User talk:Prem Mondal

Welcome!
Hello, Prem Mondal, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Dibrugarh did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to  The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Introduction tutorial
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome.

May 2021
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Dibrugarh, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 08:57, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Dibrugarh, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 09:22, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Dibrugarh. - Arjayay (talk) 09:39, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. 331dot (talk) 12:18, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Dibrugarh. You have just had one block for making unsourced changes/ and immediately started doing it again, please stop before you are blocked again - Arjayay (talk) 13:07, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

June 2021
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Mfield (Oi!) 04:06, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

November 2021
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruption and addition of unsourced content, refusal to discuss. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 18:44, 9 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Hello Prem Mondal, please note that Wikipedia is a collaborative environment, and as such communication is required. Editors are expected to make a good faith effort to respond and discuss concerns as they arise, which is not happening here.  Any and all changes to Wikipedia articles are required to be attributed to reliable sources, as you have been repeatedly notified.  Please address the concerns posted thus far on your talk page at your own convenience.  Thank you, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 19:01, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/Prem Mondal. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. DatGuyTalkContribs 20:30, 10 December 2022 (UTC)