User talk:PrinceTheRoyalSikh

Welcome!
Hello, PrinceTheRoyalSikh, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Battle of Chamkaur (1704) did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. - Arjayay (talk) 10:48, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

Hello Arjayay, It is true that I did make many correction in Battle of chamkaur pages and they were complete facts but still was removed because someone, who does not have proper knowledge of history (especially Sikh history), is author of many historical pages on Wikipedia. In Zafarnam (which is a historical fact written by Guru Gobind Singh ji himself), it is clearly mentioned that Sikh won the battle of chamkaur. Mughal’s main goal in battle of chamkaur was to catch Guru Gobind Singh ji, which they failed to do. I hope to hear from you soon and also hope that my correction on battle of chamkaur was made permanent. Thank you for your time. PrinceTheRoyalSikh (talk) 21:37, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

Warning
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Battle of Chamkaur. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Changing a referenced quote(and referenced information for that matter) is disruptive editing. Continuing to do so will result in the notification of an Admin. --Kansas Bear (talk) 22:18, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Hello Kansas Bear, I have already contacted the creator of the page. There are multiple mistakes and incomplete information on battle of chamkaur page. I have tried correcting it but I was stopped. In result, it was written that Mughals were victorious. However, Mughals fails to complete their task, which was to capture Guru Gobind Singh or kill him. Well, this is mentioned in the page below but why then it’s not mentioned in result?

Also, in aftermaths, There is literally half words from Guru Gobind Singh are missing. There is no information about - Where Guru Gobind Singh went? What he did? How he met Banda Singh bahadur? How he raised him as warrior and sent to fight Mughals and etc?

In zafarnama, the editor has failed to mention correct meaning of it and has written his/her own interpretation.

I hope to hear from you soon regrading battle of chamkaur page. I hope to clear our all the misunderstandings and dispute.

Thanking you, Yours faithfully, PrinceTheRoyalSikh PrinceTheRoyalSikh (talk) 22:26, 9 August 2021 (UTC)


 * I strongly suggest you learn what a reliable source is.
 * Wikipedia is written using reliable sources(like the quote you changed is from a reliable source). Wikipedia is not written using your opinion, what you know, or any other personal "knowledge".
 * There is no dispute, a reliable source(written by an academic) states the Mughals won the battle of Chamkaur. What you like or do not like is irrelevant.
 * It appears you have been changing the result of this battle since 23 September 2017, so consider this your only warning. --Kansas Bear (talk) 22:31, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

Hello Kansas Bear,

Zafarnama, also known as the declaration of victory, which was written by Guru Gobind Singh, is not a reliable source? No wonder why no one trust Wikipedia as reliable source these days. So, what is reliable source if not historical fact?

In battle of chamkaur, it is clearly mentioned by editor himself that Mughals motive was to capture or Kill Guru Gobind Singh, which they clearly failed to do. So, how is that victory of Mughals? Mughals did succeed in winning over the fort but it was never their objective. I would like to hear from you how Mughals were victorious if they failed to what they wanted to do. Hoping to hear from you soon.

Thanking you, Yours faithfully, PrinceTheRoyalSikh PrinceTheRoyalSikh (talk) 05:04, 10 August 2021 (UTC)