User talk:Press reporter

Speedy deletion of Glem Group of Companies
A tag has been placed on Glem Group of Companies requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Killiondude (talk) 06:57, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

Venkatarman University
I've reverted the changes you made at Venkatarman University, as they appeared to be unhelpful. The first edit added a bunch of unsourced information, which appeared to be either a hoax or plain vandalism. If you have a source for this information please add it. The second edit just blanked half the page, including all the templates, and has been reverted as well. If you object to the page being deleted, please add some relevant information to the page, including a reference or two to prove that this University actually exists and meets our inclusion criteria. If you don't have any further information, but would like the community to have a broader discussion on whether this article deserves to be included in Wikipedia, you may remove the proposed deletion template and I or another editor will take the article to AfD. If you have any questions about this, please ask. Thanks. BradV 16:55, 24 November 2008 (UTC)