User talk:Presto-3

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Herostratus 20:44, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

re: George Reeves
Hi Presto-3. Regarding your edit of this article, could you perhaps discuss your reasons on the article's talk page? Seeing the combination of (1) removal of a lot of text (2) with no previous talk page discussion about it (3) in a controversial article (4) by a new editor, I thought that it would be better to let the article stand as it was before, for the time being, pending more discussion and consensus. Herostratus 20:44, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

Do not reply to Herostratus
Find somebody else, I remember few months ago when I tried to make this article correct, I was the one who added different theories what could have happened or adjusted few things, Herostratus was the cause of all problems, talk to other administrators, do not waste your life on loosers like herostratus or wahkeenah, I have lots of information on Reeves and few web sites, let me know your email, But do not waste time with administrative vandal herostratus, I am sure you have some great ideas on Reeves, I have many many more, but will never share on wiki, because it will be reversed, it's not a place where objectivism rules, by no means, the only good thing about wiki is people can update fast, is it true of complete, that's a totally different story. Whatever is your opinion, try to find some good sources to back it up, I remember when I placed historical pdf file as proof, the vandals here simply reversed it. E.g. Even if there is suspicion somebody killed somebody, people need to point that out IT WAS NEVER PROOVEN OR Mannix was never charged, but it is and should be legal to point out that there is a heavy suspicion on a particular person, so that is not POV, it is generally accepted and much more than a hypothesis, and theory is much more powerful that hypo. or suspicion, because it is backed up with evidence and long reseach, it does not mean it's true, but it's very close to truth or truth itself many times... Good luck and remember what I said about certain terrible people here... Find few good folks who will stay with you, if you need anything, I may help. George Reeves Fan

Dartman
Dartman has been proposed for deletion. An editor felt this person might not be notable enough for an article. Please review Notability (people) for the relevant guidelines. If you can improve the article to address these concerns, please do so.

If no one objects to the deletion within five days by removing the "prod" template, the article may be deleted without further discussion. If you remove the prod template, the article will not be deleted, but if an editor is still not satisfied that it meets Wikipedia guidelines, it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. NickelShoe (Talk) 16:31, 28 July 2006 (UTC)