User talk:Praxidicae/Archive 22

In response to Greg Selkoe
Hello,

I appreciate your concern on Greg Selkoe's page, but redirecting it to one of his old businesses is kind of suspicious. He is doing much larger things, and I am personally a fan of what he's doing to change the direction of Esports, and he is making a historical mark on this subject, and believe his page shouldn't be just redirected. I can help clean it up and add newer information, which I agree it should be cleaned up and revised, but I believe his relevance is important and has been an important entrepreneur for many years heading multiple large companies such as Karmaloop, FaZe Clan, and now XSET which I believe is truly making a mark on the history of Esports.

Thanks!
 * What exactly do you find suspicious? Would you like to disclose your WP:COI? CUPIDICAE💕  18:26, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

It just seems odd that you'd accuse a person's page for promotional, which I've seen you done with other pages here, and then redirect that page to a former business which no longer has ties to that person - a business that could clearly make profit off such a redirect. I think to me, it would make sense to clean up the page as you suggested, as the person is heavily relevant in the Esports and Lifestyle space and communities. His influential capabilities are no different than any other personality on this platform, and if it needs to be cleaned up then it should be cleaned up, but I just find it suspicious you'd redirect a page to something that no longer has ties to him - it makes me think maybe you have been paid to do so or instructed to do so, which I can't prove, but it does seem quite odd you'd do that rather than clean it. Your comments in your edits were quite abrupt and, in my opinion, showed some sort of wrong intent. Gokwol (talk) 18:36, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
 * It would behoove you to read WP:AGF and also declare your conflict of interest. I don't give two turds about Selkoe or either company and have no interest in anything involving them, I am merely following guidelines and policy of Wikipedia, which don't allow promotion. CUPIDICAE💕  18:38, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
 * , you have been extensively and exclusively editing a highly promotional page and off-wiki evidence suggests that you have a connection to the subject, which means you should disclose that and not edit directly. Praxidicae's redirecting of what amounts to blatant spam is not evidence of her being paid. I suggest you either substantiate or retract that allegation, which amounts to a personal attack. Blablubbs | talk 18:42, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Then why don't you constructively change it to make it less promotional so that other contributions can be made by its old contributors? I am simply interested in Selkoe's work and have followed his projects for a long time, and I have made frequent visits to his Wikipedia page before, so to have seen it redirect to a company page that no longer has ties with him was quite odd. Gokwol (talk) 18:41, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Because the only constructive editing that can be done is to redirect it to the notable article since the current iteration is just a rehash of said article and is nothing more than an advertisement. CUPIDICAE💕  18:45, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

V-Label
Hey Praxidicae, please be more accurate and stop just deleting the page! How can you just write: "No this is promotional nonsense". This is offensive and not true. If you have more specific complaint please let me know, all I have written are facts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Giovinino (talk • contribs) 11:25, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
 * @, I’m not Praxidicae, however, it appears as though it is you who ought to be more careful. You are editing in a very disruptive manner. Celestina007 (talk) 11:39, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
 * @, can you be more specific? What's so disruptive in my editing? Giovinino
 * See the warning on your talk page. You are not permitted to revert the edits of users more than three times in a 24 hour period. Polyamorph (talk) 12:01, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

@, @ Could you please tell me what's wrong with what I've written? Please be specific Giovinino (talk) 12:23, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Honestly, I don't see how it satisfies WP:GNG. It was promotional in parts. The section containing a list of mostly red links was unsourced and not particularly useful, hence why I removed it (and you reverted). Polyamorph (talk) 13:07, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Let's leave the list until I can find some sources, ok? Tell me where it is promotional and I will change it! Giovinino (talk) 14:06, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Leave what list? This is not how articles work. You provide sources at creation, not after the fact. CUPIDICAE💕  14:08, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
 * They're talking about the list of society's which have adopted the label, most of which are red links. you need to demonstrate how the article satisfies WP:GNG. thanks. Polyamorph (talk) 14:46, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

I've added some more references and deleted all the red links Giovinino (talk) 14:33, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi @ I've never written the V is a "universal" symbol. Where did you find that? Please, be more constructive, I'm really not interested in advertising the company Giovinino (talk) 19:38, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Why have you prevented my page from being published?
I just published a page called To Catch the Kaidash. Why was it prevented from being published by yourself and how can I resolve this issue? I'd appreciate any help you could give, have a great day :) Luke780 (talk) 15:28, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
 * As noted in the move notice on your talk page, it lacks entirely in reliable sources. CUPIDICAE💕  15:29, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Submission -- Deep fried okra  ( talk ) 16:18, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Review request: Marscoin
I took your advice and completely revised Draft:Marscoin Yearnst (talk) 17:26, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

FirstCry
FirstCry, I believe all the news are about funding and acquisition which is more like a routine coverage. Could you please check if it is passing GNG or not.Sonofstar (talk) 19:34, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Donald Frith
Hi Praxidicae. While it was clear that Donald Frith would probably meet WP:NACADEMIC there were issues of NPOV and verifiability from the outset, with. I felt that the best chance of sifting what was verifiable and what was not was for the author to backup the claims with citations while it was a draft, hence me after the author prematurely moved it to mainspace, bypassing AfC and ignoring a series of declines. As it stands, there are a range of unsourced statements, and most of those that are referenced are sourced from a single obituary in a local paper, no doubt written by a family member and probably with no editorial fact-checking. To me this looks like an attempt to memorialise Frith by someone close to him. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 21:28, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
 * The standard for AFC is whether or not it has a good chance of surviving AFD. I think that is the case here and despite it's POV problems, which I also noted, he is clearly notable and sources do exist. I have less concern about WP:PROMO since you know, he's dead. Mainspace seemed the better option so that more interested editors (and those with time) can clean it up and improve it. If you feel it should be deleted, you're obviously welcome to AFD it. CUPIDICAE💕  21:30, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes, but, "If what is written in the submission meets the notability guidelines, but the submission lacks references to evidence this, then the underlying issue is inadequate verification and the submission should be declined for that reason." Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 21:35, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
 * That isn't a hardline. If you think it should be deleted, AFD it. I'm not here to argue with you. I don't often accept at AFC either but this was a clear cut case of notability and should've been accepted. It wasn't egregiously promotional and didn't violate policy. CUPIDICAE💕  21:38, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
 * , I noticed this discussion and took interest, at least in part because my wife collects teapots and I often joke that I live in a teapot museum. I have devoted a few hours to improving the article, and now convinced that Frist is notable. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  07:01, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
 * That's great! Thank you for the time you've spent. I wasn't expecting to see other mainspace contributors to it so quickly! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 09:41, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Blood of Ra Series
Hi Praxidicae. Thank you for your feedback about the page I created. After your initial move last week, I updated the page and included additional citations before republishing it. I just saw that you marked the edited page as AFD. It appears that the series meets the Wikipedia:Notability (books) criteria with it appearing in at least two non-trivial published works. (There are many more based on a quick Google/Bing search.) On the deletion discussion page, another editor added and cited the Kirkus review, which is one of the oldest and most respected book reviewers, and I added and cited a link to the London TV interview with the author. That should meet the "two non-trivial published works" standard. I'm sorry, I should have thought of including the Kirkus citation myself, and should have included the London TV one before republishing. Please let me know if you require anything else. Thank you again for your time and contributions to Wikipedia! Vera3636 (talk) 22:42, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

March 2021
Hello, I'm Owlf. I noticed that you recently removed content from Prakash Neupane without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''You've removed national rs sources like Nagarik Daily, Khasokhas, Nepal Daily, Os Nepal and international sources like Vice, Asia Times, Asia Netnews etc without any good reasons although I wont claim kathmandu tribune as relaible source but that doesn't mean other each and every sources are unreliable and your explanation on the talk page is not satisfying. Previously also you removed Vice source but C.fred reverted and added it correctly. Don't remove nepali and international rs news.''  Owlf  23:17, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Hey, what say you, since you were named and I see no edits. ☺️ CUPIDICAE💕  02:47, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I got a question about this on my talk page. Last edit I made was in September, and it was a tweak to wording (the verb "charted" was used awkwardly) and some formatting. —C.Fred (talk) 12:21, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

You requested to remove Fieldstone School article, in the change you have used CSD G11 to use speedy deletion.

I changed information and removed some data that may be considered as promotion and According to Independent sources in Talk:Fieldstone School I think you can remove your request or send why you think this article must be deleted? Majidjalilian123 (talk) 21:39, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

User:WikiFlame50, User:DarkGlow and User:RM-Taylor
Where are your warnings for any of these people?

Across both pages List of EastEnders characters and Ian Beale, User:DarkGlow is nearing double digits with 9 total reverts. User:WikiFlame50 is over 20 reverts, and they enlisted their friend User:RM-Taylor to help them revert so I consider them responsible for the latter's reverts too. Connorguy99 (talk) 01:18, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
 * when I told you to drop it and stop digging this hole, it was not so much a suggestion. CUPIDICAE💕  01:22, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Bias, in a word. Connorguy99 (talk) 01:23, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
 * My heart bleeds. – DarkGlow (contribs • talk) 01:26, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Just drop it all ready and stop moaning. You brought this on yourself WikiFlame50 (talk) 01:28, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Damn. I spent so much time composing my block rationale, someone beat me to it. And I was just gonna add to the partial block. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 01:31, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Draft:Saurabh Dwivedi
Hi CUPIDICAE💕 , I have improved the Draft. Please review if possible.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Saurabh_DwivediWisdomwiki 40 (talk) 08:27, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Page moves
Hi Praxidicae, I saw that you undid the move of Soe Win (general) → Soe Win (born 1960). You may be interested in the move proposal I made to undo a similar move at Talk:Myint Swe (born 1951). ― Tartan357  Talk 17:07, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Behnam Khedri
Hi, this article Behnam Khedri is under construction, please remove speedy deletion tag until 3 days. I will complete it and then you can check it again. Thanks Angaas (talk) 05:38, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Apology
I wanted to apologize for being a bit cross and coming across as irked on the page for that Pennsylvania state rep. After seeing what you're generally dealing with things like the AfD for John Giordano I can better understand your views on articles like those. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 13:09, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

DJ fresh
Why would you change the way I put DJ fresh discography bruh? it was perfectly fine the way I had it? No one told you to change it. I put hella work into that. Put it back the way I had it. You demoted to its original settings and it looks old and not updated bruh Marcisoldies12 (talk) 18:23, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Much like the rest, which I'll be removing, it's unsourced and cruft. CUPIDICAE💕  18:42, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * They have a COI. See their talk page. Ashley  yoursmile!  18:50, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

What are you doing why do you keep changing it? I personally know DJ Fresh and what you are doing is messing everything up please leave it alone Marcisoldies12 (talk) 18:51, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * You could be DJ Fresh for all anyone cares. The bottom line is that everything, especially on articles about living people must have a reliable source. Nothing in the discog was sourced and per policy, I removed it. CUPIDICAE💕  18:52, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

What's your problem
What your problem with Stalwart Esports and Zeyan Shafiq Article? Anjumaafi (talk) 19:44, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I noted my view on the AFD, I reverted you on Stalwart because we don't need his middle name in the lead. CUPIDICAE💕  19:44, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I've reported this user for misusing my name. ─ The Aafī on Mobile   (talk)|undefined  19:45, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Now globally locked for impersonation, that was quick :)    ——  Serial  20:04, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Please consider this
Checkout this article https://sat.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/ᱟᱠᱤᱵᱽ_ᱚᱧᱡᱩᱢ_ᱟᱯᱷᱤ Of User:TheAafi he is cross-scamming on wikipedia. He is just doing paid promotion on wikipedia. He had already done a major contribution on Article Zeyan Shafiq which was deleted. Also checkout this https://m.wikidata.org/wiki/Q87419831. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.224.246.210 (talk) 05:24, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Lol. Here's another man. Have a look . ─ The Aafī on Mobile   (talk)|undefined  05:33, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm astonished to see you as the new creator of Draft:Zeyan Shafiq which was recently deleted by . Lol. ─ The Aafī on Mobile   (talk)|undefined

Peach PRC
Hi there. You moved Peach PRC into draft yesterday, and I understand why, based on information in the article. The article was created, knowing her single “josh” was to debut in the Australian top 50 in the next 24 hours, so it was in preparation for that. I have updated that in the article and it’s now notable. If you could please move it out of draft, that would be super. Thanks so much. Tobyjamesaus (talk) 06:16, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , @, I’m not Praxidicae, if you want your draft moved to mainspace you can do that yourself or use the afc route. Celestina007 (talk) 00:29, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Sock
Hi, could you look at Special:Contributions/70.187.171.236? It seems like this is probably Sockpuppet investigations/Extrapolaris. Thanks. BilCat (talk) 04:04, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Thanks
I've responded to your notification via email. Thanks for keeping me informed. SamHolt6 (talk) 17:58, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Responded as well. CUPIDICAE💕  18:07, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Dearest Cupidcae
Just checking in to wish good health and happiness! --卩尺卂乂丨三 &#38; 卂尺ㄒㄩ尺ㄖ (talk) 23:52, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I hope you’re well. Happy belated Valentine’s Day! CUPIDICAE💕 23:57, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Review request
Hi.. madam, can you please review this draft Draft:Thiruvarppu Sree Krishna Temple? Thanks in advance ProudMallu (talk) 13:06, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Beekeeping
Hi Praxidicae, as my username might suggest, I am a beekeeper. That's why I thought that I would try and create a page for the BBKA. Just wanted to do enough to create a page and let others create content. For the past ten years I've only made minor tweaks to various bee related pages. Should I avoid Bee pages? Beeloser (talk) 19:42, 8 March 2021 (UTC) I've edited my page to list the beekeeping organisations that I have given technical advice to. I'm not paid to make any changes to Wikipedia pages either directly or indirectly. I am a member of the BBKA and was wanting to do the minimum to create a page so beekeepers (and others) could contribute to. --Beeloser (talk) 13:07, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Resubmitted
@Praxidicae, Why did you think that reading Draft:Emiway Bantai (Indian rapper) draft is like an advertisement? I have seen many such reviewers who make changes to the article themselves and publish it, you could have done it but you did not do it. I was very disappointed with you. When I spoke to the Administrator (who protected its main title) concerning the subject, he did not call it an issue in publishing the article. But you did not understand my hard work. I have made the submission by making changes to the draft again, please accept it this time, if it still looks like an advertisement, please try to make changes. I hope for you, please do not disappoint me. Thank you 223.238.210.226 (talk) 08:39, 10 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Reviewers are under no obligation to fix articles instead of declining them, though they can do so if they feel like it. On a different note, could you tell me if you have any connection to Emiway Bantai, and/or to any of the following users?
 * Best, Blablubbs | talk 13:11, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Best, Blablubbs | talk 13:11, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Best, Blablubbs | talk 13:11, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Best, Blablubbs | talk 13:11, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Best, Blablubbs | talk 13:11, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Best, Blablubbs | talk 13:11, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

@Blubulubbs, At the moment, he has nothing to do with this draft. They can be related to the main title. And I have nothing to do with them. 223.238.206.227 (talk) 15:41, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
 * And you know all this, how? CUPIDICAE💕  16:13, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

I have just guessed, I really do not know them. I have changed the Draft:Emiway Bantai (Indian rapper), please save it from being deleted. 223.238.210.234 (talk) 16:50, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

@Praxidicae Help me please. 223.238.210.234 (talk) 17:17, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello
Hi, CUPIDICAE💕. You may not remember, but we had a little spat on an AFD once not too long ago. I misunderstood your intentions, you pointed out that you had explained in an edit summary, and I offered a snarky remark or two. I wasn't in a great mood that day and I'd like to apologize. I'm not usually that much of a jerk. Hope there are no hard feelings. If you have no idea what I'm talking about, don't worry bout it. Thanks, EDG 543 (message me) 01:46, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Paper.io
Your recent edit were fine. Now the edits I made have been put at the top. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C7:5A9C:3F01:B0D2:70FB:92E:C4D3 (talk) 13:48, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion
Hey! You previously marked an article for deletion, are you able to assist me in writing a proper unbias article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bassmfs (talk • contribs) 14:38, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Not until you've addressed my inquiry on your talk page about paid editing. CUPIDICAE💕  14:39, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

I missed it but I just went and answered it. I have not gotten any payment nor is there an incentive, I do try and bring light to people doing positive things in the community to ensure they are getting the same recognition. Keith has over 300k followers on facebook and 50k on Instagram. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bassmfs (talk • contribs) 14:46, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

You might be interested in to check this project on Freelancer
https://www.freelancer.com/projects/wikipedia/Need-More-Freelancers-Keep-Votes/? https://ibb.co/8MkmrHL — Preceding unsigned comment added by Seoguy001 (talk • contribs) 15:40, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Diego Osorio
Hi! My apologies if I missed it, but I sent you a message last month on a page where I was flagged for having a COI with Diego Osorio. I do not have any affiliation to Diego and I do not have a financial stake in relation to this page or Diego. I do feel that he's an impressive individual, so I apologize if any of my text came off as un-objective. I reviewed it again and made a few tweaks in addition to adding additional independent sources. Is there anything else further I should do? I wasn't able to find anything that didn't have a citation accounted for. I'll wait for a response before re-submitting the page from my draft space. Thank you! TroyCaliLA (talk) 14:30, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Why the article about "Allan Wexler" was deleted?
Hi,

My article "Allan Wexler" was deleted for being promotional. I am new to Wikipedia and after reading the talk page, I am still not clear why it is deleted. Please note that I am not hired or paid for writing this article. Allan Wexler is well-known artist and I provided many resources to prove it. Please help me to understand why my article was deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Delightful void (talk • contribs) 20:18, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Issues with actions on James Heppelmann page
Hello Praxidicae,

I am responding here for etiquette so that the discussion is not misinterpreted.

There is an issue with Mrs Snoozy Turtle that I do not understand. I have been cooperative and polite, She is unresponsive after she raises questions and that were satisfactorily answered. The major issue is the competency to judge the notability of Heppelmann rests with understanding advanced manufacturing. I proposed that to her that if the article is to be proposed for deletion, the discussion should include people with this competency. Because there is limited expertise in the US due to globalization, I suggested bilingual editors from the Baden-Württemberg and Bayern states of Germany because advanced manufacturing expertise has not been lost in the area.

I am extremely uncomfortable with the editing process. Especially when one considers the many Apple Employees populating Wikipedia who are considered notable because editors can grasp consumer electronic technology but not advanced manufacturing technology. My interests and my list of Wikipedia articles to write are to inform about the innovation in the transdisciplinary fields of advanced manufacturing, extended reality, and digital healthcare, and the challenges of successful implementation. I work as an engineer and innovation instructor in these fields. I cannot do this work with editors whose understanding of technology is limited so they consider everything they do not understand to be PR.

I will respond to your other questions later today when a break in my work permits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stevep2007 (talk • contribs) 13:29, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry you're uncomfortable but the AFD has a clear explanation of how to discuss it in the template, it's literally in bold. Your feelings on other editors is irrelevant and I recommend against discussing them further. VAXIDICAE💉  13:31, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Deletion of article: "Dr Umar Johnson"
Why have you deleted my article "Dr Umar Johnson?" The article has been written from an impartial point of view and has been sourced where relevant. Please restore the article so I can improve it, and provide an explanation for your deletion. WaterSilicon (talk) 16:55, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
 * It definitely wasn't impartial or neutral, it was a raging advert and poorly sourced. As per the giant notice on my talk page: I am not an administrator, I did not delete it and I cannot restore it. VAXIDICAE💉  16:56, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Deletion of Rajasthan United FC
Hey @Athaenara: You deleted a page of a club in Rajasthan state of India called Rajasthan United FC (RUFC) by saying this Doesn't seem to meet WP:NFOOT or WP:GNG with no real coverage in news sources. But now i have mentioned all links. I didn't create previous article but created new one. I am also updating all the links. Here is brief about page - "Rajasthan United FC are the winners of inaugural season of Rajasthan State Man's League. that is not a promotional page. This page was made so people get to know about historic start of football in rajasthan as Rajasthan Football association started functioning in 2016 and in 2020 they conducted their first league. Winner of this league plays in I-League." Rajasthan United FC are the winners of inaugural season of Rajasthan State Man's League. So i just made a page for them. They have not asked me for any page creation and i'm not linked with them. Some days ago other user had created a deletion request for RUFC logo saying it was copyright violation But then i contacted the RUFC and taken permission to use logo. I know the Wikipedia guidelines and policies. Just let me know where I was wrong so that I can create a draft again, add more content with reliable media links. Moreover, I had added reliable media links too. Looking forward to your guidance so that I can create the article and make Wikipedia more better and informative. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vplpoonia (talk • contribs) 09:08, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Aiden Renfrow
Hey Stick. Calling me unvalid for wiki is kinda a D*ck move. I'm very valid to have my own wiki page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PFC Renfrow (talk • contribs) 13:40, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I haven't a clue what you're talking about nor what you're trying to say. VAXIDICAE💉  15:19, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Request on 05:04:36, 18 March 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by SarojiniMathiyalagan
@Praxidicae,I'm creating an article for Indian film director Vinoth Rajendran. May I know what else the article needs to meet the approval. I'm a beginner at Wikipedia I would like to request help for this.I don't have any idea what makes you feel my article looks like an advertisement. I have mentioned the reference links about the director and his works which is more enough to verify the details I guess. Can you please help me out with what else I have to change or add to meet the criteria?

SarojiniMathiyalagan (talk) 08:34, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

SarojiniMathiyalagan (talk) 05:04, 18 March 2021 (UTC) SarojiniMathiyalagan (talk) 08:29, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Deletion of changes to Viorel Oancea
Dear Praxidicae, I was surprised to see that you have deleted all the additional content I have added to the page Viorel Oancea, even though these are fully documented in public and official resources. Might I understand why? One of the comments was "this is not a resume". What exactly is the purpose of Wikipedia according to you? A platform of censorship of information? Please revert my edits and the associated links I have inserted. Thank you. Kind regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ilia76 (talk • contribs) 09:05, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
 * No, Wikipedia is not a platform of censorship of information. It is also not a place to put unsourced information that reads like a resumé. Information on Wikipedia must be supported by cited sources and written from a neutral point of view. Do you have any connection to Viorel Oancea? Giraffer (talk·contribs) 12:10, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Unusual editing behaviour
Please may I have your thoughts on the weird page move sequences illustrated here. I trust your opinions, especially in odd arenas Fiddle   Faddle  20:01, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
 * To which set of moves in particular are referring? Most of the science moves are legit. I've been looking into this editor lately for potential PGM removal so more specifics would be helpful. Primefac (talk) 13:52, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , there appears to be a general sequence of moves where the outcome is to leave this editor named as the creator of the eventual article, depriving the real creator of whatever credit they might feel they enjoy. The move itself is often legit, but the effect of the move is... interesting. I might be mistaken.  Fiddle   Faddle  14:41, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Haven't looked into it myself but they even said as much at WP:REFUND at one point. VAXIDICAE💉  14:42, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , see here.  VAXIDICAE💉  14:44, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Yeah, that's what I thought. They're very much in a Zawl-type mentality of "I must be the first one to create this page", but so far they're just shy of breaking the rules. I've not gone so far as to actually stalk their contribs, but after the AN threads it's tempting... Primefac (talk) 14:54, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I dunno, seems pretty disruptive. It's a pattern, at least... VAXIDICAE💉 14:55, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , To me it is worth a substantial warning about disruptive editing. I can dev er it if you prefer Fiddle   Faddle  15:00, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I have seen the light. VAXIDICAE💉  15:00, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , In that case they need, presumably, to be prevented from further creation of annoyance and mild mayhem? Fiddle   Faddle  15:07, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
 * If that's a long way of saying globally locked, yes. VAXIDICAE💉  15:07, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , those were the words I was searching for 👍😂 Fiddle   Faddle  15:19, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Any SPI would have to be a behavioural analysis, as CU results won't be much good (unless you get someone really familiar with the case, but unfortunately I think they're no longer a CU); too many proxies. Primefac (talk) 16:46, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
 * That being said, if the behavioural evidence is strong, then an SPI should definitely be filed (at the very least, for paper trails etc). Primefac (talk) 13:14, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I'll email it, I don't want to give away the particularly obvious tells. VAXIDICAE💉  14:03, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Works for me. Primefac (talk) 14:59, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , By the way, what is PGM? Fiddle   Faddle  15:25, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 * WP:PGM = pagemover. Primefac (talk) 15:54, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , Thank you. TLAs abound. Interesting outcome just now, potentially of this discussion  Fiddle   Faddle  16:13, 20 March 2021 (UTC)


 * I had a lengthy bit written up about the behavior and overlap with other socks but accidentally refreshed before filing, but it should be obvious based on their commons uploads and obsession with NJ among other things. Take a look at the interaction overlap tool between Starzoner or whatever ridiculous attempt at vanishing they've used and this confirmed sock and you will see, as well as the fact that they had countless drafts written by them restored. I am feeling pretty disillusioned with English Wikipedia right now and do not have the energy or willingness to really dig into it. And as a note, their vanish should be undone as a matter of policy. VAXIDICAE💉  16:28, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Hey
Praxi, you ever think the internet was a mistake? LOL I'm feeling pretty exhausted and disillusioned by everything. Bkissin (talk) 22:17, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Nothing (Technology Company)
Why you made a redirection to carl pei. The administrator gave permission that the company is notable according to A7. It is possible that there can be a page for that company. So why u just made redirection? Kashyapvelani06 (talk)&#124; KashyapV &#124; 16:14, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
 * An a7 decline doesn't mean it can't be reidrected. If you restore it, I will send it for a deletion discussion that will result in the same. VAXIDICAE💉  16:15, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

But why it cannot have a Wikipedia article? Kashyapvelani06 (talk)&#124; KashyapV &#124; 16:16, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Read my edit summary, there is no evidence it is notable yet, it's only got WP:MILL announcements and press releases and 0 independent notability. Please also take a read of WP:PAID. Thanks. VAXIDICAE💉  16:17, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

I am not paid by anyone to write this article. I thought it is notable and has presence all over the world. Thats why I created article for it. Kashyapvelani06 (talk)&#124; KashyapV &#124; 16:19, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Draft Charin Mendes at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Charin_Mendes
Dear Praxidicae, Thank you for reviewing my page. I have been working on this a lot to make it less like an advertisement. I understand however that there seems to be an issue with reliable sources. Can you please tell me what are these unreliable sources. Most of the articles that I have sourced are author sourced articles from well reputed local publications. Are we not allowed to reference these? Please help me out. Though I have tried my best to reference the facts stated, most of the release dates for the artist's songs I found the dates on the apple music store and I believe Wikipedia does not allow such external links to be sourced therefore I have left it as is and made changes. Can you please check and give me some pointers on what to change. Thanks! Appreciate the help! :) --Tashiya Jayatilaka (talk) 19:07, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Dear Praxidicae, I have re-submitted the article for review after making many changes. Can you please check. would appreciate it. Thanks--Tashiya Jayatilaka (talk) 12:50, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

About my Pages
Hey Prax. I've noticed that for every page I publish, you always find it flawed. Well I don't know why but I always try to be as neutral as possible. Could you please suggest for me ways to ameliorate the info?-- Eddie Ogyner (talk) 08:19, 23 March 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eddie Ogyner (talk • contribs) 08:15, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Perhaps you should read the warnings on your talk page and instead start publishing through AFC. Your articles are hardly neutral and are almost always terribly sourced. VAXIDICAE💉  15:33, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
 * And while you're here, would you like to disclose your previous account that you indicate on your userpage, where you claim to have joined in 2018? VAXIDICAE💉  15:35, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
 * the information in my userpage has been published in good faith. Sorry but I can't recall my username by then. I had to inevitably take a break till March this year, however this is my new userpage. --Eddie Ogyner (talk) 18:06, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
 * You can't recall the username you edited under until very recently? VAXIDICAE💉  23:06, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I wasn't active by then, I neither edited an article nor contributed to anything. What matters is the time I joined Wikipedia which is March 2018. Eddie Ogyner (talk) 06:18, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

About the deletion of "Eneba" article?
Hello Praxidicae, my article about "Eneba" was deleted for being too promotional and breaking the guidelines. I am a new Wikipedia user, so I am still not clear about which parts of the article were overtly promotional. I do want to improve it though, whether it's improving the language so it's more neutral, finding better sources if the ones provided are considered to be poor or even rewriting the whole thing. Can you provide the exact reasons why the article was deleted and how I can make it better? All help is much appreciated! Video Game Lover E (talk) 08:36, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Keyrouz
Sure you've seen it, but just leaving a note for posterity and so you can have something to point to if you need it. The Jimmy Keyrouz article that you moved to draftspace is now on its third recreation after being twice speedied for G11 (and in the first case G12). I requested salting last time around, but didn't get it. Was "disappointed, but not surprised" to see that name pop up on my watchlist again. Vaticidalprophet 13:18, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

marked as promotional and advertising
Dear, I would like to know what made you mark the wiki page as promotional ? the page stating facts only about the business and influencer on the community related to the photoghraphy. I know the rules of wiki publishing very well. any recommendation on what to not list in the future. thank you Timexway (talk) 15:18, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Curious to know why the article on Allen R. Morris was deleted
Allen R. Morris is a public figure who works in the television and film industry as a producer/director and writer. At the time of deletion, he was serving on the Board of Trustees of the National Academy of Television Arts and Sciences. He is a recipient of a national Emmy Award (among many other awards) and is a member of the Gold Circle (celebrating his more than fifty years in the television industry). The page about his career had been on Wikipedia for more than ten years. In a previous message, you stated "it is obvious that you are being paid." I responded that was not correct; a reply to which no response was ever made. I have worked with Morris' company for many years. The article I submitted was based on his accomplishments in the field and had nothing to do with our personal or professional relationship. What am I missing? Other articles I have submitted are still here. Reginald Duckworth Reginaldduckworth (talk) 21:49, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
 * It is very clearly explained here which you were notified of on your talk page. VAXIDICAE💉  21:51, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
 * , It was not hard to determine why it was deleted. the link on your talk page takes oyu to Articles for deletion/Allen R. Morris where the community discussed it and consensus was reached to delete it.
 * If you have worked for Morris's company for many years, a continuing state the way you phrase it, then broadly construed, you have received a reward, you are a paid editor if you have edited any article  about him, the company or pther staff emmbers, self identified above. Please read and understand WP:PAID and make any relevant disclosures  Fiddle   Faddle  21:55, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
 * If you have worked for Morris's company for many years, a continuing state the way you phrase it, then broadly construed, you have received a reward, you are a paid editor if you have edited any article  about him, the company or pther staff emmbers, self identified above. Please read and understand WP:PAID and make any relevant disclosures  Fiddle   Faddle  21:55, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Thank you...
...for removing the "On This Day"-type references for DOBs in BLPs. They're garbage.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 22:24, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
 * It's funny because it's so obvously sourced by Wikipedia, I can't imagine where else some run of the mill-barely-journalism outlet would find the time to individually source each of these. They're clearly all from this list and they didn't bother including some of the people born on January 17th that aren't listed there...lazy "journalism." VAXIDICAE💉  22:28, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Exactly. These lists published across multiple platforms as filler have zero editorial oversight and are breeding grounds for error replication and, as you note, circular referencing.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 22:30, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

WP:AN
Probably a nothingburger, but you've been mentioned at AN and should probably comment there. Primefac (talk) 15:02, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I already commented, if theres anyone's opinion I could care less about, it's ArmanAfifeh who is a notorious cross-wiki hoaxer. VAXIDICAE💉  15:04, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Please stop removing entries from the List of fictional asexual characters page
I'm getting a bit tired of this, having to deal with another reviewer who removed entries for a similar reason today. It is very nerve-wracking. Just because an entry does not have a Wikipedia page does NOT mean that it should be removed. That is an absurd criterion for removing pages and has no basis in editing. That is why I reverted your edits. If you want to create pages for The Olivia Experiment, Banner of the Damned, or any others, be my guest, but I have a lot of page ideas in backlog, so I definitely don't have enough time to create pages for every single entry listed. I'll create an entry on the talk page of that article about this at some point. --Historyday01 (talk) 16:17, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Have you considered the fact that you are in the wrong when two experienced, unrelated editors have made the same edits? Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate list of things. VAXIDICAE💉  16:19, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Again, as I said elsewhere, please keep your discussion on the appropriate talk page, specifically of the List of fictional asexual characters article, not here. Thanks. Historyday01 (talk) 17:33, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Are you kidding me? I responded to you before you discussed it on the talk page, don't come here to lecture me when you don't have a single clue what you're even talking about, . VAXIDICAE💉  17:34, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Again, please discuss this on the List of fictional asexual characters talk page. Thanks. Historyday01 (talk) 17:36, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

The Parker Coppins. Deletion
What The Heck!?! Why do you want it deleted!?! There are so many pages out there, that are about people, BUT NOT MADE BY THEM! AND THEY HAVE BEEN UP FOR YEARS! PLUS, PARKER IS JUST A YOUTUBER!!!! IT MAKES NO SENSE!!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mel Pines (talk • contribs) 17:24, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Chill the f out, dude. VAXIDICAE💉  17:26, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Can You fix it plz? Mel Pines (talk) 17:54, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
 * LOL, that's not how you get what you want at all! I agree with Praxidicae, the article in its current form doesn't cite any sources, has five sentences, and basically reads like a fan of Parker's wrote it! If you want to add information about Coppins, you can try to add some information to the Parker Plays article. Bkissin (talk) 18:04, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I Was! I just clicked "Publish site" on accident. I was trying to click "Show changes". I was planning on doing more. (I am a fan of Parker btw, that's why I am taking time out of my day to make the article.) Mel Pines (talk) 18:08, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm Lord Bolingbroke. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Parker Plays, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

– Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 18:11, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Whoops, I didn't see this page was created in 2017 and have marked it as reviewed again. I was cleaning up broken redirects created by the new editor above and thought they had recently created Parker Plays as well. Feel free to remove this notice if you would like. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 18:19, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
 * What a mess. I've already tagged Coppins, Parker; Draft:Redirect To Parker Plays; User:Parker Plays; and Template:Parker Coppins for speedy deletion. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 18:32, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Parker Plays title moving
The Parker Plays article was disruptively moved around by another editor to different spaces and then a period added. I am requesting RM/TR to have it placed back in mainspace since it was there for 3 years without complaint. The show was an actual regular show on Disney XD. If you want to start an AFD from there and the result is to delete or draftify then it should be turned into a redirect to Disney XD. AngusW🐶🐶F ( bark  •  sniff ) 17:27, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I am sorry, I was just trying to make a page for Parker himself, but Wiki thought that you Parker Plays page was actually called Parker Coppins. I tried to make it so that I could make my Parker Coppins page, AND keep the name of your page Parker Plays. I must've done something really wrong because I make the article a sub-page. I am a huge noob at this thing. I am very sorry, and I will do everything in my power to try and put it back. Mel Pines (talk) 17:38, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
 * No worries . These things happen when people are eager to add information about stuff on Wikipedia. For now, since the Parker Plays page is about Parker's show, why not start adding information about him there, and then if other people think that there's enough information about him to make a separate article, we can work from there. Bkissin (talk) 18:06, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Wait... how am I suppost to do that? I can't find a place to put it. I think it would be easier if I just made a full article on Parker, and publish when I am done. Is that ok? Mel Pines (talk) 18:51, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
 * OK, let me do something on that page and try to help you get started. In the meantime, let's leave Praxidicae alone. :) Bkissin (talk) 19:49, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Thank you
At first, I thought you were too strict with me or probably tyrannizing. I always violated Wikipedia policy without knowing and at times was incorrigible. THANK YOU for guiding me VAXIDICAE💉. (Eddie Ogyner (talk) 14:29, 26 March 2021 (UTC))

Thank you for cruft cleanup
Thank you for cleaning up the extra cruft from primary sources at some of these 'lists of fictional characters' articles. We're not TV Tropes. Crossroads -talk- 04:50, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Proxidicae
I've just blocked. Thought I'd make a sanity check here before I clear up the hoax. Cheers, Cabayi (talk) 19:11, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Probably Long-term abuse/Kingshowman. Impersonating other editors and meddling in AfDs are part of his MO. Favonian (talk) 19:37, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Proxidicae is actually pretty funny. But yeah, sounds like Kingshowman. VAXIDICAE💉  20:13, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

WikiProject India's Collaborations of the month invites you
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:10, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Quick question
On the badges like "Master Editor III" and such, do the "number of edits" needed to get the badge refer to live edits or total edits? xdude (talk) 15:44, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
 * They are worthless badges, I'm definitely not the right person to ask. VAXIDICAE💉  15:49, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Regarding new musician article
Hi there!

I hope you are well. This is in regards to an article I published for one of the modern guitar players Roopam Garg. Thank you for reviewing and letting me know of any promotional material I may have inadvertently written for this article. This is one of many musicians I hope to write about, and I seek to improve. I have substantiated all the text in the article with several articles from significant, credible, and reliable sources such as Guitar World Magazine, Louder Sound, Metal Injection, and others. Roopam Garg also has endorsements from several companies such as Abasi Concepts, Fishman Music, and NeuralDSP, and there are several places where he and his work can be found. Nothing about the text seems promotional as of now, as it is all referenced material. It was not intended to bolster his presence, as Roopam Garg already has an impactful following and presence. I understand that Wikipedia is a place for encyclopedic information of significance and importance, and that was the reasoning for writing this article--to expand Wikipedia's knowledgebase of notable musicians.

I have gone ahead and amended it, and have made it as forthright and objective as can be. Please let me know if there are any other ways in which I can improve the article. Thank you so much and have a nice day! Sriramk296 (talk) 20:42, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Roopam Garg (to save clicks). Primefac (talk) 00:40, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Tad Dufelmeier speedy
I contested the Tad Dufelmeier speedy. I'm happy to follow procedure though if sock-created articles require deletion. Thanks. DaHuzyBru (talk) 16:21, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Gkcogkchkcgicgkxti Джангар Бадма-Халгаев (talk) 12:20, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Draft move
Hey Praxidace. I'm not sure why the article I made for Everhood was moved to a draft page. The article seems to have passed WP:GNG as it had several sourced reviews from over four publications. The material you claimed was taken from another site was more likely taken from the Wiki, as i've written most of the content for the site and never went to that site ever. Andrzejbanas (talk) 00:48, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Dont deletion this article
Bikram malati (film director) dont claim Db Deletion Reshmabkkin (talk) 16:39, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
 * No, go away and stop spamming Wikipedia. VAXIDICAE💉  16:40, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

MfD
OK. You can delete it. But... HOW SHOULD I ASK FOR HELP MAKING THE FLOOFING ARTICLES??? Another Wiki User the 2nd (talk) 20:11, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi . Feel free to talk to the experts at the Teahouse or Editor assistance and they will be able to help you. Bkissin (talk) 22:36, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Peter Stanton (Ecologist)?
Hello, Praxidcae. This query relates to a comment in February 2020 on this page here by about ".. my" (since deleted) "Peter Stanton (Ecologist) page". I presume they meant Peter Stanton who is an ecologist. • Does this mean they are the subject of that BLP? That was their second edit on WP and they did not edit the Stanton BLP until after their post here. • It seems possible that there is COI there or editing by the subject or associates. Some editors there have edited only that BLP, or a few others, also ecologists. I'd like to see what you think Happy Easter, Regards, 220  of  ßorg 12:09, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

Atto Abbas
Hi, I'm finding it very difficult to deal with this issue... I've already filed for sockpuppetry here on en.wiki for various accounts linked to User:Solomon Joe. I'm trying to speedy delete Atto Abbas from all projects, but it will be practically impossible for me to ask for SALTing on the other projects as I can't speak their language. I've noticed that the page to request global blocks is semi-protected indefinitely, and I don't have enough edits on media.wiki to be able to add a request. What do you think should be done? Nehme1499 14:36, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
 * I've requested a global lock for all the recent accounts. VAXIDICAE💉  14:36, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Where has the request been done? So I can keep an eye on the page. Nehme1499 14:46, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi, can you check your talk page on simple? The guy has created another sock. Nehme</b><b style="font-family:Verdana;color:#27B382">1499</b> 14:16, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Have you joined Vikidia?
Hi Praxidicae. I wonder if I could verify with you whether you may have joined the English Vikidia please? I am asking because we have a user who has signed up within the last 24 hours, with a username remarkably similar to yours and only one letter different...

We've previously had a user make accounts impersonating Wikipedians, and I wanted simply to confirm if you've made an account or not! If you haven't, please make a note here and I will whack the account on Vikidia until I can confirm their intent.

Many thanks,

Dane &#124; Geld 14:54, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks for checking in, definitely not me. VAXIDICAE💉  14:55, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
 * No problem. The account is indefinitely blocked for impersonation and I've left their talk page unlocked for now in case they want to address the matter.  Please keep an eye open on the new user log in case they try their luck here next...  Take care!  Dane &#124; Geld  16:11, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Page moved to Draft "From Patrice to Lumumba"
Hey Praxidace. I'm not sure why the article I made on the documentary film From Patrice to Lumumba was moved to a draft page. Which sources are you disputing?
 * There are exactly zero independent reliable sources in your draft. They are all listings and plot summaries. EGGIDICAE🥚  13:34, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for your great work
Hello, Mam! You look like a very strict admin. Yes, I was new and I made a mistake that's why I withdrew that nomination with other nominations too. I am sorry if this was violating any Wikipedia rule. But there are many other editors who withdrew their nominations when they see enough sources. So, I don't think this is a reason to block me. I am new and can make mistakes like other new editors. I am also apologizing for this. I just completed my 12th I hope to edit further here if given tips from you mam. I can really be a great Wikipedia editor. Of course not as like you but still pretty close as much as possible. Remember A student's success depends on his Teacher. Anyways I founded this place I hope it will likely help me (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Teahouse). But still, if I have any probs can I ping you? Pumpsdups (talk) 19:13, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
 * I am not a sir. TAXIDICAE💰  18:44, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Ok, Mam! I am sorry. Although, You are like my school mam very strict. Anyways I founded this place I hope it will likely help me (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Teahouse). Pumpsdups (talk) 19:05, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

UPI
I'm a little confused. You're saying United Press International, a decades-old journalistic institution, is using Wikipedia for its birthdate claims? If that were the case, why are those birthdates not in Wikipedia before I added the UPI cite?--Tenebrae (talk) 23:51, 24 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Also, there is now no WP:RS cite for the WP:BLP claim of Lucy Boynton's birthdate. Uncited BLP claims must be removed immediately. Am I misunderstanding something, that you left those BLP vios in?--Tenebrae (talk) 23:55, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
 * If you're unable to determine why WP:CIRCULAR applies, you shouldn't be editing BLPs, ever. Obviously you're capable of reading, so read my comment directly above this one. VAXIDICAE💉  00:10, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I saw your exchange at WT:V. What is it that convinces you that the UPI pages are just copying from Wikipedia, despite having different items and different wording?   WhatamIdoing (talk) 22:03, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I have already explained no less than 6 times on various talk pages. I’m not doing it again. VAXIDICAE💉  00:43, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I don't mean to ask you to repeat anything. Would you mind leaving a link to one of those explanations on my talk page?   WhatamIdoing (talk) 03:37, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
 * , at the time you asked this question, there was a conversation with literally directly above this section about UPI. It's explained most simplistically there. I'm not going to dig through all my diffs to explain why an obvious non-RS is not a reliable source. I'm not trying to be mean here but I've been quite busy doing other things and do not feel like expending the time or energy on rehashing something as obvious as why a listicle full of indiscriminate information that follows several of our articles to a T shouldn't be used to source information. And for the record, I never said UPI was unreliable as a whole, though now I have my doubts. No source can ever be considered reliable 100% of the time. It is always context and content specific.  EGGIDICAE🥚  12:16, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
 * It's fun to see your seasonal signatures.
 * Looking at your comment (because it's so obvously sourced by Wikipedia, I can't imagine where else some run of the mill-barely-journalism outlet would find the time to individually source each of these), I don't find it convincing. Here's why:
 * "On this day" lists have been a thing for longer than I've been alive (which is to say, a lot longer than Wikipedia has existed). Back in the day, at least in the US, each newspaper kept it own for local events (usually in the form of a paper file folder with clippings from what you ran on this day in each previous year, plus handwritten notes about things to add), and you could subscribe to the wire services to get reminders about national events.  Or, if you couldn't afford that, then you were already subscribing to the big paper in your state anyway, and you could see what you missed from theirs, and make a note for next year.
 * For the "plagiarize Wikipedia model" to be realistic, we'd have to assume that a century-old wire service junked its files because it'd be easier to copy a Wikipedia list than to pull up last year's version of their own work. That seems unlikely to me.  Also, the "plagiarize Wikipedia model" doesn't explain how the UPI lists contain information that isn't in the Wikipedia article.  I don't find that their lists follow our articles to a T.  I find that we include more overall, but they include entries that we don't. WhatamIdoing (talk) 17:36, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
 * There are plenty of papers that were once reputable that are no longer. UPI has never been a beacon of journalistic integrity but for anyone to believe that an unnamed editor went out and researched hundreds of birth dates per day - which only list names on our x day x year pages and none that exist but aren't there, is silly. If you hear hooves, think horses, not zebras. I stand by my statement because it was also in response to a banned editor who insisted on replacing actual reliable sources with his preferred non-RS. If you think I'm wrong, feel free to revert my removals and I'll go get consensus at WP:RSP but this seems like a silly attempt to wear out good faith editors for no reason. PS:I never said they plagiarized it, I did say it's circular, which is not the same. TAXIDICAE💰  17:41, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm also not inclined to trust a source for it's journalistic integrity or ethics when it is owned by the leaders of a "dangerous cult". Further, this is not the paper it once was and it's quality has greatly declined with the change in ownership. TAXIDICAE💰  18:02, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Let me give you an example. You removed this source as being, according to your intuition, nothing more than a partial copy of the Wikipedia article.  The source you removed reports these four births:
 * Thornton Waldo Burgess
 * Kevin Durand
 * Caleb Followill
 * Emma Greenwell
 * These four people are not mentioned in our article January 14. If it is true that these sources actually "only list names on our x day x year pages", then where did these four names come from?  From where I'm sitting, it looks like "not from that Wikipedia page" is the only logical answer. WhatamIdoing (talk) 20:26, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
 * That was one of many, but why do we need to add this dubious UPI source that lacks a byline when most of the ones I removed that Tenebrae placed already had sufficient sourcing. As I said, I'm pretty much done discussing this, if you want to restore the sources, have at it and I will get consensus at WP:RSN on whether their silly "on this day" is reliable and whether UPI is reliable as a whole. I'm not here to continue Tenebrae's battle over BLP sources and I am really not trying to spend all of my free time arguing about this as I think I've made several cogent points that are in line with WP:V, especially considering the ownership of this "paper" and the lack of a byline in what is effectively a listicle. TAXIDICAE💰  20:29, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
Fiddle  Faddle  20:38, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

owenbonnici page
Praxidicae, Why are you dismantling each time the owenbonnici wikipedia page?

Boxofideas (talk) 08:20, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Fergal Harkin
Hello Praxidicae. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Fergal Harkin, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Substantially different to the previous version and there appear to be new sources too. Thank you. SmartSE (talk) 16:19, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion Arnulfo Jose Ramos (AJ “El Kallejero” Ramos)
Hi! I saw that a speedy deletion tag was placed on this page AJ “El Kallejero” Ramos. I would like to know how can I make it better and what information exactly is promotional or not encyclopedic so I can fix it today. I am relatively new on Wikipedia and I am just trying to help create and fix articles about latin Musicians, Media personalities, journalists etc. that are underrepresented on the English Wikipedia with articles that are not written right and so on. I would really like you to let me know how can I fix this article before it is speady deleted. Thanks --Dominicansinhistory (talk) 00:15, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

This page Arnulfo Jose Ramos is not ambiguously promotional, because... (It is substantially different to the previous version. Please stop requesting speedy deletion on articles arbitrarily after users have put so much to write them. I left a message on your talk page and you did not even answer to me, someone else had to explain to me what was wrong with the article for me to fix it. Not answering a message is really impolite and it shows that you do not really care about other users on Wikipedia except yourself and what you think is right.) --Dominicansinhistory (talk) 18:29, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion Arnulfo Jose Ramos (substantially different to the previous version)
This page Arnulfo Jose Ramos is not unambiguously promotional, because... (It is substantially different to the previous version. Please stop requesting speedy deletion on articles arbitrarily after users have put so much to write them. I left a message on your talk page and you did not even answer to me, someone else had to explain to me what was wrong with the article for me to fix it. Not answering a message is really impolite and it shows that you do not really care about other users on Wikipedia except yourself and what you think is right.) Dominicansinhistory (talk) 18:32, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
 * I will continue to request deletion on articles that appear to be promotional. The fact that the text is different is irrelevant as this isn't a WP:G4 tag. Commenting on what you believe my motives to be will get you nowhere, perhaps read the warnings on your own talk page and work on fixing the article. TAXIDICAE💰  18:34, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for answering! It seems like there is nothing that can be done so that this article do not appear promotional to you. I think that instead of looking for what seems or appears promotional, users should read the articles, analyze them and look for the facts and definitely answer the messages on their talk page. I edit and create articles on my free time, and I intent to continue to do it, why? I just like writing and like Wikipedia and before I rewrote the article I read a lot of information that was provided to me, to make sure I follow every detail. If you see anything promotional on the article, I want to kindly ask you to help me and erase it or point it out here so that I can fix it and continue to learn. Dominicansinhistory (talk) 18:49, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Streisand effect
You appear to be engaged in an edit war. And you are up against WP:3RR. Suggest you take it to the article talk page. <b style="color:#060">7&amp;6=thirteen</b> (<b style="color:#000">☎</b>) 21:42, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
 * I've reverted 3 times in a week long period after you and 2 editors inserted BLP violating content against a clear consensus. That isn't edit warring. TAXIDICAE💰  13:01, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Nalanda Nritya Kala Mahavidyalaya
Hello. I had created my first article - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Nalanda_Nritya_Kala_Mahavidyalaya

i requested to move it from Draft to Wiki.

the current status is as below:

A page with this title has previously been moved or deleted.

If you are creating a new page with different content, please continue. If you are recreating a page similar to the previously deleted page, or are unsure, please first contact the user(s) who performed the action(s) listed below.

15:15, 2 April 2021 Praxidicae talk contribs moved page Wikipedia:Nalanda Nritya Kala Mahavidyalaya to Draft:Nalanda Nritya Kala Mahavidyalaya over a redirect without leaving a redirect (doesn't belong here) (thank)

Kindly guide LTbharat (talk) 14:36, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Eggxidicae :)

 * Damn I really missed that opportunity. VAXIDICAE💉  16:21, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Love the latest. No excuse not to get them returns in! :)   ——  Serial  14:50, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Godfather
Thank you for intervening in this matter. On reflection, I consider myself to have behaved badly. Please accept my apology. I shall put it down to being a grumpy old man who will be 79 in under two weeks. Regards, Gareth Griffith-Jones (contribs) (talk) 8:25 pm, Today (UTC+1)
 * No worries, I would just request that you and the other user stick to the talk page for now. Happy early birthday! TAXIDICAE💰  19:28, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Hossein Mohammadi Vahidi
Hello. I wanted to know why you deleted this article? New resources and a new award have been added to this article, which proves the reputation. What is the reason for this?--Jackpet11 (talk) 17:49, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Per the giant blinking notice: I'm not an administrator, I didn't delete your article and can't undelete it. TAXIDICAE💰  17:49, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Dearest sweet Praxie
I got my first dose Pfizer today. I wish you (#1 best), (#2), TBaloney (#3), and  (#4) good healths and good weekend! --IHeartPraxieMost (talk) 21:13, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Stay, healthy my friend! I got my second Pfizer last Wednesday! . TAXIDICAE💰  21:26, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Lucky! I've got my first Moderna dose tomorrow! Bkissin (talk) 18:07, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Good luck, I've not heard great things about the side effects for that one! TAXIDICAE💰  18:08, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Man, sometimes life just isn't fair – the only username I got today was . :/ Blablubbs&#124;talk 21:35, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Nats literally being referred to as husband by his wife, with her consistently using he/him pronouns for him
Why do you want to pretend that evidence that proves that Nats uses he/him pronouns doesn't exist? When his wife has made multiple videos in which she either refers to him as her husband, uses he/him pronouns when referring to him, or does both in the same video, I'd argue that's a fair indication of which of us is right...
 * Great, until that person does so themselves, it shouldn't be changed. TAXIDICAE💰  18:16, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Carolyn Aronson draft
Hello! I would love some specific pointers as to how I can improve the Carolyn Aronson article. I want to add her in order to improve Wikipedia's female representation in its entrepreneurs area, in particular women who are not in tech. She is one of the most successful female entrepreneurs so seemed like a good starting point. I used pages such as Jesse Genet, Cindy Eckert, Emily Weiss and Estée_Lauder_(businesswoman) as models. I would like to learn from you so I can create more pages about female entrepreneurs such as Sabrina Tan and Rea Ann Silva that will hopefully pass muster for inclusion. Rednikki (talk) 20:26, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Rednikki (talk) 20:26, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

April 2021
Hello, a user name Zaheer Don Zaheer Don, adding content to Becky Lynch article like a fanboy. Contents in "Impact and legacy" section are unnecessary. Those contents can be add on other sections. And it's unnecessary to add biggest and highest paid at same time. That guy have no manner how to talk and refer me as fanboy when he is the one who edit like a like a fanboy. Please warn him to edit like standard editor. Rtyggu (talk) 09:50, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Vandalism
You warned User:Rtyggu for edit war. He is still destroying Wikipedia artiles. Please block this user. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zaheer Don Zaheer Don (talk • contribs) 09:48, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Not doing any vandalism. Just making the article a standard Wikipedia article instead of a fan blog. Rtyggu (talk) 10:02, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Request for edit
Hello, I request you to re edit this. []. I added these information along with reliable citation. I have no idea why you remove the content. Articles like Becky Lynch and Charlotte Flair also have similar sections. So I request you to add this section in the article. Thank you Rtyggu (talk) 11:45, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

I never added any information without reliable citation. So why you removed the section? Please re add the section. Thank you Rtyggu (talk) 12:18, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

You warn me for edit war. When I only added proper facts along with reference. You can see this I added citations in every important place. Then you removed this? Rtyggu (talk) 12:23, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

I'm still waiting for your answer. Why you remove the section from one article but not from other? Please re add the section.Rtyggu (talk) 12:40, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Possible sockpuppetry
Can you take a look at this talk page (Talk:Oliver C Beats#Contested deletion) and tell me what you think? <b style="font-family:Verdana;font-size:80%;color:#000080">Nehme</b><b style="font-family:Verdana;color:#27B382">1499</b> 19:29, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

"Praxidicae moved page YSN Flow to Draft:YSN Flow without leaving a redirect: Not ready for mainspace, incubate in draftspace (via script) undo thank"
Hi Prax. Yeah, no problems with that. Still wondering when Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Praxidicae will become a blue link. Pete AU aka --Shirt58 (talk) 10:47, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

Tramp_Stamps_(band) AFD Suggestion
I Request you to please share your opinion, Your knowledge is pretty good. I observed the dates of the news and all are in the last 10-12 days. For me, this is more like an overnight sensation. I just want to improve my understanding that's why I am asking you. Sonofstar (talk) 18:04, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
Thank you for your edit on my second article, and for being nice about the mistake in sourcing!

Andro fred (talk) 21:28, 26 April 2021 (UTC) <br style="clear: both;"/>

I am a paid contributor. I have disclosed on my user page
Hello Sir, I am a paid contributor. I have disclosed on my user page. Is it correctly disclosed or is there something else? Please remove the tag/disclaimer from my pages regarding paid disclosure.Pakvision (talk) 01:38, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Except that isn't your Freelancer that you linked to, . But that's your MO, same as the last dozen accounts. Nice try. TAXIDICAE💰  13:36, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

I am really very sorry if you're serious and hurt about my work on"Foreign relations of India"
Sorry for my actions, if that hurts you. Actually, I'd been planning all these since a couple of months. Actually, I thought that the the relations articles should be based on their geographic locations. According to my geographic knowledge, countries located on left and up of India should have their names before India in their relations with India article, while countries having right and down positions geographically should have the names 'after' India. That was all my target. Thank you. Have a nice day. Utkarsh555 (talk) 14:00, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Dear Praxadicae
Hello my friend, i saw you moved the page Balma (DJ) back to draft, and saw it and try to format it accordingly. I´m sorry if i made a mistake while editing it. Would like to politely invite you to reconsider the speedy deleting.

Thanks in advance for your time, service and patience.

Best Regards. INGEK1 (talk) 15:23, 28 April 2021 (UTC)