User talk:Prestigiouzman

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used mainly for trolling, disruption or harassment. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. DMacks (talk) 16:18, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Closed Path
I thought that my voyage had come to its end

at the last limit of my power,---that the path before me was closed,

that provisions were exhausted

and the time come to take shelter in a silent obscurity.

But I find that thy will knows no end in me.

And when old words die out on the tongue,

new melodies break forth from the heart;

and where the old tracks are lost,

new country is revealed with its wonders.

Rabindranath Tagore

--Prestigiouzman (talk) 02:25, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Sock Puppet Investigation
I have opened an investigation over your apparently editing while not signed in order to dodge the block on your account. See Sockpuppet investigations/Prestigiouzman. Agricolae (talk) 17:23, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts
Fiddle  Faddle  12:09, 5 October 2013 (UTC)


 * We have no reason to believe you. You created a sock and then used it to lie that it wasn't a sock. You also created . Why in the world would anyone believe you? Dougweller (talk) 11:36, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

I did not directly say that these Usernames were not mine in any of my edits but i may have been misleading in verifying that they were mine, so i did not tell a lie, but i think you can see yourself that i am trying my best to meet the criteria asked of me and i feel i'm doing well in this crash course as i have relative little knowledge of I.T,but i feel compelled to use this medium until i feel otherwise and i don't want to create more socks because i know its against policy and i feel that you and other users i have recently been acquainted with are better than the first crowd i came into contact with,i can see that you are trying to guide me also from your edit at Eridu talk page and i would like my edits to be able to stand up to scrutiny so i think its a blessing to have yous around in a way--Prestigiouzman (talk) 03:42, 14 October 2013 (UTC)


 * This behaviour is that of the barack room lawyer. I see no indication of any description that this editor will ever become a useful collegiate editor. It interests me that I am one of the first crowd he came into contact with and was praised by him, and am now discarded. It appears that this editor indulges in whatever behaviour will, at the time, be useful to him to seek to continue his ploughing of his lone furrow of disruptive editing. My recommendation is to leave the block in place. The time taken to removing the ordure he places here is disproportionately great compared with any beneficial edits.
 * I tried hard to guide and lead him in his early days here, but it was a relief when he was blocked. It hardly surprised me at all that sockpuppets arrived, nor will their future arrival surprise me. I oppose any unblock, though appreciate that this is not a ballot. Fiddle   Faddle  08:04, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

I'm sorry that you think this way, in life i don't really talk much except when i think the conversation is funny ,otherwise i don't engage in conversation unless i am trying to find out something, sometimes i say to myself,jesus christ,what am i reading this for,its not funny, i have tried to talk to you and others but it seems like yous are a different kind of people so i seen no use in talking anymore,but then i was continually drawn into conversations which were not funny no matter how much light i tried to bring to them so i started answering questions in the way that would stop people from drawing me into conversations, all i am trying to do is put forward what i have learned and show people this by linking everything up so it becomes clear, you know that i stick to certain fields and i don't feel i am rampaging around in a destructive manner and i cant see how giving me one more chance is going to do any harm, i am not just saying whatever i think it will take, i am trying to give myself a reason to keep using computers, one half of me actually wants my request to be declined because it is taking my concentration away from where it should be,but another half of me wants to continue on using computers for the time being anyway--Prestigiouzman (talk) 10:14, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Accounts deletion request verification--Prestigiouzman (talk) 12:15, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Jaysus--Prestigiouzman (talk) 10:34, 27 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Continuing to engage in sock-puppetry (User:Prograceman) is a perfect guarantee that you will never ever be allowed back, and makes everyone less likely to trust you in the future if you claim you are ready to follow the rules. DMacks (talk) 15:52, 27 November 2013 (UTC)