, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Personally, I am happy not to be addressed as "sir", because to me it has a feel of cringing sycophancy, as well as being stiff and over formal. However, the fact that you get it so often and I so rarely puzzles me. I have now checked back and the last time I got a "sir" on my talk page was in May 2017, not far short of 2000 talk page edits ago, while you get it quite frequently. What do I do that discourages editors from calling me "sir"? There must be something. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:06, 30 August 2018 (UTC)


 * You could always do like did and put the “obnoxious pink userbox” up. I’ve been told it works :p TonyBallioni (talk) 15:09, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure, Mrs. Watson. You could always add "sir" to your signature, and take out that pseudonym part. Drmies (talk) 20:08, 30 August 2018 (UTC)


 * I read this conversation and thought of Peppermint Patty telling Marcie to "stop calling me sir"! Just sayin' Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  18:03, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Well spotted, . I had forgotten that. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:17, 6 September 2018 (UTC)


 * For a very long time, I also thought Chrissy is a male editor; as nickname for chris/christopher. Now i think it is short for Christabella/Michelangelo/Christine. I think it depends on what type of editors you are dealing with. Most of the indian editors tend to use sir/madam. Especially the paid ones. — usernamekiran (talk)   11:56, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
 * yes, in fact when I told a couple of members of my family about this I said that I bet the editors were Indian. Perhaps the answer to my question is just that Chrissy does more editing than I do in India-related areas. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 14:48, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

India Observatory
Hi. Thank you for your message. In order that I can edit this page appropriately, I would be grateful for a bit more clarity on the changes required. Thank you. Lseio (talk) 14:24, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

Assistance with March Networks draft submitted to AfC?
Hello, Chrissy -

Thanks very much for reviewing my proposed March Networks article; I appreciate it. Since the submission has been declined, I was wondering if you'd be open to providing me with some recommendations on how to improve it so that it better meets NPOV and other requirements? I'd love the opportunity to pick your brain about how to make sure we're stringently following the MOS.

Also, because I want to make sure I'm completely transparent about things, you can see my COI declaration on my user page regarding this submission.

Mdrozdowski (talk) 14:40, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

why
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Óláfs_saga_Tryggvasonar&type=revision&diff=859395178&oldid=859389912

Why have you reverted this edit - the reasons for the changes are well explained in the edit history.

All the links where to different compilations of the same work. This work needs an article on it.5.198.10.236 (talk) 01:22, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Because it's a disambiguation page and is useful. Write a separate article and leave the DAB. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  01:23, 14 September 2018 (UTC)


 * The name of the article is/ would be Óláfs saga Tryggvasonar - no disambiguation is really needed because they are all versions of the same work .. there is only one topic.

5.198.10.236 (talk) 01:29, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

Pharmacy Management System reappears
Software programs for pharmacy workflow management appears to be nearly the same content as Draft:Pharmacy management system, recreated under a new name. David notMD (talk) 00:53, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
 * I shortened it by half, but IMO still an iffy article.David notMD (talk) 14:37, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Another editor changed name of Software.... to Pharmacy management system, and then left a note at the Draft under that name - still out there - that the article now exists in the shortened form, so the draft should not be reviewed again. David notMD (talk) 17:17, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.13 18 September 2018
Hello, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

The New Page Feed currently has 2700 unreviewed articles, up from just 500 at the start of July. For a while we were falling behind by an average of about 40 articles per day, but we have stabilised more recently. Please review some articles from the back of the queue if you can (Sort by: 'Oldest' at Special:NewPagesFeed), as we are very close to having articles older than one month.


 * Project news
 * The New Page Feed now has a new "Articles for Creation" option which will show drafts instead of articles in the feed, this shouldn't impact NPP activities and is part of the WMF's AfC Improvement Project.
 * As part of this project, the feed will have some larger updates to functionality next month. Specifically, ORES predictions will be built in, which will automatically flag articles for potential issues such as vandalism or spam. Copyright violation detection will also be added to the new page feed. See the projects's talk page for more info.


 * There are a number of coordination tasks for New Page Patrol that could use some help from experienced reviewers. See New pages patrol/Coordination for more info to see if you can help out.


 * Other
 * A new summary page of reliable sources has been created; Identifying reliable sources/Perennial sources, which summarizes existing RfCs or RSN discussions about regularly used sources.


 * Moving to Draft and Page Mover
 * Some unsuitable new articles can be best reviewed by moving them to the draft space, but reviewers need to do this carefully and sparingly. It is most useful for topics that look like they might have promise, but where the article as written would be unlikely to survive AfD. If the article can be easily fixed, or if the only issue is a lack of sourcing that is easily accessible, tagging or adding sources yourself is preferable. If sources do not appear to be available and the topic does not appear to be notable, tagging for deletion is preferable (PROD/AfD/CSD as appropriate). See additional guidance at WP:DRAFTIFY.
 * If the user moves the draft back to mainspace, or recreates it in mainspace, please do not re-draftify the article (although swapping it to maintain the page history may be advisable in the case of copy-paste moves). AfC is optional except for editors with a clear conflict of interest.
 * Articles that have been created in contravention of our paid-editing-requirements or written from a blatant NPOV perspective, or by authors with a clear COI might also be draftified at discretion.
 * The best tool for draftification is User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js(info). Kindly adapt the text in the dialogue-pop-up as necessary (the default can also be changed like this). Note that if you do not have the Page Mover userright, the redirect from main will be automatically tagged as CSD R2, but in some cases it might be better to make this a redirect to a different page instead.
 * The Page Mover userright can be useful for New Page Reviewers; occasionally page swapping is needed during NPR activities, and it helps avoid excessive R2 nominations which must be processed by admins. Note that the Page Mover userright has higher requirements than the NPR userright, and is generally given to users active at Requested Moves. Only reviewers who are very experienced and are also very active reviewers are likely to be granted it solely for NPP activities.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:11, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Revert
Please explain.
 * Please learn to sign your edits. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  19:29, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Please answer the question. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.4.173.193 (talk • contribs)
 * I did, sign your posts. It's not optional. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  19:56, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigations/Shiwam Kumar Sriwastaw
Hi tried to add a user for investigation as it was my first time I am not sure that i have done that properly or not. Could you please check it. Thanks. Sid95Q (talk) 12:00, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Mohammed Al Nabhani
Why did you decline Draft:Mohammed Al Nabhani? The sources in the article show that he passes WP:NTENNIS (specifically, his long Davis cup record and his ATP main draw appearance). Iffy★Chat -- 08:09, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
 * I did not decline for notability. I declined it because it is improperly sourced and there are NO references. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  11:14, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
 * The external links are references to the statistics that support his notability claim. Iffy★Chat -- 11:46, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
 * and we require in line sources per the ILC declones. Go fix it if you want to accept it but the bulk of the content is unsourced. Again. I did not decline for notability CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  12:02, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
 * WP:MINREF and WP:BLPRS only requires inline citations if the material is being challenged or is contentious, neither of which are the case here. Iffy★Chat -- 12:12, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
 * that applies in main space. If we weren’t allowed to decline for ILC, then it wouldn’t be a option. I’ve explained my piece, of you want to fix it and accept it, be my guest.  CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  12:14, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
 * And I'll note this was moved to draft by an experienced editor,, for precisely the reason I've declined it. You adding one more basic listing as an external link does not change this. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  13:41, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
 * If this article were nominated for deletion at AFD instead of being draftified, would it be likely to survive? Iffy★Chat -- 13:58, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
 * , the issue with allowing pages through AfC without proper sourcing is that they tend to stay in that state for a long time until someone nominates it for deletion or sends it back to draftspace. In this case, that's already happened, so references to reliable sources must be added to the article before it can be accepted. I just did a quick Google news search, and I see plenty of sources that can be used to improve the article. Add two or three of them and resubmit. There's no sense in arguing about this further. Brad  v  14:04, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Article for review
KankP (talk) 11:24, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Dear (User:Chrissymad) - I have recently started contributing to Wikipedia community in volunteer capacity and have made a contribution (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dr._Omkar_Rai). Somehow this is marked for deletion and I don't understand why as all the references are of very repute, reliable, authentic and prestigious. Also the text sourcing and formatting is also in a standard format. Would request you to have a review and suggest me if you see any improvement to help me make my contribution worthy for wikipedia.

Looking forward to learn and contribute.