User talk:PresN/Archive 18

WikiCup 2017 July newsletter
The third round of the competition has finished in a flurry of last minute activity, with 288 points being required to qualify for round 4. It was a hotly competitive round with all but four of the contestants exceeding the 106 points that was necessary to proceed to round 4 last year. Coemgenus and Freikorp tied on 288, and both have been allowed to proceed, so round 4 now has one pool of eight competitors and one of nine.

Round 3 saw the achievement of a 26-topic Featured topic by MPJ-DK as well as 5 featured lists and 13 featured articles. PanagiotisZois and SounderBruce achieved their first ever featured articles. Carbrera led the GA score with 10, Tachs achieved 17 DYKs and MBlaze Lightning 10 In the news items. There were 167 DYKs, 93 GARs and 82 GAs overall, this last figure being higher than the number of GAs in round 2, when twice as many people were taking part. Even though contestants performed more GARs than they achieved GAs, there was still some frustration at the length of time taken to get articles reviewed.

As we start round 4, we say goodbye to the fifteen or so competitors who didn't quite make it; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them (some people have fallen foul of this rule and the points have been removed).

If you are concerned that your nomination, whether it be for a good article, a featured process, or anything else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth 05:37, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – July 2017
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2017).

Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Happyme22 • Dragons flight
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Zad68

Guideline and policy news
 * The RFC discussion regarding WP:OUTING and WMF essay about paid editing and outing (see more at the ArbCom noticeboard archives) is now archived. Milieus #3 and #4 received support; so did concrete proposal #1.

Technical news
 * Fuzzy search will soon be added to Special:Undelete, allowing administrators to search for deleted page titles with results similar to the search query. You can test this by adding ?fuzzy=1 to the URL, as with Special:Undelete?fuzzy=1. Currently the search only finds pages that exactly match the search term.
 * A new bot will automatically revision delete unused file versions from files in Category:Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old.

Miscellaneous
 * A newly revamped database report can help identify users who may be eligible to be autopatrolled.
 * A potentially compromised account from 2001–2002 attempted to request resysop. Please practice appropriate account security by using a unique password for Wikipedia, and consider enabling two-factor authentication. Currently around 17% of admins have enabled 2FA, up from 16% in February 2017.
 * Did you know: On 29 June 2017, there were 1,261 administrators on the English Wikipedia – the exact number of administrators as there were ten years ago on 29 June 2007. Since that time, the English Wikipedia has grown from 1.85 million articles to over 5.43 million.

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:59, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Archive bot
Greetings. Is there a tool in Wikipedia that could be used to autoarchive all links in references? I've seen users doing that. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 22:27, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Aka you saw JudgeSurreal go on a driveby archiving spree today? :) Yeah, - easiest way to find it if you forget is to go to the history of whatever article, and click on "Fix dead links". It will ask you to login to WP's authorization portal so that it can post on your behalf when you tell it to- do that. Then it will take you back to the archiving page. If you just run it, it will archive all dead links in references. If you select "Add archives to all non-dead references" it will do live links as well. In the top bar you can pick to run the bot on a set of articles, though if you do you don't get the option to archive live links. It's usually shockingly fast to run. -- Pres  N  01:23, 8 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Thanks. Now I won't have to go archiving manually like I did with D.Gray-man XD.Tintor2 (talk) 01:28, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
 * I just stumbled on this topic coincidentally, but Jeeezuz Christ! Fantastic! Now I won't have to manually archive all 449 references on Marilyn Manson (band)—or any other article ever again. Cheers PresN and Homeostasis07 (talk) 23:28, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q2 2017
 The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter

Volume 10, No. 1 — 2nd Quarter, 2017

Previous issue | Index | Next issue 

Project At a Glance As of Q2 2017, the project has:


 * 211 Featured Articles
 * 70 Featured Lists
 * 11 Featured Topics
 * 1 Featured Portals


 * 28 Featured Pictures
 * 1,172 Good Articles
 * 23 Good Topics

Content


 * Changes to Featured and Good content
 * News items and announcements


 * Feature: Shiny Wikipedians - A Featured Content Leaderboard
 * Feature: Final Fantasy VII postmortem

Project Navigation

To opt-out or sign up to receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to update the distribution list. (Delivered 14:32, 9 July 2017 (UTC))
 * VG Project Main pages
 * Main project – talk
 * Project category – talk
 * Portal – talk
 * VG Project Departments
 * Assessment – talk
 * Cleanup – talk
 * Peer review – talk
 * Reference library – talk
 * Newsletter – talk
 * Video game images – talk
 * Video game images – talk

Dungeon Siege @ FA
Looks like you and I are in the same boat with our FA nominations. We've both been waiting around for a while, so would you be interested in us both reviewing each others' articles? Josh Milburn seems pretty cool. I recall him saying – just a couple of weeks ago – something along the lines of "as long as the nomination is active, it can stay at FA noms". Would you be up for this? Here's mine. I'd do a source review for your article—which seems to be the kind of review holding up most FA noms [I don't know why, they're actually much easier than regular prose reviews]. I've just finished my last Wiki project, so I'm free to do this. Let me know if you're interested. Cheers. Homeostasis07 (talk) 23:17, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
 * That sounds great! Would you rather have a source review or a prose one? -- Pres N  03:20, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
 * I need one of either, so whichever one you feel most comfortable doing. I'm starting your source review now. ;) Homeostasis07 (talk) 17:20, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Source review'd you, thanks very much! Sorry about all the nitpicks in yours. -- Pres N  02:17, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
 * No problem. You needed to do what you needed to do. ;) Pleasure doing business with you. And good luck with your nomination. Homeostasis07 (talk) 23:48, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Congratulations on the promotion; thoroughly deserved. Josh Milburn (talk) 22:32, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Lars Alexandersson
I have been recently worked into the Power Ranger like character of the fighting game series Tekken: Lars Alexandersson. I managed to give both the creation and reception a huge expansion. However, I also uploaded one image that talks about the characters' redesign and I'm not sure if it also fits well. Also, the producer Harada has talked about his creation in his twitter account. Is this allowed? Anyway, I also wanted to hear Drake's comments since he also experienced with it. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 00:30, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Despite some negative connotations, Twitter is a valid publishing source, and a creator's own words are allowed to be cited. It's a first-party source, so it can be cited for factual information but not anything that would require interpretation, and doesn't count for notability, but you're fine there anyways. As far as the image, I'm not the best at judging; I think it'd defensible as you're explicitly commenting on the redesign, though it'd be better if you had a little more talking about what changed. -- Pres N  01:21, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
 * I agree with the points PresN made above. As long as it's from one of the game creator's official Twitter accounts, then it's valid information. As to the image, yes some added commentary would be good if you don't want its inclusion challenged. You could look at the article for Lightning, which faced a similar issue during its lifetime. --ProtoDrake (talk) 07:07, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

You mean creation information or reaction to the design? If it is creation, I couldn't find anything so far. On the other hand, there are almost two paragraphs about response to it.Tintor2 (talk) 13:31, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
 * I think reaction would be a more than tolerable addition. Something like noting critic reaction to the usage of the design as a small line within the image cation. --ProtoDrake (talk) 13:44, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Then I think it can be used. Thanks you two.Tintor2 (talk) 16:49, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Emm, I used the tweet template but it says the references are lacking a number but I don't get it. Any idea?Tintor2 (talk) 21:57, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
 * With cite tweet, you don't put the url, you put the username and tweet number. I fixed them for you. -- Pres N  23:32, 29 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Thanks PresN and Drake. *sweating* I can't find anything else to add to the article. Last week I requested the guild of ce to copyedit it due to English not being my native language? Do you that once the copyedit is finished, I could nominate it to GA. I also cleaned up the two images' fair uses based on Lightning. Greetings.Tintor2 (talk) 01:32, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
 * I don't see why not. I've seen character GAs in worse shape at nomination and they still passed. Mine included... --ProtoDrake (talk) 07:57, 31 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Also ProtoDrake After expanding the article more, I found early sketches of the character in an artbook of the series. I also found out that the character's theme song (which is highly discussed) alongside with his redesign from Tekken 7 appear in a cover here. Do you think I should avoid these images or one of them is worth adding to the article? Sadly, wikimedia commons doesn't have a free image about the single CD. Cheers and thanks for the advices.Tintor2 (talk) 01:59, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Personally, I'd not push it with the images. I've had to watch myself going nuts on images for illustration on some of the articles I've worked on because they're among the first under fire by reviewers. What's there looks more than adequate. --ProtoDrake (talk) 09:14, 12 August 2017 (UTC)


 * I see. I'll at least remove the sketch one for being redundant.Tintor2 (talk) 13:41, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – August 2017
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2017). Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Anarchyte • GeneralizationsAreBad • Cullen328 (first RfA to reach WP:300)
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Cprompt • Rockpocket • Rambo's Revenge • Animum • TexasAndroid • Chuck SMITH • MikeLynch • Crazytales • Ad Orientem

Guideline and policy news
 * Following a series of discussions around new pages patrol, the WMF is helping implement a controlled autoconfirmed article creation trial as a research experiment, similar to the one proposed in 2011. You can learn more about the research plan at meta:Research:Autoconfirmed article creation trial. The exact start date of the experiment has yet to be determined.
 * A new speedy deletion criterion, regarding articles created as a result undisclosed paid editing, is currently being discussed (permalink).
 * An RfC (permalink) is currently open that proposes expanding WP:G13 to include all drafts, even if they weren't submitted through Articles for Creation.

Technical news
 * LoginNotify should soon be deployed to the English Wikipedia. This will notify users when there are suspicious login attempts on their account.
 * The new version of XTools is nearing an official release. This suite of tools includes administrator statistics, an improved edit counter, among other tools that may benefit administrators. You can report issues on Phabricator and provide general feedback at mw:Talk:XTools.

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Request
Hi PresN, would you be interested in performing a source review of my FAC here? It's completely fine if you're currently wrapped up with real-life obligations. Thanks either way. Slightlymad (talk) 05:06, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Re:Homeworld
Hey! Thanks for fixing my mistake on Homeworld. I've been drive-by adding awards to articles for a few weeks (or maybe longer) now, and the speed and volume required mean that some errors slip by me. Glad to see that at least a bit of what I added on Homeworld was useful. Keep up the great work—and belated congratulations on the Homeworld FA. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 18:27, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
 * thanks! No worries, easy mistake to make and easy to correct. I've seen your stream of edits a couple times, it's super-super helpful for pretty much everything you're touching, so no use fussing about small bits of being inconsistent with one article's format. Glad to see you around here having fun improving articles! -- Pres N  19:49, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Rebound (video game)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Rebound (video game) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Indrian -- Indrian (talk) 15:40, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Merchant Prince cover.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Merchant Prince cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Qwak!
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Qwak! you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of J Milburn -- J Milburn (talk) 20:01, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Qwak 1974 photo.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Qwak 1974 photo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:49, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

WikiCup 2017 September newsletter
Round 4 of the WikiCup has ended and we move forward into the final round. In round 4, a total of 12 FAs, 3 FLs, 44 GAs, 3 FLs, 79 DYKs, 1 ITN and 42 GARs was achieved, with no FPs or FTs this time. Congratulations to Peacemaker67 on the Royal Yugoslav Navy Good Topic of 36 items, and the 12 featured articles achieved by Cas Liber (5), Vanamonde93 (3), Peacemaker67 (2), Adityavagarwal (1) and 12george1 (1). With a FA scoring 200 points, and bonus points available on top of this, FAs are likely to feature heavily in the final round. Meanwhile Yellow Evan, a typhoon specialist, was contributing 12 DYKs and 10 GAs, while Adityavagarwal and Freikorp topped the GAR list with 8 reviews each. As we enter the final round, we are down to eight contestants, and we would like to thank those of you who have been eliminated for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia. The lowest score needed to reach round 5 was 305, and I think we can expect a highly competitive final round.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews Needed. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to reduce the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck, and let the best man (or woman) win! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth 06:25, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – September 2017
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2017). Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Nakon • Scott
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Sverdrup • Thespian • Elockid • James086 • Ffirehorse • Celestianpower • Boing! said Zebedee

Guideline and policy news
 * ACTRIAL, a research experiment that restricts article creation to autoconfirmed users, will begin on September 7. It will run for six months. You can learn more about the research specifics at meta:Research:Autoconfirmed article creation trial, while Wikipedia talk:Autoconfirmed article creation trial is probably the best venue for general discussion.
 * Following an RfC, WP:G13 speedy deletion criterion now applies to any page in the draftspace that has not been edited in six months. There is a bot-generated report, updated daily, to help identify potentially qualifying drafts that have not been submitted through articles for creation.

Technical news
 * You will now get a notification when someone tries to log in to your account and fails. If they try from a device that has logged into your account before, you will be notified after five failed attempts. You can also set in your preferences to get an email when someone logs in to your account from a new device or IP address, which may be encouraged for admins and accounts with sensitive permissions.
 * Syntax highlighting is now available as a beta feature (more info). This may assist administrators and template editors when dealing with intricate syntax of high-risk templates and system messages.
 * In your notification preferences, you can now block specific users from pinging you. This functionality will soon be available for Special:EmailUser as well.

Arbitration
 * Applications for CheckUser and Oversight are being accepted by the Arbitration Committee until September 12. Community discussion of the candidates will begin on September 18.

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:35, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

List of awards and nominations received by Inna
Hi there! It's been a long time since you reviewed Alexandra Stan discography for FL status. I wondered if you could take a look at the FLC above. Let me know if I can do something for you. Best regards, Cartoon network freak (talk) 18:05, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Qwak!
The article Qwak! you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Qwak! for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of J Milburn -- J Milburn (talk) 07:21, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Invitation to Admin confidence survey
Hello,

Beginning in September 2017, the Wikimedia Foundation Anti-harassment tool team will be conducting a survey to gauge how well tools, training, and information exists to assist English Wikipedia administrators in recognizing and mitigating things like sockpuppetry, vandalism, and harassment.

The survey should only take 5 minutes, and your individual response will not be made public. This survey will be integral for our team to determine how to better support administrators.

To take the survey sign up here and we will send you a link to the form.

We really appreciate your input!

Please let us know if you wish to opt-out of all massmessage mailings from the Anti-harassment tools team.

For the Anti-harassment tools team, SPoore (WMF), Community Advocate, Community health initiative (talk) 19:52, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Google books
A fellow user requested me to do a source review in a FAC. Everything seems fine, but I'm confused about one that uses scans from google books. Are scans from Google Books fine or should they be removed? Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 14:50, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
 * As in, a "|url=" pointing to a google books scan in a cite book? I've seen it both ways; I think at this point a google books link is considered to be consistent with WP linking standards as far as a convenience link goes- if it violates copyright standards in a given user's country the link doesn't work, so I think it's fine. -- Pres N  15:36, 18 September 2017 (UTC)


 * I see but I can't tell in what instance it would break copyrights or not.Tintor2 (talk) 15:38, 18 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Hello, there is something I have been wondering. Is it possible to request free images or vids. I mean today it was revealed the character GA Lars Alexandersson is getting a special collaboration with Japanese wrestler. I notice the Tekken franchise even has some free videos just like the ones I added to Tekken 7. Is there a way I can ask to see if there is a free image to avoid uploading another nonfree images that compares the wrestler and Lars' design based on him? Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 22:28, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
 * not sure what you're asking; request from who? You can always ask a company or person to release an image/video as CC-by-SA or whatever, though getting a response from Bandai is pretty unlikely. I see that those videos were uploaded to youtube with that license, which is why you can use them, though I don't know if youtube has a way to filter on that like flickr does. If you want to see what free images already are on commons, just look through []. -- Pres N  01:42, 23 October 2017 (UTC)


 * It was just an idea I have because Lars' costumes keep having notorious response like the one from Kishimoto that resulted in his inclusion in a Naruto and now the wrestling outfit. Are requests made here?
 * Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 21:25, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Again, requests to who? That's a category talk page; I don't know who would be watching that but I suspect it's nobody. If you want a free-use image of Lars in costume, your best (only) bet is to find the person who took the image and ask that they release it under the CC-by-SA license. I've had the best luck with finding pictures on flickr and then asking the poster to re-license it, but it's still pretty hit or miss and you're not going to get more than amateur photos. -- Pres N  21:54, 23 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Mmmh, I see. Guess I gotta avoid it. Here's the official video and here an English site.Tintor2 (talk) 22:00, 23 October 2017 (UTC)


 * On another note I've been working on the fighting game (for a change) Naruto Shippuden: Ultimate Ninja Storm 2. When I asked in the project whether I should add the cast or not, the consensus appeared to be yes so I added a list. An editor also said that the plot could be expanded. However, it is just a retelling of the series. What do you think? Should I add a premise for every chapter in the game? Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 17:59, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

an edit summary of yours that I was wondering about
"...Request by user on Discord chat" I am a little familiar with IRC but what is "Discord chat"? Thanks, Shearonink (talk) 04:47, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
 * The desciption page is at WP:DISCORD; to sum up, it's an IRC-like platform (article) that you can access via browser or app, except that it allows for unlimited "channels", or rooms, and also keeps all of the old posts on the screen even if you weren't logged in, so that if you join the discord server you see all the messages that were there before, not just the ones after you logged on. There's usually a few dozen of us online at any time; we have a few general channels and ones for a few wikiprojects. -- Pres N  12:10, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
 * I had never even heard of "Discord"...will have to check it out. Thanks for the explanation. Shearonink (talk) 14:23, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q3 2017
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – October 2017
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2017). Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Boing! said Zebedee • Ansh666 • Ad Orientem
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Tonywalton • AmiDaniel • Silence • BanyanTree • Magioladitis • Vanamonde93 • Mr.Z-man • Jdavidb • Jakec • Ram-Man • Yelyos • Kurt Shaped Box

Guideline and policy news
 * Following a successful proposal to create it, a new user right called "edit filter helper" is now assignable and revocable by administrators. The right allows non-administrators to view the details of private edit filters, but not to edit them.
 * Following a discussion about mass-application of ECP and how the need for logging and other details of an evolving consensus may have been missed by some administrators, a rough guide to extended confirmed protection has been written. This information page describes how the extended-confirmed aspects of the protection policy are currently being applied by administrators.

Technical news
 * You can now search for IP ranges at Special:Contributions. Some log pages and Special:DeletedContributions are not yet supported. Wildcards (e.g. 192.168.0.*) are also not supported, but the popular contribsrange gadget will continue to work.

Arbitration
 * Community consultation on the 2017 candidates for CheckUser and Oversight has concluded. The Arbitration Committee will appoint successful candidates by October 11.
 * A request for comment is open regarding the structure, rules, and procedures of the December 2017 Arbitration Committee election, and how to resolve any issues not covered by existing rules.

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:23, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Nier: Automata's Spoilers
By what you are saying: "Lets not get into spoiling Automata's plot here", are you telling me we shoulden't spoil Automata's plot unless new players had played Automata first? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.105.63.8 (talk) 14:48, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
 * I was saying that the Nier article shouldn't go into details about Automata; partly not to spoil a game that the article isn't about but also to avoid going into a lot of detail about a game that the article isn't about. -- Pres N  17:21, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

List of songs recorded by Led Zeppelin
Hi PresN, would you mind doing a source review for my FLC please? It's all that's needed for it to become featured. Thanks very much. BeatlesLedTV (talk) 20:39, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Four Award

 * Thanks! And no, this is my only FA that I actually created the page- most of my FAs were starts/Cs that I completely rewrote, but that doesn't count, and the rest of my GAs that I started from scratch I haven't taken through FAC. Nice to finally have one! -- Pres N  02:55, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Ah well, I do like the idea of any award that promotes people improving any stub article they create.....Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 03:42, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Rebound (video game)
The article Rebound (video game) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Rebound (video game) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of TarkusAB -- TarkusAB (talk) 13:41, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Rebound (video game)
The article Rebound (video game) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Rebound (video game) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of TarkusAB -- TarkusAB (talk) 22:21, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

List of video game magazines
Hi there,

So you have a bit of a reputation as the list guy in the video game wikiproject, so I figured I would come to you first. The List of video game magazines is in bad shape. The overview sections is surprisingly well sourced, but the list itself needs some revamping. I'm going through right now and trying to find good sources for the magazines, but I'm not quite sure how to tackle the actual list format. Any suggestions? Famous Hobo (talk) 02:42, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Hmm, so I tried looking through Category:Lists of magazines for inspiration, but didn't see anything too great. There's about 100 entries- do you think it's about complete, or missing a lot? Regardless, that's around the point where anything more complicated than a wikitable becomes too long to support. In terms of just cleaning up the table itself, though, maybe something like this? -- Pres N  18:13, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

I like that format. As for the number of magazines, I'm not sure how many there are. The problem is how do we define video game magazines? Magazines that only focus on gaming? What about old 80s magazines that focused on gaming and general computing like ACE, or Japanese magazines like focus on gaming and manga like Dengeki Maoh. If we allow these magazines, what's the cut off, as this opens the floodgates for magazines that feature one or two game reviews but primarily focuses on something else. For now, I'll just try to clean up the list. Famous Hobo (talk) 02:31, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Early game source
Hey PresN! I know you're interested in improving WPVG's early game coverage, so I thought I'd share a resource I just stumbled across. It's an in-depth history of Maze War called "The First First-Person Shooter", which ran in Computer Games Magazine #176 (July 2005). If that sounds useful, I can upload some images of the article. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 04:37, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes, definately! I haven't touched that article yet, but I did work some on the "other" possible first first-person 3D game Spasim, so I'm sure I'll get to it as well. Thanks for thinking of me! -- Pres N  04:51, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Perfect! I'll get you the images ASAP. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 05:07, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Hey! Here you go:, , . The citation is: Hope it's helpful. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 19:55, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – November 2017
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2017). Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Longhair • Megalibrarygirl • TonyBallioni • Vanamonde93
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Allen3 • Eluchil404 • Arthur Rubin • Bencherlite

Technical news
 * The Wikimedia Foundation's Anti-Harassment Tools team is creating an "Interaction Timeline" tool that intends to assist administrators in resolving user conduct disputes. Feedback on the concept may be posted on the talk page.
 * A new function is now available to edit filter managers that will make it easier to look for multiple strings containing spoofed text.

Arbitration
 * Eligible editors will be invited to submit candidate statements for the 2017 Arbitration Committee Elections starting on November 12 until November 21. Voting will begin on November 27 and last until December 10.
 * Following a request for comment,, and  will serve as the Electoral Commission for the 2017 ArbCom Elections.

Obituaries
 * The Wikipedia community has recently learned that (William Allen Peckham) passed away on December 30, 2016, the same day as . Allen began editing in 2005 and became an administrator that same year.

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

WikiCup 2017 November newsletter: Final results
The final round of the 2017 WikiCup is over. Congratulations to the 2017 WikiCup top three finalists:
 * First Place -
 * Second Place -
 * Third Place -

In addition to recognizing the achievements of the top finishers and everyone who worked hard to make it to the final round, we also want to recognize those participants who were most productive in each of the WikiCup scoring categories:
 * Featured Article – Cas Liber (actually a two-way tie with themselves for an astonishing five FAs in R2 and R4).
 * Good Article – Adityavagarwal had 14 GAs promoted in R5.
 * Featured List – and  both produced 2 FLs in R2
 * Featured Pictures – improved an image to FP status in R5, the only FP this year.
 * Featured Topic – has the only FT of the Cup in R3.
 * Good Topic – Four different editors created a GT in R2, R3 and R4.
 * Did You Know – Adityavagarwal had 22 DYKs on the main page in R5.
 * In The News – had 14 ITN on the main page in R2.
 * Good Article Review – completed 31 GARs in R1.

Over the course of the 2017 WikiCup the following content was added or improved on Wikipedia: 51 Featured Articles, 292 Good Articles, 18 Featured Lists, 1 Featured Picture, 1 Featured Topics, 4 Good Topics, around 400 Did You Knows, 75 In The News, and 442 Good Article Reviews. Thank you to all the competitors for your hard work and what you have done to improve Wikipedia.

Regarding the prize vouchers - please send  an email from the email address to which you would like your Amazon voucher sent. Please include your preference of global Amazon marketplace as well. We hope to have the electronic gift cards processed and sent within a week.

We will open up a discussion for comments on process and scoring in a few days. The 2018 WikiCup is just around the corner! Many thanks from all the judges. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. ,, and MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:41, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Housekeeping...
Hey PresN, am trying to look at User:Dweller/Featured Articles that haven't been on Main Page as well as WP:FAR as I am an FAR coordinator. I figured you being familiar with video games could scroll down User:Dweller/Featured Articles that haven't been on Main Page and check some of the video game articles, with a view to ticking them (or nominating them) at TFA if in really good nick, noting problems..and if really substantial problems then nominating at WP:FAR, cheers....Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:14, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Rerelease
Today, I tried doing a major expansion in Naruto Shippuden: Ultimate Ninja Storm 3. However, the game has some kind of re-release and I don't know where exactly should I put it. Should it be a subsection of development? Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 22:04, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Different articles do it differently, but personally I like making Re-release or Remaster or whatever a seperate section after Reception (see: Homeworld), as it kind of fits in a "Legacy" sense, which if present usually goes after Reception. -- Pres N  13:10, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

WikiCup 2018
So the 2017 WikiCup has come to an end. Congratulations to the winner, to the other finalists and to all those who took part. 177 contestants signed up, more than usual, but not all of them submitted entries in the first round. Were editors attracted by the cash prizes offered for the first time this year, or were these irrelevant? Do the rules and scoring need changing for the 2018 WikiCup? If you have a view on these or other matters, why not join in the WikiCup discussion about next year's contest? , and. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Keen Dreams Revision
Hello. I have revised Commander Keen in Keen Dreams in my sandbox. Having gone through the article and its predecessor, I can say it is safe to remove (or at least shorten) repeating information that already exists in Commander Keen in Invasion of the Vorticons, since the main focus is on the this standalone game and not the trilogy. I have also removed the repeating information from the top summary and moved information such as declaration of "Lost Episode" at the top. In addition, I have placed subsections, named and placed appropriately.

If you think I'm on the right track, feel free to make some edits to my revision and if it works well, the changes can made to the article. I'm glad to be of help. Deltasim (talk) 14:40, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Hmmm. I think there's a few ideas there that could be useful, but there are several others that I really don't like. Taking it from the top:


 * I don't like what you did to the lead; you cut out all summary of the gameplay and development sections for no particular purpose- the lead wasn't exactly very long to begin with, and its purpose is to summarize the entire article, not just sections 2 and 4.
 * I don't understand how making the 2-paragraph Gameplay section into 2 1-paragraph sub-sections is useful to the reader? Like, of course you could subdivide any gameplay section on Wikipedia into as many or as few subsections as you want, but there's no organizational need driving it here- it's really very small already.
 * Same with Development- while I don't use subsections as much as I should, I just don't see the point of chopping off one paragraph and giving it a header. It's just awkward. If we were talking splitting up a 6-8 paragraph section then sure, but we're not.
 * On the flip side here, though, while I think the development section should give more context than your version about why and how this game was developed (I don't much care if it repeats a bit of Vorticons, those are two different articles and each article needs to stand on its own), perhaps the existing version talks too much about the "pre-development" information and it should be cut down to somewhere in the middle.
 * I'm not strongly attached to calling the release and post-release section "legacy" instead of "release", but I don't much understand why you cut the first two sentences, only to leave them in the lead? The lead is supposed to summarize the article, for one thing, not hold unique information, and also the points about how the game is called the "lost episode" of the series and got no reviews in the mainstream press are pretty important details when talking about the real-world impact of the game, so I don't understand why you would cut it.

I guess, writing this out, overall I'm just not feeling this change to be an improvement. It chops out a bunch of information from a fairly short article, and adds subsections to sections that were only 2 or 4 paragraphs to begin with. I don't want to be rude, because I honestly really respect a lot of the work you do in the articles you work on, I just... don't see the benefit to most of this revision, or even really the point. -- Pres N  04:50, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
 * It's good to summarise an article, though the repetition of things like the Steam release first in the top summary then the Legacy section is quite redundant. When you want to summarise an article, you actually want to describe it in a nutshell. The summary is about 333 words long. I don't think there is a strict word count guideline on wikipedia, but I would recommend the summary be shortened to 200 words at least (give or take 10). As for splitting the sections into subsections, the purpose would be to allow readers to find the exact information they are looking for such as what lead to the game's development or the modifications from the original engine (in the development section). Perhaps additional information about the game covering the Commercial Performance (such as copies sold or methods of which they were sold) should come before revisions to the article. Try to look through Softdisk catalogs to dig up more information. I can safely say that my work on attempting to revise the article is done. I hope it's inspired you on what improvements and that my 3rd opinion has been helpful. Deltasim (talk) 06:29, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Lunar Lander (1979 video game)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Lunar Lander (1979 video game) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Indrian -- Indrian (talk) 22:21, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

Women in Red World Contest
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Orphaned non-free image File:Keen Dreams title.gif
Thanks for uploading File:Keen Dreams title.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:56, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

Galaxy Game
Hi -- Some context to my edit from earlier today: it was a revert of a change made over a year ago by an IP, changing "one of the first" to "one of the last".

My first reaction to reading the lead sentence was that it was odd in tone. Saying "one of the last of the first" is peculiar, and the fact that the anon editor made a one word change came off, at least to me, as snarky.

Thinking about it a little more, though, I saw that there was a point to the anon edit, which was that the game could not be legitimately characterized as one of the first ever video games.

However, GG's significance (which is what a lead sentence is intended to establish) is that it is an example of an early video game (albeit not the "first of the first"). So rather than just doing a straight up revert, changing "last" back to "first", I recast the sentence to make the more general point that it is among the first video games (just not one of the first early video games).

(Maybe) more briefly: Among the three descriptions


 * one of the first games created in the early history of video games
 * one of the last games created in the early history of video games
 * one of the first video games

...the last establishes the most significant point, and is the least odd sounding. What do you think? Regards, --NapoliRoma (talk) 06:41, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Hmm, part of the problem with the last one is that the next sentence says "it was one of the first coin-operated video games", so you get some awkward repetition. Maybe just "...developed in 1971 during the early history of video games"? -- Pres N  02:19, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes, that's better than what I had. I made the revision with one slight tweak ("era" instead of "history"). Thanks!  --NapoliRoma (talk) 21:09, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Keen series - What to look for
Hello. I'm glad you're impressed with my edits on the Commander Keen series. If there's anything particular you'd like me to look for let me know. Here's a small list of things I think would go well with the articles if they can be well referenced:


 * Number of copies sold.
 * Gravis PC GamePad in which copies of keen 1 and 4 came with.
 * Bobby Prince's using Voyetra Sequencer Plus Gold for the music.
 * Using Deluxe Paint for the artwork.
 * Official pieces of merchandise such a Keen Wristwatch that came with some box copies of Keen 6.
 * Special related events such as expos.

There is also an interesting article on rare vintage copies at https://www.thestar.com.my/tech/tech-news/2017/06/30/original-doom-ii-discs-sell-for-us3150/. It's great that I can help out. Deltasim (talk) 17:36, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
 * I think in terms of priorities, sales numbers are always great, and the Gravis PC GamePad tie-in is a good addition. The specific tools used for the music/art aren't really as useful- in general that info is too technical/detailed. Merchandise or expos are good, though. Thanks so much for all the great sources you've been adding! -- Pres N  02:16, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – December 2017
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2017). Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Joe Roe
 * Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg JzG
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Ericorbit • Perceval • Thingg • Tristanb • Violetriga

Guideline and policy news
 * Following a request for comment, a new section has been added to the username policy which disallows usernames containing emoji, emoticons or otherwise "decorative" usernames, and usernames that use any non-language symbols. Administrators should discuss issues related to these types of usernames before blocking.

Technical news
 * Wikimedians are now invited to vote on the proposals in the 2017 Community Wishlist Survey on Meta Wiki until 10 December 2017. In particular, there is a section of the survey regarding new tools for administrators and for anti-harassment.
 * A new function is available to edit filter managers which can be used to store matches from regular expressions.

Arbitration
 * Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is open until Sunday 23:59, 10 December 2017 (UTC). There are 12 candidates running for 8 vacant seats.

Miscellaneous
 * Over the last few months, several users have reported backlogs that require administrator attention at WP:ANI, with the most common backlogs showing up on WP:SPI, WP:AIV and WP:RFPP. It is requested that all administrators take some time during this month to help clear backlogs wherever possible. It should be noted that AIV reports are not always valid; however, they still need to be cleared, which may include needing to remind users on what qualifies as vandalism.
 * The Wikimedia Foundation Community health initiative is conducting a survey for English Wikipedia contributors on their experience and satisfaction level with Administrator’s Noticeboard/Incidents. This survey will be integral to gathering information about how this noticeboard works (i.e. which problems it deals with well and which problems it struggles with). If you would like to take this survey, please sign up on this page, and a link for the survey will be emailed to you via Special:EmailUser.

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:57, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Lunar Lander (1979 video game)
The article Lunar Lander (1979 video game) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Lunar Lander (1979 video game) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Indrian -- Indrian (talk) 18:41, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Lunar Lander (1979 video game)
The article Lunar Lander (1979 video game) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Lunar Lander (1979 video game) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Indrian -- Indrian (talk) 18:41, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

FLC housekeeping needed
Hi, Pres. There are a couple of FLC matters that need to be sorted out. First, the nominator at Featured list candidates/List of New England Patriots starting quarterbacks/archive1 has requested closure because they are busy off-Wiki, but I supported early in the FLC. Since I declared support, you or TRM should probably handle this one. Second, Featured list candidates/List of Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy launches/archive1 is awaiting a source review you promised. Come to think of it, quite a few FLCs need source checks at the moment. However, this one in particular is an old FLC and it would be great if we could come to a decision on it soon. Cheers. Giants2008 ( Talk ) 02:20, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi PresN, you closed many FLCs yesterday, thanks, but you didn't add the FLCClosed template to several, will the bot still archive these? The Rambling Man (talk) 08:05, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

TFL notification
Hi, PresN. I'm just posting to let you know that List of Uncharted media – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for January 19, 2018. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008  ( Talk ) 02:19, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Advice needed
Some fellow editors and me trying to see if the article Sasuke Uchiha could become FA in the next year as it has been copyedited twice and every change has been prose reviews. However, I have one doubt, are sketches of the designs mentioned on the article better than actual images. I mean, the character is noted for having three designs: early teen, teenager and adult who are all covered in the main infobox image. In regards to his teen design recently found early sketches of it which are mentioned in the design section. Should the final image be replaced with sketch. It's just some doubt I have. Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 21:34, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
 * I think the sketches should stay, as they show development info as well as design, and as you say the infobox image has the final designs, though they're at odd angles. -- Pres N  02:03, 29 December 2017 (UTC)