User talk:Praxidicae/Archive 5

A barnstar for you!
Dear Chrissymad,

I do not agree with your speedy deletion of my article: “Keesy Adrian Main (footballer, born 1993)”

This article is not a recreation or a duplicate.

I have completely changed the text. I've also added good references. What should I do to fix my article and not be deleted? Why is the article about Harly Wise accepted in Wikipedia?

And the article about Keesy Adrian Main not?

They are similar football players.

Can I post another article about this football player?

What should I do to post my article?

Thanks in advance for your response!

Sincerely, Football Europe — Preceding unsigned comment added by Football Europe (talk • contribs) 17:37, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Revert on Equipment rental
Just to let you know, I took a look at on the article Equipment rental. I guess it was a "rollback" of multiple edits. (I didn't think that I deleted those refs in my cleanup edit.) Apparently some other editors deleted those refs for being out-of-date. I don't really have an opinion about that, but repeated copyedit and cleanup on the article, and slapped a 'needs updating' maintenance template on it. There was some uncited 2016 data that I 'rescued' and put on the talk page, in case some other editor might find a citation for it and include it in the future. – Reidgreg (talk) 13:22, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Regarding your recent request
Hello, thank you for your message

Unfortunately, I was unable to find any violation of guidelines of wikipedia. Would you mind posting the precise violation from the wikipedia rules?

This is how wikipedia regards quotations -

Quotations are a fundamental part of Wikipedia articles. Quotations—often informally called "quotes"—provide information directly; quoting a brief excerpt from an original source can sometimes explain things better and less controversially than trying to explain them in one's own word.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Quotations

As such, it is absolutely not worthy of removal, and is in fact, highly productive and necessary.

Thanks.
 * Per what you've linked and my own prod: Wikipedia is not a list or repository of loosely associated topics such as quotations. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  23:54, 12 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Regarding the claim made by the user 'Chrissymad' above, I present this -


 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AFI%27s_100_Years...100_Movie_Quotes


 * This page lists the top 100 movie quotations in American cinema.


 * Therefore, there is no violation. Wikipedia does list quotations.


 * Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Probity22 (talk • contribs) 01:11, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
 * , you're really comparing two different things here. AFI was celebrating 100 years of being around, and they produced a series of documentaries and videos commemorating that fact. It received widespread attention in multiple news sources.
 * If Wikipedia had a generic list of "Famous Movie Quotes" it would be deleted within a day, because there is no encyclopaedic value. But the article you linked to is about one specific list by a specific company who happened to be celebrating a milestone. The quotes are necessary to provide detail. If I said something about Islam on my blog, could I include it on Quotations on Islam? Of course not. You've made your case, but really the only place you'll be able to change minds is at the deletion discussion itself.
 * Also, as a side note, when leaving a talk page comment, please end your post with ~, which will automatically add your name so that others know who is commenting. Thanks! Primefac (talk) 11:44, 13 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Primefac, see this page -


 * List of quotes featuring Berlin -


 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_quotes_featuring_Berlin


 * So we have pages about quotations on wikipedia. Also, "If I said something about Islam on my blog, could I include it" - No, as that would be a different case. This article is regarding quotes by notable, influential individuals. And yes, I have already presented the case on the deletion discussion page. Should I remove this discussion? Thanks. Probity22 (talk) 11:54, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
 * , that page has also been nominated for deletion, so your argument is kind of falling apart. Regardless, please see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS for why continually saying "but this page exists!" is a pointless argument. We treat every Wikipedia page on its own merits; we don't keep (or delete) one page simply because another exists. Primefac (talk) 12:29, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Request on 15:13:48, 13 June 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Galilite
Hi Chrissymad,

Thank you for your review. You mention that "everything is sourced from their website", and it's not the case. There are references to Bloomberg, etc.

As per notability, it certainly is referenced a lot by "secondary sources", they are just not very informative or up to date. Simply google Aspect Software. It'd be surprising if it weren't; it's one of the largest companies in its area employing 2,000 people all over the world. It's also referenced in the German Wikipedia.

It's interesting that smaller companies that it acquired, like Voxeo or LinguaSys that was employing barely 10 people, are considered more notable and are all referenced in Wikipedia.

Will it help if events like financial issues are added?

Galilite (talk) 15:13, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Please review Min-on submission
I have corrected footnote format. Previous editor said the advertisement tone was corrected. I have revised the draft, as you can see, many times. I hope it is qualified to be posted in Wikipedia.Stgrlee16 (talk) 20:08, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Verity Records block evasion
I have an SPI pending here, and a request for Verity Records to be protected. Home Lander (talk) 22:23, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Check out Sockpuppet investigations/Joseph kargbo ;) CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  22:40, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Oh, perfect. Will add the IPs there as well. Home Lander (talk) 22:42, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

13:18:28, 15 June 2017 review of submission by Craighansennz
HI. It's Craig Craighansennz (talk) 13:18, 15 June 2017 (UTC) I've been riding for some time and really like the wireless shifter and the way it uses the app, which is unique, to calibrate the system. I'd like to publish the article as I think it adds to knowledge. I will add loads more explanatory content about it as I review content about the system. Could you advise me on the best way to enhance this article? I am not a marketer or employed by the company for promotions, just a fan :-) I know you're super busy so would value your advice so I can be a better writer for Wikipedia.

Thanks Chrissymad

Craig Craighansennz (talk) 13:18, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

Please add my contribution: “Keesy Adrian Main (footballer, born 1993)” back!
Hi Chrissymad, I do not agree with your speedy deletion of my article: “Keesy Adrian Main (footballer, born 1993)”

This article is not a recreation or a duplicate. I have completely changed the text. I've also added good references.

Why is the article about Harly Wise accepted in Wikipedia? And the article about Keesy Adrian Main not? They are similar football players.

Please add my contribution back!

Thanks in advance! Sincerely, Football Europe — Preceding unsigned comment added by Football Europe (talk • contribs) 19:37, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
 * , Adrian Main was deleted following this deletion discussion, where it was almost unanimously (minus yourself) decided that Main did not meet the criteria for inclusion on Wikipedia. Until such time as these concerns are met, Wikipedia will not have an article about Main. Just because articles on other footballers may exist doesn't meant this one automatically exists. Primefac (talk) 20:51, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

Spearton vandal...
I added the latest user to your page here. I'm assuming you wish for the page to remain up-to-date. Home Lander (talk) 20:32, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Of course, feel free & thanks! CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  00:39, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Noor Khan (disambiguation).
Hi I am Arbaz Khan Yesterday, I edited Noor khan which was disambiguation page. You reverted changes. I think for disambiguation page it should be named as "Noor Khan (disambiguation)" instead of Noor Khan. And Noor khan page should be left for real page. Please help me in this matter. I'll be very thankful for this favour. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arbaz1528 (talk • contribs) 10:33, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Even if the page is renamed to Noor Khan (disambiguation), the article that you created is not appropriate for Wikipedia as it is not adequately supported by independent reliable sources/significant coverage. Have published reliable sources written about this person in-depth? CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  11:09, 19 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Thanks, I will try to collect more information of this person and I will make another page. after that I will let you know about that so then will you help me in this case as what more is needed Ok. Thanks Arbaz Khan

Facebook as a reliable reference for railway articles
Hi,

I've reverted your edits to the articles on a handful of Victorian Railways (and successors) passenger carriages.

In the context of these articles, the specific facebook posts *are* reliable.

First off, a source has to be hypothetically accessible, not actually accessible, so if you can't see the posts I linked to that's up to you to resolve. The groups I generally link to are Victorian Railway Enthusiasts and Vicsig.

Second, within those groups there are quite a few reliable people (employees) who post details and/or photos as evidence, as well as people who have published books in the past and use Facebook to post updates. Their choice to use Facebook as a medium does not change the validity of the content. Generally speaking, where I've used Facebook references in my tables, the purpose is to be able to trace who said what and when, because the FB archiving system is pathetic and other sites, like VicSig, do not have the capacity (for now) to retain historic data; they can only display current information, which is useless to historians in the period 1986-(pre)current where not much was published.


 * Wikipedia_talk:Verifiability/Archive_65 - establishing that some threads on facebook can be considered reliable depending on who the author is. Case study was a company/group page but principle should apply to others as well.


 * Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_219 - my outline of a few cases of people who should be considered reliable sources in the context of specific articles, regardless of the medium they choose to publish in. Basically, I'm using this quote from Verifiability - "Self-published expert sources may be considered reliable when produced by an established expert on the subject matter, whose work in the relevant field has previously been published by reliable third-party publications."

Anothersignalman (talk) 14:18, 19 June 2017 (UTC)


 * That said, one of your edits merged a lot of references together via a bot. Not sure how you did that but I'd be interested to learn and restore that to the pages. Anothersignalman (talk) 14:19, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Expert, employee or otherwise, FB groups are not a reliable source and they are not a published source. Anyone can make a FB profile, anyone can make a FB group and anyone can claim to be any of those people. A closed group is not up to me to resolve. It is WP:OR. It does not look like any consensus was ever reached in that noticeboard section you linked and until such a time it is established, I would not recommend adding them back. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  14:22, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Discussion continued here: User_talk:Anothersignalman Anothersignalman (talk) 14:32, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Review of my article
Hello,

You recently reviewed my article about "Robert Israel" and it was rejected based on your thoughts about notability. Could you please give me specific ways to fix the article, instead of directing me to what Wiki says is notable? I think I submitted a proper article and I'd like your opinion as to what to fix. Thank you. Adam Adam Rotenberg (talk) 17:56, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

So this is about fairness…
Hi Chrissymad or Primefac,

If you think you're honest, give me good tips to post the article.

Last time, you said that I should come up with good evidence. I did that in the new article, but you deleted it.

Then tell me what to do?

Thanks! Football Europe — Preceding unsigned comment added by Football Europe (talk • contribs) 19:16, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
 * , here's the issue. We have two general guidelines regarding notability of footballers. The first (and most important) is the General Notability Guideline. I'll get to that in a sec. The second is at WP:NFOOTY, which states that players who are not in a Top Tier (e.g. Liga I) are not "automatically" notable, and thus GNG must be met.
 * To demonstrate a subject has met GNG, they must have significant coverage in independent reliable sources. This means things like articles about his history, his playing background (i.e. "his life"). Let's take a look at the references you provided in your last attempt.
 * - Game summary, where Main is mentioned as having "helped out" - no significant coverage
 * - This is just a list of players. Again, no significant coverage.
 * - This one is a little better, as it actually gives some information about Main, but it's still not the depth of coverage we'd prefer. However, it is a decent source, so this could be used to verify his nationality, his goal scoring, or the award he won.
 * - Another game summary.
 * Basically, you've definitely proven that this chap exists. However, Wikipedia is not a yellow pages or a listing of every person who has ever lived. Some people just won't ever be notable. Will you or I or Chrissymad ever do enough to merit an article? Probably not. Will Main? Maybe. If he keeps playing footy and keeps doing well he'll eventually receive that "significant coverage" that we look for.
 * So let's go back to what we're looking for - sources. Think about it this way - if the subject is mentioned (by name) less than three times in an article, it's not significant coverage (it might be reliable coverage, but we need both to demonstrate notability). No significant coverage, no article. It's as simple as that.
 * If you can find these sources and if that means you've demonstrated notability, then I would suggest working on the draft in your sandbox. However, do NOT submit it for review until you have at least two sources which have significant coverage.
 * I encourage you to continue working on your sandbox draft, but I also want you to consider the possibility that Main may never actually meet our criteria for inclusion. There are other footballers out there, maybe write (or improve) articles on them? Either way, I suggest sandboxing (or using the Article Wizard so that a reviewer can take a look at your work. Primefac (talk) 12:57, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

I edited Noor Khan Page
I edited Noor khan Page which was disambiguation. But this is a name of real Pakistani Actress. And I want to make it a real page instead of disambiguation.

So, tell me how to make it a real page (an article) Please help me make it an article — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arbaz1528 (talk • contribs) 13:55, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
 * , the draft in your sandbox is looking pretty good, though you'll need some more reliable sources that talk about her in detail. I've added a sandbox template to the page, which has a "submit your draft for review" button on it. When you feel it's ready, just click that button and follow the directions, and a reviewer will give feedback (if required) on how to further improve the page. If you want more help, stop by the Teahouse, Wikipedia's live help channel, or the help desk to ask someone for assistance. Primefac (talk) 13:03, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

16:11:06, 19 June 2017 review of submission by B. Hullihen
This is Barb Hullihen. I thank you for your prompt review of my:drafted page: Draft:The Harry R. Horvitz Center for Palliative Medicine I do need help. I went through the wikipedia adventure to make sure I understand the requirements for submitting an articel in wikipedia. I wanted to start over using a neutral voice and steering clear or conflict of interest. I did used to work at the Cleveland Clinic but I no longer do. I wonder how can I avoid this suggestion of conflict again?? Any suggestions.

Initially I placed only one reference but I have many more references and publications about the HRH Ctr. It was one of the first of it's kind in the US and it as the first recognized by the WHO in the US as dedicated to palliative care in an in-patient setting. I can of course start poating these refrences, I simply wanted to start simply and then edit as I write more text.

Do you suggest I jsut start in the Teahouse with these questions???

B. Hullihen B. Hullihen (talk) 16:11, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
 * , you say you have more references that talk about the Center. I highly suggest adding them to the draft, and including what they say (in your own words!) to flesh out the page a bit more. Remember that the best sources are ones that are NOT directly connected to the Center (so a review/story/etc by a newspaper is good, a piece by a donor/member/sponsor/etc is not). This shows that people have "taken note" of the Center and it's not just another clinic. You're always welcome to ask individual editors such as Chrissymad or myself for more advice, and there is also the the Teahouse, Wikipedia's live help channel, or the help desk. Primefac (talk) 13:09, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Your "Contribution" to Wikipedia consists of deleting other folks' material.
Basil :
 * A type of leather tanned with redoul [leatherfrance.com/en/glossary/basil]

This is perfectly sensible, correct and -- with 2 references -- checkable. If it's not in the right format, then don't delete it ; tidy it up.

78.147.35.62 (talk) 02:27, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Per WP:DABREF (and the section below it on elinks) neither references nor elinks should be used on a dab. This wasn't about improper formatting, it was about improper content. Primefac (talk) 02:29, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Review of submission of "Claro Energy"
Please help me out to publish my article. My draft was rejected due to notability issue and I didn't find that issue. If you can explain in detail and help me out, then it will be of great help. Also, I have cited reliable references along with my article. Please help out.--Lifeisshubh (talk) 05:41, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

La Luna Sangre editing
Charchang 08 (talk) 14:57, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

How can I not stop Editing the page of La Luna Sangre when some idiots who wanna mess arround are adding some actors/actress at random that are not included in the cast of La Luna Sangre? Without any proof or sources

Actors/Actress such as:
 * Geoff Eigenmann
 * Lexi Fernandez
 * Isabelle Daza
 * Sam Pinto
 * I have no idea what the content issue is but you keep removing a revdel request template and now you're edit warring. Take it to the talk page. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  14:58, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Charchang 08 (talk) 15:12, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

My only problem is the editing of the cast! Don't put random actors or actress that are not included in the cast except if you have sources.

Simple English
Hi,

Can you explain to me what the Simple English Wikipedia is. I really don't understand because there is already an English Wikipedia, so why Simple English? Thanks Plum3600 (talk) 18:47, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Simple English Wikipedia has a pretty good explanation. :) CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  18:51, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Faryal Makhdoom
Hi again. I have made this draft article called Draft:Faryal Makhdoom and I have been waiting for it to get reviewed, but apparently no one has yet. I was wondering if you could review it for me if your an administrator. Would mean a lot to me. Thanks! Plum3600 (talk) 21:11, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I am not an admin however the wait for reviews is going on 6 weeks right now and I can't expedite that. However, drafts are not reviewed in chronological order so it could be today or longer. I will say though that based on the sources, I would not accept the draft as the sources are largely rags and otherwise non-notable sources or passing mentions. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  22:18, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
 * But isn't Hello!, thesun and thedailymail notable? Plum3600 (talk) 22:25, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
 * In this context, not particularly. Also please see WP:DAILYMAIL CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  22:33, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I have removed all thedailymail references. Anything else? Plum3600 (talk) 22:53, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
 * The references are still largely unreliable but they're also about being Khan's wife rather than coverage of *her*. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  23:05, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I only talk about her being Khans wife in the "Feud With In-Laws" bit. I've talked about her early life and career and personal life. Plum3600 (talk) 23:07, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Sangwari speedy
Apologies Chrissymad, I inadvertently removed your tag, as I thought I was reverting the OP. I replaced it (augmenting it by A7, too). Good catch there, couple of seconds before me! Take care, &mdash;  O Fortuna   semper crescis, aut decrescis  17:56, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry if I annoyed you Chrissymad. But discussion and exemplification of issues pertaining to an article is *very much* what a talk page is for. Anyway, it's gone, over and done with, nhf. Cheers, &mdash;  O Fortuna   semper crescis, aut decrescis  18:51, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
 * My mistake! I thought the editor who created it put it there (like many do when tagged for deletion.) CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  18:54, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for that CM. I hope you will accept my apology if my last message sounded snarky? The original error was in any case mine for not looking at the history correctly- Sorry for that. Have a good weekend! &mdash;  O Fortuna   semper crescis, aut decrescis  19:00, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Apologies for everyone! Primefac (talk) 19:05, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I like to keep a few in the bank ;)   &mdash;  O Fortuna   semper crescis, aut decrescis  09:12, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Why are you trying to delete an informative page?
You put forward a speedy deletion on an article me and my community with me now were creating, please can you stop trying to take down an informative and useful article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GoodDays (talk • contribs) 14:12, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Please review the links given in the speedy deletion tag. Articles are required to be written in a neutral, encyclopedic tone and based on what independent reliable sources say, not the fans or the subject. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  14:16, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Autistic Furry 1234567890
I can't find an account similar to this name that has been registered. Does this resemble behavior of any known socks? Home Lander (talk) 20:05, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
 * see ... Aside from the existing account, it resembles just about every nuisance sock ever. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  20:06, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Sheesh, I missed that one? Had to have made a typo somewhere. From the log, seems the page needs to be salted. Home Lander (talk) 20:09, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

RE: World Vision International ( WVI ) page updates
Are you still working on edits to the WVI page?

Colin hk canada (talk) 14:30, 19 June 2017 (UTC) : I think you may have the wrong editor. CHRISSY MAD ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  14:32, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
 * My mistake, I'll take a look this evening. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  14:32, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Are you still able to edit the WVI page? Thanks. Colin hk canada (talk) 13:35, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

Emulator list dispute
Not sure who you're confusing me with but the inexperienced editor who just removes stuff is FlotillaFlotsam, not me and I did not call you inexperienced. PS: Please discuss on the article talk page. --KAMiKAZOW (talk) 16:35, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

Article
Hi. About that edit: how do I show it's notable? I know it is because it was on Billboard and it can be streamed on Spotify and iTunes. Ish Ya Boy (talk) 18:55, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Spotify and itunes mean nothing in the context of notability. If it's charted and has coverage, you need to include the in-depth coverage (in published RS only). If there is no coverage, it should remain as a redirect. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  18:57, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Does Billboard count as coverage? If it charted then that must mean it's notable because it's acknowledged by many. Ish Ya Boy (talk) 19:02, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Coverage? No. Notability? Yes. You can't write an article about something that has no coverage which is why a mention on the target of the redirect is appropriate if there are not sources to summarize in a full length article.  CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  19:03, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Alright. Ish Ya Boy (talk) 19:07, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

22:37:44, 27 June 2017 review of submission by Vijaycs42
I was wondering why the submission for Blueshift Labs was not considered notable despite the citations from Venturebeat, MarketingLand, Martechtoday, Internet Retailer and Mediapost - all of these are detailed articles. Are these not considered good & independent sources? Or is it just that some of these articles refer to the company as simply Blueshift instead of Blueshift Labs? If yes, perhaps I could change the title to Blueshift (Marketing Automation)? Happy to include additional articles too if that helps. Thanks for your advice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vijaycs42 (talk • contribs) 22:48, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

Need some help
Hi, I need your help for not to delete the page of film director Lom Harsh. I am new on Wikipedia, so i need your help in creating any new article. Expecting your valuable reply as soon as possible. Ankitkmwt (talk) 28 june 2017 —Preceding undated comment added 07:53, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Hold up...
According to the official guidelines, a record that has charted on a national chart is allowed its own article. Therefore, The Bedroom Tour Playlist should be allowed its own article. Ish Ya Boy (talk) 18:35, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
 * It makes it notable yes but if the only content is "x charted" it's not very useful as an article, is it? CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  18:35, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I can add more to it. Ish Ya Boy (talk) 18:39, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Naval Supply Systems Command
I should be around IRC later, but if not I need to drop this here. It reeks of copyvio but I'm not finding anything with the tools (other than what I've already removed). If I could get a second (or third, depending on how many stalkers you have) that would be great.

Trimming the promo and unnecessary detail would also be fantastic.

If not, that's cool, I'll probably hit this later today, but I'm mobile at the moment and don't want to forget. Ta! Primefac (talk) 19:23, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
 * It's entirely copied from what appears to be a PD source (or rather, multiple) but then there are also the WP:PAID issues...the COI and of course lack of disclosure. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  19:25, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

mail
If you do, please ping me. I usually avoid teh dramaz, but I might be able to offer a useful opinion.Dlohcierekim (talk) 02:11, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Just a note
Hey! I happened to come across your user page while patrolling recent changes (to be more specific, while trying to stop the vandal who has been harassing user, which is pretty sad since he's a very dedicated and diligent patroller). Just wanted to notify you that I created an AFD log using your format. Hope you dont mind it! I thought I'd let you know since I didn't want to use the format without due credit to the creator :) Jiten Dhandha  •  talk  •  contributions  • 12:53, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

WikiCup 2017 July newsletter
The third round of the competition has finished in a flurry of last minute activity, with 288 points being required to qualify for round 4. It was a hotly competitive round with all but four of the contestants exceeding the 106 points that was necessary to proceed to round 4 last year. Coemgenus and Freikorp tied on 288, and both have been allowed to proceed, so round 4 now has one pool of eight competitors and one of nine.

Round 3 saw the achievement of a 26-topic Featured topic by MPJ-DK as well as 5 featured lists and 13 featured articles. PanagiotisZois and SounderBruce achieved their first ever featured articles. Carbrera led the GA score with 10, Tachs achieved 17 DYKs and MBlaze Lightning 10 In the news items. There were 167 DYKs, 93 GARs and 82 GAs overall, this last figure being higher than the number of GAs in round 2, when twice as many people were taking part. Even though contestants performed more GARs than they achieved GAs, there was still some frustration at the length of time taken to get articles reviewed.

As we start round 4, we say goodbye to the fifteen or so competitors who didn't quite make it; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them (some people have fallen foul of this rule and the points have been removed).

If you are concerned that your nomination, whether it be for a good article, a featured process, or anything else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth 05:37, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Check it
Please can you check my draft? Draft:The Bedroom Tour Playlist Ish Ya Boy (talk) 17:29, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft article libby Birch
Hi, and firstly thanks for recently improving my article so it may be accepted. I am happy for any changes which make this a better article. when you last reviewed draft Libby Birch there is now a review in progress notation saying i shouldnt touch it for 12 hours but that has lapsed ? will i just leave it all now and does this take time to be passed through the administrator or is there something else that i should do at this time. thanks again Gregb kennedy kennedygregb (talk) 00:05, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
 * , Chrissymad has marked the page under review so that she can work on it a bit, clean it up, etc and hopefully get it to an acceptable state. Sometimes "in review" templates sit there for a while. You're welcome to make constructive changes during this period, just note that if you see a lot of activity by her it's probably best to stay out of the way ;) I'm sure she also appreciates the reminder, since she's a busy lass and often forgets where she puts things :p Primefac (talk) 00:10, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

many thanks to all those helping with this article and the process kennedygregb (talk) 03:05, 30 June 2017 (UTC) I just made some minor referencing improvements, is there anything else that needs to be done to this article in your opinion now ? thanks again for assisting ,Greg b kkennedygregb (talk) 21:54, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Morgan Berry
What's missing in Morgan Berry's Wikipedia page? Travaughn13 (talk) 05:13, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Under review template
I just want to remind you that you have put the "under review" template on these drafts and it has been more that 12 hours.

Plum3600 (talk) 16:43, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Draft:Libby Birch
 * Draft:Clevnet
 * Draft:Good Night Stories for Rebel Girls
 * Draft:LaToya Cantrell
 * I'm aware, thanks though. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  16:43, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

changes to page
I was hoping to remove the information regarding 'personal financial information' Regarding Mr. Nicholas Snider. It is unfortunate that someone would post this information. I truly believe that it is a violation of boundariesAl Ponyo (talk) 23:02, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Content that is reliably sourced isn't removed just because it's disagreeable. Nevermind, I've restored your edits. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  23:19, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Re: source validity
Hey,

Interested in your feedback here - Wikipedia_talk:Verifiability

Thanks, Anothersignalman (talk) 01:27, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm getting rather frustrated with these repeat RfCs after having explained my position (as well as many others) about how referencing and reliability works. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  01:28, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

08:45:13, 5 July 2017 review of submission by Rachelmurrayliu
Hi Chrissymad,

I wanted to double check what you meant by " This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified."

I asked on the LiveChat help, and the admins there weren't sure what about it you found unsourced in particular.

They did suggest removing the inline text hyperlinks such as "The National Council for Curriculum and Assessment" and "FON Project"?

Is that what you were referring to, or did I have other mistakes too?

Thanks for your time.

Rachelmurrayliu (talk) 08:45, 5 July 2017 (UTC)Rachelmurrayliu

"Screen size/fonts size"
Thank you VERY much...problem resolved. Seth Whales  talk  15:14, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
 * I do that often on my computer on Chrome so it's a daily occurrence. :) CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  15:19, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Clevnet
Hi- you marked Draft:Clevnet under review 21 days ago? Just dropping a note in case you've forgotten. Best wishes, jcc (tea and biscuits) 17:10, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Oh, and more recently, Draft:LaToya Cantrell, Draft:Libby Birch and Draft:Good Night Stories for Rebel Girls but these are all more recent. jcc (tea and biscuits) 17:11, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
 * I am aware, I am actively working and verifying sources for each one. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  15:20, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Mess up during round robin move
Hi,

This was my first attempt to move a page with round robin move, and I messed up. The discussion can be found here. In the process, I did some mistake. The page has been successfully moved from Wilson's Heart to Wilson's Heart (House), but it ended up with a redirect page: Wilson's Heart (House) temp. Not sure where I went wrong. Could you please elaborate? And also, how to clean-up my mess? Sorry for messing up. — usernamekiran (talk)  20:48, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Not sure you're asking the right user on this? CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  20:50, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Arent you a page mover as well? — usernamekiran (talk)  20:52, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
 * I just posted (pasted) the same message to Widr. He seems to be online. — usernamekiran (talk)  20:54, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Why removed?
Hello There

why my edit was removed? I am writing about myself so how can I write no neutral opinion. My fact are correct and other ones are not.

please advise

Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Effettosorpresa (talk • contribs) 12:43, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
 * What you've added is a copyvio and not written neutrally - Wikipedia is an encyclopedia so content must be free and neutral; this is neither. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  12:58, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

I wrote this because I am Damiano — Preceding unsigned comment added by Effettosorpresa (talk • contribs) 13:00, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
 * It does not change anything - Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and articles are written based on what independent reliable sources say, not what the subject says. And in that case, please review WP:COI. Additionally this does not negate the copyright issue. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  13:04, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Revdel'd. Primefac (talk) 13:23, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

SellerPrime reference removed from Amazon MarketPlace page
Hey Chrissy, Hope you are not Mad! I just added the reference to SellerPrime on Amazon Marketplace wiki page. I think the reference is relevant, the most important factor affect your listing in Amazon. Please verify the content again. Cheers!

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Amazon_Marketplace&oldid=789669237 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sellerprime (talk • contribs) 20:04, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

A7
You place an A7 notability speedy deletion tag on Ajeet Aryan Sharma. You should know by now that all members of a legislature are considered notable here.  DGG ( talk ) 02:58, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
 * , while normally this is true, I can find almost no evidence this person even exists, let alone is an elected member of a legislature. I, too, could write an article about Joe Bloggs, the MP from Worcestershire, but that has about as much truth as this article seemingly does. If you find evidence of his membership (which I can't even find on the party's own page, and they seem to list everyone), I'm more than willing to reverse the deletion. Primefac (talk) 03:21, 9 July 2017 (UTC)


 * If you don't think the person exists, why do you think they are not notable? If they don't exist or haven't done what they said, then the reason for deletion is as a hoax. But that's not obvious, so it has to go to AfD. You reinstated an A7 after I declined it, and no matter whether you are ultimately right, that is not a legitimate way to proceed.  DGG ( talk ) 03:50, 9 July 2017 (UTC).
 * Fair point. Plus, a G4 deletion is a lot easier to do than constantly re-A7'ing. Primefac (talk) 04:00, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
 * I do know better, however there's been a spate of declines recently for tagging *people* as hoaxes since "living people can't be hoaxes". However, this was deleted less than 24 hours prior by Bbb23 as A7 for the same article and nearly identical content. When looking at A7, do we not apply CCS? In this case, there was nothing credible about it and therefor a7 could apply. And also, in this case I agree with the hoax tag because on the 4th the same editor created Ajeet Aryan who is a "blogger". Believe it or not, I do my "homework" before applying tags. And for what it's worth, now after looking a little deeper, it appears his profession isn't the only thing that changes, but his name too. 1, 2 CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  14:01, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Perhaps I should have look further myself; perhaps it would have helped had you said some of this in the nomination. I will look at the author's work in case he isn't blocked already.  DGG ( talk ) 14:30, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
 * I didn't realize the last part of the issue until today however when tagging with Twinkle there is no ability to add a reason unless you do custom (which is pretty much declined 99% of the time regardless of content in the CSD) I'd imagine the reviewing admin would be able to see the history as well. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  18:28, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
 * You could do a custom reason and then start off with . Just a thought. Primefac (talk) 18:32, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Pretty much a guaranteed decline, given my experienced. In any case, as I said previously, it was not credible so failed the second C in CCS. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  19:08, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Miss Grand International Indonesia 2017
Dea is Miss Grand International Indonesia 2017. Tarorenaba (talk) 18:14, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
 * That's nice but don't remove the AfD notice. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  18:17, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Edited Nasra Ali's page - added 2 reliable sources
Hi Chrissymad,

As you've requested I've added reliable sources for the Nasra Ali's biography post for authentication. Please review, if the suggestion for deletion can be lifted.

Thank you!

Rahmano (talk) 12:00, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Journal of International Affairs
Hi, I'm the managing editor at JIA. I just noticed that you deleted all of our updates that were made yesterday. Could you please either explain why you are doing this, or alternatively let us update our page? JIA SIPA (talk) 16:13, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Two reasons, one it was incredibly promotional and two it was a copyright violation. Please also see WP:COI. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  16:17, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Could you elaborate? What was exactly a copyright violation, all info was taken from our website. Additionally, what was promotional? All I added was the current editorial board and notable contributors JIA SIPA (talk) 16:21, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
 * "all info was taken from our website."...that's the copyvio. Articles are based on what independent reliable sources have said about the subject and not what the subject says about itself. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  16:23, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but we are a very reputable journal in the academia, there was nothing promotional about what we said, we simply mentioned the facts, such as the new editorial board. We edited the name of the current editor in chief. We added the logo of our journal, and we added notable contributors. I can provide sources for all of this, in that case will you let me update the page? No promotion here just want the page to be updated, we really do not need promotion, we are an NGO, the editors are not paid, neither are the contributors. There is no personal interest here. JIA SIPA (talk) 16:33, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Please review WP:COI and follow the directions there - you should be requesting edits be made on the talk page given your conflict of interest. We also do not include contact info in articles, so adding email addresses was inappropriate. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  16:37, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Hello, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update: Technology update:
 * The new page backlog is currently at 18,511 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a a day.
 * Some editors are committing to work specifically on patrolling new pages on 15 July. If you have not reviewed new pages in a while, this might be a good time to be involved. Please remember that quality of patrolling is more important than quantity, that the speedy deletion criteria should be followed strictly, and that ovetagging for minor issues should be avoided.
 * Several requests have been put into Phabractor to increase usability of the New Pages Feed and the Page Curation toolbar. For more details or to suggest improvements go to Page Curation/Suggested improvements
 * The tutorial has been updated to include links to the following useful userscripts. If you were not aware of them, they could be useful in your efforts reviewing new pages:
 * User:Lourdes/PageCuration.js adds a link to the new pages feed and page curation toolbar to your top toolbar on Wikipedia
 * User:The Earwig/copyvios.js adds a link in your side toolbox that will run the current page through

General project update:
 * Following discussion at Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers, New pages patrol/Noticeboard has been marked as historical. Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers is currently the most active central discussion forum for the New Page Patrol project. To keep up to date on the most recent discussions you can add it to your watchlist or visit it periodically.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:48, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

GTISC
Chrissy, I noticed that you reverted all of Georgia Tech's edits to the GTISC page. This page was horribly outdated by more than two years and inaccurate; the unit has been absorbed into another, and the GTISC website redirected to the proper home within the gatech.edu domain. We are trying to inform the public of GTISC's change and leave an accurate record on Wikipedia. This is not promotional. We are simply correcting what is no longer accurate. I'm going to undo your changes again and move an external link to the proper place on the page. I appreciate your understanding. Thank you. CyberBuzz GA (talk) 15:32, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Reverted Edit on Dominican Republic Page
Hi Chrissymad, I recently reverted an edit made by user 66.176.126.150 on the Dominican Republic page due to his sources being poor and he appeared to be in an edit war. My undo was then undone which I think was a mistake. Would it be alright to put the page back to how it was before 66.176.126.150 made his changes? Thanks. WhistlingCanines (talk) 16:23, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

Sockmasters
Of course it was. D'oh! I must be losing it. Take care! &mdash; fortuna  velut luna  16:32, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

Conjuring Fate speedy deletion
Hi Chrissymad! I've reviewed the speedy deletion tag on the Conjuring Fate article, and I'm not quite sure it meets the G11 or G12 criteria. There appears to be significant amounts of content that isn't an obvious copyright violation, and the article is fairly neutrally worded, though it probably fails the notability criteria for bands WP:BAND. I agree that article should be deleted, but based on these factors I wasn't comfortable speedy deleting it. So what I have done is that I have delisted the speedy deletion and renominated it for deletion as a proposed deletion instead. Let me know if you have any questions, or if you think I've erred.

Thanks, Prodego  talk  01:37, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
 * 2 of the 3 short paragraphs were directly copied from the source I included and were rather promotional, in addition to that I believe it completely fails significance (and the claims of such are unsupported by facts) so it probably loosely qualified for A7 (band) too as I can find no indication that they're actually signed to the label the article claims. I'd previously tagged it for deletion via BLPPROD and some non-RS were added and the prod removed for whatever it's worth.  CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  02:05, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Prevent deletion of Kanvic Consulting Page
Hey. A page that i created recently, Kanvic is up for deletion. I feel that it should be up here. If you would be so kind to guide me as to how i can keep this page on without violating the norms of Wikipedia, i would be highly grateful. Looking forward to your response. Regards, Nilasis. — Preceding unsigned comment added by B.nilasis (talk • contribs) 10:36, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Zoë2000
What was the attack page you warned this editor about here ? She's created a very bizarre article Boys (TV series)  that had some very questionable content (twin incest, etc). but I don't know if it is the same article. Meters (talk) 00:29, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
 * The death threats on their user page before it was deleted... CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  00:32, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Did they involve the people involved in Boys (TV series) ? I've taken it to AFD. The original version of it appeared to be a hoax with just the thinnest veneer of reality. Meters (talk) 05:54, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

On the house
Re: your warning to User talk:93.168.90.109: edit warring, perhaps (though not to the point of WP:3RR), but they committed no vandalism on the house. – wbm1058 (talk) 08:28, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
 * It was a series of continued vandalism/disruptive editing across multiple articles, perhaps the disruptive editing warning would have been better but I still stand by it. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  10:23, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

ECCO Search Page
Hey there--you recently gave me guidance on the creation of our company page. Thanks! However, I noticed you removed ECCO Safety grup from the search criteria/disambiguation page. Did I do anything wrong? That result/sentence was not added by me, and has been there for some time. Let me know! Johnny at ECCO (talk) 21:19, 20 July 2017 (UTC)Johnny at ECCO — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnny at ECCO (talk • contribs) 20:38, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

CCGS Page
Hello I just wanted to know why you removed the edit I made to CCGS, am I new to this and want to know what I did wrong so I do not do it again next time. Thanks :) Joel146 (talk) 15:52, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Welcome and please see MOS:DAB and WP:DDD. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  15:53, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for responding! That is very long how am I supposed to know what I specifically did wrong from all of that? Joel146 (talk) 15:58, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Please take some time to read at least the second link as it adequately explains why in a very short, concise way. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  15:59, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
 * I already did...this is all very confusing maybe I'm not cut out for this.Joel146 (talk) 16:12, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm really not sure how it can be better explained than at WP:DDD. DABs are for navigating Wikipedia, so anything linked in a DAB should be an article or something covered in an article and DABs do not have external links or refs. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  16:14, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

So should I have not put anything as a source at all? Joel146 (talk) 16:17, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
 * There should be no need for refs on any DAB as DABs are for navigating Wikipedia, so it should be covered in the linked article. If the article doesn't exist or the topic is not covered significantly in a related article, it shouldn't be on a DAB. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  16:19, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

Oh that a makes sense now. There should be a page on it though. Joel146 (talk) 16:22, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

Threshold - Legends of the Shires
Hi Chrissymad, I'm new to Wikipedia, having added the aforementioned article to now see its been deleted and replaced by a redirect to the band page. Why do you not think it warrants a page with track listing etc.? Thanks! (and apologies if I'm using the talk function incorrectly) Johnwarnes (talk) 08:09, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Deletion of article:olubunmi kuku
hi i noticed you requested for speedy deletion of an article i put up, please restore the page because the intention behind it was not to promote an entity but to give more information about an entity Tygeera (talk) 16:40, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion Tag on Megamaker
Hello Chris,

Greetings from the other side, i recently removed a speedy deletion tag you placed on Megamaker i will work on the page and remove promotional contents as it was tagged for. I believe it's an encyclopedic content and should be improved on. Thanks in advance Zazzysa (talk) 13:06, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Deposit Bonds - undo redirect
Hello Chrissymad ,

you have redirected my article on deposit bonds to deposit insurance, they are two different things

1) deposit bonds are related to real estate purchases 2) deposit insurance protects banks

please read articles next time befiore judging on something you dont know, can you undo the redirect so i can re - do

Regards

Helzingh — Preceding unsigned comment added by Helzingh (talk • contribs) 05:19, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

RfA
Hello! I have been digging into your contributions and logs for a while and I wonder, would you consider accepting an RfA nomination? Because I believe you are the type of user that we need for the mop. --Kostas20142 (talk) 15:39, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Seconding that! You'd make a good administrator  -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 15:41, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Do you think you're the best person to draft a nomination though, Kontas20142 ? Nick (talk) 16:21, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Well, I feel I can make it if I try hard (maybe there will be a co-nominator as well). However I feel that my talk page would be the best place for this discussion --Kostas20142 (talk) 16:31, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

General question
Chrissymad-

Based on your reversion of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nisa

I rarely edit wikipedia, but when I do, it tends to be for something minor that is missing or out of place. I have come to expect a quick reversion.

In this case, I was searching for a recent paper from NISA Investment Advisors and ended up on the wikipedia aggregation page instead of their site. When I found they weren't on the page, I added them. I understand that they don't have a standalone wiki page (is this the reason?) but they do actually have the nisa.com domain, so I thought it made sense.

Should I continue to infrequently contribute?

Clevell (talk) 16:48, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
 * No need for such hostility but please see MOS:DAB and WP:DDD for why I reverted your addition. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  16:59, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

Re: Dave Salanitro article being considered for deletion
Dear Chrissymad

On behalf of my colleague, Dave Salanitro, I urge you to reconsider your petition for removal. We have overhauled the startling wreck of Dave's, frankly unreadable, Wikipedia page, which was made known to him via a surprise Google announcement. I assure he was as appalled as you must have been at what he found, and we are both still confounded by how it got there.

Understanding that we could not delete the page, I encouraged Dave to seize the opportunity. His accomplishments, his contributions to the craft of design and the profession at large have earned him a place on Wikipedia. Please take the time to read my extended argument at User_talk:Maxxheth; I hope you'll agree that Dave Salanitro is far from ordinary.

Thank you for your consideration.Maxxheth (talk) 06:54, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Hi, Chrissymad: I interviewed Dave Salanitro for the cover of HOW Magazine in the fall of 1997 (I was the Senior Editor there at the time). All of us at HOW were in awe of the work they were creating--absolutely dynamic, original, and cutting edge. Their original work stood out even more starkly in San Francisco, where there seems to be more design studios than coffee shops. I then went on to work as the Web Director for Chronicle Books, where I was thrilled to see the Oh Boy Artifacts line thrive. Please remove your petition for deletion. Lisabagg (talk) 19:48, 1 August 2017 (UTC)Lisa Baggerman Hazen

Sir, please remove the speedy deletion tag from my page
Sir, This page is about the 71 years old cultural event of the oldest medical college of asia. This is a traditional event of the doctors of West Bengal. The topic is encyclopedic. If this is not important then what is? Plz reconsider and remove the tag. Dipra Dattasarma (talk) 13:33, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Chiranjeevi Jetty
Hi, Are you keeping an eye on this one? There seem to be 2 or 3 editors intent on either vandalising / blanking the page or adding the same puffery that you just deleted. One is blocked already and it seems likely that the others are not here to contribute generally. Eagleash (talk) 11:13, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
 * yep! It's on my watchlist and i'm about to file an SPI. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  11:14, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I mulled over SPI yesterday but when the first account was blocked, thought I'd wait, see how it went. Cheers. Eagleash (talk) 11:20, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

TALI RUSH article
Tali rush is a producer so guys stop deleting my articles Amazigh2968 (talk) 13:05, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

Request on 13:48:33, 14 August 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by FelicianoTech
Hi,

The Wikipedia help pages suggested contacting the reviewer who denied a page draft for advice on how to fix the page. So, what can I do to get this page approved?

Thank you.

Ricardo

FelicianoTech (talk) 13:48, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

13:25:59, 14 August 2017 review of submission by ModugnoT
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:The_Oreo_Cat Hi Crissy.

You rejected my article and left the comment that my refs are almost all social media. However, that is the whole reason for the submission. I am writting about a social media icon. I am not sure what else to provide here. The Oreo Cat evenhas many verified social accounts including our facebook page and others. It's also a registered enterprise you can see on Google: http://theoreocat.business.site/ https://www.google.ca/search?q=The+Oreo+Cat&oq=The+Oreo+Cat&gs_l=psy-ab.3..35i39k1l2j0i20k1j0.986.2336.0.2613.12.12.0.0.0.0.195.1271.4j7.11.0....0...1.1.64.psy-ab..1.11.1266...0i67k1.4WT3h_6HO0U

I am not sure what else you want me to add. Can you give me an idea here?
 * , as I mentioned on the (now declined) draft page, notability on Wikipedia is determined by what independent sources say about the subject. If the only people who have ever written about "The Oreo Cat" are the owners of the Oreo Cat, then the cat simply isn't notable per our standards. See The Golden Rule. Primefac (talk) 15:00, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Zeke Cohen concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Zeke Cohen, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

madhan page
madhan wrirer is not madhan he is madan kindly revented the change — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chennaiboys (talk • contribs) 13:47, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Hello, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update: Technology update: General project update: If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:33, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
 * The new page backlog is currently at 16,991 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a a day.
 * has created a NPP browser in WMF Labs that allows you to search new unreviewed pages using keywords and categories.
 * The Wikimedia Foundation Community Tech team is working with the community to implement the autoconfirmed article creation trial. The trial is currently set to start on 7 September 2017, pending final approval of the technical features.
 * Please remember to focus on the quality of review: correct tagging of articles and not tagbombing are important. Searching for potential copyright violations is also important, and it can be aided by Earwig's Copyvio Detector, which can be added to your toolbar for ease of use with this user script.
 * To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

WikiCup 2017 September newsletter
Round 4 of the WikiCup has ended and we move forward into the final round. In round 4, a total of 12 FAs, 3 FLs, 44 GAs, 3 FLs, 79 DYKs, 1 ITN and 42 GARs was achieved, with no FPs or FTs this time. Congratulations to Peacemaker67 on the Royal Yugoslav Navy Good Topic of 36 items, and the 12 featured articles achieved by Cas Liber (5), Vanamonde93 (3), Peacemaker67 (2), Adityavagarwal (1) and 12george1 (1). With a FA scoring 200 points, and bonus points available on top of this, FAs are likely to feature heavily in the final round. Meanwhile Yellow Evan, a typhoon specialist, was contributing 12 DYKs and 10 GAs, while Adityavagarwal and Freikorp topped the GAR list with 8 reviews each. As we enter the final round, we are down to eight contestants, and we would like to thank those of you who have been eliminated for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia. The lowest score needed to reach round 5 was 305, and I think we can expect a highly competitive final round.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews Needed. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to reduce the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck, and let the best man (or woman) win! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth 06:25, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:District 1 2016 Primary Election


Hello, Chrissymad. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "District 1 2016 Primary Election".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 17:47, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

EFH
Hi Chrissyman, I changed your group from EFM to the new EFH group (discussion of which came a lot from your request!). This will prevent changing filters, but will ADD the ability to see the spamblacklist log. Could you try out the SBL log to make sure it is working without admin access? Thank you, — xaosflux  Talk 21:06, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
 * It does indeed! Thanks! CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  21:35, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Hello, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update: Technology update: General project update: If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:16, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
 * The new page backlog is currently at 14304 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a day.
 * Currently there are 532 pages in the backlog that were created by non-autoconfirmed users before WP:ACTRIAL. The NPP project is undertaking a drive to clear these pages from the backlog before they hit the 90 day Google index point. Please consider reviewing a few today!
 * The Wikimedia Foundation is currently working on creating a new filter for page curation that will allow new page patrollers to filter by extended confirmed status. For more information see: 
 * On 14 September 2017 the English Wikipedia began the autoconfirmed article creation trial. For a six month period, creation of articles in the mainspace of the English Wikipedia will be restricted to users with autoconfirmed status. New users who attempt article creation will now be redirected to a newly designed landing page.
 * Before clicking on a reference or external link while reviewing a page, please be careful that the site looks trustworthy. If you have a question about the safety of clicking on a link, it is better not to click on it.
 * To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

RMM Page
Hello, I would like to remind you that we are allowed to edit wiki pages when they are in the deletion review process. In fact, it is encouraged. Thank you! I've reverted the page back to the version I edited, which undid your undo. If you have specific problems with the page feel free to edit! But I am well within wiki guidelines to edit the page and try to improve it based on the AfD concerns. Outlier11
 * The COI issues have not been addressed and thus I've added the tag back. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  19:53, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Thank you! That was an oversight on my part, I meant to put it back in. Outlier11

September 2017
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like you to assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not do on Bert Biscoe. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --- Α Guy Into Books™ &sect; ( Message ) - 20:37, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Good faith was assumed - however what appears to be an edit war warranted my warning to you and still does. 3 reverts is when you get into block territory. That warning was a friendly reminder that you were getting to that point. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  20:55, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Thats ok, but templates really get on my nerves, possibly they just seem patronising or something... I did put the content on the AfD discussion page rather than restoring it again, which has generated another thread of argument (as usual) so no worries!. --- &Alpha; Guy Into Books&trade; &sect; ( Message ) -  21:03, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Great to see...
Your name popping up several places on my watchlist again :) TonyBallioni (talk) 12:24, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

03:57:02, 3 October 2017 review of submission by Jzirin
I have revised my draft to include references to publications where my articles have appeared. All my books and articles are not about me but about external subjects (the courts, the law, foreign relations). SINCE ZIRIN IS NOTED AS A WRITER AS WELL AS A LAWYER AND TALK SHOW HOST, IT IS RELEVANT TO CITE HIS WRITINGS TO VERIFY THE SUBJECT'S PROMINENCE. Please tell me of anything else I need to do to qualify for publication. Thanks for your assistance. Jim Zirin (talk) 03:57, 3 October 2017 (UTC)October 2, 2017
 * , the Golden Rule for Articles says that you must have independent sources that discuss the subject in detail. There is nothing wrong with including some of Zarin's publication history or listing some of his publishers, but in order to demonstrate notability you must include what other people have said about him. Otherwise, it's just a promotional page with no verifiable substance. On that note, I highly recommend you check out WP:REFB Section 3.1 for more information about adding references to an article. Primefac (talk) 11:57, 3 October 2017 (UTC)