User talk:Prince-Archbishop of Wikipedia

Welcome
 Hello, Prince-Archbishop of Wikipedia, and Welcome to Wikipedia!  Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

--- Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:


 * Table of contents / Department directory


 * The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)

Need help?


 * Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
 * Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
 * Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations


 * Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
 * The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
 * Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:


 * Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help


 * Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...


 * Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes ( ~ ). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The [[File:Button sig.png]] or [[File:Insert-signature.png]] button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
 * If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Prince-Archbishop of Wikipedia, good luck, and have fun. Aboutmovies (talk) 23:32, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

November 2016
Hello,. Thank you for your edits to Chloë Grace Moretz and Kelly McGillis. I see you've restored the both edits, this time with a summary that appears valid. (In Moretz's case in particular, you are indeed correct: the included data refers to her family.) The removal of contentious data from biographies of living persons is a requirement; however, I hope you understand that any additions or removals without explanation may be considered invalid and reverted at any time. If you have any questions, feel free to let me know. — ATS &#128406;  talk  01:13, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

November 2016

 * Obvious behavioral evidence is routinely used for blocking socks; please see WP:DUCK. Your account registered within hours of Wesco482 being blocked and you immediately jumped into supporting the unblock. Additionally, you jumped into the same edit wars on Miami Sound Machine and Gloria Estefan articles. Please don't insult our intelligence any further by claiming you are just a random new editor who happened to stumble into these things. --Spike Wilbury (talk) 12:08, 15 November 2016 (UTC)


 * This could of course be Wesco482, but I doubt it, as Wesco never edited anything unrelated to Gloria Estefan. Prince-Archbishop of Wikipedia's editing pattern reminds me of this recently CU blocked user. Not that it matters much at this point, as it's an obvious sock account anyway. Widr (talk) 16:07, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

You blocked me because I supported the unblock of a user you had blocked. That is, you blocked me because I disagreed with you. I've reported your behavior to the Arbitration Committee. Prince-Archbishop of Wikipedia (talk) 20:33, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
 * You will be sure and let us know exactly what they say in their reply? Beeblebrox (talk) 21:08, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
 * and Of course I will. Prince-Archbishop of Wikipedia (talk) 21:35, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

--UTRSBot (talk) 22:14, 3 December 2016 (UTC)