User talk:PresN/Archive 9

Welcome to the 2011 WikiCup!
Hello, happy new year and welcome to the 2011 WikiCup! Your submissions' page can be found here and instructions of how to update the page can be found here and on the submissions' page itself. From the submissions' page, a bot will update the main scoresheet. Our rules have been very slightly updated from last year; the full rules can be found here. Please remember that you can only receive points for content on which you have done significant work in 2011; nominations of work from last year and "drive-by" nominations will not be awarded points. Signups are going to remain open through January, so if you know of anyone who would like to take part, please direct them to WikiCup/2011 signups. The judges can be contacted on the WikiCup talk page, on their respective talk pages, or by email. Other than that, we will be in contact at the end of every month with the newsletter. If you want to stop or start receiving newsletters, please remove your name from or add your name to this list. Good luck! J Milburn and The ed17 12:59, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for DabEL and question
Thanks. TCO (talk) 03:01, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Is there a tool that you use to do the check, where is it, and should I do this on the future myself, before bringing articles up?
 * What is a Dab? And I assume EL is external link?

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q4 2010
MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 18:05, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Jenova Chen
The DYK project (nominate) 18:03, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

Talk:Flow (video game)/GA1
Very nice. I've offered a few thoughts on the review page. J Milburn (talk) 02:19, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I've promoted it, and left you with a few thoughts for FAC. It's generally very nice, and I can see it being ready for FAC very soon indeed. J Milburn (talk) 12:19, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

Re:Flow GAN
Sounds good; I'll get started as soon as I can. WPVG could definitely use more FTs, as the recent loss of "Half-Life 2 titles" and a few others has left us with only five. And, besides Myst, they're pretty small and/or obscure. A thatgamecompany FT would be a huge gain for the project, and I'm happy to help you make it happen.

Oh, and thanks for the offer; I'll keep it in mind, as I might need help in the future on my "Looking Glass Studios games" GT/FT. You already gave me a hand with list formatting on the eventual main article, List of video games developed by Looking Glass Studios, but, due to my complete lack of experience in the field, I'll probably once again need your assistance when I go for FL in a few months. If I do, I'll let you know. Again, thanks. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 23:20, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm making headway through the article. I'm going to give this one my standard two-pass copyedit; I'll work my way from beginning to end, and then do it again. I noticed two things while working:
 * "In Flow, the player controls a small creature in a watery environment, and causes that creature to eat other organisms, grow larger and dive deeper into the sea". -- This sentence shows a marked similarity to: "The player starts out controlling a multi-segmented worm- or snake-like microorganism on a bright, two-dimensional plane". I understand that the first one describes the overall scope of the game, while the second elaborates on one aspect of this, but it's a little disjointed to read twice about how the game is played—particularly when the descriptions are close together. I'm not sure how to solve the issue.
 * "If the player reaches the bottom again, the creature there is now their original worm organism, and defeating it starts the game over again as a worm". -- The lack of reference here may be brought up at FAC. I can understand why you couldn't find one, but it might be best to jury rig something, anyway.
 * As a sidenote, I see that you're currently leading in the WikiCup. I'll try to hurry through the article so that you can get those FA points as soon as possible. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 09:43, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Ah; I didn't realize the competition was so tough, this having been the first time I'd ever heard of it. In that case, I won't rush. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 20:49, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
 * First pass complete. It was fairly smooth; I had a bit of trouble getting started on the lead, but the article's brevity and writing style made the rest quick work. The latter was a refreshing change of pace, in fact, as I've never before worked with someone who uses as many semicolons as I do. Glad to know I'm not alone. Anyway, I'll start on the second pass tomorrow, which will clean up the stuff I overlooked during the first, along with any errors I might have made. Since it's such a short article, I should be done within the week. As for FAC, I don't foresee any problems beyond that worm line I mentioned above, and possibly the small number of reviews. Your call, though; it's been quite awhile since I've paid attention to the goings-on at FAC. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 09:57, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Nearing completion of the second pass, with just Reception to go. The article may need a few tweaks here and there—I may have missed something, or created a few problems of my own—but I think it'll be solid enough to pass 1a. I'm confident in my ability to meet that criterion; two articles I copyedited in the past were promoted, and both of our current VG FACs, which I heavily copyedited, have not received significant prose-related opposition. However, should 1a concerns arise during the nomination, I'll be ready to deal with them.
 * Also, I see that you've already started on Cloud (video game); impressive work so far. Are you planning on taking that to FAC, as well? By my count, there'll be seven articles in the FT; at least four will need to be Featured. With Flow and Flower accounted for, that leaves two—which, obviously, will not include Kellee Santiago or Journey (video game). Will I be hitting Jenova Chen next, or waiting for finalized versions of Cloud and thatgamecompany? JimmyBlackwing (talk) 10:51, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Sure thing; I'll be ready. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 21:31, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Finished. Feel free to nominate it whenever you're ready; as I said above, I'll deal with 1a complaints if they occur. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 10:38, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Sorry; I kept forgetting to respond. Anyway, no problem. I hope the FFXIII nom goes well. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 23:51, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Nightwish nomination
Hi, i intend to nominate this article, Nightwish, to be a featured article; what's your opinion about it, does it need to get better in something? Rodrigo15 (talk) 14:13, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks a looot! I'm gonna work on your suggestions. I'll "see" you soon.Rodrigo15 (talk) 21:31, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Hi, it's me again; i've just made some corrections on the article according to your seggestion, thanks for it. Can you please be the one to make that "copy-editor" correction? I'd get very happy =). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rodrigo15 (talk • contribs) 23:55, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Can you also vote here? Thanks.Rodrigo15 (talk) 01:09, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for checking the links on the Maya stelae FAC nom. Best regards, Simon Burchell (talk) 13:11, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

Featured article candidates/Painted turtle/archive1
Hello friend. A little while ago you left a review at the above FAC. Bare comments tend to be offputting to new editors who would otherwise leave commentary; would you mind checking out what we did and letting us know if your concerns have been addressed?--NYMFan69-86 (talk) 16:25, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

VG/GL proposal
Since you do not like my current proposal, but also acknowledge that the current version is bad, can you give more detail as to what you think is WP:CREEPy in mine that you don't like and how you would suggest changing. Ad I mentioned at WT:VG, the proposal really needs an entire revamp and a piecemeal one of correcting only this or that section will be bad and we should be brining it up to a level to help with FLC/FAC articles (GANs ignore that and many other guidelines). We should be giving advice to help those people out because if it helps them, it will help those with lesser articles bring them up. 陣 内 Jinnai 21:42, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia Ambassador Program is looking for new Online Ambassadors
Hi! I noticed your activity reviewing Featured Article Candidates, and wanted to let you know about the Wikipedia Ambassador Program, and specifically the role of Online Ambassador. We're looking for friendly Wikipedians who are good at reviewing articles and giving feedback to serve as mentors for students who are assigned to write for Wikipedia in their classes.

If you're interested, I encourage you to take a look at the Online Ambassador guidelines; the "mentorship process" describes roughly what will be expected of mentors in the coming term. If that's something you want to do, please apply!

You can find instructions for applying at WP:ONLINE. The main things we're looking for in Online Ambassadors are friendliness, regular activity (since mentorship is a commitment that spans several months), and the ability to give detailed, substantive feedback on articles (both short new articles, and longer, more mature ones).

I hope to hear from you soon.--Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 00:52, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

Featured article nomination comments
Thank you for taking the time to review my nomination of ZX81 as a featured article candidate. I have responded to the issues you raised in the FAC discussion - could you please review my replies and let me know if you're satisfied? Prioryman (talk) 12:49, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

FL?
Am working on a list. Looking to go to FL. Will be first FL exprience. Suggestions. state reptiles TCO (talk) 08:45, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

Wake the Wiki ogre!
Hey we are doing a little campaign to get 10 turtle GAs or FAs or FLs in two months? How about being part of the crew? You could find something that appealed to you. Maybe a turtle list? And rock it out. And then we will all share virtual beers and celebrate successes and commiserate setbacks! TCO (talk) 06:22, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Cloud GAN review
I'd be happy to review Cloud if you'd be willing to review Transformers: War for Cybertron for me. --Teancum (talk) 22:29, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

WikiCup 2011 January newsletter
We are half way through round one of the WikiCup. Signups are now closed, and we have 129 listed competitors, 64 of whom will make it to round two. Congratulations to, who, at the time of writing, has a comfortable lead with 228 points, followed by , with 144 points. Four others have over 100 points. Congratulations also go to, who scored the first points in the competition, claiming for Talk:Hurricane King/GA1, , who scored the first non-review points in the competition, claiming for Dognapping, and who was the first in the competition to use our new "multiplier" mechanic (explanation), claiming for Grigory Potemkin, a subject covered on numerous Wikipedias. Thanks must also go to Jarry1250 for dealing with all bot work- without you, the competition wouldn't be happening!

A running total of claims can be seen here. However, numerous competitors are yet to score at all- please remember to submit content soon after it is promoted, so that the judges are able to review entries. The number of points that will be needed to reach round two is not clear- everyone needs to get their entries in now to guarantee their places! If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17 22:40, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

Question
Hey Pres. I noticed that Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within (soundtrack) was in the Music of Final Fantasy template and I wanted to know if the article needs to be part of the Music of the Final Fantasy series topic. GamerPro64 (talk) 02:13, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Now that Cloud's been passed...
So, now that Cloud's been passed (extremely quick and impressive work, by the way), what's next on the agenda? Are you going to work that up to FAC? I know it's short, but MissingNo.—possibly our shortest FA—passed in 2009, despite a few reviewers whining about the length. I don't know how difficult it is to get a short article to FA these days, but it was doable a few years ago. If you do decide to try for FAC, let me know when you want me to copyedit it.

On another note, I noticed that you heavily expanded thatgamecompany and Kellee Santiago. Nice work; I can't wait to see what else you do with the former, in particular. The thatgamecompany Featured Topic will be one of WPVG's truly stand-out achievements. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 15:31, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
 * No problem, and thanks for the compliment. Like I said before, thatgamecompany fascinates me; I'm more than happy to help you with this FT. I'll start in on Cloud as soon as possible, which will probably be tomorrow. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 21:19, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Working my way through the article. As an experiment, I'm doing a rougher first pass than usual, so that I can look at it more clearly on the second pass. The article's length should make it no-big-deal to get this done before Flow has been nominated and (with any luck) promoted. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 18:17, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Sorry I'm taking so long; I haven't felt that much pressure to work on it, since the FFXIII and Flow noms aren't even remotely close to being over. I'll try to get back to it soon. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 21:31, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
 * It's a shame to see that FFXIII failed; I hope Flow goes over better. I'll start in again on Cloud today or tomorrow, so it'll be ready by the time Flow's nomination is over. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 22:50, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

List-help
Greetings! I was sent here for advice on list-formatting. I want to reformat the List of Metamorphoses characters into a table-list with explaining notes, appearances etc. For it I have made a workpage, and I would like your opinion on layout, sort-ability and whatever it needs. Don't worry about references yet, I'll take care of them later. Thanks in advance! :) Regards, Mottenen (talk) 20:46, 16 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Hello again! I've formatted the whole list now and it looks great, but I'm not sure how to put the refs so they look good. I don't think it is completely finished content-wise (maybe 90-95 %), but 200 characters is more than enough for now. I prefer using the harvnb system when citing books - I did it on Myrrha with great success. I hope you will help me again, so I can bring the list to FA. Mottenen (talk) 18:51, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

Anachronox
Haha, thanks! Wish I had more time for this kind of thing. I'm looking at Unreal Tournament after Anachronox gets FA. Anachronox is such an amazing game, but I'd almost say 50% of my motivation for writing the article was ensuring a sample of that Democratus music could be featured. I love being able to share great things through Wikipedia. ZeaLitY [ Talk  -  Activity  ]  20:10, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

March 2011 GAN backlog elimination drive a week away
 WikiProject Good Articles will be running a GAN backlog elimination drive for the entire month of March. The goal of this drive is to bring the number of outstanding Good Article nominations down to below 50. This will help editors in restoring confidence to the GAN process as well as actively improving, polishing, and rewarding good content. If you are interested in participating in the drive, please place your name here. Awards will be given out to those who review certain numbers of GANs as well as to those who review the most. On behalf of my co-coordinator Wizardman, we hope we can see you in March. MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 00:05, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

2009 World Series
Good point on the future link rot, cleaned em up. Thanks! Staxringold talkcontribs 02:02, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

Message from the ITF leader.
This is the leader of the ITF. I have noticed a degree of inactivity during my absence, and we wish that you can help change this to help future articles on independent video games. Thank you,    Takeo   22:41, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

WikiCup 2011 February newsletter
So begins round two of the WikiCup! We now have eight pools, each with eight random contestants. This round will continue until the end of April, when the top two of each pool, as well as the next 16 highest scorers of those remaining, will make it to round three. Congratulations to (first, with 487 points) and  (second, with 459), who stormed the first round. finished third with 223. Twelve others finished with over 100 points- well done to all of you! The final standings in round one can be seen here. A mere 8 points were required to reach round two; competition will no doubt be much more fierce this round, so be ready for a challenge! A special thanks goes, again, to for dealing with all bot work. This year's bot, as well as running smoothly, is doing some very helpful things that last year's did not. Also, thanks to for some helpful behind-the-scenes updating and number crunching.

Some news for those who are interested- March will see a GAN backlog elimination drive, which you are still free to join. Organised by WikiProject Good articles, the drive aims to minimise the GAN backlog and offers prizes to those who help out. Of course, you may well be able to claim WikiCup points for the articles you review as part of the drive. Also ongoing is the Great Backlog Drive, looking to work on clearing all of the backlogs on Wikipedia; again, incentives are offered, and the spirit of friendly competition is alive, while helping the encyclopedia is the ultimate aim. Though unrelated to the WikiCup, these may well be of interest to some of you.

Just a reminder of the rules; if you have done significant work on content this year and it is promoted in this round, you may claim for it. Also, anything that was promoted after the end of round one but before the beginning of round two may be claimed for in round two. Details of the rules can be found on this page. For those interested in statistics, a running total of claims can be seen here, and a very interesting table of that information (along with the highest scorers in each category) can be seen here. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17 23:48, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:MarbleMadnessNEScover.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:MarbleMadnessNEScover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 06:18, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

Project Status
Well it seems we're getting there. I've found this image that could possibly be of use to making a barnstar, also could be of use to make a new better logo to replace the one we got. Well i haven't done much just looking for articles that don't fit stub and fixing some of parasite eve. But since they're nto at stub, i've been looking at other articles that i'm not too familiar with.Bread Ninja (talk) 07:42, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

WikiProject Video games Triple Crown


Thank you for all your hard work. May you wear the crowns well, and may the gamepad crown motivate you to press on with more outstanding articles. – SMasters (talk) 09:08, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

This is the time for all good men to come to the aid of the party...
Will you please give us a review for U.S. state reptiles? You have also helped on the article, both with work and suggestions.TCO (talk) 19:27, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Update
Hey. I thought I'd tell you that I'm going to be really busy for an extensive period of time, and am planning to refocus all of my now-limited Wikipedia time on my LGS topic. Sorry; I know that I promised to help you finish the thatgamecompany FT. I'll finish up Cloud as soon as time allows, but I'm afraid I can't help with Kellee Santiago or the thatgamecompany article. Really, really sorry. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 23:08, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks; I'll keep that in mind. I just finished up Cloud, so you should be able to send it through the machine here soon. I think it might be best to try for A-Class or a peer review before hitting FAC; it's such a short article that any flaw could be a deal-breaker. MissingNo.—which I copyedited back in 2009—was a pretty tight ship, but its FAC was a mess regardless. Tiny issues led to unjustified "oppose" votes, and several commenters believed that its brevity alone made it ineligible for FA status. I don't know how much has changed since then, but I'm betting that you're in for a bumpy ride. Good luck. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 07:07, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Congratulations on Flow's promotion to FA! Looks like your hard work has paid off yet again; great job. The TGC FT is nearly within reach. Good luck with Cloud, whenever you plan to nominate it. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 22:07, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I've already had it on my watchlist for a few days. I also noticed that you've started in on TGC's main article; amazing work, as always. I can't wait until this topic gets featured. Depending on when the TGC article is ready for FAC, I may have time to do a bit of copyediting on it, if you'd like. I assume it'll probably be at least a month, since Cloud's FAC won't be over for weeks and you still need to work the article up to GA status. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 05:40, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

A quick Request
Need help over a dispute over the free-content image in this article over at Jinnai's talk page. I assumed Jinnai could be more decisive but now it's gone long enough and we need consensus (strong direct consensus). If you could please take a look and put your 2 cents that would be enough. i know you're currently busy and this would be a great favor to me if you could have the last word.Bread Ninja (talk) 23:53, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

WikiCup 2011 March newsletter
We are half way through round two of the WikiCup, which will end on 28 April. Of the 64 current contestants, 32 will make it through to the next round; the two highest in each pool, and the 16 next highest scorers. At the time of writing, our current overall leader is with 231 points, who leads Pool H.  (Pool G) also has over 200 points, while 9 others (three of whom are in Pool D) have over 100 points. Remember that certain content (specifically, articles/portals included in at least 20 Wikipedias as of 31 December 2010 or articles which are considered "vital") is worth double points if promoted to good or featured status, or if it appears on the main page in the Did You Know column. There were some articles last round which were eligible for double points, but which were not claimed for. For more details, see WikiCup/Scoring.

A running total of claims can be seen here. However, numerous competitors are yet to score at all- please remember to submit content soon after it is promoted, so that the judges are able to review entries. The number of points that will be needed to reach round three is not clear- everyone needs to get their entries in now to guarantee their places! If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17 01:05, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q1 2011
MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 03:03, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

Re: Super Meat Boy
I hadn't planned on taking it to GAN - I'm not as active as I used to be as I accepted a position as Deputy Editor at XBLAFans.com. I think Bionic Commando Rearmed will probably be my last GAN, with the possible exception of Hydro Thunder Hurricane. --Teancum (talk) 21:39, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

Meatboy and Bandage Girl's origins.
Hi there. I saw you changed Meat Boy and Bandage Girl's origins in the Super Meat Boy article. However, Meatboy and Bandage girl are from the Newgrounds flash Meatboy. I've corrected this. Make sure this is correct, and if it is, link it please. If it isn't undo. Thanks! Croben (talk) 15:42, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

"In pop culture" discussion
You had mentioned a while ago that you thought the "in pop culture" guideline at WP:VG/GL was inappropriate. The item has come up as I have attempted to remove it because I believed it no longer had consensus. However, there are some who claim it still does. However, they want to know some specifics of where you think it conflicts with MOS and other higher level guidelines/policy at WT:VG/GL. Thanks. 陣 内 Jinnai 22:17, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Cloud
Congratulations on making yet another article featured. Kudos! - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 21:25, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

*thumbs up*
Two FACs down, one to go. I haven't had much time for Wikipedia recently, but I saw on my watchlist that Cloud had passed. Your work on thatgamecompany articles has been exemplary. In fact, rather than wait until you've cleared all the red tape on the thatgamecompany featured topic, I think I'll just give this to you now:

Bit.Trip Beat
I was wondering, do you think that this could one day be a featured article? I ask because it utilizes Nintendo Life which, while not the best source, has some useful development information. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 20:09, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Alright, cool. If you get the time after I do a copy edit/general fix of the article, do you think that you could give a quick look over? - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 20:17, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Image strengthening
I've found that a lot of good articles and probably a lot of featured articles (I haven't check them yet) are abusing the use of copyrighted images on Wikipedia (for example, I've seen several articles that use three images to visualize content in the article even though the first image demonstrates everything that the other two images are trying to do). Would you be interested in helping fix this problem? - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 18:38, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

Silent Hill
Hi, PresN. Can you please voice your opinions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games? The issue concerns about the word count in the plot section (which is original research) and has been discussed at Talk:Silent Hill (video game) with a resolution and I have requested a copyedit of the article at the Guild of Copy Editors WikiProject. Yomiel, a seemingly incivil user has committed possible personal attacks, disruptive editing, and possibly going against the project's consensus despite various attempts to stop with this behavior, as found in the relevant discussions at Yomiel's talk page and the Wikiquette alert report. Thanks, Darth Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 02:50, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

That's it. I have had it. PresN, this is a flat-out lie, which was corrected before on the page Sjones is directing you to. I have never been uncivil to anyone, and he knows this. I've never been guilty of disruptive editing. I literally added a few words to the article in question. A certain editor went ballistic because I didn't include references for these minor edits. This person repeatedly undid my edits, even as they admitted to knowing the information I added was factual. They were basically trying to twist the roles to let them cause trouble. This person resquested comments on the talk page formally, but no one ever responded. They then made another section on the article talk page. A few people joined in, and they asked me for proof of what I was saying. I pointed out that this other editor knew my edits were accurate, but I obliged them and provided said resources. But this editor would not quit, because he wanted the article his way. He repeatedly made accusations against me, warning me and notifying me on my talk page, which irritated me. I repeatedly asked him to stop, but he would not. He reported me on some special page. Throughout this whole thing, he has done nothing but harass me and lie about how things have played out. Sjones' actions make no sense to me, since I don't really recall him ever even being part of any of this. Out of nowhere, he created the section on that page he asks you to check out. But on this page, he states that he things we are beating a dead horse with this argument. I pointed out that he was the one who was dragging the matter on by posting about it there. And he also accused me of being a disruptive editor there, too, where I corrected him. And now, after that, he does it again here. This makes me questions his true motives. It seems like he is less interested in the article itself and more interested in painting me in a bad light.Yomiel (talk) 13:31, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Never mind the above. It's already been taken care of. Darth Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 16:50, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

WikiCup 2011 April newsletter
Round 2 of the 2011 WikiCup is over, and the new round will begin on 1 May. Note that any points scored in the interim (that is, for content promoted or reviews completed on 29-30 April) can be claimed in the next round, but please do not start updating your submissions' pages until the next round has begun. Fewer than a quarter of our original contestants remain; 32 enter round 3, and, in two months' time, only 16 will progress to our penultimate round. , who led Pool F, was our round champion, with 411 points, while 7 contestants scored between 200 and 300 points. At the other end of the scale, a score of 41 was high enough to reach round 3; more than five times the score required to reach round 2, and competition will no doubt become tighter now we're approaching the later rounds. Those progressing to round 3 were spread fairly evenly across the pools; 4 progressed from each of pools A, B, E and H, while 3 progressed from both pools C and F. Pools D and G were the most successful; each had 5 contestants advancing.

This round saw our first good topic points this year; congratulations to and  who also led pool H and pool B respectively. However, there remain content types for which no points have yet been scored; featured sounds, featured portals and featured topics. In addition to prizes for leaderboard positions, the WikiCup awards other prizes; for instance, last year, a prize was awarded to (who has been eliminated) for his work on In The News. For this reason, working on more unusual content could be even more rewarding than usual!

Sorry this newsletter is going out a little earlier than expected- there is a busy weekend coming up! A running total of claims can be seen here. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17 19:27, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

Jenova Chen print interview
Hello. I was going through a stack of magazines I had and I came across an interview with Jenova Chen in a fairly recent issue of Game Informer. I thought it might be of some benefit to his article or some of the related articles. Seeing as how you have a nice grasp on them all, I was wondering if you would rather me use the reference to insert any relevant information or e-mail you a transcript of the source and allow you to do it yourself. ~ Hibana (talk) 19:46, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
 * All right, what's the best way to contact you? ~ Hibana (talk) 23:50, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

Re:Thatgamecompany
Yes, absolutely. I'll get on it later today. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 21:57, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Hey. Just wanted to ask for clarification on something. In the first paragraph of History, it says, "The strongly positive response to the game inspired Santiago and Chen to consider founding their own company to continue making games like Flow after they left school". Is "Flow" a typo of "Cloud", or was there information in the article that put this in context at one point? Right now, I'm not sure what to do with it. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 04:49, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Status update: finished with the lead and the History section. That's more than half the article down. Unless I get super-busy soon, I should be done in the next few days. The prose is straightening out really easily, so a second pass won't be necessary. I'm excited by the prospect of watching the last article in your topic become featured. Got any projects planned for Wikipedia after the Hugo award and Thatgamecompany FTs? JimmyBlackwing (talk) 07:58, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Yeah. Considering all the work you've done, I can understand why you wouldn't want to immediately tackle another FT. Anyway, I'll be done with TGC tonight, after which point you may nominate it at your leisure. It's been fun working with you on these articles. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 08:23, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Finished! Good luck at FAC. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 11:51, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Great work! Drop me a line when it's up at FTC; I'd like to support it. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 18:00, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Note from reader: The "citation needed" tag that was removed was in reference to the "most game developers.." stated as fact, rather than Santiago's opinion. If it's a quote, it should be written as such and should quote Santiago accurately. She said "A lot of game developers," not "most". If stated as fact, there should be a citation to support it. Also, thatgamecompany is not an independent game studio, they are a fully funded third-party studio, so that should probably be updated in the first sentence on the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.173.41.126 (talk) 08:31, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Super Meat Boy
Good job on this article. Could you perhaps pay it forward and give Mighty Jill Off a copyedit? - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 20:16, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Certainly; I can't expect you to work on that when you've got Thatgamecompany to worry about. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 20:46, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the copyedit. As someone who has contributed in excess of a dozen featured articles, is there anything in Mighty Jill Off that might hinder it from succeeding at the FAC? - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 09:17, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Hmm, I see. Do you think I should cut down the art design section some, or just leave it? I don't think that there exists much more to say for the actual game's design. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 19:10, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

Don't take it personally, babe, it just ain't your story
Just a question: what was the point of the false-foreshadowing found early in the game? Did I miss something, or was it just trying to trick the player? And is there any explanation for what the name means? - New Age Retro Hippie (talk) (contributions) 08:34, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Lotsa very interesting perspectives. I also kind of thought that the name could also refer to Tanya's self-centeredness and how she, in effect, thinks it's her story. :B It's just a shame that there are no sources discussing this stuff (as far as I can see). It'd be good for the article. - New Age Retro Hippie (talk) (contributions) 21:48, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
 * And I hate to ask for moar, but hay, if you could copyedit and/or GA review Disco Kid, that'd be coo. :3 It's a small article, so I figured it wouldn't be a big problem. - New Age Retro Hippie (talk) (contributions) 23:49, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Glass Joe copyedit
I was wondering if you could provide a copyedit for this article. It's finally made GA, and I'm hoping to bring it to FAC after one more look-through by another pair of eyes. - New Age Retro Hippie (talk) (contributions) 21:20, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Alright, thanks for the assistance! Do you think that it'd be wise to basically put Glass Joe up right now? - New Age Retro Hippie (talk) (contributions) 23:21, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Alright, it's up now. - New Age Retro Hippie (talk) (contributions) 23:53, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Hum, maybe it was too soon? Ah well, if it fails it fails I suppose; hoping I can make enough improvements to shift the tides back in my favour. - New Age Retro Hippie (talk) (contributions) 01:00, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Pffffft, it's no big thing, man. No one's perfect, after all, and you still contributed a whole bunch to the quality. In any case, I'll always take constructive criticism in opposition over nothing at all. :) - New Age Retro Hippie (talk) (contributions) 19:16, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
 * FAC closed. Ah well; at least I learned some very useful tips for FAC in the future. I'll just try to expand on the in-universe stuff some, and try to paraphrase the reception more, and then renominate it in a couple of months. - New Age Retro Hippie (talk) (contributions) 20:41, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Don't take it personally, babe, it just ain't your story
The DYK project (nominate) 00:06, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Conker's Bad Fur Day
Could you do a copyedit for this article instead of Disco Kid in the future? I was meaning to go through it, but I've been playing some engrossing games and have recently fallen ill. And as a bonus, if you could take over the review of Ironsword: Wizards & Warriors II, that'd be kew. Of course, I won't hold it against you if you decline. - New Age Retro Hippie (talk) (contributions) 09:18, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

WikiCup 2011 May newsletter
We're half way through round 3 of the 2011 WikiCup. There are currently 32 remaining in the competition, but only 16 will progress to our penultimate round. , of pool D, is our overall leader with nearly 200 points, while pools A, B and C are led by, and  respectively. The score required to reach the next round is 35, though this will no doubt go up significantly as the round progresses. We have a good number of high scorers, but also a considerable number who are yet to score. Please remember to submit content soon after it is promoted, so that the judges are able to review entries. Also, an important note concerning nominations at featured article candidates: if you are nominating content for which you intend to claim WikiCup points, please make this clear in the nomination statement so that the FAC director and his delegates are aware of the fact.

A running total of claims can be seen here. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17 23:34, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Digital: A Love Story
Materialscientist (talk) 16:04, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:DigitalALoveStoryTitle.png
 Thanks for uploading File:DigitalALoveStoryTitle.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 05:48, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Flower ref
I don't know how to properly put the link in the article without possibly messing something up, I'll just give it to you to use. link. GamerPro64 21:51, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

D:ALS
Why did you add back the second image? Again, I don't really feel that the "cover" is particularly useful in this case; a game of this sort is less defined by its logo than other games are by their cover, and it doesn't really show anything that a screenshot doesn't. Your call, I'm not going to fight it either way, but slipping it something in with minor edits after a GAC doesn't come across all that well. J Milburn (talk) 00:00, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Re: Hugo Award
No, your analysis isn't quite right. VDM (under the imprints Alphascript and Betascript) reprint Wikipedia articles. Related Wikipedia articles, but Wikipedia articles rather than actual content; they provide little or no editorial oversight. Thus the book "Warm Worlds and Otherwise: Alice Sheldon, James Tiptree, Jr, Robert Silverberg, The Girl Who Was Plugged In, Hugo Award" included a number of articles, compiled into one "book": Warm Worlds and Otherwise, Alice Sheldon, James Tiptree, Jr, Robert Silverberg, The Girl Who Was Plugged In and Hugo Award. I should probably write an explanation of this and link to it from the edit summary (I shall do before the next bot run), but I feel the bot was correct here. - Jarry1250 [Weasel? Discuss.] 08:27, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:DigitalALoveStoryTitle.png
 Thanks for uploading File:DigitalALoveStoryTitle.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:43, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

Hey
How goes it? I haven't been around much (again), but it looks like you're still active. How's the mop? :) &mdash;Deckiller (t-c-l) 01:38, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

WikiCup 2011 June newsletter
We are half way through 2011, and entering the penultimate round of this year's WikiCup; the semi-finals are upon us! Points scored in the interim (29/30 June) may be counted towards next round, but please do not update your submissions' pages until the next round has begun. 16 contestants remain, and all have shown dedication to the project to reach this far. Our round leader was who, among other things, successfully passed three articles through featured article candidates and claimed an impressive 29 articles at Did You Know, scoring 555 points. Casliber led pool D. Pool A was led by, claiming points for a featured article, a featured list and seven good article reviews, while pool C was led by , who claimed for two good articles, ten articles at Did You Know and four good article reviews. They scored 154 and 118 respectively. Pool B was by far our most competitive pool; six of the eight competitors made it through to round 4, with all of them scoring over 100 points. The pool was led by, who claimed for, among other things, three featured articles and five good articles. In addition to the four pool leaders, 12 others (the four second places, and the 8 next highest overall) make up our final 16. The lowest scorer who reached round 4 scored 76 points; a significant increase on the 41 needed to reach round 3. Eight of our semi-finalists scored at least twice as much as this.

No points were awarded this round for featured pictures, good topics or In the News, and no points have been awarded in the whole competition for featured topics, featured portals or featured sounds. Instead, the highest percentage of points has come from good articles. Featured articles, despite their high point cost, are low in number, and so, overall, share a comparable number of points with Did You Know, which are high in number but low in cost. A comparatively small but still considerable number of points come from featured lists and good article reviews, rounding out this round's overall scores.

We would again like to thank and  for invaluable background work, as well as all of those helping to provide reviews for the articles listed on WikiCup/Reviews. Please do keep using it, and please do help by providing reviews for the articles listed there. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews generally at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup.

Two final notes: Firstly, please remember to state your participation in the WikiCup when nominating articles at FAC. Finally, some WikiCup-related statistics can be seen here and here, for those interested, though it appears that neither are completely accurate at this time. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17 23:38, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

Courtesy note
Hey. Just letting you know that because of the cancellation of Fortress (Square Enix), I started up the 3 month retention period. Not sure who to send the notice to, so I'm sending to you since you started the sup nom and you're pretty good on getting these handled. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 23:18, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q2 2011
–MuZemike 14:26, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

*high five*
Just thought you deserved one (in case you haven't seen yet). JimmyBlackwing (talk) 19:41, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
 * You should! And I hadn't seen that you nominated the Hugo Awards topic. Congratulations on that, too. If you get two FTs under your belt, I imagine that you're a shoo-in for the WikiCup. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 20:03, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Small help
Hey PresN, can you teach me how to use the archiving script that you spoke about in your nomination at FLC? It would really help me to archive so many articles. :) — Legolas ( talk 2 me ) 07:44, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

For you
 The Video game Barnstar

For your efforts at creating and promoting high-quality video game articles.... even though you're going to catch up with me at this rate :P Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ( talk ) 17:12, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Re:Super Meat Boy
Well, I try not to let my personal opinions get involved with Wikipedia, but, if you must know, I'll explain. Firstly, McMillen strikes me as pretentious. I liked what I played of Gish, and Aether wasn't terrible, but his "artsy" stuff (Coil comes to mind) left me rolling my eyes. Not that the idea of "artsy" games bothers me—I love the work of thatgamecompany, Nicklas Nygren, Keita Takahashi, Mark Essen, etc. It's McMillen's style that irritates me. For example, although he intended the original Meat Boy to be subversive—thanks to its "extreme difficulty" and irreverent gross-out humor—I found it uninspired, easy, smug and annoyingly childish. That's the foundation of my dislike for Super Meat Boy, which I haven't played (for obvious reasons). The endlessly adoring press coverage did not help.

Not that I have anything against the article becoming featured. Improving Wikipedia's indie game coverage is great, regardless of my personal opinion on the work. Even though I don't focus on them while editing, indie games are one of my favorite subjects; I've really enjoyed watching the recent drive to create and improve indie game-related articles. Even still, reading more about Super Meat Boy was an unpleasant thought, which is why I haven't reviewed the article. I figured that more people would have commented by now, making it unnecessary for me to do so. That's obviously not going to happen, though, so I'll just have to suck it up and review. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 22:16, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Ah, it's fine; I can handle it. It's more important that the nomination gets reviews. I warn you that I'm one of those dreaded "nit-pick" reviewers, though. Now to review that article. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 04:20, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Looks like the nomination got swamped all at once. Hopefully you have time to get back to it before a delegate archives it. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 03:25, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Actually, I found the article very interesting and well made, and it showed me a different way of viewing SMB. Plus, I always expect to run into a few prose problems when I review articles at FAC; it comes with the territory. Anyway, I'll review your changes later today, make a few tweaks and most likely support. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 21:13, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Sorry to see that the nomination was archived. You did a lot of good work on that article, and the only opposition was, in my opinion, unjustified. Oh well. Luck of the FAC draw. You'll almost surely make it through next time. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 17:20, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Music of Nier
Materialscientist (talk) 08:04, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

Your new article Music of Nier
Dear PresN, I saw your article Music of Nier in the New Articles list. This article looks very well put together. The images are real great! It would be great if you could also help improve the article Chris Taylor (game designer). As you know, Wikipedia is always a work in progress. It’s nice to see you editing! Hope you’ll stick around! Jipinghe (talk) 20:05, 15 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Hi again PresN! If my previous message to you seemed patronizing or just ignorant in any way, then please accept my sincere apologies. I'm actually currently involved with a research project involving messages in Wikipedia. As I'm still a rather new user myself, I could really use some advice and feedback from an experienced Wikipedian like you! Would you be interested in helping me out? :D Jipinghe (talk) 20:39, 18 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks for all the suggestions! I'm definitely taking them into consideration as we continue planning out the research project. In fact if you don't mind, I'd like to give you so some more details of the project, such as what it is, and how we plan to run it, so that you can perhaps offer some more tailored suggestions to specific questions/problems that I have. I'd like to continue this discussion off-site, so if you're okay with that you can send me a quick email at jipingh@andrew.cmu.edu. Thanks! Jipinghe (talk) 19:10, 19 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Hi PresN, just checking in with you to see if everything's alright. It's been about a week since I sent my long email to you and I just wanted to make sure I didn't scare you off since I haven't received a reply from you yet. :P Please do let me me know if you need any clarification or anything! Also, if you've decided that don't want to help me out on this anymore, just let me know, and I won't bother you again. Cheers, Jipinghe (talk) 18:14, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Thanks
I appreciate the notification—I wasn't aware of the closure. Best, Meph talk 22:51, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

Sorry about your FACs

 * I would have helped contribute, but I was kind of busy with a wedding and a blog. - New Age Retro Hippie (talk) (contributions) 02:43, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

WikiCup 2011 July newsletter
We are half way through the penultimate round of this year's WikiCup; there is less than a month to go before we have our final 8. Our pool leaders are (Pool A, 189 points) and  (Pool B, 165 points). The number of points required to reach the next round is not clear at this time; there are some users who still do not have any recorded points. Please remember to update your submissions' pages promptly. In addition, congratulations to PresN, who scored the first featured topic points in the competition for his work on Thatgamecompany related articles. Most points this round generally have, so far, come from good articles, with only one featured article (White-bellied Sea Eagle, from ) and two featured lists (Hugo Award for Best Graphic Story, from PresN and Grammy Award for Best Native American Music Album, from ). Points for Did You Know and good article reviews round out the scoring. No points have been awarded for In the News, good topics or featured pictures this round, and no points for featured sounds or portals have been awarded in the entire competition. On an unrelated note, preparation will be beginning soon for next year's WikiCup- watch this space!

There is little else to be said beyond the usual. Please list anything you need reviewing on WikiCup/Reviews, so others following the WikiCup can help, and please do help if you can by providing reviews for the articles listed there. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews generally at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup- points are, of course, offered for reviews at GAC. Two final notes: Firstly, please remember to state your participation in the WikiCup when nominating articles at FAC. Finally, some WikiCup-related statistics can be seen here and here. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17 11:40, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

hi
I want to make Rihanna's song "S&M" an A class article, but have no idea how to nominate it for it. Then I saw you was involved with the promoting of "Music of the Final Fantasy VII series" to an A class article, which is one of only three A class articles on WP:SONGS and was wondering how it is nominated? Thanks. (If you reply on your talk page leave me a talkback message). Calvin  &bull; Na Na Na  C'mon!  18:57, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Oh right okay thanks. So there's no scheme for promoting actual songs to A class because it's never been done before? Okay I'll nominate for the GOCE. Thanks. Calvin  &bull; Na Na Na  C'mon!  19:11, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Okay. I don't think I would feel right changing it from GA to A, although I do think it is A class quality. Calvin  &bull; Na Na Na  C'mon!  19:16, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

FFXIII
Hi. Sorry it's from last week but I only just noticed this revert. Normally when a game is released, reviewed, and criticised, nobody is ever quite sure how much of the criticism was expected or anticipated by the development team and what steps they took, if any, to address it during development. FFXIII received some serious negative responses about one or two aspects of the game, and the developers have very kindly given some insight into how and why things ended up the way they did. In what way this is irrelevant or "odd" commentary is a mystery to me. These details about the specifics of how focus testing was conducted is directly relevant and puts basically the entire criticism of the game into context. Not including this, especially when it's coming from the horses' mouths so to speak, is doing a disservice to the reader. At the very, very least, you cannot simply state in the development section: "The game was intended to appeal to both Western and Japanese audiences, and focus groups from both regions were used."

and leave it there. It is disappointing to see a soon-to-be-FA disingenuously ignoring key information. – Steel 00:41, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

RE:
Hi, thanks for the comment. I'm interested in archive the refs, for prevent dead links: WP:LINKROT and cover albuns of video games. I will start by Final Fantasy article. T.R.Elven (talk) 03:03, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

Woops!
Hey there, sorry...newbie here! Thanks for the info. Mordecairule 18:06, 2 August 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mordecairule (talk • contribs)

Chrono Trigger: Crimson Echoes
Hey Pres, can you help with the lead in Chrono Trigger: Crimson Echoes? I can plan on putting it up for GAN as soon as that and sourcing the "Gameplay" section are done (and maybe requesting the GOCE to copy-edit). GamerPro64 21:16, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I can't find anything about Crimson Echoes' Gameplay. Do you think that its good as it is? GamerPro64  18:34, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
 * That's the problem. I can't find a reference about the Coliseum. I don't even know if that's even true. Jonathan wrote it and I don't think he'll reply with my notifications. GamerPro64  20:02, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

MarcusBritish and Jim Sweeney
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Your only involvement was here, when you (appropriately, in my view) advised everyone to calm down and not be dicks. Still, I thought I'd let you know. – Quadell (talk) 12:28, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

Sorry!!!!
I'll make sure I read the articles carefully next time. And while I'm at it, would you kindly take a look at this article? I looked at it but couldn't come to a conclusion. Thanks!!!--Dom497 (talk) 17:04, 4 August 2011 (UTC)\

Forgot to add this in but when uploading pictures to Wikipedia, you can put them under the license of promotional material if the images are from the games website.--Dom497 (talk) 17:09, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Nananana Katamari.ogg
 Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Nananana Katamari.ogg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:08, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

WikiCup 2011 July newsletter
The finals are upon us; we're down to the last few. One of the eight remaining contestants will be this year's WikiCup champion! 150 was the score needed to progress to the final; just under double the 76 required to reach round 4, and more than triple the 41 required to reach round 3. Our eight finalists are:


 * , Pool A's winner. Casliber has the highest total score in the competition, with 1528, the bulk of which is made up of 8 featured articles. He has the highest number of total featured articles (8, 1 of which was eligible for double points) and total did you knows (72) of any finalist. Casliber writes mostly on biology, including ornithology, botany and mycology.
 * , Pool B's winner and the highest scorer this round. PresN is the only finalist who has scored featured topic points, and he has gathered an impressive 330, but most of his points come from his 4 featured articles, one of which scored double. PresN writes mostly on video games and the Hugo Awards.
 * , Pool A's runner-up. Hurricanehink's points are mostly from his 30 good articles, more than any other finalist, and he is also the only finalist to score good topic points. Hurricanehink, as his name suggests, writes mostly on meteorology.
 * , Pool B's runner-up. Wizardman has completed 86 good article reviews, more than any other finalist, but most of his points come from his 2 featured articles. Wizardman writes mostly on American sport, especially baseball.
 * , the "fastest loser" (Pool A). Miyagawa has written 3 featured lists, one of which was awarded double points, more than any other finalist, but he was awarded points mostly for his 68 did you knows. Miyagawa writes on a variety of topics, including dogs, military history and sport.
 * , the second "fastest loser" (Pool B). Most of Resolute's points come from his 9 good articles. He writes mostly on Canadian topics, including ice hockey.
 * , who was joint third "fastest loser" (Pool A). Most of Evan's points come from his 10 good articles, and he writes mostly on meteorology.
 * , who was joint third "fastest loser" (Pool B). Most of Phil's points come from his 9 good articles, 4 of which (more than any other finalist) were eligible for double points. He writes mostly on aeronautics.

We say goodbye to our seven other semi-finalists,, , , , , and. Everyone still in the competition at this stage has done fantastically well, and contributed greatly to Wikipedia. We're on the home straight now, and we will know our winner in two months.

In other news, preparations for next year's competition have begun with a brainstorming thread. Please, feel free to drop by and share any thoughts you have about how the competition should work next year. Sign ups are not yet open, but will be opened in due course. Watch this space. Further, there has been a discussion about the rule whereby those in the WikiCup must delcare their participation when nominating articles at featured article candidates. This has resulted in a bot being created by new featured article delegate. The bot will leave a message on FAC pages if the nominator is a participant in the WikiCup.

A reminder of the rules: any points scored after August 29 may be claimed for the final round, and please remember to update submission pages promptly. If you are concerned that your nomination, be it at good article candidates, a featured process or anywhere else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17 00:10, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

Hugo Award for Best Dramatic Presentation
Well done for your work on that article (and the rest)! I remember a few years ago when I tried to nominate the article for Short Form for FL and got rebuffed because it was too short. I actually had it on my significant contributions list for quite some time and never noticed it got merged, at which point it stopped being a significant contribution (by Triple Crown rules; I only contributed six inline cites; I don't like taking credit for others' work.). But, wow, well done :) Sceptre (talk) 04:08, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Hugos
I'm sorry I'm being such a pain at the Hugos FAC; I think it will get promoted if you can fix the sourcing, which I hope can be done. There are enough supports that I suspect (though I don't know) that the delegates will decide there is consensus to promote. If it does promote, I'd like to try a rewrite in a sandbox to see if I can come up with a version that addresses the issues I think I see. If I do that, I'll post a note at the article talk page and let you know -- obviously I'd like to get your take on it. Thanks -- Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 15:51, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

WikiCup 2011 September newsletter
We are on this year's home straight, with less than a month to go until the winner of the 2011 WikiCup will be decided. The fight for first place is currently being contested by, and , all of whom have over 200 points. This round has already seen multiple featured articles (1991 Atlantic hurricane season from Hurricanehink and Northrop YF-23 from Sp33dyphil) and a double-scoring featured list (Miyagawa's 1948 Summer Olympics medal table). The scores will likely increase far further before the end of the round on October 31 as everyone ups their pace. There is not much more to say- thoughts about next year's competition are welcome on the WikiCup talk page or the scoring talk page, and signups will open once a few things have been sorted out.

If you are concerned that your nomination, be it at good article candidates, a featured process or anywhere else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17 12:48, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q3 2011
MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 07:42, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

trimming down plot section in oblivion
You said to "ping" you yesterday, so here i am; I'd be very grateful if you made the plot section concise; also, a user says that the gameplay section needs to be condensed as well; could you possibly trim this down too?-SCB &#39;92 (talk) 16:18, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

WikiCup 2011 October newsletter
The 2011 WikiCup is now over, and our new champion is, who joins the exclusive club of the previous winners: (2007),  (2008),  (2009) and  (2010). The final standings were as follows:



Prizes for first, second, third and fourth will be awarded, as will prizes for all those who reached the final eight. Every participant who scored in the competition will receive a ribbon of participation. In addition to the prizes based on placement, the following special prizes will be awarded based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, the prize is awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round.


 * The Featured Article Award:, for his performance in round 2. matched the score, but Casliber won the tiebreaker.
 * The Good Article Award:, for his performance in round 4.
 * The Featured List Award:, for his performance in round 4. matched the score, but Miyagawa won the tiebreaker.
 * The Recognised Topic Award (for good and featured topics):, for his performance in round 3.
 * The Did You Know Award:, for his performance in round 1.
 * The In the News Award:, for his performance in round 1.
 * The Reviewer Award (for good article reviews):, for his performance in round 3.

No prize was awarded for featured pictures, sounds or portals, as none were claimed throughout the competition. The awards will be handed out over the next few days. Congratulations to all our participants, and especially our winners; we've all had fun, and Wikipedia has benefitted massively from our content work.

Preparation for next year's WikiCup is ongoing. Interested parties are invited to sign up and participate in our straw polls. It's been a pleasure to work with you all this year, and, whoever's taking part in and running the competition in 2012, we hope to see you all in January! J Milburn and The ed17 00:46, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. In Nebula Award for Best Novel, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Doubleday (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to the 2012 WikiCup
Hello, and welcome to the 2012 WikiCup! The competition officially begins at the start of 2012 (UTC) after which time you may begin to claim points. Your submission page, where you must note any content for which you wish to claim points, can be found here, and formatting instructions can be found in hidden comments on the page. A bot will then update the main table, which can be seen on the WikiCup page. The full rules for what will and will not be awarded points can be found at WikiCup/Scoring. There's also a section on that page listing the changes that have been made to the rules this year, so that experienced participants can get up-to-date in a few seconds. One point of which we must remind everyone; you may only claim points for content upon which you have done significant work, and which you have nominated, in 2012. For instance, articles written or good article reviews started in 2011 are not eligible for points.

This round will last until late February, and signups will remain open until the middle of February. If you know of anyone who may like to take part, please let them know about the comeptition; the more the merrier! At the end of this round, the top 64 scorers will progress to the next round, where their scores will reset, and they will be split into pools. Note that, by default, you have been added to our newsletter list; we will be in contact at the end of every month with news. You're welcome to remove yourself from this list if you do not wish to hear from us. Conversely, those interested in following the competition are more than welcome to add themselves to the list. Please direct any questions towards the judges, or on the WikiCup talk page. Good luck! J Milburn (talk) and The ed17 (talk) 17:55, 31 December 2011 (UTC)