User talk:Press Stevens

Your article has been moved to AfC space
Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Press Stevens/Arctic Anthropology has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Arctic Anthropology, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article. Your draft is waiting for a review by an experienced editor, if you have any questions please ask on our Help Desk! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 17:10, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the [ reviewer's talk page]
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Avic ennasis @ 08:26, 3 Tamuz 5772 / 08:26, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Arctic Anthropology, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Oakley77 (talk) 22:07, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the [ reviewer's talk page]
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! avs5221(talk&#124;contrib) 15:47, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the [ reviewer's talk page]
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Athleek  123  21:27, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Press Stevens
Hi I saw your request to delete this article and start again. I've tagged it so that it will probably be deleted, if you don't want it to be deleted anymore, please let me know as soon as possible (reply to this). Callanecc (talk • contribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 15:47, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for seeing that. I wasn't sure if anyone would respond. I am going to re-edit it one more time, and if still isn't accepted, I want to delete it. Is this still allowed?

Press Stevens (talk) 15:49, 6 July 2012 (UTC)


 * The article had already been approved (I assume you're refering to articles for creation?). However from what is there the title (Press Stevens) doesn't really have anything to do with what's in the article.
 * I can move it back to your userspace (so you can edit it without problems like it being deleted) then when it's ready you can resubmit it to AFC. How does that sound? Callanecc (talk • contribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 15:58, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

That sounds great. I'd really appreciate it being moved. Thank you.

Press Stevens (talk) 16:04, 6 July 2012 (UTC)


 * I've moved the article to User:Press Stevens/Ecological Restoration, feel free to work on it there. If you need any help in the future please feel free to leave a message on my talk page and I'll do my best to help. Callanecc (talk • contribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 16:21, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for your help. I really appreciate it. Press Stevens (talk) 16:24, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
 * No worries, feel free to let me know if you need any help in the future :). Callanecc (talk • contribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 16:37, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Gold   Standard  19:33, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the [ reviewer's talk page]
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Electriccatfish2 (talk) 23:02, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Arctic Anthropology


The article Arctic Anthropology has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fails WP:GNG

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nouniquenames (talk) 02:08, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
joe&bull;roet•c 08:32, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Notability of journals
Following on from the above discussion about Arctic Anthropology, I notice you have some other work-in-progress articles about journals. I appreciate you're probably fed up of being told to read things, but this essay spells out exactly what the magic citations are for notability when it comes to journals. You've observed that we talk in links a lot around here, well, here's one you can throw around yourself.

Keep up the good work, and feel free to ask on my talk page if you have any questions. joe&bull;roet•c 09:56, 9 July 2012 (UTC)11
 * you will notice that the key factor is the indexing: every major selective index should be listed, but only the very most important ones. Note also that journal editors-in-chief of major journals are considered notable by WP:PROF. Check to see if they have an article. -- Earlier editors-in-chief should also be listed--all of them are notable. (but only the editors in chief).  DGG ( talk ) 00:31, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Contemporary Literature (journal), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!  DGG ( talk ) 23:47, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.
 * I am adding the necessary material to show the notability. Please excuse the earlier rejections, by some inexperienced editors who did not know precisely the standard guidelines for this subject.

user name
However,  the name you have used can be considered to   refer to the publisher of the journal, and therefore you must choose another username. As explained in WP:USER, only individuals may edit. When you have a username that refers to the name of your organization, you imply that you are editing officially, and have a superior right to edit the page. But that is not the way WP works--all editors are considered equal--and your contributions like those of any editor must be justified by sources. I'm sure you do not intend to give such impression, but that's why we have the rule. Therefore, please choose another name. On that user   page, you should say whom you are working for. It would also be appropriate to link to it on this user page.  DGG ( talk ) 00:35, 6 August 2012 (UTC)