User talk:Press321

SNCF
Please do not revert my edits until you have read WP:COI and left a message on the talk page of SNCF stating which edits you would like to make. We can then discuss your proposed changes. JamaUtil (talk) 16:46, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

COI Warning 1
Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article SNCF, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Please propose changes to the existing text on the article talk page. Please do not masquerade your edits by making them while logged out. Thank you. JamaUtil (talk) 19:21, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Hello Press321, thank you for your edits to Wikipedia. Your not-logged in response claimed that I should respect your edits because I have references to back up everything I wrote.  I'm glad you have those; but you apparently haven't added them into the article.  The list of references did not change after you made your edit.  Please try modifying the text that is already there in readable paragraphs and meaningful ways.  I think you'll find fixing small things in pieces will create a better article.  This will also help us to discuss specific changes.  Your current edits are problematic mostly because you appear to have a conflict of interest, but also because you have introduced one giant paragraph into the article (and no new information, that I can find).  Please try to work with the text that is on the page, I look forward to your new sources. JamaUtil (talk) 19:10, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Unsourced warning 1
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article SNCF, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. JamaUtil (talk) 06:42, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

November 2010
Hello Press321, now that your IP addresses have been blocked, thank you for making edits while logged in. As posted before, you appear to have a significant conflict of interest in editing SNCF (not many people go to the trouble of using 5 different IP addresses). Would you mind trying to edit by inserting only verifiable facts into this article? If you have specific facts you are trying to promote, I recommend trying to find sources that highlight those facts. You can then add those sources into the article, plus any new content you are interested in adding. Let me know if you need any assistance. JamaUtil (talk) 16:13, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to SNCF. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. -- Eraserhead1 &lt;talk&gt; 22:38, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

SNCF
Press321, before trying to make your usual edit to SNCF, I want you to read this article. Note that the phrasing of SNCF as it stands now is completely consistent with the BBC article. I hope you try editing some other articles. JamaUtil (talk) 05:05, 15 November 2010 (UTC)