User talk:Primosmoscow

Welcome
As per above welcome tag and message, please take your time to read through it. --Dave1185 (talk) 23:55, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

1st Advice
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Please fill in your reasons in the edit summary box when editing, otherwise the we won't know what is added or removed during the process, thank you~! Dave1185 (talk) 23:53, 20 July 2009 (UTC)


 * David, Uyghur's identity is clear, but your summary is distorting the fact and misleading. --Primosmoscow (talk) 05:32, 22 July 2009 (UTC)


 * For your information... Primos, anybody can edit on Wikipedia including a 10 year old kid but apart from correcting the obvious grammatical/vocabulary mistake(s), it really takes a responsible person to provide a valid reason (read Manual of Style & Reliable Sources/Verifiability) in the edit summary box when editing any portion(s) of the article so that other regular editors can take over the improvement if it doesn't seem right or needs to be corrected. Also, you can see the evidently obvious statement from Wikipedia when you click on the edit tab above, the words that are displayed prominently in the main dialogue box below reads:-

So, if you cannot handle all these then my advice to you now is that Wikipedia isn't meant for you, because of one simple fact this is an online encyclopedia with a big community of responsible editors all working together to write and improve articles using all available reliable source for references instead of writing up what you think is the truth. The truth will speak for itself through itself but not by your own words, which can wrong or devoid of Neutral point of view. Another thing, given that you have created this account shortly after 15th of July 2009 (not long after the Urumuqi riot) and that all your edits are focused on this particular subject, we have very strong reasons to be suspicious on your dubious edits. I stand to be corrected. --Dave1185 (talk) 10:53, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) “By saving, you agree to irrevocably release your contribution under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License 3.0 and the GFDL. You agree to be credited by re-users, at minimum, through a hyperlink or URL to the page you are contributing to. See the Terms of Use for details. If you do not want your writing to be edited, used, and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here. Any text that you did not write yourself (apart from brief citations) must be available under terms consistent with Wikipedia's Terms of Use before you use it.”; &
 * 2) “Please note: * If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly or redistributed for profit by others, do not submit it. * Only public domain resources can be copied without permission—this does not include most web pages or images.”

2nd Advice
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Dave1185 (talk) 16:53, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

3rd Advice
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Uyghur people. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Griffinofwales (talk) 02:52, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Look, that's simply not the way it works here. Several editors (see above) have been voicing complaints about your unreferenced edits that have no basis in consensus. Some of them have voiced the opinion that the entire article Uyghur people has become a mess. You are welcome to participate in discussions and on the talkpage, but please refrain from starting an edit-war. Thank you Seb az86556 (talk) 05:07, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

3RR
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Seb az86556 (talk) 06:46, 22 July 2009 (UTC)