User talk:Praxidicae/Archive 7

McBride & the Ride
My edit was not vandalism. Precedent is that common instruments are not linked in music articles. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 00:26, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
 * I was trying to find the last non-vandalized version which happened to be beyond yours (there is socking.) Sorry. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  13:25, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

YGM
~ Rob 13 Talk 00:46, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Edits to Ryan D Craig's page 12/6/17
Hi Chrissymad,

I noticed that you removed my edits for Ryan D Craig and I wanted to see if I could get clarification on why it was removed. I look forward to hearing back from you.

Thank you! Tara — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tnjones522 (talk • contribs) 15:42, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Association of Spaceflight Professionals
That thing needs a complete overhaul, and probably a couple of tags. If the spirit moves you, there's material in here that will probably allow for a decent rewrite... Drmies (talk) 17:42, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Erand Hoxha
errant hoax, ha? -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 18:48, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion Tag
Hi Chrissymad, I created an article for Turicum Private Bank, which was nominated for deletion and then deleted, with the following reason..."because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia." I'm surprised I can't create a simple article about a company when there are hundreds of articles about companies, organisations etc The article will hold basic information about the company, when people search Turicum in a web browser. C Henwood (talk) 10:25, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Hello, thanks for helping to build Wikipedia, the free content encyclopedia. Subjects of encyclopedia'a must meet notability requirements. Articles need verifiable information from reliable sources that treat the subject in depth. This showed no indication of why the subject would be significant enough for an encyclopedia article. You might want to try again using the WP:article wizard. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 14:51, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

LISTEN
I worked hard for that page to be created... If there was only a minor thing to be corrected... WHY COULDN'T other wiki users make that change??? Is this fair?--Kingdamian1 (talk) 00:01, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Hello, thanks for helping build Wikipedia, the worlds largest free contnet encyclopedia.. If you mean Nicholas Einhorn, it was a WP:COPYVIO, not a "minor problem". Please see Copyrights. Wikipedia content may not be copyrighted elsewhere. It must be freely distributable. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 14:58, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Hello, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update: Outreach and Invitations:
 * The new page backlog is currently at 12713 pages. Please consider reviewing even just a few pages each day! If everyone helps out, it will really put a dent in the backlog.
 * Currently the backlog stretches back to March and some pages in the backlog have passed the 90 day Google index point. Please consider reviewing some of them!
 * If you know other editors with a good understanding of Wikipedia policy, invite them to join NPP by dropping the invitation template on their talk page with: . Adding more qualified reviewers will help with keeping the backlog manageable.

New Year New Page Review Drive
 * A backlog drive is planned for the start of the year, beginning on January 1st and running until the end of the month. Unique prizes will be given in tiers for both the total number of reviews made, as well as the longest 'streak' maintained.
 * Note: quality reviewing is extremely important, please do not sacrifice quality for quantity.

General project update: If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. —  TonyBallioni (talk) 20:27, 12 December 2017 (UTC) 
 * ACTRIAL has resulted in a significant increase in the quality of new submissions, with noticeably fewer CSD, PROD, and BLPPROD candidates in the new page feed. However, the majority of the backlog still dates back to before ACTRIAL started, so consider reviewing articles from the middle or back of the backlog.
 * The NPP Browser can help you quickly find articles with topics that you prefer to review from within the backlog.
 * To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

Request on 16:59:46, 13 December 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Twinsoft1
Here are few additional points to adequately show the subject's notability.

One of the important contribution by Pankaj Patel is 130/30 index. He was the one who build the portfolio from the idea of 130/30 type needs the index. Prof Andrew Lo provided theoretical reasoning, Pankaj Patel created portfolio of equities to build the index. Philip Vasan brought Pankaj and Andrew in one room to come up with index.

In partnership with Professor Andrew Lo of MIT, and  Philip Vasan  of Blackrock, Pankaj launched the first passive and investible 130/30 Equity index.

I will add these additional references: https://www.cfapubs.org/doi/full/10.2469/dig.v38.n3.25 https://www.math.nyu.edu/faculty/avellane/Lo13030.pdf

I will be happy to answer any other follow questions you might have.

Twinsoft1 (talk) 16:59, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Beagle
Please can you explain this revert? Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  18:04, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Wenonah Hauter Page
Hello Chrissymad,

I am seeking to make a page for Wenonah Hauter, who is featured in the Requested articles page here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requested_articles/Biography/By_profession#Activists

Previously you flagged the page for speedy deletion for copyright infringement for being too similar to the website about her. I have worked hard to put a biography of her in my own words but wanted to see if I could run it by you first to get your approval. The copy I had in mind is below, please let me know!
 * Hi, I removed the article from my talk as it wasn't appropriate for this page. It appears the copyright violation is no longer a problem however this is sourced almost entirely to her own website. Please see WP:RS and WP:PRIMARY. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  18:06, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

18:10:46, 14 December 2017 review of submission by 2603:300B:71F:4600:116F:F06F:8AEA:D0C8
Updated the sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:300B:71F:4600:116F:F06F:8AEA:D0C8 (talk) 18:10, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Why?
Can you explain why you decided draft Draft:Muneeb Butt add it had all content that the draft wants. 39.38.31.216 (talk) 15:29, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Totally Accurate Battle Simulator, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Hamro (talk) 09:43, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

whom are you talking? 39.38.34.196 (talk) 12:30, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

Request on 16:04:54, 17 December 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Constant shallowness
Hello Chrissymad,

You suggested changes on an article for the group called Vukovar. Your suggestions were based around the references. The references used are mainly Louder Than War which is a national publication in print and online. These alone should be strong enough without the secondary references. Can you please look into it and reconsider your position.

Also, you said something about the presentation - would you kindly give me instructions on how to improve this?

Thanks.

Yours, Constant Shallowness. Constant shallowness (talk) 16:04, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

Constant shallowness (talk) 16:04, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
 * , while Louder Than War does appear to be a reliable source, the issue is that the three references given are by the same author (to quote from WP:GNG, "Multiple publications from the same author or organization are usually regarded as a single source for the purposes of establishing notability). Thus, you essentially have "one" good source that discusses the band. You will need to add more in order to demonstrate notability. It will also be helpful to turn your end-of-page references into inline citations; see WP:REFB Section 3.1 for information about how to quickly and easily add references to a page. Primefac (talk) 17:29, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

13:21:35, 18 December 2017 review of submission by Glenn Shaw
Thank you for your review of my article. I followed your suggestions and added some References. Your help is appreciated. Have a great day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Glenn Shaw (talk • contribs) 13:21, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

16:42:57, 18 December 2017 review of submission by CMFLWiki
I have made all the relevant changes that were suggested and wish for the page to be made public please. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CMFLWiki (talk • contribs) 16:42, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Request on 11:24:20, 19 December 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Joshiankit15
I just wanted to know about my recent article what types of amendments required. please guide me

Joshiankit15 (talk) 11:24, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
 * , your article needs to be sourced by reliable sources that can verify the information in the draft. OneFiveNine is okay for proving it exists, but we need more than just the fact that it exists to have an article on it. Primefac (talk) 15:36, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

Mailing list archive and forum posts vs Reddit
What makes a mailing list or a forum post more suitable to be referenced than a Reddit post? --Ysangkok (talk) 19:19, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Those aren't either. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  19:23, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
 * What do you mean by "utterly non-notable"? Do you really think that nobody is more non-notable than Mr. Maxwell? I added a reference to the NYT, do you think that is a testament to notability? --Ysangkok (talk) 19:48, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

West & Intercall Reversions
Hi Chrissymad,

I wanted to chat with you about some reversions you made in early November on the pages for InterCall and West Corporation. I am the editor who's changes you reverted (hi!) and was hoping to 1) hear in a bit more detail what your concerns are, and 2) work out a compromise to restore some of the content to the pages, in order to ensure an accurate representation of Intercall (West UC) and West Corporation.

connected contributor (paid) COI Disclosure: Partly thanks to your reversion, I'm more familiar with Wikipedia's COI guidelines, and am now working to be more transparent! I am employed by R. Clement Creative, a creative consultant firm retained by West Corporation to develop content that accurately represents West Corporation within Wikipedia's guidelines. I would like to work with you to find ways to develop content that accurately represents West but follows Wikipedia's ethos and guidelines.

Hope we can talk soon! CCDirkes (talk) 20:08, 21 December 2017 (UTC)CCDirkes

Advice on editor's illogical actions
Hi. May I ask your advice on something? I added an edit to a page that was unbalanced with proper citation. But an editor just removed it, citing I'm 'socking'. I read up on that, but I am not doing that. The only way to prove i'm not a 'sock' is by meeting people on Wiki, but there's been no recent or upcoming meetings in my city to prove I'm a real person. I reverted the edits I made on the page since the editor didn't state good reasons. I stated my reason for reverting it, and asked how he could remove cited information that is relevant to a page. He just reverted it again and sent me a warning for editing war.... Surely someone can't just remove an edit and make a false accusation, and then I get the warning? If you could advise me on what to do, I'd really appreciate it. Thanks! AspiringCheetah (talk) 05:34, 22 December 2017 (UTC)AspiringCheetah
 * , I've only briefly looked at the situation, but my advice would be to discuss the matter on the article's talk page. You might have valid concerns and useful contributions to make, but clearly there is an editor who feels they are neither. So discuss the matter on the talk page, remember to keep calm and civil with the other editors, and if it's clear the discussion is going nowhere you're welcome to request a Third opinion or dispute resolution. Primefac (talk) 13:57, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
 * More eyes and assistance would be appreciated. Long story short, cult who's leader was convicted of rape (to be released early 2018) has aggressively tried to push a pro POV view into Wikipedia articles.  Some years ago, the article was ugly, using several unreliable anti-cult websites in areas, and cult published websites in others. Multiple sock puppets, meat puppets and lots of civil POV pushing from cult followers.  It's so much fun.  Providence (religious movement) is the article in question.  Ravensfire  (talk) 18:16, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Merry Christmas
Happy Holidays text.png Hello Chrissymad: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, — MRD2014 Merry Christmas! 02:12, 25 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message

Merry Christmas!
Happy Holidays text.png Hello Chrissymad: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, — k6ka  🍁 ( Talk ·  Contributions ) 03:13, 25 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message

Social influence bias
Hi, I've just accepted Social influence bias at AfC. You had declined an earlier version of the draft, so you might want to have a look at it now as some of the issues might still be present. – Uanfala (talk) 20:02, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Why you are doing this
Where am I wrong Sanketssatpute (talk) 21:37, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
 * You need to provide a reliable source - not Facebook (which you did not include anyway) and it must be written in a neutral tone. I'd advise you refrain from editing the article any further as you've already gotten into an edit war. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  21:40, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Yes but im not biased too I have the sources too I have checked from local new papers too Then why you are not allowing them Sanketssatpute (talk) 21:42, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

I request you to allow e to do them Sanketssatpute (talk) 21:43, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Ill send you the details and links of the same Sanketssatpute (talk) 21:43, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

You can check first and then do the needfull Sanketssatpute (talk) 21:43, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Stop editing the article as you are engaged in an edit war. Secondly, Facebook is not a valid source and even if it were, the content is not neutral. The onus is on you, meaning you must add a reliable source. Period. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  21:44, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Ill show you the links then will you do the change?? Sanketssatpute (talk) 21:46, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
 * No because it's not neutrally worded, irrelevant and Facebook is not a valid source. I will not proxy edit for you to continue your edit war. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  21:46, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

New Years new page backlog drive
Hello, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Announcing the NPP New Year Backlog Drive!

We have done amazing work so far in December to reduce the New Pages Feed backlog by over 3000 articles! Now is the time to capitalise on our momentum and help eliminate the backlog!

The backlog drive will begin on January 1st and run until January 29th. Prize tiers and other info can be found HERE.

Awards will be given in tiers in two categories:


 * The total number of reviews completed for the month.
 * The minimum weekly total maintained for all four weeks of the backlog drive.

NOTE: It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing. Despite our goal of reducing the backlog as much as possible, please do not rush while reviewing.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. — TonyBallioni (talk) 20:24, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Tina Sauerländer
Hi Chrissymad, something seems to have gone wrong with your review. I had a look at this, this morning, and I planning to G11 it as well, and I see you have done it. But the article seems to still exist in draft format without the tag. This is the draft Draft:Tina Sauerländer, but the one you G11'd is now in User:MarcLehmann, who is now just recently created. I don't know what is going on. It looks like the draft has been saved in that account, and the G11 is not on the original article? scope_creep (talk) 15:00, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

Famousvideomovies
Hi Chrissymad, I have just raised an AIV as well. This user seems to have significantly sped up with his activities since seeing the SPI. I guess there needs to be some action before the SPI is being picked up... pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 16:02, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
 * it seems pretty ducky to me but yeah, he needs a block. Seems he learned to use Twinkle...poorly.  CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  16:03, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

Potolkumar Gaanwala
This seems to be a reverse copyvio from a WP mirror.  DGG ( talk ) 21:14, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

Please stop deleting my article, just give me a chance to finish it.
Hello,

I noticed that you keep deleting the article "Dell Inspiron 1100" Jut give me a bit to finish it, The laptop is notable because it sold well and was notorious for technical problems, and several other laptops were based on it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexreiter512 (talk • contribs) 20:24, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Why not instead work it into the Dell Inspiron article? SQL Query me!  22:12, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

15:52:13, 2 January 2018 review of submission by 73.229.72.141
Hi - we updated the sources on the page - can you please review?73.229.72.141 (talk) 15:52, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

edit
i sourced that article :P — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ciacho10 (talk • contribs) 17:50, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for ruining several days work, updating and refreshing, Allan Peiper's wikipedia page. I note you've rana rchive of material, I actually wrote, several years ago, and was of poor quality. So, I began updating the page, correctly, on January 1st 2018 - and I was working slowly, and accurately. Now, it's completely gone, and you've replaced it with material that's the sole reason, I was replacing it.

I spent a long period of time, compiling accurate race details and updates, and in one swift second, you've deleted my work, and on your talk page, you absolve all responsibility for your conduct. I assumed, Wikipedia was about working together, to create a worthwhile input of material.

Outstanding...... PDM888 (talk) 15:54, 3 January 2018 (UTC) PDM888
 * It may do you well to read WP:PROMO. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  15:57, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

ChrissyMad

Yes, I am aware of that. The page has a large amount of race data and detail. I am not writing a promo piece. By all means, pull me up on "too much comment" under each paragraph - I am open to criticism. I have compiled a large amount of race results, and I am looking to add this to the profile. I can add the details as I learn. Malicious conduct, rather than a message or polite advice, would be more helpful.

PDM888 (talk) 16:02, 3 January 2018 (UTC)PDM888
 * Content like began cycling at 12 years of age. Driven by a fierce competitive spirit, he was soon representing the State of Victoria, at the 1975 Australian Road Cycling Championships. The road race was held in Hobart,Tasmania, that year, where he finished 4th in the finishing sprint. is not race data, is straight up promo. See also WP:NPOV. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  16:04, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Raxola
Hello Chrissymad. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Raxola, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: '''There's more sources this time, and they're enough for CSD. Take if back to AfD if necessary. .''' Thank you. Ged UK  16:12, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: User talk:1 Asad Ali Palijo
Hello Chrissymad. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of User talk:1 Asad Ali Palijo, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: '''We should keep the talk page really. I'll blank the non talk stuff.''' Thank you. Ged UK  16:25, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Request on 14:29:18, 4 January 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Binil Joy
Why my article is declined? Please help me to create an article is acceptable by wiki Binil Joy (talk) 14:29, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
 * , at the point when Chrissymad declined your draft, there was all of one reference. This is the reason it was declined. It looks like you've added more, which is good. Good luck! Primefac (talk) 15:47, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

CDI Disambiguation page
Hi Chrissymad, just curious as to why you have reverted my change to this page? Carthage52 (talk) 11:11, 6 January 2018 (UTC)Carthage52

Endymion Disambiguation page
Hi Chrissymad Please informe me about the reason for reverting the insertion of with your help I can improve the page.
 * Shinsei Madō Ō Endimion - Divine Magician Deity Endymion or Endymion The Master Magician, opponent character in videogame Yu-Gi-Oh! 5D's, trasposition of the card deck game Yu-Gi-Oh! Duel Monsters []

This is the evidence in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yu-Gi-Oh!_5D%27s Characters, Duel Monster Spirits, Yu-Gi-Oh! 5D's Stardust Accelerator characters: Endymion, the Master Magician (character) Endymion, the Master Magician Endymion, the Master Magician-WC09 Corresponding card Endymion, the Master Magician Names Endymion, the Master Magician 神しん聖せい魔ま導どう王おう エンディミオン Rōmaji Shinsei Madō Ō Endimion Alternate names Divine Magician Deity Endymion Video game debut Yu-Gi-Oh! 5D's World Championship 2009: Stardust Accelerator [ Endymion, the Master Magician, known as Divine Magician Deity Endymion in the Japanese version, is a character version of the card, "Endymion, the Master Magician". He appears in the video game Yu-Gi-Oh! 5D's World Championship 2009: Stardust Accelerator, as an unlockable opponent. The player can unlock him by winning all single tournaments. Endymion, the Master Magician uses a Deck titled "Endymion is King".

You can found documentation on internet easily. After 2 days I will revert the cancellation.

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrodini2017 (talk • contribs) 00:11, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Moser's Rides
Hello Chrissymad. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Moser's Rides, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Producing a notable product indicates importance/significance (WP:CCSI). Thank you.  So Why  13:51, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Raju Kannampuzha
User:Binil Joy is now posting his article on Draft talk:Raju Kannampuzha, after the draftspace and mainspace have both been protected. Also potentially controversial unsourced BLP content [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Iringole_Kavu&diff=prev&oldid=794656610] and just generally adding unsourced trivia content to articles that is not really possible for editors to easily verify. SeraphWiki (talk) 05:31, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
 * User is blocked, draft talk is deleted. Primefac (talk) 16:05, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion
I notice that you tagged the page ShowBiz Cinemas for speedy deletion with the reason "non-notable business". While that's a valid reason for speedy deletion in general, this page does not qualify for speedy deletion under that criterion because the article states that the chain owns 7 locations with 117 screens, which is a plausible indication of notability. If you still want the page to be deleted, please consider tagging it with a speedy deletion template which does apply, redirecting it to another page, proposing the page for deletion if it appears to be an uncontroversial matter, or taking the page to  WP:AFD for discussion on the merits. Thanks! Stifle (talk) 09:34, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

17:51:13, 10 January 2018 review of submission by VandelBuster
Hello Chrissymad,

I'm trying to get this going here and I'm having troubles. Obviously. Haha. I have a few questions and need some help clarifying things/get a better understanding.

So, author interviews are primary sources, and I have more than enough of those. The newly added stuff from Columbia College's archives, that's all primary, except the DEMO 10 Magazine (Ref 34), as well. Mainly because they're from the time he graduated as opposed to being after he graduated, which the DEMO 10 Magazine says. Is that correct?

Book pages on the publishers own sites, are those primary as well?

Book reviews are secondary sources, right? I have a bunch of them, but I don't know if there's an acceptable amount per book/story. I mean, I don't want to put up six or seven for one book.

Lastly, what's an acceptable amount of references overall? I see pages being accepted with four or seven, you know? I've had to have more seconadry than that already, right? That's another thing that's making me ask what am I doing wrong overall (other than a lot of author interviews).

Hoping for feedback and maybe some advice. Thanks for your time. VandelBuster (talk) 17:51, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

db-repost tag
. Please do not use this tag without actually verifying its applicability, i.e., "a page that was previously deleted via a deletion discussion, is substantially identical to the deleted version, ... etc". If you are not an admin, you cannot possibly verify this yourself. Staszek Lem (talk) 21:54, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
 * I actually can see both deleted versions due to edit filters and it seemed nearly identical to me minus one new addition. Also, it's been AFD'd twice, see also Pavlo Hrytsak and deleted as a consequence of both. To say that a non-admin shouldn't tag G4 is a bit silly otherwise it needs to be admin use only and it doesn't warrant a warning, even if it's declined. Curious how you've viewed it while chiding me for the same when you're not an administrator either. And as far as "if you are an admin, you should know better." WP:AGF. Thanks! CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  21:59, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
 * It is normal for non-admins to use the G4 tag and for admins to review. If there is sourcing after the AfD took place, most admins won't delete the article, but it is very much the norm for non-admins to apply this tag for admin attention. The number of admins who actively patrol new pages is pretty low, so we rely on people like Chrissy to alert us of potential reposts with the G4 tag. TonyBallioni (talk) 22:00, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Sorry for looking nasty. I am not aware of "edit filters" . Please tell me where can I read about them. Now, Back to the case.  The Afd was dated 2016, but the article has significant 2017 info. You say yourself "one new addition". I do not know what it was, but being Executive Producer of Eurovision Song & getting an award are significant claims of notability. Staszek Lem (talk) 22:06, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
 * -- Got your point, thanks; will keep this in mind. Staszek Lem (talk) 22:08, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
 * It's not substantially different and after doing WP:BEFORE it's evident that there is no significant coverage or change from the last two AFDs. One of which was closed in October 2017. Articles for deletion/Pavlo Hrytsak. I'm a bit confused as you've commented there as well and knew that the Eurovision stuff was specifically mentioned in that AfD too, meaning it was still deleted on that rationale that affiliation doesn't = notability. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  22:09, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Well, I am confused myself.:-) I do not always remember all things I did. Staszek Lem (talk) 22:16, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Please explain me about "edit filters". Staszek Lem (talk) 22:13, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
 * , a quick search of Wikipedia will tell you what you need to know. Primefac (talk) 22:15, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Got it: tells me close nothing I need to know. May be I am dumb, but I still have no slightest idea how I can use them. Staszek Lem (talk) 22:22, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
 * You don't use them, they're there to catch vandalism (which is why Chrissymad prefers to not have the link here). Primefac (talk) 22:30, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

regarding the zirin article
Regarding this I had already disputed the removal of a perfectly fine reference and invoked BRD at that time and already opened a talk page discussion. User Chetsford has been removing references added by three different editors over and over and over again and replacing them with multiple cn tags to the point where it has become disruptive. Please see the talk page if you care for more information. Thank you. Lacypaperclip (talk) 22:24, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
 * This has been disputed by two editors now and it's a BLP meaning it should not be added back to the article until consensus has been reached. It's not disruptive behavior to dispute a non-RS on a BLP. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  22:26, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
 * - it's customary to ping editors when you make accusations about them. Just a FYI. Thank you! To your point, while I appreciate that the subject of this article has been adding to his own bio "over and over" we do have WP:COI guidelines for a reason. Chetsford (talk) 22:56, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

12:59:44, 12 January 2018 review of submission by Ih-media
Hi Chrissymad,

Thank you for reviewing my article. I have added a more appropriate reference to the article, but their isnt much to go at at the moment in the way of validating the info stated as this is her first major role. All the other members of the Age Before Beauty cast have pages on here, except Vicky, so I thought it would be good to complete the list.

Again, thanks for the hard wk you do & I hope this revision is more acceptable.

Ih-media (talk) 12:59, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Ih-media (talk) 12:59, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Mylittlejob speedy deletion
Hi Chrissy, Thanks for the prompt response to my article on Mylittlejob. Can you elaborate how this is promotional vs The Muse or OLX etc.?

The site was actually a student project in the beginning and now affects hundred thousands of college students.

Intellectual integrity asks for consistency and I just want to make sure I get this right.

Any hints on how to make the article more appropriate (and less like the other sites), please let me know.

The company is further fighting Trump's repeal of DACA and has now political impact. I am reporting this from a students perspective working on the site. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mjglr (talk • contribs) 17:23, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Removal of my edit
Hi,

I would like to know why you reverted my edit from the disambiguation article HEK. Is is it because disambiguation articles are meant for articles that already are on Wikipedia?

I'm just curious :)

Thank you - Hi im gosu (talk) 16:35, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
 * , you are correct. Primefac (talk) 16:49, 15 January 2018 (UTC)


 * About what? Hi im gosu (talk) 17:03, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
 * That disambiguation articles are meant for articles that already are on Wikipedia. Primefac (talk) 17:07, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Okay. Hi im gosu (talk) 17:12, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Request on 08:13:19, 15 January 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Batbaatar
I made changes following your suggestions. Please re-review of the draft: Jigjidsuren_Gombojav

Dear Chrissymad,

I made changes to the draft according to your suggestions, and I would like to request if you could re-review the page. You noted that the subject of the page is lacking notability, but I would like to appeal to you why the subject was notable and worthy of a wikipedia page. Here are the reasons:


 * 1) The topic, Mongolian Cinema, is not popular among western audiences, yet it does not make it unworthy of discussion, or inclusion in the wikipedia. I can argue that it is the opposite — obscure topics and subjects should be encouraged to be included in the wikipedia, and would be important additions to English references.
 * 2) The subject of the page, Jigjidsuren Gombojav, is a prominent film director in Mongolia. His film won the main award from the Karlovy-Vary Film Festival, which was a first for a Mongolian film. Then, two of his films were included in the competition program of the Moscow International Film Festival in the 1980's, an accomplishment a very few other directors have achieved in Mongolia. In other words, his films represent the Mongolian cinema of the Soviet era. Please verify from the references below.
 * 3) For his work in cinema, literature, and teaching, he was awarded the highest honors from the Mongolian government. Please verify the information from the references I included in the draft.
 * 4) To quote from the wikipedia's own suggestions on creating a biography page:
 * The person has received a well-known and significant award or honor, or has been nominated for such an award several times.
 * The person has made a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in his or her specific field.
 * The person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers or successors.

I think the collective works (~20 feature films, 2 encyclopedia, 1 historical book) of Jigjidsuren Gombojav and his accolades satisfy the above mentioned criteria. As I said above, the topic could be unfamiliar to western audience and the sources are scarce but that does not render the topic or subject unworthy of discussion.

Please consider your decision one more time, and re-review my draft. Hope you will approve the article this time.

Thanks for your time and efforts.

Batbaatar (talk) 08:13, 15 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Inclined to accept; from a source I checked seems well-regarded director and probably passing WP:ANYBIO Galobtter (pingó mió) 08:38, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
 * I declined because it's improperly sourced and purposely did not comment on notability as it was sourced almost exclusively to directory type sources and primary sources rather than in-depth coverage. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  19:03, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Hmm? Your decline was This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant... Galobtter (pingó mió) 19:05, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Because that's the stock decline reason in the AFCH script when you selected "v" - improperly sourced. Someone can be notable but the sources used don't meet the significant independent coverage portion of that criteria. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  19:06, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Hmm, unless the sources are unreliable don't see a reason to decline.. Galobtter (pingó mió) 19:11, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Because it's improperly sourced...meaning it's not coverage of the person. If you feel that you can provide appropriate sources, please add them. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  19:13, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Zapproved speedy deletion
Hi--thanks for stopping by my new page and offering some feedback. I'm a little confused about what threshold is "notable" vs. "promotional." It seems fairly objective at the moment, stub though it may be. Any help would be great. The company has created pretty important software and has gotten a bunch of third-party recognition; I am planning to add more citations to the current stub. If you have any suggestions for how to better present it, I'm all ears. Thank you! Kwalinsk (talk) 22:07, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion of Brijesh Shrestha
The page Brijesh Shrestha (musician) which you have contest for speedy deletion tagging being a hoax is not suitable. The page is not fake and Brijesh Shrestha is real artist you can google about him. Please cancel the speedy deletion. If i did any mistake than i’m sorry fot that. CopX (talk) 17:32, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

List of programs for point cloud processing - edits
Chrissymad -- I'm not clear why you would go into a compiled list and decide to remove certain items. The page is merely a list of programs that provide information for users. I didn't create the page, nor do I maintain the list. A while back I added an entry to the list. Yes, my company provides that software but it is not promoted nor advertised in any way on the page. Or more to the point -- it's one entry on a list that contains many other programs that do something similar.

What was your rationale for removing some items from the list and leaving others on your initial edit? — Preceding unsigned comment added by KKSolv3D (talk • contribs) 16:08, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
 * As I explained several times - Wikipedia isn't a directory and we don't blindly list non-notable items. If it's inclusion is warranted it should at least be mentioned in an associated article (and sourced to reliable sources, not primary, as many of those were) or have an article itself. See WP:DIRECTORY, WP:NOT and given your username, WP:COI. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  16:10, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Did you forget about Draft:Gould Chalker?
Hey! I was reviewing some of the drafts and stumbled upon Draft:Gould Chalker. Did you forget to review it? It has been 2 days since you marked it for reviewing. Just wanted to bring this into your notice. Thanks! Dial911 (talk) 05:15, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

Gutting scrypt / SHA256 coin list page
Hello, I'm Leopheard. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. I noticed you arbitrarily absolutely gutted the articles for the page List_of_scrypt_crypto_currencies and the same for the SHA256 one. You didn't even bother to even start a discussion on the talk pages, just went ahead and made a list of coins you consider to be valid. The whole point of this article was a quick and easy alternative to the List of cryptocurrencies page. Please be more constructive in the future. This is your first warning leopheard (talk) 01:06, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Information orange.svg Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. leopheard (talk) 01:12, 15 January 2018 (UTC) re: same for List of SHA-256 crypto currencies
 * Nuvola apps important.svg Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. leopheard (talk) 01:12, 15 January 2018 (UTC) re: List of X11 cryptocurrencies — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leopheard (talk • contribs) 01:12, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
 * , first off, leaving three warning messages for what is essentially the same issue (just on three pages) is a bit excessive. Second, I have looked at the three articles you mention and I see nothing "arbitrary" about Chrissymad's edits - they are removing non-notable (i.e. "redlinked") names from lists. This is perfectly acceptable, though I suppose I can see how "rm nn" to someone not familiar with their style wouldn't realize that was "remove non-notable". Third, there is nothing wrong with being bold and making an action that one thinks will improve Wikipedia. If people disagree, there is discussion and a consensus is reached. That's the way it should be. I do encourage you to read through WP:LISTCRITERIA for the main reasons why Chrissymad trimmed down all those redlinked lists. Primefac (talk) 01:55, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
 * What is excessive is making dramatic changes to a page without any form of discussion, as you yourself say should be done. For one person to simply decide what is and isn't notable is obviously going to run into problems. So, just because a user hasn't heard of a particular thing, it shouldn't be on Wikipedia? This isn't a site for the most popular things, but surely a lot more than the status quo? Should all references to car manufacturers be removed that aren't Ford, GMC and Chevy? Exactly. leopheard (talk) 00:53, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
 * , it is not excessive. Aside from bold editing being perfectly acceptable, the removal of redlinks in lists is supported by LISTCRITERIA, REDDEAL, WTAF, and LISTCRUFT. Primefac (talk) 16:00, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

Paul Sidwell article
Hi Chrissymad, could you revert your deletion of Paul Sidwell?

The Paul Sidwell article is notable because Sidwell is currently one of the most important scholars on Austroasiatic languages (the largest language family in Southeast Asia), with many publications. Many Wikipedia articles link to this page. Before, someone had written that article to look like a personal page. But the Paul Sidwell article should nevertheless be revived, since it meets all the requirements in Notability (academics). &mdash; Stevey7788 (talk) 06:07, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
 * , Chrissymad did not delete the article. You'll have to contact at User talk:Amortias. Primefac (talk) 16:01, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

Deletion of ARITH Symposium on Computer Arithmetic
Date: 17 Jan. 2018 19:43

Hi Chrissymad, could you please tell me what part of the page is a copyright violation of what? Also, what action needs to be taken to re-instate the page?

Thanks!

ANannarelli —Preceding undated comment added 11:04, 18 January 2018 (UTC)


 * I suppose that's the paragraph "Since 1969…" on the ARITH-21 page, which can also be found (with minor changes) already on the ARITH-18 page. But I don't know whether it was used earlier. The original author probably didn't care about copyright issues. I wonder whether the use of this paragraph can fall under fair use; in particular, it has been copied year after year for the subsequent ARITH conferences. Vincent Lefèvre (talk) 14:55, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
 * The conference itself is perfectly able to re-use its own copyright material, and we cannot accept fair use text because of our CC-BY-SA license. Primefac (talk) 16:04, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

Deletion of
Hi Chrissymad,

I'm the bot who is deleting  . I noticed your edit on Rex Black in which you added  . This template is deprecated and deleted. Please stop adding  . In case you want to support the Persondata project you can help with the migration of the dataset to Wikidata at KasparBot's tool. See Persondata or contact my operator T.seppelt in case you have any questions.

Thank you very much, -- KasparBot (talk) 01:00, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Regarding reverted edit to Sommetrics
Regarding your reversion of my edit to Sommetrics, the article was originally created by User:Profpugh. I removed the promotional content throughout the article, removed the Db-spam tag and added an advert tag for others to help improve the article. Cipher99 (talk) 06:06, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

09:50:30, 24 January 2018 review of submission by Grisby2000
This draft entry has been fairly thoroughly edited, it seems that most issues of tone, objectivity, and sourcing have been resolved. And it checks up with the artist's entry on the french wikipedia. Do you have any further suggestions to help improve it? Grisby2000Grisby2000 (talk) 09:50, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

Draft: David Holy - Submission declined on 16 January 2018 by Chrissymad (Question)
Dear Chrissymad,

first off, thanks for your great work and immediate response!

"David Holy" is my first contribution to Wikipedia and I totally get why my first draft was declined. However, I'm not sure how to resolve the issue (-> This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability.). The article is supposed to be the English version of an article that already exists (German Wiki). I tried to use the new translation tool but I can't publish the translated article (because I'm a noob and therefore not permitted to publish ;-)). The German version seems just fine and the English version is basically the same, including the sources.

Thank you very much, FootballAficionado1897 — Preceding unsigned comment added by FootballAficionado1897 (talk • contribs) 15:59, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

18:19:15, 23 January 2018 review of submission by JJNelson
I do not understand what is wikipedia's definition of 'notability'. The company has multiple independent articles done by The Vindicator and sells nationally. It has appeared in a national magazine for the most popular home & garden show twice and even appeared on the inside cover of the one issue. Just because you may not be aware of the company does not discredit its existence. It has plenty of reviews on multiple websites to prove that it, in fact, exists. The company is in an industry that has magazines that are not as popular as the high tech or banking industry. Plus after all this is an online encyclopedia, so, if the company has proof of existence (58 years), as this one does, and the article does not appear to be biased, then the page should be published in order for wikipedia to meet the definition of itself. Unless of course, there is actually a market cap requirement for companies to be listed on wikipedia. In that case, I was not aware of the large barriers to entry on an open source encyclopedia...

Additionally, the main source that I used for this article is on Wikipedia. So I think I would be safe to assume that it is considered to be notable and reliable by Wikipedia, unless now we list newspapers that are neither reliable nor notable, which would be in contradiction for your requirements for businesses. So my question is this: How is a company that has multiple articles on it published by The Vindicator (Which is considered notable and reliable by Wikipedia, and actually centered politically), not notable itself? If you say that it is not then your whole argument is a blatant contradiction. Think logically please.

JJNelson (talk) 18:19, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

JJNelson (talk) 18:19, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
 * It's not about it's existence, it's about notability and none of these sources establish it. They're largely PR, run of the mill, primary or fluff pieces. Wikipedia is not itself a source, whether it links to an existing article is irrelevant in determining notability. As far as the Vindicator source, it's an interview and not independent coverage. The rest, again, are passing mentions, primary or not coverage. Please also see WP:PAID and WP:COI before continuing to edit.  CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  18:54, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

What do you mean that they are largely PR? The Vindicator discloses if the article is a paid interview (As you can see if you click the link, neither of these articles are). Also, if you even took the time to check the one article used titled, "Baird Bros. event offers carpentry projects, demos, tours," you would realize that not a single employee or owner of the company was interviewed in that article. It was a report on the event going on there and interviews of people attending the event. It is possible for an interview to be independent coverage. You just keep making up rules as you go when you come to the realization that your initial premise was utter garbage. Is there any hierarchy at Wikipedia so I can bypass your changing narrative? Or is this an 'open source' platform where one editor can decide whether or not something makes the cut. JJNelson (talk) 15:33, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
 * I broke it down for you on your talk page. I'm not the only editor who has declined this. It is possible for an interview to be independent coverage. It's not possible when it's someone affiliated with the company. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  15:36, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

They interviewed an 11 year old girl and a carpenter... Besides that, would any of these be acceptable, the one is strictly news coverage of an accident that one of the companies drivers was involved in.    
 * I've already explained a half dozen times why these are not appropriate sources. Specifically, the one about the crash is NOT about the company whatsoever and in no way would make anyone notable. They are not independent coverage and even if they were, they're all local. This is getting into the realm of tendentious editing and I'd strongly suggest you take a breather. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  16:05, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Saying I am biased yet I was asking if a negative article, or at the very least a neutral article, about a truck accident involving one of the companies drivers could be included. Your premise is proven invalid right there. Plus they are independent, you just don't like them because in your opinion you think the company paid for them. And since you cannot prove that they did, you say that they are local, which should not matter. If a newspaper is notable enough to be listed on wikipedia, that should make their stories notable enough to be accepted by wikipedia. JJNelson (talk) 16:15, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
 * My assessment is no invalid - it's not coverage of the company and were the other sources able to establish notability, I'd say that the information is trivial and unencyclopedic at best. However, I'm not going to keep repeating myself. If you have no interest in listening and actually attempting to understand what is being said, I can't help you. Have a nice day. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  16:17, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

I also highly doubt that every company listed on this website is covered by a national media outlet. Making your premise once again invalid by contradiction. The problem with Wikipedia editors is that they are not objective and edit things subjectively for an encyclopedia. Which is why ultimately this website will fail, blockchain will crush it. See Lunyr. JJNelson (talk) 16:18, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
 * I think it's best you and I stop interacting. Cheers. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  16:19, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Beyond failure
Hmm... was it probably invented by someone they know? I'd say 60/40 yes. Does it clearly indicate that? I guess we'll see. G M G talk   19:21, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Considering none of the sources even so much as mentioned either of the topics (I'm fairly sure this is a sock and the account was compromised) and I did a search and got nothing. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  19:24, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Well, if they managed to remember their password after not logging in for nine years, I can say they're more organized than I am. I s'pose we'll get it taken care of one way or another though.  G M G  <sup style="color:#000;font-family:Impact">talk   19:26, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
 * I meant compromised as in an old account, no edits suddenly becomes active and spamming garbage like that indicates to me that it's likely a compromised account and this reminds me a lot of a sock that was super active in 2016. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  19:27, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
 * SPI time?  G M G  <sup style="color:#000;font-family:Impact">talk   19:29, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Won't be useful, all the data is too old. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  19:29, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Well... depends on whether it's duck worthy and that let's us start a paper trail.  G M G  <sup style="color:#000;font-family:Impact">talk   19:34, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Submission declined for the article about Georges Marciano
Hello Chrissymad and thank you for your work on Wikipedia.

You have declined my article on Georges Marciano on January the 22nd, and I wanted to have your opinion on what I could do to improve it and have it accepted. I personally think that the subject is notable (he is the founder of one of the world's biggest fashion companies) and well sourced (Forbes, Vogue, Quebec national newspapers...).

Let me know your opinion!

Have a good day

--Thomas Nobrainer (talk) 17:13, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

Hello
Please,Allow me to function on wikipedia peacefully. I mean no harms. INCREDIBLE INDIA (talk) 22:25, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

Revert of Java Champion list
Hi Chrissymad,

I'm not sure why you are removing the list of Java Champions, this is a recognised program and the source is linked in the article. Please, if you don't have a valid reason, revert your change. Neugens (talk) 15:38, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
 * , I believe this has been adequately answered on your talk page, but the list was removed because none of the members of the list had their own Wikipedia pages. Generally on "awards", "alumni", and "list of" entries, we only include the subjects with articles. Primefac (talk) 17:10, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Untitled
Hi Chrissymad, I am updating my personal information. Please do not undo what I am doing now. Thank you. PJ Jones (with AW) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Behindindywithparnellijones (talk • contribs) 17:24, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

14:24:11, 29 January 2018 review of submission by Anakonda2015
Hello Chrissymad

I'm hoping that this page will come live soon and I have tried and see what could make it more neutral and formal than it already is, but I just can't see how to improve it. Any hint from you would be immensely useful!

Many thanks in advance for your help Anakonda2015

Anakonda2015 (talk) 14:24, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:July 2017 flood in Maryland


Hello, Chrissymad. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "July 2017 flood in Maryland".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 08:58, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Regarding Deletion of the Page Kaamini Khanna
Regarding Deletion of the page Kaamini Khanna. Why are you Deleting the whole page again and again. Read it first. The information that is matching as per the duplication tool cannot be deleted. They are the names or important thing. Don't just rely on the tools at least read first. Over that I have the permission to use that content anywhere. Secondly if you want any proof I can provide you. Revert... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nigam.kirtimaan (talk • contribs) 18:43, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Two issues. 1.) No it's not just a list and it's incredibly heavily paraphrased and 2.) It's incredibly promotional. Please review WP:COI and WP:PAID. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  18:45, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

What do you suggest then ? As the person is important no doubt, I have heard her on Radios here in my Country and seen her on TV  Kaamini Khanna ~  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nigam.kirtimaan (talk • contribs) 18:53, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Hi Chrissymad and nigam, I went through the articles and crossed check with my sources, some information is correct but there are some information which I was unable to verify from anywhere. My Conclusion is that this article needs heavy editing. Upto you Chrissymad and nigam. GaneshSrivastav (talk) 19:47, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

As a moderator, along with other moderators, shouldn't you follow the rules?
From the page YOU linked me to. "Before reverting, first consider whether the original text could have been better improved in a different way or if part of the edit can be fixed to preserve some of the edit, and whether you would like to make that bold edit instead. The other disputant may respond with another bold edit, or with a refinement on your improvement. The "Bold–refine" process is the ideal collaborative editing cycle. Improving pages through collaborative editing is ideal. However, if you find yourself making reversions or near-reversions, then stop editing and move to the next stage, "Discuss"."

No one originally DISCUSSED my edits. Citations were made. My sources are not third-party? Except they are. The links are directly to pages that show the content. You should better explain yourself. Other moderators should definitely ALWAYS give reasons why performing a revert. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TempusInfernus (talk • contribs) 20:49, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
 * A.) I am not a moderator or administrator. B.) There is absolutely no rule about reverting and removing unsourced information (and especially when it's bordering on promo.) I'd suggest you read the helpful links you've been given instead of yelling at people. The onus is on you, not other editors, to provide the sourcing when adding material. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  20:52, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

I'm somehow pasting quotes to you from pages I haven't read? And I'm suddenly yelling? Why are you being emotional & unreasonable and making assumptions? What is your motivation? I posted 3 direct citations to uses of the design. I initially avoided citing Weiss as they are a for profit company owned or affiliated with, I believe, CNBC. If you have a problem with that, please explain what it is more directly rather than unhelpfully impeding the information. Be specific about YOUR problem with the sources. You shouldn't be reverting, you should be fixing - according to the EXACT page you linked me to. TempusInfernus (talk) 21:00, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Hey there I watch Chirssymad's talk page and saw this come along. I'd like to provide you with a brief explanation of WP:BRD (Bold, Revert, Discuss). Here is how the cycle works: You make a bold edit → Someone reverts → you go to the talk page and discuss the edit. As for sourcing, Wikipedia places an emphasis on verifiability if you don't include a reliable source your edits are likely to be reverted. All information on wikipedia needs to provide a reliable citation. Generally on Wikipedia we prefer not to use primary sources, secondary sources could be used whenever possible. Hope this helps explain things. As far as I can tell, Chrissymad is inline with our policies. --Cameron11598 (Talk) 21:18, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bengie's Drive-In Theatre has been accepted
<div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:#E6FFE6; padding:1em; padding-top:0.5em; padding-bottom:0.5em; width:20em; color:black; margin-bottom: 1.5em; margin-left: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> Bengie's Drive-In Theatre, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! MatthewVanitas (talk) 18:56, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Bengie%27s_Drive-In_Theatre help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Photo for Bengie's Drive-In Theatre?
If you happen to be in the area, can you snap a photo for the article? MatthewVanitas (talk) 18:57, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
 * That's actually one of the reasons I hadn't moved it into main space myself (and I needed to go to my local library to get some additional refs that unfortunately aren't available online anymore : Cheers! CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  19:09, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

Request on 03:24:18, 5 February 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Atszostek
Hello - thank you for your help with this article! Endorfin is a young company and has only received media coverage from small, local news sites.

I have noticed multiple articles about chocolatiers on Wikipedia that cite very few sources other than their own websites (e.g.: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chocolaterie_Robert, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fazer). Is there something about these articles that makes them acceptable for Wikipedia with so few references?

Would the Endorfin article be acceptable if I edit it to only include very basic information about the company (i.e., name, location, awards received)?

Thank you again, Anne

Atszostek (talk) 03:24, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Please see WP:OTHERSTUFF in response to the other articles. If there is no significant in depth coverage, it's likely WP:TOOSOON for an article. Please also review WP:COI. Cheers! CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  03:27, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Request on 08:11:12, 5 February 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Valeria.brigatti
Hello. Could you highlight which sources are unreliable on my submission, please? Thank you.

Valeria.brigatti (talk) 08:11, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Don't contradict yourself
You talk about "Unsourced npov crap" on iCELL Network. (1)What proves do you have saying that the coe's name isn't Chua Thiong Kien? (2)That the company isn't dead? (3)That it is located at 19 Kallang Ave, Singapore 339410? (4)That the company isn't bankrupted/indebt? You don't have any evidence*/source* that you mention earlier. Since you said "Inspired npov crap" and undid the truth, you're implying to me that the old information is* up to date.

Here's my prove. (1)His name is* Chua Thiong Kien (surname first) because I've worked with him and seen* his ic before. (2)The company is dead. If you can try to call their phone no. Which is +65 63094520 which it won't even connect. If the company is very successful as it claimed to be then why is their website down? (Source*: ) (3) If their company is still located at 19 Kallang Ave, Singapore 339410 till today then why is there no unit number? Because the company isn't even there anymore.(source*: (4) Since it is so successful as it claimed to be then why did it not have a webpage or updated webpage? Or a proper address? Or why did it dropped from the Wireless@sg programme? Because Mr Chua did things unregistered and that ended up in a law case. Want a prove? Give me your email and I'll prove it to you with my "source"*. A real bold state you made there without a source* to back you up. Tell me how can there be a neutral point of view in the truth. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 183.90.36.152 (talk) 06:03, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
 * It's very possible, and you may be right, but we don't accept unsourced changes to a page, even if this means restoring the "wrong version." If something has changed, and there are reliable sources that demonstrate that change, then obviously the page should be updated. If something is currently unsourced, then it should be removed (not replaced with more unsourced information). It's not a "contradiction", it's just the way we work. Primefac (talk) 15:13, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

Request on 14:01:00, 7 February 2018 for assistance on AfC submission by Avishravi
I canot Understand the problem in it please help

shraviavi (talk) 14:01, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
 * As I previously explained in IRC, there are no independent reliable sources and I see no change since the last deletion at Aravinnd Iyer. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  14:03, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Scooby-Doo reversion
Hi! Just wanted to let you know that I undid your revert on Scooby-Doo. The IP that you reverted was actually correcting the date from this earlier vandalism which somehow got missed. Cheers, Katniss   May the odds be ever in your favor ♥  15:12, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Yesha Sivan
Hello Chrissymad. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Yesha Sivan, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: '''No copyvios left anymore. And I don't think it's spammy either. Enough notability for A7 as well. Needs to go to AfD if you still want it deleted. .''' Thank you. Ged UK  16:12, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
 * , just as a note from a copypatroller, if you're declining a G12 please make sure you revdel the content that caused the request to be made in the first place. Thanks! Primefac (talk) 16:31, 7 February 2018 (UTC)