User talk:Preslavk~enwiki

Proposed deletion of Mythology of Babylon 5
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Mythology of Babylon 5, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Abandoned project that appeared to be about to violate WP:NOT in numerous ways.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Nuttah (talk) 17:16, 12 July 2009 (UTC)


 * I advise you to do this very quickly, before the article gets deleted--it cannot stand as is. DGG (talk) 13:03, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

February 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content (particularly if you change facts and figures), as you have to the article Fringe (TV series), please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. —  Dæ dαlus Contribs 09:52, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Re, Fringe,
Re, your message, um, no. What you're talking about is synthesis and isn't allowed. Even so, it classifies as original research and isn't allowed anyway. Either cite your sources or the content won't be allowed in, and, if there are as many as you say there are, there shouldn't be any trouble at all finding those sources.—  Dæ dαlus Contribs 10:05, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

I suggest you read the No original research, Neutral point of view, Verifiability policy pages before editing the Fringe article again. --Loremaster (talk) 19:17, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Preslavk. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Preslavk~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 02:13, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 17:45, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Outstanding elements of Babylon 5 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Outstanding elements of Babylon 5 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Outstanding elements of Babylon 5 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 08:18, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Outstanding elements of Babylon 5 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Outstanding elements of Babylon 5 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Outstanding elements of Babylon 5& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 19:09, 10 November 2019 (UTC)