User talk:PrenatalPro

AfC notification: Draft:Pink Stork (Company) has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Pink Stork (Company). Thanks! Drmies (talk) 14:39, 28 February 2024 (UTC)


 * I am working on getting more secondary sources. But I based Pink Stork's article off the Articles that are both approved for Ritual Vitamins and O Postiv Vitamins. I will make it more in-depth and neutral. Thank you. PrenatalPro (talk) 16:34, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pink Stork (Company) (February 28)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by WikiDan61 were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pink Stork (Company) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Pink_Stork_(Company) Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:WikiDan61&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Pink_Stork_(Company) reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:23, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

Why did you submit this after I made that comment? Drmies (talk) 15:33, 28 February 2024 (UTC)


 * That was a mistake. I apologize. PrenatalPro (talk) 21:40, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pink Stork (Company) (March 6)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pink Stork (Company) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Pink_Stork_(Company) Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DoubleGrazing&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Pink_Stork_(Company) reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:03, 6 March 2024 (UTC)


 * I don't understand what is wrong with the article. Can you explain it to me? Many businesses have Wikipedia pages with far less credible sources. Would it help to add local newspaper sources as well as secondary sources? They are just difficult to verify because they are not recorded online (Or at least, I can't find them).
 * Thank you, PrenatalPro (talk) 16:15, 6 March 2024 (UTC)