User talk:Primaltwitch

July 2007
Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Kevin Olsen. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use Sandbox for test edits. Thank you. Trusilver 05:00, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
 * This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. --Just James 05:05, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Kevin Olsen
A template has been added to the article Kevin Olsen, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Postcard Cathy 18:19, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * First off, contest a prod if you want but don't delete things like stub tags unless you improve the article to the point that it is no longer a stub and don't delete uncategorized tags unless you replace them with actual categories. To do so, the way I understand it, is considered vandalism.  Second, if you are going to contest a prod and make edits to the article, that is great.  But make an effort to show notability.  As it is, you basically reworded the article and included the part about Olsen's minimal success.  Any objective person looking at that is gonna say that a singer with minimal success is not wiki worthy.  Anyway, I put the article up for afd.  Make your case there as to why you think the article should stay. Postcard Cathy 02:46, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Duplicate images uploaded
Thanks for uploading Image:Kevin Olsen.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Kev Olsen.jpg. The copy called Image:Kev Olsen.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 03:30, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Kevin Olsen.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Kevin Olsen.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  MBisanz  talk 05:40, 31 May 2010 (UTC)