User talk:Preppy12

November 2014
Hello, I'm Cannolis. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Christian Serratos without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Cannolis (talk) 20:02, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Greg Fasolino has repeatedly changed information to suit his personal views. Back when this started with Greg simultaneously there happened to be a stalker on Twitter saying he would do harmful against the law type of things to Christian Serratos. All because he saw her when she first appeared on Neds. Now this was a small show that she is not known for nor has had a fan base that was met by Christian. Christian went all over the world with Twilight and met fans that camped out. That said after the PD and detectives thought they calmed this man he went on to place Neds as the show all over Wikipedia and many sites. All sites have complied minus Wikipedia. It seems Greg has worked this system that Wikipedia has going on and now he takes things down that her team places up. He also manipulates the system and places wrong personal information to have us correct it and place more personal information all to his liking. Please understand that this is a very serious issue. Please assist in this.

WP:NPA
Not sure why you're blaming User:Greg Fasolino for the misspelled name as the page history shows that this IP editor made that error. This editor also just removed content in a very similar edit to yours. Cannolis (talk) 20:05, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

November 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Christian Serratos. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Neil N  talk to me 01:26, 12 November 2014 (UTC)