User talk:Pricecw

October 2013
Please do not add or change content, as you did to Ouya, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. GSK ✉ ✓ 05:13, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

I am in the process of adding the information for this. I am sorry you disagree with the information, but it is a fact, and I have, as stated in the reversion, uploaded the data, and am in process of adding it to the article.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Ouya, you may be blocked from editing. GSK ✉ ✓ 06:13, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

You win, you get to keep your pet project "clean" from real data, I provided a primary source (the actual HW), and a third party source (the manufacturer of the antenna, who has nothing to do with the OUYA). Since you would rather bury real data to help OUYA hide data, have fun. I have used Wikipedia in the past, and usually trusted it as unbiased, and thought I would start helping in areas I have expertise, however, I see that is not the case.

Anyway, I will remove my expertise, I do want to be party to an organization that can not show reality. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.232.167.176 (talk) 04:15, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Please help guide on how to remove my account. Or is the only way to get deleted is to force it to happen?

Ouya
The document requires an 'expert interpretation' That does not fall under reliable sources. Please use a 'third source' rs. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 06:13, 14 October 2013 (UTC)