User talk:Presentabsence

August 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.  Wisdom89  ( T |undefined /  C ) 01:50, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Cirt (talk) 01:52, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Dear Anonymous
We know. Scientology is a cult, Hubbard was a loony, David Miscavige is an asthmatic dwarf, blah blah blah... We get it. But how helpful is it to your cause to vandalize encyclopedic articles about Scientology? How effectively will screwing with Wikipedia affect Scientology? You're doing it wrong. Wikipedia isn't your target.

You want to effectively edit these articles to get the truth out? Here's the secret formula:
 * 1) Locate new articles and scholarly research about Scientology from sources that meet Wikipedia standards on reliability and verifiability.
 * 2) In a neutral tone, add encyclopedic content to the Scientology articles. If you make fun of Hubbard and Scientology, you're doing it wrong. Let the facts speak for themselves. With facts like Fair Game and Disconnection, why embellish them with opinion?
 * 3) Profit!
 * 1) Profit!


 * Sincerely,
 * Everyone at Wikipedia who would like you to stay on target -- Good Damon 02:32, 9 August 2008 (UTC)