User talk:Prehensile Tale

Welcome!
Hello, Prehensile Tale, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Drmies (talk) 00:56, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Help me!
Hi. I recently added a page for a school (Woodcot Primary), intending its content to be along the same lines as other schools already in Wikipedia. It was replaced by a redirection link to the education section for the town concerned (Gosport). Could you give me a steer on what makes a school worthy of its own page or not? Many thanks.

Prehensile Tale (talk) 13:00, 27 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Hi Prehensile Tale. Primary schools are very rarely notable enough for their own page. Most of the school articles already on Wikipedia are secondary schools. For this one to be notable there would need to be multiple independent reliable sources discussing the school in significant detail. Sarah-Jane (talk) 13:47, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thanks for coming back so promptly. I totally get that primary schools are hardly what one would call top line encyclopedia entries, so see the argument for them not being included at a page level. Where I struggle, perhaps, is that it feels a little arbitrary? For example, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Western_Advocate_(Texas) gets a page, and I am finding it hard to convince myself that that makes 'notability' sense. Not looking to argue the point particularly, just voicing my mild confusion, I guess. Thanks again.

Prehensile Tale (talk) 14:08, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Sometimes things slip through the cracks and some non-notable articles remain while others are spotted and deleted/redirected. If you come across any articles that you don't think are notable you can nominate them for deletion at WP:Articles for deletion.Sarah-Jane (talk) 14:40, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ross Bell (American naturalist) (December 14)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ross Bell (American naturalist) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Ross_Bell_(American_naturalist) Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Onel5969&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Ross_Bell_(American_naturalist) reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 Onel 5969  TT me 20:14, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ross Bell (American naturalist) has been accepted
 Ross Bell (American naturalist), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!  DGG ( talk ) 04:57, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Ross_Bell_(American_naturalist) help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Draft:Jerry A. Powell (American entomologist)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Draft:Jerry A. Powell (American entomologist), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://essig.berkeley.edu/about/powell.shtml.

It is possible that the bot was mistaken and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:57, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Jerry A. Powell (American entomologist)


Hello, Prehensile Tale. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Jerry A. Powell".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the  or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 09:08, 18 August 2017 (UTC)