User talk:Preslacl

Hello, I'm 2601:188:0:ABE6:5933:D286:AF4C:C919. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 2601:188:0:ABE6:5933:D286:AF4C:C919 (talk) 12:43, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. 2601:188:0:ABE6:5933:D286:AF4C:C919 (talk) 12:47, 3 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Please understand, if you continue to add unsourced content or original research to a Wikipedia article, under this or other accounts (I notice an IP has done this as well), those accounts may be blocked, and the article can be protected from such edits. Thanks, 2601:188:0:ABE6:5933:D286:AF4C:C919 (talk) 12:47, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. 2601:188:0:ABE6:5933:D286:AF4C:C919 (talk) 12:52, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Battle of Fornham
The material you have been adding has rightly be removed as unreferenced and original research. However, it is nervelessness interesting information and if it was all sourced to appropriate documentation might be very useful in Wikipedia. May I suggest that you start a new article under the articles for creation process and produce a sourced article Draft:Battle of Fornham which can be reviewed and when ready added to Wikipedia. Regards  Velella  Velella Talk 13:13, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

December 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Neil N  talk to me 14:51, 3 December 2015 (UTC)