User talk:Preetikapoor0

India quick links
utcursch | talk 13:03, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Godhra Train Burning
Thanks for the help. Baka man  02:33, 4 January 2007 (UTC) O an btw, if you plan on editing more contentious articles like these I suggest you use a pseudonym and not a name. A user was actually stalked on Facebook by a banned Muslim troll. JUst a heads up. Baka man  02:35, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Featured Picture
Congratulations, and thanks for nominating it. Raven4x4x 08:34, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

Hi Preetikapoor0,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:PIA09102PIA09102 Liquid Lakes on Titan.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2007-05-06.  howcheng  {chat} 16:49, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Jade Goody
I have slightly reformatted the details you have included, but will not remove the comments again without contributing to the talk page. Philip Cross 21:42, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Vidya Balan
i think your Hindi spelling of Vidya is wrong.if U spell her name its pronounced as "Vidha".Pliz Try 2 fix it ..OK.. --Cometstyles 15:13, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

re: Celebrity Big Brother 2007 (UK)
Hiya, I've replied to your earlier message on my talk page. Peteb16 16:18, 21 January 2007 (UTC) I've replied to your reply! on my talk page. Peteb16 17:00, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Brahmi.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Brahmi.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Ambuj Saxena (talk) 15:57, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Indian_army_soldier_after_siege_of_Kut_q79446.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Indian_army_soldier_after_siege_of_Kut_q79446.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Konstable 11:29, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

fixed long time ago Preetikapoor0 20:13, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Mahindra logo.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Mahindra logo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:30, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

fixedPreetikapoor0 20:12, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Time cove june 26 2006 1101060626 400 1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Time cove june 26 2006 1101060626 400 1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:43, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Suresh Oberoi
No problem at all! —Scott5114↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 04:56, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Copyright problems with GMR Group
Hello. Concerning your contribution, GMR Group, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, GMR Group appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. GMR Group has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribute Share-Alike then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) and CC-BY-SA, under CC-BY-SA, or released into the public domain leave a note at with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. RobDe68 (talk) 21:55, 18 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Hey smarty-pants.before accusing me of copyright violation and threatening me with a block, you need to do your homework. What were my contributions to this article?How many other people contributed to this article and what were there contributions.Did somebody copy from this website? Or Was it the Other Way Around?Preetikapoor0 (talk) 00:58, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The bottom line is you created the article and it was tagged for copyright infringement and that's all the copyvio message states, it never "accuses" you of anything nor does it "threaten" you with anything, it's a template message that I'm actually requested to add to the article creator's talk page when tagging for speedy delete. Whoever wrote the text in the article first (you or the website) is irrelevant because of this: "Copyright © 2008.All rights are reserved by www. IPLBlast.com", that's all that matters. As the article's creator you got the copyvio message as a courtesy so you could contest the speedy delete, which you never did. Nowhere does the copyvio message threaten to ban you and in fact gives you suggestions on how to keep the article from being deleted in the future. RobDe68 (talk) 02:14, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Proposed Image Deletion
A deletion discussion has just been created at Category talk:Unclassified Chemical Structures, which may involve one or more orphaned chemical structures, that has you user name in the upload history. Please feel free to add your comments.  Ron h jones (Talk) 23:03, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

Deletion reverted on talkpage
Dear Preeti, Thanx for reverting my deleted talks on my talk page, i deleted them to make my talk page clean, may i know why you reverted that useless conversations?

All files in category Unclassified Chemical Structures listed for deletion
One or more of the files that you uploaded or altered has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it/them not being deleted. Thank you.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of MGA73 (talk) at 18:16, 28 November 2011 (UTC).

Vernal equinox
Hello. Disambiguation pages ( see WP:DISAMBIG ) are not the place for article type explanatory content.

Your information should be placed in a relavent article, or, if no such article exists, then please create that article.

I see no major issue with your content, but you placed it in the wrong place.Oranjblud (talk) 15:49, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

BLP
Hi. Can you please avoid bringing up sensitive accusations against living people, particularly where it has no relevance. I suggest you read our Biographies of living people policy: WP:BLP, IRWolfie- (talk) 09:11, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
 * I have reverted this edit. Though it is not a biographical article, BLP is still applicable there. I am unsure where you found they are doing sex trafficking etc. -- Tito ☸ Dutta 06:24, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Sanskrit
I reverted your edit here, not because of the tags themselves but because the added comments mess up the table and are unlikely to gain attention of editors (as opposed to lay readers). Can you voice your thoughts on the article talk page instead? Abecedare (talk) 23:16, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Third metacarpal styloid process, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Styloid (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 25 January
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:28, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
 * On the John Peter Smith Hospital page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=592399858 your edit] caused a DOI error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%0A%0A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fw%2Findex.php%3Fdiff%3D592399858%20John Peter Smith Hospital%5D Ask for help])

Nomination of Marlise Munoz for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marlise Munoz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Marlise Munoz until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. HangingCurveSwing for the fence 00:38, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * 1,1,1-Trichloro-2,2,2-trifluoroethane (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to CFC


 * Ozone depletion (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to CFC

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

AFD comments
Hi, You've been here long enough to know simply stating "notable enough"   isn't a valid reason to keep and so to put it bluntly you're wasting everyones time,

You need to provide a much better reason as to why an article should be kept!.

Please read Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions and WP:AFD

Thank you. – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  03:47, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Rani Amrit Kaur Sahib of Mandi moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Rani Amrit Kaur Sahib of Mandi, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 08:35, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)