User talk:PrimalBlueWolf

Your submission at AfC PrimalBlueWolf/Command: Modern Air Naval Warfare was accepted
 PrimalBlueWolf/Command: Modern Air Naval Warfare, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Samwalton9 (talk) 17:45, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.
 * It would be following the usual practice to replace the content on PrimalBlueWolf/Command: Modern Air Naval Warfare and User:PrimalBlueWolf/Command: Modern Air Naval Warfare with .—  Vchimpanzee  ·  talk  ·  contributions  · 21:22, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up! It looks like someone else has done it already... Ill have to be quicker next time! PrimalBlueWolf (talk) 03:24, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Actually I only requested the deletion of the article space article which I named wrong by accident. The second link there is the previous location of the draft in your userspace so you should still probably request deletion of that :) Samwalton9 (talk) 14:39, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
 * I once made that mistake when moving one of my articles from user space to article space.— Vchimpanzee  ·  talk  ·  contributions  · 16:38, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks very much for the award. I will do my best to live up to it! PrimalBlueWolf (talk) 10:32, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from, SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:37, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

Please, read the source, before reverting and posting on a personal talk site
Please, read the source, before reverting:"...We may note that the doctrines of Wahhabism are an important factor in the development of the complexity which is modern Islam. I have chosen another example for this study, the Libyan Arab Republic (L.A.R.) and its leader since the revolution of September 1st 1969, Mu'ammar al-Kadhdhāfī Here we find a reinterpretation of Islam and an explicit attempt to make this form of Islam the basis of a political ideology, the "Third International Theory". L.A.R. claims to be the model state, the Utopia, of the practical application of this ideology, in its institutions and in its political actions. When the Libyan monarchy was overthrown in the coup d'état of September 1st 1969, the consequences were not only constitutional changes, but a totally new policy, a policy which has been regarded as surprising and abstruse. al-Kadhdhāfī characterized the process of changes as a "cultural revolution", and the world outside noticed at least two features thereof: the application of quranic precepts in ..." I got this tip about Third International Theory being utopian from.

Thank you for taking the time to leave a note. Have you read WP:NPOV before? It is absolutely essential that we keep a neutral point of view in Wikipedia articles. Describing a particular government as utopian is not compatible with neutral point of view, unfortunately. That source notes that the L.A.R. themselves claim to be a utopia, but not that the author believes this, or indeed whether it is commonly believed. On that note, if you wish to discuss the source, please continue discussion on the talk page for Third International Theory, rather than here - that way, other editors can participate in the discussion and help us improve the article. Discussing the article at length here is exclusionary in nature which is less than ideal. As a final note, I'll ask that should you comment on my talk page in future, that you sign your posts. You can do this with four ~ characters. Thanks again for contributing to Wikipedia! PrimalBlueWolf (talk) 11:20, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

Your words are "L.A.R. themselves claim to be a utopia" and L.A.R. is a particular government, which enbodies the Third International Theory. And your words are "Describing a particular government as utopian is not compatible with neutral point". Even if a government claims to be a utopia, there is no government, which could rightfully claim to be a utopia, what ever that means. Therefore, calling L.A.R. a "utopian model state" is neutral fact, since it is a self-proclamation.--Geysirhead (talk) 11:46, 26 December 2021 (UTC)