User talk:Pretoriannews

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 26)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by MicrobiologyMarcus were:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Pretoriannews/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=User:Pretoriannews/sandbox Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MicrobiologyMarcus&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Pretoriannews/sandbox reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

microbiology Marcus [petri dish·growths] 18:34, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

April 2024
Hello, Pretoriannews. This is your user talk page; the purpose of this page is notification and communication with other Wikipedia editors. It is not a workspace for articles in progress or for self-promotion. Please use your user sandbox or the draft article space to practice editing or to create new articles. Thank you. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 19:09, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

Notability of subjects
Thank you for your work. Not all topics are notable (suitable for a stand-alone Wikipedia article). does not cite sources establishing notability, so it may get deleted. A source shows that the article topic is notable when it:


 * contains significant coverage: it addresses the topic directly and in multiple paragraphs of detail. A source with only trivial or off-topic mentions of the subject doesn't count.
 * is a reliable source: it has a reliable publication process, or a suitable expert author (look up the reliability of common sources, or discuss). Newspapers and books usually meet this criteria, company and personal websites usually do not.
 * is independent of the subject: it isn't produced by the article's subject or someone similarly affiliated with it. For example, these are not independent: the subject's press releases, autobiographies, website, and interviews.

If you can find notability-establishing sources, please add them: more than one is needed unless the applicable subject-specific notability guideline states otherwise. Specific questions can be answered live at the Teahouse help forum. Thank you. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 19:10, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 4)
 Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=User:Pretoriannews/sandbox Articles for creation help desk] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Annh07 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: There is no indication of significance, no source, no changes since the previous submission.

Annh07 (talk) 19:26, 4 May 2024 (UTC)