User talk:Prime numbers 2357

Bella and the Bulldogs
Any reason for why IMDB doesn't count as a source to simply showcase what a producer / writer has created? Butler's entire wikipedia page has been removed and thus also all the "proper" references to him. The only other way of simply showcasing that he is the creator of "the cuckold" is the link the film and timestamp the credits. none of what i wrote had anything to do with my own opinion on this topic, i was simply stating what i had seen others claim.

Prime numbers 2357 (talk) 20:17, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
 * It is irrelevant what other projects this person worked on. IMDb can't be used as a reference per WP:RS/IMDb, but no one is disputing that that film exists and he worked on it. Opinions as to why some other project a principal worked on makes him unsuitable for another project is pure personal opinions. Geraldo Perez (talk) 20:29, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

April 2020
Your recent editing history at Bella and the Bulldogs shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Geraldo Perez (talk) 20:33, 3 April 2020 (UTC)