User talk:Prettyladieslover

Wikipedia's ten second answer to solve the US DEBT CRISIS
GAAP Accounting changes to how a government defines a defict and a surplus. In a deficit the government enters more deposit credits then it earned. And is a surplus the government enters less deposits into the bank of clearance matrix. Balance the two over time. Quantitative easing and management of the domestic bank of clearance obligations and equations -- the government can directly create deposits without having to borrow. The banks that receive the deposits are happy as the bank of clearance honours the loans those banks makes from the deposits it receives from the spenders of this deficit spending.

In my home nation, we have 60 billion in fiat currency outstanding yet the federal government budget is 200 billion -- and this fits into this as it is not cash the taxman receives from your cash, but deposit credits.

End the government debt crisis in the world -- and it is still based on that the governemnt books must be balanced like a household -- only that it's borrowing directly from its bank of clearance equations. Some people will still think its the same system, which is makes it cool!

Key advantages: Aggregate supply curve even if straight, this is the least government taxes for the most service. The current system can accomidate this. Not a drastic change. No longer will a nation face ruin if it can balance its books. Before even with balanced books if in the hole not balanced. America is okay now. A nation's definition of interacting with the money supply is no longer exponential.

Any thoughs/questions? Easied quantitative easing defintion there is. --Prettyladieslover (talk) 23:16, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

November 2012
Hello, I'm Dger. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Bank of Canada‎ because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Dger (talk) 03:41, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Use of article talk pages
You recent posts on Talk:Fractional_reserve_banking appear more to be blog entries or opinion pieces meant to convince, rather than addressing specific questions about how to improve the article. I'l like to point you to What Wikipedia is not, specifically Wikipedia is not a Soapbox. I have redacted the posts as I don't see how they are constructive to improving the article. Please try to keep talk page posts short and on topic. Thanks, LK (talk) 02:15, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

The math be definition translates there are three basic transactions. (TRUE BY DEFINITION) Basic forms of prime rates 1)Standard usage is prime rate refers to inner bank lending had how lending creates new deposits in othe banks which creates a need to balance this with inner bank lending. 2)Fiat currnecy held by all the banks and lending these reserves to use the current amount( internal to banks (not a rate, as not holders of paper as an investiment) 3)Central bank and money creation policy and renting money after the beyond the current fiat currency money supply size. Estimates are used to caluculate and deposits of banks with fed the rate and new money rental rate combined. Updates and estimate accounting. The prime rate and the fed rate

@@@@@@@@

How the Fed eats its lunch

edit conflict -- originally created or made available

How the prime rate works and how the reserve limit is not a limit but a point where the government taxes loans by requiring the renting of central bank base money kept in the central bank's safes.

Why print and sell new money when you can rent it? The central bank makes the rules. The deposit dollar bill reserve level is the limit. If an outfit loans more then their ability to find the necessary paper cash reserves with inner bank lending -- this imposes legal reserve requirements agreed to in their bank charter, when breached is an issue, so with the ability to maximize inner bank loans the prime rate shares this paper cash all the banks have to reduce the payments to the central bank. -- any money supply growth above this amount must rent central bank base money rented at the prime rate-- or that outfit is in breach as the rest of banks have booked their cash. A breach is not possible so pay the fee to the central bank for renting their money or your bank charter will be terminated. When the prime rate was higher, the Fed made more, the Rule of 72. My nation's banking fractional dollar bills in reserve to loans is five percent so you can imagine the amount of idle cash when the reserve is higher and in the biggest deposit loan aggregate in the world. The reason for basel is for these central bank revenue potentials to go global -- is it not? --Prettyladieslover (talk) 23:08, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Musical chairs and not enough chairs and renting chairs. The above basic definition is not how it works in my nation as quote, "the Bank of Canada "issues" less than 5% of Canada's money, with the remainder (95%) being "created" by commercial banks through the process of fractional-reserve banking.[18] "At one time the Bank of Canada could dictate the amount of reserves that Canadian chartered banks must keep but that power was removed in the early 1990s"

@@@@@@@@@@

mises wiki
I agree that the Mises Institute wiki is not a reliable source. Their website says "anyone can edit" it, and we don't know that LvMI edits the contributions. So your best alternative, for specific information, is to use the Mises wiki for your own research and then extract info from the sources in the wiki that you find. But don't cite the Mises wiki itself as a reliable source. Also, look at WP:ELNO for more information.--S. Rich (talk) 00:55, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

== piece edited out, no references -- story telling describing the international currency market and the sale of domestic bank deposits as currency -- trades fractional banking deposits and not fiat currency ==

Summary: Debate on how capital moves between nations and what you're buying. (buyer beware) Obviously if you only have a few dollars it is fiat currency for you, but when it involves 100 billion or more than in no way shape or form is this fiat currency traded (not government fiat currency). Extra: The cause of the US morgage products crisis was seperating the lending and finding of borrowers -- from and the bank and its deposits side -- and how morgage investment products creates a deposit that from that lending, creates a business to buy these new loans. Borrowers from these morgage product lenders had to refinance, more bait. New deposits attract a feedback loop to buy the morgage products that created the new deposits. Thoughts/Questions?

The below is a description of the fractional reserve international banking engine and what happens when that engine looks like it is breaking. @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ placed in Causes of the 2008–2012 global recession (lots of news articles that say this, basic discription, economic truism)

"In the Financial crisis of 2007–2008 there was a near shut down of the Bank for International Settlements and the Foreign exchange market. Currency prices are not based on the sale of fiat currency, rather fractional banking deposits sold by private banks.  When these key banks too big to fail are in trouble, the credit markets no longer partake in fractional reserve banking. The problems of banks selling loan packages to each other, and the feedback loop of banks being responsible for morgage products packaged together and sold and resold between the banks, meant a failure was not isolated to a single bank, and creating a snowball.  Unable to trust the balance sheet of fellow banks, fractional banking and the international credit markets shut the hatches to credit to weather the storm. This created a domino effect in stock market capitalization sizes, as the M3 money supply tried to turn itself into the M1 monetary aggregate." --Prettyladieslover (talk) 22:03, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/Karmaisking for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. TFD (talk) 18:32, 2 December 2012 (UTC)